<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing-oasis-article1-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PRD</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Physical Review D</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Phys. Rev. D</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2470-0010</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2470-0029</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Physical Society</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-major"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-minor"><subject>Beyond the standard model</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Exploring collider aspects of a neutrinophilic Higgs doublet model in multilepton channels</article-title><alt-title alt-title-type="running-title">EXPLORING COLLIDER ASPECTS OF A …</alt-title><alt-title alt-title-type="running-author">HUITU <italic>et al.</italic></alt-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Huitu</surname><given-names>Katri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1"/><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="n1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kärkkäinen</surname><given-names>Timo J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1"/><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="n2"><sup>†</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mondal</surname><given-names>Subhadeep</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1"/><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="n3"><sup>‡</sup></xref></contrib><aff id="a1">Department of Physics, and Helsinki Institute of Physics, P. O. Box 64, FI-00014 <institution>University of Helsinki</institution>, Helsinki, Finland</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rai</surname><given-names>Santosh Kumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2"/><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="n4"><sup>§</sup></xref></contrib><aff id="a2">Regional Centre for Accelerator-based Particle Physics, <institution>Harish-Chandra Research Institute</institution>, HBNI, Jhusi, Allahabad 211019, India</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><fn id="n1"><label><sup>*</sup></label><p><email>katri.huitu@helsinki.f</email></p></fn><fn id="n2"><label><sup>†</sup></label><p><email>timo.j.karkkainen@helsinki.f</email></p></fn><fn id="n3"><label><sup>‡</sup></label><p><email>subhadeep.mondal@helsinki.fi</email></p></fn><fn id="n4"><label><sup>§</sup></label><p><email>skrai@hri.res.in</email></p></fn></author-notes><pub-date iso-8601-date="2018-02-28" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><day>28</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date iso-8601-date="2018-02-01" date-type="pub" publication-format="print"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><elocation-id>035026</elocation-id><pub-history><event><date iso-8601-date="2017-12-14" date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder>authors</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p content-type="usage-statement">Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ext-link> license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP<sup>3</sup>.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>We consider a neutrinophilic Higgs scenario where the Standard Model is extended by one additional Higgs doublet and three generations of singlet right-handed Majorana neutrinos. Light neutrino masses are generated through mixing with the heavy neutrinos via the Type-I seesaw mechanism when the neutrinophilic Higgs gets a vacuum expectation value (VEV). The Dirac neutrino Yukawa coupling in this scenario can be sizable compared to those in the canonical Type-I seesaw mechanism owing to the small neutrinophilic Higgs VEV giving rise to interesting phenomenological consequences. We have explored various signal regions likely to provide a hint of such a scenario at the LHC as well as at future <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> colliders. We have also highlighted the consequences of light neutrino mass hierarchies in collider phenomenology that can complement the findings of neutrino oscillation experiments.</p></abstract><funding-group><award-group award-type="grant"><funding-source country="EU"><institution-wrap><institution>H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open-funder-registry">10.13039/100010665</institution-id></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>645722 </award-id></award-group><award-group award-type="unspecified"><funding-source country="FI"><institution-wrap><institution>Magnus Ehrnroothin Säätiö</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open-funder-registry">10.13039/501100004155</institution-id></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group><award-group award-type="unspecified"><funding-source country="IN"><institution-wrap><institution>Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open-funder-registry">10.13039/501100001502</institution-id></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group></funding-group><counts><page-count count="14"/></counts></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><label>I.</label><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>The discovery of the 125 GeV Higgs boson <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c1 c2">[1,2]</xref> has been a remarkable achievement of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This has provided us a closure regarding the predictions of the Standard Model (SM). While our quest toward understanding the physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) continues, the 13 TeV run of the LHC is expected to make a big impact in terms of both higher energy reach and better precision by accumulating a huge amount of data at large luminosity. The enigma of the nonzero neutrino mass has pushed the theorists as well as experimentalists to develop new theories and experimental techniques in order to establish the right theoretical pathway toward unveiling the true nature of neutrino mass generation. The neutrino oscillation experiments have established the fact that at least two of the three light neutrinos are massive, and that they have sizable mixing among themselves (for a review, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c3">[3]</xref>). The SM, lacking any right-handed neutrinos, is unable to account for these phenomena. This has led to a plethora of scenarios leading to neutrino mass generation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c4 c5 c6 c7 c8 c9 c10 c11 c12">[4–12]</xref>. As the resulting neutrino mass eigenstates may be either Dirac or Majorana type, both scenarios have potentially unique signatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c13 c14 c15 c16 c17 c18 c19 c20 c21 c22 c23">[13–23]</xref> in the collider experiments. The LHC Collaborations have put forth significant effort to extract any possible information about such scenarios from the accumulated data, and the null results so far have only been able to constrain the parameter space of various neutrino mass models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c24 c25 c26 c27 c28 c29">[24–29]</xref>.</p><p>In the post-Higgs discovery LHC era, the true nature of the scalar sector remains another vital area of interest. The natural question that arises is whether the 125 GeV Higgs is the only scalar as predicted by the SM or other exotic scalars exist alongside, as predicted by various BSM theories including some of the neutrino mass models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c10 c30">[10,30]</xref>. The measurements of couplings of the 125 GeV Higgs with known SM particles have so far been consistent with the SM predictions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c31">[31]</xref>. Thus, even if this Higgs boson were indeed part of a larger scalar sector, its mixing with the other states would be small. There are still enough uncertainties in these measurements to allow new exotic scalar multiplets. Unless the LHC observes some hint of a new scalar, our only hope lies in the precision measurements of the Higgs couplings in order to constrain the BSM physics scenarios. Meanwhile, there has been a long term interest in the simplest two-Higgs doublet models (2HDM) (for a review, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c32">[32]</xref>) which are also strongly motivated by supersymmetric scenarios. A two-Higgs doublet model predicts the presence of two <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-even, one <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-odd and two charged Higgses, one of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-even Higgs states being the 125 GeV Higgs boson. Despite the presence of these additional scalar states, the mixing between the two doublets can be arranged so that the other scalars are practically decoupled from the SM Higgs. In such cases, the interaction of the SM-like Higgs with the exotic scalars may be so suppressed that any hint of such interactions can be very hard to pick up even with the precision measurements at the LHC. The hope of finding these scalars, therefore, lies in their direct search. While the increasing center-of-mass energy at the LHC can probe heavier exotic particles, extracting any new physics information from the tremendous amount of collected data also faces the increasing challenge of tackling the QCD background. Hence looking for lepton-enriched final states is understandably efficient in suppressing the SM background contributions and probing new physics scenarios which can potentially give rise to lepton-rich final states.</p><p>In this work, we consider a 2HDM where the additional Higgs doublet has an odd <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry charge opposite to all the SM particles, preventing it from interacting directly with the leptons and quarks. One can additionally incorporate right-handed neutrinos in the model with similar transformation property under <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry as the new Higgs doublet. One can thus generate Dirac neutrino mass terms when the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> breaks spontaneously and the new Higgs doublet gets a vacuum expectation value (VEV). This class of models, known as neutrinophilic Higgs doublet models (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), has been proposed long ago <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c33 c34 c35">[33–35]</xref> and the relevant phenomenology has been studied quite extensively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c36 c37 c38 c39 c40 c41 c42 c43 c44">[36–44]</xref>. In principle, one can also generate Majorana neutrino mass terms in such a scenario, since a Majorana mass term for the additional right-handed neutrinos does not break the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry but breaks the accidental lepton number symmetry by two units (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>). Such a neutrino mass generation mechanism looks very similar to the Type-I seesaw <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c4 c5 c6 c7">[4–7]</xref> case, save for the fact that one uses the neutrinophilic Higgs VEV instead of electroweak VEV in order to generate the light-heavy neutrino mixing. The advantage of having the additional Higgs doublet to generate nonzero neutrino masses is that the additional VEV can be very small<fn id="fn1"><label><sup>1</sup></label><p>This is also preferred from the naturalness argument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c45">[45]</xref>.</p></fn> in order to counter the smallness of the light neutrino masses which would otherwise be fit with a very small Dirac neutrino Yukawa coupling that has no significant collider phenomenological aspects.</p><p>Depending on whether the nonzero neutrinos are Dirac or Majorana type, the collider signals of a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scenario can be very different. When Majorana neutrinos exist, a smoking gun signal would be lepton number violating final states. In this work, instead of looking for direct heavy neutrino production, we have considered the production of the neutrinophilic charged Higgs (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and explored its various possible decay modes. There are some earlier studies on the charged Higgs in similar scenarios emphasizing its decay into a charged lepton and a heavy neutrino in the process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c44">[44]</xref>. We show that even cleaner signals can be obtained using this decay mode with higher lepton multiplicity where the SM background is practically nonexistent. We also show that sizable signal event rates can be obtained with other possible decay modes of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can serve as complementary channels in probing a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-like scenario. We perform our analysis using the 13 TeV LHC as well as an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider with 1 TeV center-of-mass energy. In the process, one can extract information on the neutrino sector parameters also. We show that a very clean indication of the neutrino mass hierarchy can be obtained from the multiplicity of the charged leptons in the final state even after a rigorous collider simulation. Such information can be very useful in complementing the neutrino oscillation experiments.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><label>II.</label><title>MODEL</title><p>In the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> model, the particle content of the SM is extended by one additional Higgs doublet (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and three generations of SM gauge singlet right-handed neutrinos (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). A discrete <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry is introduced, under which both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2, 3, are odd while all the SM fields are even. The most general scalar potential involving the two Higgs doublets is given by <disp-formula id="d1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo id="d1a1">=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:mo indentalign="id" indentshift="1em" indenttarget="d1a1">+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="newline"/><mml:mo indentalign="id" indentshift="1em" indenttarget="d1a1">+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:mo indentalign="id" indentshift="1em" indenttarget="d1a1">+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>†</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(1)</label></disp-formula>where a nonzero <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> explicitly breaks the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry in the model. In the absence of this term, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry can be broken spontaneously by VEV <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the field <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the standard electroweak symmetry is broken when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> acquires a VEV, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let us first discuss a framework, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry is broken only spontaneously in order to generate light neutrino masses and mixing. The model is constrained by sterile neutrino searches, effective number of neutrinos and amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> required in big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), observed temperature anisotropies of cosmic microwave background (CMB) and astrophysical limits.</p><p>Because of an instability of right-handed neutrinos <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> induced by their mixing to left-handed neutrinos, the mixing strength between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, that is, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be probed by sterile neutrino searches. In semileptonic meson decays, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are produced and can subsequently decay to charged leptons and mesons. Present constraints on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> allow a region where their magnitude is of order <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c29">[29]</xref>. For tau-sterile mixing, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>In <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, however, we found the model favoring even lower values of active-sterile mixing, of order <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and even lower for higher Majorana neutrino masses (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">1</xref>). The largest and smallest active-sterile mixings are driven by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> elements. Therefore all the active-sterile mixing elements fall between them: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>. The matrix elements are proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>; therefore <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with some constants <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. They are deduced from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">1</xref>, having values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>MeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The matrix elements then belong to the following interval: <disp-formula id="d2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(2)</label></disp-formula>In addition, the constraints for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> were derived from assumption that the branching ratios for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decay are dominant. This is not applicable for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, since then the decay modes of right-handed neutrinos are dominated by decays to invisible particles.</p><fig id="f1"><object-id>1</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f1</object-id><label>FIG. 1.</label><caption><p>Absolute values of active-sterile mixing block matrix elements as a function of heavy neutrino mass <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. All the active-sterile elements fall in the blue band.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_1.eps"/></fig><p>As the model is unconstrained by semileptonic and leptonic decay modes, the lower bound for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> arises from BBN. In the early universe the right-handed neutrinos must be heavy enough to fall off from the thermal equilibrium before BBN. This is due to the latest results for the effective number of neutrinos (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.23</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) by PLANCK <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c46">[46]</xref>, which forbids large interference from right-handed neutrinos. This leads to a constraint <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>MeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>In addition neutrinophilic VEV <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is constrained from both above and below. Ultralight VEV is forbidden by astrophysical constraints: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (eV) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c47 c48">[47,48]</xref>. On the other hand, the surface energy density associated with the domain wall arising from discrete <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry breaking is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>η</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c49">[49]</xref>. The effect of these domain walls to the temperature anisotropies of CMB is <disp-formula id="d3"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>η</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:math><label>(3)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is Newton’s gravitational constant, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Hubble constant, and we have assumed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c50">[50]</xref>. Since the observed temperature anisotropies by PLANCK are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the birth of a domain wall will not contradict cosmological data if the VEV is small. If we require the contribution to CMB temperature anisotropies not to exceed the experimental limit, together with the astrophysical constraints, we get <disp-formula id="d4"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>eV</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>MeV</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:math><label>(4)</label></disp-formula>In order to apply perturbative theory to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the absolute values of the elements of the light neutrino Yukawa coupling matrices must be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> at most. We performed a global fit to available neutrino oscillation data to calculate the matrix elements, assuming normal neutrino mass ordering, higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>θ</mml:mi><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> octant, and no <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> violation. We found the dependence of the largest Yukawa coupling of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be <disp-formula id="d5"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>max</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.629</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>keV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(5)</label></disp-formula>The dependence is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2</xref>.</p><fig id="f2"><object-id>2</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f2</object-id><label>FIG. 2.</label><caption><p>Yukawa contours on the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) plane. The lines corresponding to the neutrino Yukawa couplings <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> are drawn. Below the red <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> line, the theory is nonperturbative. Blue-shaded region denoted “CMB” is excluded due to restrictions of CMB temperature anisotropies induced by domain walls. The available parameter space is restricted also from BBN requirement <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_2.eps"/></fig><p>The breaking of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry is necessary in order to generate light neutrino masses within the framework of this model by means of their mixing with heavy right-handed neutrinos. One can add the following Yukawa interaction and Majorana neutrino mass terms to the Lagrangian while keeping the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> parity unbroken, <disp-formula id="d6"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>add</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(6)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the Majorana mass terms corresponding to the right-handed neutrinos. Once <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> acquires a VEV, the Yukawa term gives rise to Dirac neutrino mass terms, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>The physical Higgs sector now consists of two neutral <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-even (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), one neutral <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-odd (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the charged Higgs (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<fn id="fn2"><label><sup>2</sup></label><p>We have assumed the scalar potential to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> invariant.</p></fn> In the case when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, the physical mass eigenvalues at tree level are given by <disp-formula id="d7"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo id="d7a1">=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo indentalign="id" indenttarget="d7a1">=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(7)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> being small, terms proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been neglected. Note that the mixing angle between the SM and neutrinophilic Higgs states are proportional to the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:math></inline-formula> and can be safely neglected since we assume <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Under this circumstance, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-even neutrinophilic Higgs (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is always light and the heavy neutrino almost always decays into <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and a light neutrino resulting in an opposite-sign dilepton signal for a charged Higgs pair production channel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c40">[40]</xref>. However, if the explicit symmetry breaking term is present in the Lagrangian, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, the mass eigenvalues are given by <disp-formula id="d8"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo id="d8a1">=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="newline"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo indentalign="id" indenttarget="d8a1">=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:malignmark/></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(8)</label></disp-formula>Now the neutrinophilic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-even Higgs can be heavy depending on our choice of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula>. A heavy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and (or) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> opens up the possibility of a cascade decay via heavy neutrinos resulting in multilepton signals of such a scenario that we intend to explore. In the limit <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, the symmetry of the theory is enhanced. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be assumed to be naturally small. Besides, a large <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can also give rise to significant mixing between the two Higgs doublets, which is strictly constrained from the present Higgs data.</p><sec id="s2a"><label>A.</label><title>Neutrino mass generation</title><p>The neutrino oscillation data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c3 c51 c52">[3,51,52]</xref> indicate that at least two of the three light neutrinos have nonzero mass. One of the most natural ways to generate tiny neutrino mass is via the seesaw mechanism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c4 c5 c6 c7 c8 c9 c10 c11 c12">[4–12]</xref>. In <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the mechanism is very similar to that of the Type-I seesaw <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c4 c5 c6 c7">[4–7]</xref>. The mixing between light and heavy neutrinos is introduced via the term <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the aftermath of symmetry breaking, when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gets a VEV. In the basis <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> neutrino mass matrix looks like <disp-formula id="d9"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtable columnalign="center center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(9)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The light effective <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> neutrino mass matrix in the approximation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by <disp-formula id="d10"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(10)</label></disp-formula>The above equation looks exactly similar to what we obtain in the canonical Type-I seesaw scenario. The only difference is that in the present framework <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be quite small and as a result one can have larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the canonical Type-I seesaw scenario, thus making this model phenomenologically more interesting. In order to fit the oscillation data, one also needs to account for the mixing among the three light neutrino states constrained by the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix. One can rewrite <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="d10">(10)</xref> as <disp-formula id="d11"><mml:math display="block"><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>diag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:math><label>(11)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>diag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diagonal light <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> neutrino mass matrix and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the PMNS mixing matrix. In order to produce proper mixing satisfying the experimental bounds on the PMNS matrix elements, one of the matrices, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, has to be off-diagonal. Here we choose to keep <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diagonal and fit the PMNS matrix via an off-diagonal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained using Casas-Ibarra parametrization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c53">[53]</xref> <disp-formula id="d12"><mml:math display="block"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfrac><mml:msqrt><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>diag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>diag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:msqrt><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:math><label>(12)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be any orthogonal matrix and complex provided <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>. For simplicity, we have chosen <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be an identity matrix.</p><p>Thus with correct choices of the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="d9">(9)</xref> is capable of explaining the neutrino oscillation data at the tree level itself. There is a potential source of large correction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c54 c55">[54,55]</xref> to the neutrino states at one loop arising from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> loops. These mass corrections can be sizable enough to violate the experimental limits. However, the loop contributions to the neutrino masses corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have a mutual sign difference and can exactly cancel each other if they are mass degenerate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c37 c56 c57 c58">[37,56–58]</xref>. As can be seen from both Eqs. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="d7">(7)</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="d8">(8)</xref>, the mass splitting between these two states is driven by the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> which is therefore set equal to zero throughout this work.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><label>III.</label><title>CONSTRAINTS AND BENCHMARK POINTS</title><p>Constraints on the charged Higgs mass and its couplings may arise from direct collider search results, neutrino oscillation data, and lepton flavor violating decay branching ratios. The LHC Collaborations have looked for signatures of exotic scalars in various channels and put bounds on the charged Higgs mass in the range 300–1000 GeV provided it can decay only into a top and a bottom quark <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c59 c60 c61 c62">[59–62]</xref>. However, in our present scenario, the charged Higgs, being a neutrinophilic one, does not couple to the quarks. In such scenarios, there are no direct search constraints on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In principle, the constraints derived from slepton searches at the LHC can be reinterpreted to put bounds on the neutrinophilic charged Higgs masses although only in the massless limit of the lightest neutralino. Two body decay of the sleptons into a charged lepton and lightest neutralino gives rise to a dilepton signal which can be relevant for the present scenario. Existing data exclude slepton masses up to 450 GeV in the presence of a massless neutralino <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c63 c64">[63,64]</xref>. However, one always obtains same-flavor-opposite-sign (SFOS) lepton pairs from such slepton pair production processes. The signal requirement also demands a jet veto in the central region alongside the SFOS lepton pair for such analyses. In the present scenario, the largest event rate in such a signal region can be obtained when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> decays into a charged lepton and a heavy neutrino. A heavy neutrino further decays into a light neutrino and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-boson which further decays invisibly. Clearly, the resulting signal cross section is rendered small due to branching suppressions. The demand of SFOS lepton pairs makes this cross section even smaller.<fn id="fn3"><label><sup>3</sup></label><p>The obtained signal cross section for our lightest benchmark point even before the detector simulation is less than the observed number as quoted in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c63 c64">[63,64]</xref>.</p></fn> Thus, the existing slepton mass limit when reinterpreted for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proves to be much weaker. Its couplings with the heavy neutrinos, on the other hand, can be constrained from neutrino oscillation data and lepton flavor violating decay branching ratios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c44">[44]</xref>. As mentioned in Sec. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s2a">II A</xref>, we have used off-diagonal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> while fitting the PMNS matrix. These off-diagonal entries are severely constrained from lepton flavor violation (LFV) decay branching ratio constraints <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c65 c66 c67 c68 c69 c70 c71">[65–71]</xref>. These constraints are also reflected upon our choice of the neutrinophilic Higgs VEV, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. It has been observed and also verified by us that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c44">[44]</xref> at the smallest, if the neutrino oscillation data and the LFV constraints are to be satisfied simultaneously, the most stringent constraint arising from the nonobservation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c65 c66">[65,66]</xref>. This constraint puts the spontaneously breaking <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scenario in jeopardy. As evident from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2</xref>, such a choice of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is clearly ruled out from restrictions on CMB temperature anisotropies induced by domain walls. However, if the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry is broken explicitly, this domain wall problem can be averted. Hence for this work, we choose to work with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> scenario only.</p><sec id="s3a"><label>A.</label><title>Charged Higgs branching ratios and pair production cross section</title><p>The possible decay modes of the neutrinophilic charged Higgs (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in our present scenario are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relevant interaction vertices are given in Appendix <xref ref-type="app" rid="app1">A</xref>. Depending on the mass hierarchy of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the choice of neutrino mass hierarchy one (or two) of these decay modes determines the event rates of the different possible final states at the collider. Note that the branching ratios of the decays into the neutral <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-even and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-odd Higgs states are always the same since they are mass degenerate by our choice of the parameters. These two decay modes dominate over the heavy neutrino decay modes always, if the mass difference, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, is larger than that of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-boson mass, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is an artifact of the small Dirac neutrino Yukawa parameters, which are otherwise constrained by neutrino oscillation data and the nonobservation of LFV decays. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> being smaller by orders of magnitude from the competitive gauge coupling, a large branching ratio into the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> decay modes is not ensured even if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In spite of the additional phase space suppression, three-body decays of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> via off-shell <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-decay, dominate over these two-body modes unless <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This behavior is depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">3</xref> where the competitive nature of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is clearly visible through the distributions of the starred and circular points, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overtakes the three-body decay branching ratio only if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix" stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) takes over and remains the only dominant decay mode.</p><fig id="f3"><object-id>3</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f3</object-id><label>FIG. 3.</label><caption><p>Variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⁢</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The color coded bar on the right shows the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For all the points, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is kept fixed at 100 GeV. Normal hierarchy is assumed for the light neutrinos. For inverted hierarchy, although the numerical values of the BRs are expected to be different, the pattern of the distribution remains the same.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_3.eps"/></fig><p>In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">4</xref>, we have shown variation of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> production cross section at the LHC and an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider. The figure on the left shows the variation of the cross sections as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the 13 TeV LHC and different center-of-mass energies (500 GeV, 1 TeV, and 3 TeV) at an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider. Note that, at the LHC, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> production channels include <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>∓</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> while for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider, pair production is the only viable option. Since we have assumed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for our study, the cross sections of the above mentioned second and third production channels are exactly equal. Hence we have shown their combined cross section in the figure, and evidently, it dominates over the pair production cross section throughout the entire charged Higgs mass range. However, both these cross sections fall rapidly with increasing mass. On the other hand, at an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider the cross section falls far less rapidly implying the fact that such a collider will be more effective than the LHC in order to probe heavier charged Higgs masses. The figure on the right shows the variation of the pair production cross section at an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider with varying center-of-mass energies for our chosen benchmark points. Moreover, a lepton collider is likely to be much cleaner in terms of the SM background contributions. In this work, we have taken into account all the aforementioned production channels for LHC and just the pair production for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider analysis.</p><fig id="f4"><object-id>4</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f4</object-id><label>FIG. 4.</label><caption><p>Variation of the charged Higgs pair production cross section at the LHC and an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider at center-of-mass energies of 13 and 1 TeV, respectively. The distribution on the right shows variation of the charged Higgs pair production cross section at an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider with varying center-of-mass energy (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula>) for our four benchmark points.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_4.eps"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3b"><label>B.</label><title>Choice of benchmark points</title><p>We now proceed to choose some benchmark points representing the different interesting features of the present scenario for further collider studies. As discussed earlier, one can obtain different possible final states depending upon the mass hierarchies of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since we also aim to correlate the light neutrino mass hierarchy with the multiplicity of different lepton flavor final states, we will study cases in which at least one of the heavy neutrinos is lighter than the neutrinophilic Higgs states so that it can appear in the cascade. In Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">I</xref> we present the input parameters, the relevant masses, and the resulting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the four benchmark points of our choice. We have incorporated the complete model in SARAH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c72 c73 c74 c75 c76">[72–76]</xref>, and subsequently imported in SPheno <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c77 c78">[77,78]</xref> in order to perform the analytical and numerical computation of the masses and mixings of the particles, their branching ratios, and other relevant constraints. See Appendix <xref ref-type="app" rid="app2">B</xref> for LFV constraints for our benchmarks.</p><table-wrap id="t1" specific-use="style-2col"><object-id>I</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.t1</object-id><label>TABLE I.</label><caption><p>Relevant model parameters and masses. As mentioned before the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is set equal to zero throughout this work.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5"><oasis:colspec align="left" colname="col1" colsep="0" colwidth="13%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col2" colsep="0" colwidth="21%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col3" colsep="0" colwidth="21%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col4" colsep="0" colwidth="23%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col5" colsep="0" colwidth="21%"/><oasis:thead><oasis:row><oasis:entry valign="top">Parameters</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:thead><oasis:tbody><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.270</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.210</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.235</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.212</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.50</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> [GeV]</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>100.0</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>100.0</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>200.0</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>125.0</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> [GeV]</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>187.5</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>187.9</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>325.6</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>188.5</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> [GeV]</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>188.5</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>272.8</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>326.4</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>252.8</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> [GeV]</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>100.0</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>100.0</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>200.0</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>125.0</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>(Normal)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>(Normal)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>(Normal)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>(Normal)</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>1.445</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.261</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.336</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.261</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>5.719</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.396</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.336</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.396</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>6.944</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>1.445</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.261</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.336</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.261</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>5.719</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.396</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.336</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.396</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>6.944</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.044</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.197</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.476</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.197</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>8.088</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>4.802</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.476</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>4.802</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>9.820</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>1.616</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.528</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.376</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.528</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>6.394</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.797</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.376</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.797</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>7.763</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>(Inverted)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>(Inverted)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>(Inverted)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>(Inverted)</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry>(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.796</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>7.116</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>5.594</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>7.116</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.785</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.135</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>5.694</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.135</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.101</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.796</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>7.116</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>5.594</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>7.116</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.785</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.135</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>5.694</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.135</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.101</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>5.369</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>10.060</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>8.053</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>10.060</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>1.109</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.019</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>8.053</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.019</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>4.386</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">(</mml:mo><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>4.245</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>7.956</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>6.367</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>7.956</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0.877</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.387</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>6.367</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>2.387</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>3.467</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo minsize="8ex" stretchy="true">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:tbody></oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap><p>The four benchmark points are chosen such that all the dominant decay modes of the neutrinophilic Higgs and the heavy neutrinos are highlighted by different mass hierarchies. The relevant branching ratios are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">II</xref>. The two most dominant decay modes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The first decay mode is driven by the Dirac neutrino Yukawa couplings, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the second one is driven by gauge couplings. As discussed above, the elements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are already constrained from the neutrino oscillation data as well as from the LFV constraints, and thus are in general weaker than the competitive gauge coupling. Hence, if the mass splittings among the neutral and charged neutrinophilic Higgs and the heavy neutrino states are such that both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> decay modes are kinematically accessible for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the gauge boson associated one becomes its only relevant decay mode. However, if at least one of the heavy neutrinos is lighter than the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> states are almost degenerate to it, then the decay via heavy neutrinos becomes important. The latter scenario is highlighted in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the former scenario. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, on the other hand, highlights the situation where the two-body mode <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> competes with the three-body decay into <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) alongside an off-shell <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-boson. However, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being on the larger side, the three-body decay dominates as discussed earlier in Sec. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3a">III A</xref>. The heavy neutrinos (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in this scenario can decay either via the SM gauge bosons (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) or the different Higgs states. Note that decays of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can occur only through their mixing with the light neutrinos which are suppressed in the present scenario. Hence, these decay modes become relevant for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> only if the neutrinophilic Higgs states are kinematically inaccessible to it. The choice of neutrino mass hierarchy clearly reflects in the branching ratios of both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and is also expected to be reflected in the final event rates of the multilepton signals we intend to explore.</p><table-wrap id="t2" specific-use="style-2col"><object-id>II</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.t2</object-id><label>TABLE II.</label><caption><p>Relevant branching ratios. Here <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9"><oasis:colspec align="left" colname="col1" colsep="0" colwidth="20%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col2" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col3" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col4" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col5" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col6" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col7" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col8" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col9" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:thead><oasis:row><oasis:entry rowsep="0" valign="top"/><oasis:entry nameend="col3" namest="col2" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry nameend="col5" namest="col4" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry nameend="col7" namest="col6" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry nameend="col9" namest="col8" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row><oasis:entry valign="top">Branching ratio</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:thead><oasis:tbody><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.49</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.77</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.49</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.77</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.05</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.13</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.51</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.51</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.06</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.04</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.10</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.09</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.10</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.09</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.21</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.43</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.21</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.43</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.16</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.21</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.17</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.21</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.43</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.21</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.43</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.16</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.21</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.17</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.01</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.01</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.18</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.13</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.20</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.14</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.01</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.23</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.01</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.18</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.13</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.20</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.14</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.12</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.12</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.12</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.12</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.32</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.32</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.27</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.27</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.00</oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:tbody></oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap><p>In addition, we checked the effect of neutrinophilic Higgses on the oblique parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>. We have ensured the corrections induced by our benchmark points do not exceed the uncertainties given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c79">[79]</xref>. See Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">5</xref> for the allowed (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values.</p><fig id="f5"><object-id>5</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f5</object-id><label>FIG. 5.</label><caption><p>In the gray region, the oblique corrections induced by the neutrinophilic Higgses are too large. A too large mass difference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is disfavored. Red dots label the chosen benchmark points. The black line corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_5.eps"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><label>IV.</label><title>COLLIDER ANALYSIS</title><p>Charged Higgs in our benchmark scenarios can give rise to novel signatures in lepton enriched final states. Majorana neutrinos, if produced via cascade from the charged Higgs can further decay resulting in same-sign leptonic final states, which are characteristic to seesaw models and also have much less SM background. The gauge bosons resulting from the decays of the neutrinophilic Higgs and heavy neutrinos may also decay leptonically, and thus one can easily obtain a multilepton final state associated with missing energy. Leptonic branching ratios of the gauge bosons being small, one would expect smaller event rates in the final state with increasing lepton multiplicity. However, it also means less SM background to deal with resulting in cleaner signals. In this section we explore the different possible multilepton final states with or without the presence of additional jets along with detailed signal to background simulation in order to ascertain the discovery potential of the charged Higgs for our chosen benchmark points in the context of 13 TeV LHC as well as future lepton colliders.</p><sec id="s4a"><label>A.</label><title>Identifying signal regions</title><p>In the context of LHC, we aim to study cleaner multilepton channels with no tagged jets in the final state. The possible final states that we probe in the present context are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo form="prefix">≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo form="prefix">≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and same-sign trilepton <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents everything else (jets, photons, or leptons)<fn id="fn4"><label><sup>4</sup></label><p>For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> consists of no leptons since in this case, we demand exactly three leptons with the same sign in the final state.</p></fn> in the final states. As mentioned earlier, the various branching ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence the final signal event rates depend on the mass difference factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, it is interesting to study how the signal rates vary depending on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> which in turn can also provide an indirect hint about the masses of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and (or) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">6</xref> we have shown the variation of the cross sections corresponding to the three signal regions mentioned above as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with color-coded <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that these cross sections are theoretical estimates obtained after combining contributions from all three relevant production modes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the LHC prior to detector simulation and do not include the cut efficiencies. The two rows of figures correspond to normal and inverted hierarchies of neutrino masses, respectively. While <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> only receives a contribution from pair production, both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are enriched with contributions from pair production as well as associated production of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most of the signal events corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are expected to arise from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> decay into a charged lepton and a heavy neutrino followed by the heavy neutrino decay into a charged lepton and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Depending on the leptonic or hadronic decays of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-bosons, one can obtain various lepton multiplicities as represented by these signal regions. The signal cross sections are largest when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are mass degenerate for any given <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and they drop with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, on the other hand, receives more contributions when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> decays into <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) along with an on-shell or off-shell <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-boson. Moreover, in the case of pair production, same-sign leptons cannot be obtained if both the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> decays via <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> result in the cross section of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being smaller with smaller <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the associated production channels contribute dominantly to this signal region throughout the whole range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. As evident from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">6</xref>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the most favorable channel to look for such scenarios. In general, the inverted hierarchy of the light neutrino masses is expected to generate more multileptonic events owing to the larger branching ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as reflected by the plots on the bottom row.</p><fig id="f6"><object-id>6</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f6</object-id><label>FIG. 6.</label><caption><p>Variation of cross sections corresponding to the signal regions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 13 TeV LHC. The two rows represent scenarios with normal and inverted hierarchies of the light neutrino masses, respectively. The color coding represents variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For all points, heavy neutrino masses are kept at 100 GeV.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_6.eps"/></fig><p>In a similar way, we now proceed to choose some signal regions for our analyses in the context of an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider. The possible final states we probe in this context are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo form="prefix">≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo form="prefix">≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>jet</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).<fn id="fn5"><label><sup>5</sup></label><p>Just as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not contain any leptons.</p></fn> The corresponding signal rates are showcased as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">7</xref>. Trends of the distributions are similar to what we obtained for the LHC case. However, the difference in the production cross section is manifested by the signal cross sections indicating a larger event rate at the LHC for similar final states at the low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> region. The rapid fall in production cross section with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at the LHC makes it less relevant for heavier charged Higgs masses. An <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider can be more effective provided the center-of-mass energy is large enough for the production. Here, the signal rates drop alarmingly close to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>500</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the choice of center-of-mass energy as 1 TeV.</p><fig id="f7"><object-id>7</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f7</object-id><label>FIG. 7.</label><caption><p>Variation of cross sections corresponding to the signal regions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider with 1 TeV center-of-mass energy. The two rows represent scenarios with normal and inverted hierarchies of the light neutrino masses, respectively. The color coding represents variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For all points, heavy neutrino masses are kept at 100 GeV.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_7.eps"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4b"><label>B.</label><title>Analysis</title><p>In order to carry out the simulation, events were generated at the parton level using <sc>MadGraph5</sc> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c80 c81">[80,81]</xref> with <sc>nn23lo1</sc> parton distribution function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c82 c83">[82,83]</xref> and the default dynamic factorization and renormalization scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c84">[84]</xref>. We have used <sc>pythia</sc> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c85">[85]</xref> for the subsequent decay of the particles, showering, and hadronization. After that the events are passed through <sc>Delphes</sc> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c86 c87 c88">[86–88]</xref> for detector simulation. Jets have been reconstructed using the <italic>anti-kT</italic> algorithm via <sc>FastJet</sc> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c89 c90">[89,90]</xref>. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jet and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jet tagging efficiencies as well as the mistagging efficiencies of the light jets as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jet have been incorporated according to the latest ATLAS studies in this regard <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c91">[91]</xref>.</p><sec id="s4b1"><label>1.</label><title>Primary selection criteria</title><p>We have applied the following cuts (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the jets, leptons, and photons in order to identify them as final state particles: <list list-type="roman-lower"><list-item><label>(i)</label><p>All the charged leptons are selected with a transverse momentum threshold <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and in the pseudorapidity window <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mi>η</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item><label>(ii)</label><p>All the jets including <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jets and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jets must have <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mi>η</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item><label>(iii)</label><p>We demand <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> between all possible pairs of the final state particles to make sure they are well separated.</p></list-item></list>As discussed in Sec. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3">III</xref>, the choice of neutrino mass hierarchy affects the branching ratios of the neutrinophilic Higgs as well as the heavy neutrinos in certain flavor specific decay modes. Thus, the hierarchical effect is reflected by the abundance of a certain flavor of leptons in the signal events. As we have seen, one would expect less abundance of electrons in the final states for a normal hierarchy scenario compared to that for an inverted hierarchy. This feature is evident in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">8</xref> which shows the electron multiplicity in the final state with at least four leptons for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in normal as well as inverted hierarchy scenarios. Such lepton multiplicity distributions can thus provide an indirect probe of the existing neutrino mass hierarchy.</p><fig id="f8"><object-id>8</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.f8</object-id><label>FIG. 8.</label><caption><p>Electron multiplicity distribution for BP1 in normal and inverted hierarchy scenarios indicated by blue and red lines respectively. The distributions correspond to the choice of final states as per <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e035026_8.eps"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s4c"><label>C.</label><title>Results@LHC13</title><p>In the context of LHC, we have studied the final states corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as defined in Sec. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4a">IV A</xref>. Although the choice of our signal regions ensure small or no SM background, we have checked the relevant production channels, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo form="prefix">+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>jets</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nevertheless in this regard. In Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">III</xref> we show the expected number of different signal events at the 13 TeV run of the LHC with an integrated luminosity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after imposing a transverse missing energy cut, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jet veto (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),<fn id="fn6"><label><sup>6</sup></label><p>These cuts help reduce some of the surviving SM background contributions.</p></fn> in addition to the primary selection criteria, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The choice of our signal regions combined with the cuts <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> render the SM backgrounds to negligible event numbers. We have observed that our <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is nearly backgroundless, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are left with 2 and 1 SM-background events, respectively, at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> integrated luminosity. As for the obtained signal event numbers, one can easily get an estimate of the expected rate from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">6</xref> for the different final states. However, note that in these figures the heavy neutrino mass is kept fixed at 100 GeV and if this mass is changed, so are the heavy neutrino branching ratios and hence the signal cross sections. However, the cross sections shown in these figures are good enough for order of magnitude estimation for a given <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><table-wrap id="t3" specific-use="style-1col"><object-id>III</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.t3</object-id><label>TABLE III.</label><caption><p>Charged Higgs pair production cross sections and number of events corresponding to the three different signal regions at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> luminosity at 13 TeV LHC for our chosen benchmark points.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6"><oasis:colspec align="left" colname="col1" colsep="0" colwidth="20%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col2" colsep="0" colwidth="30%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col3" colsep="0" colwidth="17%"/><oasis:colspec align="char" char="." colname="col4" colsep="0" colwidth="12%"/><oasis:colspec align="char" char="." colname="col5" colsep="0" colwidth="12%"/><oasis:colspec align="char" char="." colname="col6" colsep="0" colwidth="12%"/><oasis:thead><oasis:row><oasis:entry align="left" morerows="1" valign="bottom">Benchmark points</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" morerows="1" valign="bottom">Production cross section [fb] (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" morerows="1" valign="bottom">Neutrino hierarchy</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" nameend="col6" namest="col4" valign="top">Number of Events (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:thead><oasis:tbody><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>60.71</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>8</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>130</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>247</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>25</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>343</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>397</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>22.13</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>⋯</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>13</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>42</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>24</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>55</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>6.72</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>3</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>40</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>67</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>8</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>86</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>101</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>27.34</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>26</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>71</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>3</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>60</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>112</oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:tbody></oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap><p>As expected <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the smallest event rate owing to its large lepton multiplicity, but with negligible SM background. Thus it can be a very clean signal but only if the charged Higgs mass is on the lighter side, as in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and at least one of the heavy neutrinos is lighter than the charged Higgs. The situation, however, worsens considerably with increasing charged Higgs mass, as indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a much better event rate and can probe <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at much lower luminosity than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As the numbers in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">III</xref> indicate, the inverted hierarchy scenario for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be probed with a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical significance at an integrated luminosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; i.e. if these signal regions are studied, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in this mass range can be probed and possibly be excluded with the LHC data already accumulated. For the corresponding normal hierarchy case, however, for the same benchmark point, one needs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for similar discovery significance in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> requires an integrated luminosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (for inverted hierarchy) or more. For the benchmark points like <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the decay <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is either suppressed or absent altogether. Thus for such points <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ceases to be a viable signal region while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relevant only at large luminosities. In this case <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> turns out to be the most viable signal region. In this signal region, to achieve <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical significance in the inverted hierarchy case of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> one requires <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>200</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. For all the benchmark points, the choice of light neutrino mass hierarchy is clearly manifested through the different signal event rates. Evidently, with multileptonic final states, an inverted hierarchy scenario is more likely to be probed at lower luminosities at the LHC.</p></sec><sec id="s4d"><label>D.</label><title>Results@<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider</title><p>In Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">IV</xref> we have presented the expected number of different signal events at the 1 TeV run of an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider with an integrated luminosity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> after imposing a missing energy cut, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:menclose notation="updiagonalstrike"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:menclose></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jet veto (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), in addition to the primary selection criteria, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The event rates are quite good and devoid of any direct SM background, which makes it an ideal platform to look for a neutrinophilic charged Higgs. Although the number of events shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">IV</xref> correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the inverted hierarchy scenarios in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be probed with a statistical significance of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a much lower luminosity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Note the improved event rates in signal regions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> despite the smaller <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> pair production cross section in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over those of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is a consequence of increased hadronic branching ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and improved cut efficiency due to the larger mass gap between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Even <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which can be probed at the LHC only at very high luminosity can be probed here at around <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with similar statistical significance via <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which turns out to be the most favored signal in general for all the benchmark points. The overall signal rate is relatively weaker in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to better lepton tagging efficiency at a lepton collider, which results in a smaller number of events with exactly three same-sign leptons as demanded.</p><table-wrap id="t4" specific-use="style-1col"><object-id>IV</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.t4</object-id><label>TABLE IV.</label><caption><p>Charged Higgs pair production cross sections and number of events corresponding to the three different signal regions at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> luminosity at 1 TeV <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider for our chosen benchmark points.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6"><oasis:colspec align="left" colname="col1" colsep="0" colwidth="20%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col2" colsep="0" colwidth="30%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col3" colsep="0" colwidth="17%"/><oasis:colspec align="char" char="." colname="col4" colsep="0" colwidth="12%"/><oasis:colspec align="char" char="." colname="col5" colsep="0" colwidth="12%"/><oasis:colspec align="char" char="." colname="col6" colsep="0" colwidth="12%"/><oasis:thead><oasis:row><oasis:entry align="left" morerows="1" valign="bottom">Benchmark points</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" morerows="1" valign="bottom">Production cross section [fb] (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" morerows="1" valign="bottom">Neutrino hierarchy</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" nameend="col6" namest="col4" valign="bottom">Number of events (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:thead><oasis:tbody><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>22.83</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>36</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>47</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>9</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>77</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>90</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>9</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>16.91</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>5</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>16</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>6</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>6</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>23</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>8</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>12.48</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>30</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>75</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>16</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>63</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>122</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>17</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>18.44</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>8</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>22</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>8</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry/><oasis:entry>Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>16</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>39</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>12</oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:tbody></oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><label>V.</label><title>SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS</title><p>We have considered a simple extension of the SM with one additional scalar doublet and three generations of singlet right-handed Majorana neutrinos, where the additional Higgs states interact with the SM sector only via the right-handed neutrinos. The model, known as the neutrinophilic Higgs doublet model, is a well-motivated framework from the viewpoint of neutrino mass generation. The light neutrinos gain tiny nonzero masses via the Type-I seesaw mechanism when the neutrinophilic Higgs obtains a VEV to break the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry. We have discussed in brief why the spontaneous breaking of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry is disfavored, if one imposes the constraints derived from the CMB temperature anisotropies induced by domain walls as well as LFV decay branching ratios. We have, therefore, considered a scenario where the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">Z</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> parity is broken explicitly and thus is devoid of the domain wall problem. In such a scenario, the charged Higgs can have interesting collider phenomenology, explored in this work. Depending on the different decay modes of the neutrinophilic charged Higgs, we have identified some particularly clean signal regions likely to provide a hint of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>HDM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scenarios at the collider experiments.</p><p>We have also highlighted the interesting role play of the light neutrino mass hierarchy. Whether the neutrinos follow normal or inverted hierarchy is likely to be manifested via multiplicity of different flavored leptons in the final state. Thus such a finding at the collider experiments can complement the neutrino oscillation experiments which are yet to ascertain the correct mass hierarchy of the three light neutrinos.</p><p>The fact that the charged Higgs pair production cross section falls quite rapidly at the LHC with increasing mass led us to perform a comparative study between the LHC and a future <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> machine in order to probe such scenarios. We observed that although LHC is quite efficient to probe light charged Higgs masses, an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collider will be able to probe a much larger parameter space with heavier states.</p></sec></body><back><ack><title>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title><p>K. H. and S. M. acknowledge the H2020-MSCA-RICE-2014 Grant No. 645722 (NonMinimalHiggs). T. K. expresses his gratitude to Magnus Ehrnrooth foundation for financial support. The work of S. K. R. was partially supported by funding available from the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, for the Regional Centre for Accelerator-based Particle Physics (RECAPP), Harish-Chandra Research Institute.</p></ack><app-group><app id="app1"><label>APPENDIX A:</label><title>RELEVANT INTERACTION VERTICES</title><p><disp-formula id="und1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∓</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="newline"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∓</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="newline"/><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace depth="0.0ex" height="0.0ex" width="2em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are the charged lepton, neutrino, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-even neutral Higgs mixing matrices, the bases of the mass matrices being <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> is a diagonal matrix.</p></app><app id="app2"><label>APPENDIX B:</label><title>LEPTON FLAVOR VIOLATING BRANCHING RATIOS</title><p>In Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">V</xref> we have shown the obtained branching ratios for various lepton flavor violating processes corresponding to the four benchmark points. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is projected to be probed experimentally up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>6.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the near future <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c66">[66]</xref>. As indicated by the numbers, the obtained branching ratios for this process are at least 1 order of magnitude smaller for our benchmark points. The rest of these obtained LFV branching ratios are several orders of magnitude below the present experimental sensitivity in the respective channels.<table-wrap id="t5" specific-use="style-2col"><object-id>V</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.035026.t5</object-id><label>TABLE V.</label><caption><p>Lepton flavor violating branching ratios obtained for our chosen benchmark points.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9"><oasis:colspec align="left" colname="col1" colsep="0" colwidth="21%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col2" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col3" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col4" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col5" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col6" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col7" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col8" colsep="0" colwidth="10%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col9" colsep="0" colwidth="11%"/><oasis:thead><oasis:row><oasis:entry rowsep="0" valign="top">LFV</oasis:entry><oasis:entry nameend="col3" namest="col2" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry nameend="col5" namest="col4" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry nameend="col7" namest="col6" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry nameend="col9" namest="col8" valign="top"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row><oasis:entry valign="top">Process</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Normal</oasis:entry><oasis:entry valign="top">Inverted</oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:thead><oasis:tbody><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>2.97</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.79</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.56</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.21</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.81</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.31</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.99</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.38</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.38</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>2.05</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.10</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.56</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.15</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.80</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.18</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.98</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>2.90</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>3.87</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.79</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.05</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.14</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.52</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.39</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.86</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.72</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.65</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.46</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.18</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.68</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.26</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.82</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.31</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.51</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>2.73</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.14</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.73</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.20</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.07</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.24</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.30</oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo form="prefix">×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.12</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>1.50</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.30</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.39</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.45</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.60</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.53</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>0.71</oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:tbody></oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p></app></app-group><ref-list><ref id="c1"><label>[1]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>1</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>G. Aad</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>716</volume>, <page-range>1</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c2"><label>[2]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>2</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Chatrchyan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>716</volume>, <page-range>30</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c3"><label>[3]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>3</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia</string-name> and <string-name>M. Maltoni</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rep.</source> <volume>460</volume>, <page-range>1</page-range> (<year>2008</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRPLCM</pub-id><issn>0370-1573</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c4"><label>[4]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>4</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>P. Minkowski</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett.</source> <volume>67B</volume>, <page-range>421</page-range> (<year>1977</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/0370-2693(77)90435-X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c5"><label>[5]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>5</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>R. N. Mohapatra</string-name> and <string-name>G. Senjanovic</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <page-range>912</page-range> (<year>1980</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.912</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c6"><label>[6]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="report"><object-id>6</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Gell-Mann</string-name>, <string-name>P. Ramond</string-name>, and <string-name>R. Slansky</string-name></person-group>, CERN Report No. <pub-id pub-id-type="other">Print-80-0576</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c7"><label>[7]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="proc"><object-id>7</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Yanagida</string-name></person-group>, in <source>Proceedings of the Workshop on the Baryon Number of the Universe and Unified Theories, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979</source> (<publisher-name>National Lab for High Energy Physics</publisher-name>, <year>1979</year>), p. <page-range>109</page-range>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c8"><label>[8]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>8</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. L. Glashow</string-name></person-group>, <source>NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. B Phys.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <page-range>687</page-range> (<year>1980</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/978-1-4684-7197-7_15</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c9"><label>[9]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>9</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Schechter</string-name> and <string-name>J. W. F. Valle</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>25</volume>, <page-range>774</page-range> (<year>1982</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.25.774</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c10"><label>[10]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>10</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Schechter</string-name> and <string-name>J. W. F. Valle</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>22</volume>, <page-range>2227</page-range> (<year>1980</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2227</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c11"><label>[11]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>11</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Weinberg</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <page-range>1566</page-range> (<year>1979</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1566</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c12"><label>[12]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>12</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Weinberg</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>22</volume>, <page-range>1694</page-range> (<year>1980</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1694</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c13"><label>[13]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>13</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W.-Y. Keung</string-name> and <string-name>G. Senjanovic</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <page-range>1427</page-range> (<year>1983</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1427</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c14"><label>[14]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>14</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Datta</string-name>, <string-name>M. Guchait</string-name>, and <string-name>A. Pilaftsis</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>50</volume>, <page-range>3195</page-range> (<year>1994</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3195</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c15"><label>[15]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>15</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. M. L. Almeida, Jr.</string-name>, <string-name>Y. do Amaral Coutinho</string-name>, <string-name>J. A. Martins Simoes</string-name>, and <string-name>M. A. B. do Vale</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>62</volume>, <page-range>075004</page-range> (<year>2000</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.62.075004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c16"><label>[16]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>16</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>O. Panella</string-name>, <string-name>M. Cannoni</string-name>, <string-name>C. Carimalo</string-name>, and <string-name>Y. N. Srivastava</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>65</volume>, <page-range>035005</page-range> (<year>2002</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.65.035005</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c17"><label>[17]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>17</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Han</string-name> and <string-name>B. Zhang</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <page-range>171804</page-range> (<year>2006</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.171804</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c18"><label>[18]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>18</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. del Aguila</string-name>, <string-name>J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra</string-name>, and <string-name>R. Pittau</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>10</issue> (<volume>2007</volume>) <page-range>047</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2007/10/047</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c19"><label>[19]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>19</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>K. Huitu</string-name>, <string-name>S. Khalil</string-name>, <string-name>H. Okada</string-name>, and <string-name>S. K. Rai</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <page-range>181802</page-range> (<year>2008</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.181802</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c20"><label>[20]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>20</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Atre</string-name>, <string-name>T. Han</string-name>, <string-name>S. Pascoli</string-name>, and <string-name>B. Zhang</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>05</issue> (<volume>2009</volume>) <page-range>030</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/030</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c21"><label>[21]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>21</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>C.-Y. Chen</string-name> and <string-name>P. S. B. Dev</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>85</volume>, <page-range>093018</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.85.093018</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c22"><label>[22]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>22</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>P. S. B. Dev</string-name>, <string-name>A. Pilaftsis</string-name>, and <string-name>U.-k. Yang</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <page-range>081801</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.081801</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c23"><label>[23]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>23</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Das</string-name>, <string-name>P. S. B. Dev</string-name>, and <string-name>R. N. Mohapatra</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>97</volume>, <page-range>015018</page-range> (<year>2018</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>2470-0010</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.97.015018</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c24"><label>[24]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>24</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Abulencia</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CDF Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <page-range>221803</page-range> (<year>2007</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.221803</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c25"><label>[25]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>25</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Chatrchyan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>717</volume>, <page-range>109</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2012.09.012</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c26"><label>[26]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="report"><object-id>26</object-id>CERN Technical Report No. <pub-id pub-id-type="other">ATLAS-CONF-2012-139</pub-id>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2012-139/">https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2012-139/</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c27"><label>[27]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>27</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>V. Khachatryan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>748</volume>, <page-range>144</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.070</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c28"><label>[28]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>28</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>P. S. Bhupal Dev</string-name>, <string-name>R. Franceschini</string-name>, and <string-name>R. N. Mohapatra</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>86</volume>, <page-range>093010</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.86.093010</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c29"><label>[29]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>29</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. F. Deppisch</string-name>, <string-name>P. S. Bhupal Dev</string-name>, and <string-name>A. Pilaftsis</string-name></person-group>, <source>New J. Phys.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <page-range>075019</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">NJOPFM</pub-id><issn>1367-2630</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/075019</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c30"><label>[30]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>30</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Magg</string-name> and <string-name>C. Wetterich</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett.</source> <volume>94B</volume>, <page-range>61</page-range> (<year>1980</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/0370-2693(80)90825-4</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c31"><label>[31]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="report"><object-id>31</object-id>Technical Report No. <pub-id pub-id-type="other">ATLAS-CONF-2015-044</pub-id>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2015-044/">https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2015-044/</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c32"><label>[32]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>32</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>G. C. Branco</string-name>, <string-name>P. M. Ferreira</string-name>, <string-name>L. Lavoura</string-name>, <string-name>M. N. Rebelo</string-name>, <string-name>M. Sher</string-name>, and <string-name>J. P. Silva</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rep.</source> <volume>516</volume>, <page-range>1</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRPLCM</pub-id><issn>0370-1573</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c33"><label>[33]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>33</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>E. Ma</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <page-range>2502</page-range> (<year>2001</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2502</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c34"><label>[34]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>34</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Gabriel</string-name> and <string-name>S. Nandi</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>655</volume>, <page-range>141</page-range> (<year>2007</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2007.04.062</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c35"><label>[35]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>35</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. M. Davidson</string-name> and <string-name>H. E. Logan</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>80</volume>, <page-range>095008</page-range> (<year>2009</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.80.095008</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c36"><label>[36]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>36</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Gabriel</string-name>, <string-name>B. Mukhopadhyaya</string-name>, <string-name>S. Nandi</string-name>, and <string-name>S. K. Rai</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>669</volume>, <page-range>180</page-range> (<year>2008</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2008.09.033</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c37"><label>[37]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>37</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>N. Haba</string-name> and <string-name>K. Tsumura</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>06</issue> (<volume>2011</volume>) <page-range>068</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP06(2011)068</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c38"><label>[38]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>38</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>N. Haba</string-name> and <string-name>T. Horita</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>705</volume>, <page-range>98</page-range> (<year>2011</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.103</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c39"><label>[39]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>39</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W. Chao</string-name> and <string-name>M. J. Ramsey-Musolf</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>89</volume>, <page-range>033007</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.89.033007</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c40"><label>[40]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>40</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>U. Maitra</string-name>, <string-name>B. Mukhopadhyaya</string-name>, <string-name>S. Nandi</string-name>, <string-name>S. K. Rai</string-name>, and <string-name>A. Shivaji</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>89</volume>, <page-range>055024</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.89.055024</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c41"><label>[41]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>41</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Chakdar</string-name>, <string-name>K. Ghosh</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Nandi</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>734</volume>, <page-range>64</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2014.05.036</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c42"><label>[42]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>42</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>O. Seto</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>92</volume>, <page-range>073005</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.92.073005</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c43"><label>[43]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>43</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>E. Bertuzzo</string-name>, <string-name>Y. F. Perez G.</string-name>, <string-name>O. Sumensari</string-name>, and <string-name>R. Zukanovich Funchal</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>01</issue> (<volume>2016</volume>) <page-range>018</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP01(2016)018</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c44"><label>[44]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>44</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>C. Guo</string-name>, <string-name>S.-Y. Guo</string-name>, <string-name>Z.-L. Han</string-name>, <string-name>B. Li</string-name>, and <string-name>Y. Liao</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>04</issue> (<volume>2017</volume>) <page-range>065</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP04(2017)065</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c45"><label>[45]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>45</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>G. ’t Hooft</string-name></person-group>, <source>NATO Sci. Ser. B</source> <volume>59</volume>, <page-range>135</page-range> (<year>1980</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c46"><label>[46]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>46</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Planck Collaboration</collab></person-group>, <source>Astron. Astrophys.</source> <volume>594</volume>, <page-range>A13</page-range> (<year>2016</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">AAEJAF</pub-id><issn>0004-6361</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1051/0004-6361/201525830</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c47"><label>[47]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>47</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Zhou</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>84</volume>, <page-range>038701</page-range> (<year>2011</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.84.038701</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c48"><label>[48]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>48</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Sher</string-name> and <string-name>C. Triola</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>83</volume>, <page-range>117702</page-range> (<year>2011</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.83.117702</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c49"><label>[49]</label><mixed-citation id="c49a" publication-type="journal"><object-id>49a</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Ya. B. Zeldovich</string-name>, <string-name>I. Yu. Kobzarev</string-name>, and <string-name>L. B. Okun</string-name></person-group>, <source>Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <page-range>3</page-range> (<year>1974</year>) <pub-id pub-id-type="coden">ZETFA7</pub-id><issn>0044-4510</issn></mixed-citation><mixed-citation id="c49b" publication-type="journal" specific-use="translation"><object-id>49b</object-id>[<person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Ya. B. Zeldovich</string-name>, <string-name>I. Yu. Kobzarev</string-name>, and <string-name>L. B. Okun</string-name></person-group><source>Sov. Phys. JETP</source> <volume>40</volume>, <page-range>1</page-range> (<year>1974</year>)].<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">SPHJAR</pub-id><issn>0038-5646</issn></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c50"><label>[50]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>50</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W.-M. Yao</string-name> <etal/></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. G</source> <volume>33</volume>, <page-range>1</page-range> (<year>2006</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JPGPED</pub-id><issn>0954-3899</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c51"><label>[51]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>51</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia</string-name>, <string-name>M. Maltoni</string-name>, and <string-name>T. Schwetz</string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys.</source> <volume>B908</volume>, <page-range>199</page-range> (<year>2016</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">NUPBBO</pub-id><issn>0550-3213</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.02.033</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c52"><label>[52]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="eprint"><object-id>52</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>P. F. de Salas</string-name>, <string-name>D. V. Forero</string-name>, <string-name>C. A. Ternes</string-name>, <string-name>M. Tortola</string-name>, and <string-name>J. W. F. Valle</string-name></person-group>, <pub-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1708.01186</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c53"><label>[53]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>53</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. A. Casas</string-name> and <string-name>A. Ibarra</string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys.</source> <volume>B618</volume>, <page-range>171</page-range> (<year>2001</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">NUPBBO</pub-id><issn>0550-3213</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00475-8</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c54"><label>[54]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>54</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Pilaftsis</string-name></person-group>, <source>Z. Phys. C</source> <volume>55</volume>, <page-range>275</page-range> (<year>1992</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">ZPCFD2</pub-id><issn>0170-9739</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/BF01482590</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c55"><label>[55]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>55</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W. Grimus</string-name> and <string-name>L. Lavoura</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>546</volume>, <page-range>86</page-range> (<year>2002</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02672-2</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c56"><label>[56]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>56</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>D. Aristizabal Sierra</string-name> and <string-name>C. E. Yaguna</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>08</issue> (<volume>2011</volume>) <page-range>013</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP08(2011)013</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c57"><label>[57]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="proc"><object-id>57</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>D. Aristizabal Sierra</string-name></person-group>, <source>Proc. Sci.</source>, <issue>EPS-HEP2011</issue> (<volume>2011</volume>) <page-range>435</page-range> [<pub-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1110.6435</pub-id>].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c58"><label>[58]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>58</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>D. Aristizabal Sierra</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. Conf. Ser.</source> <volume>375</volume>, <page-range>042003</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JPCSDZ</pub-id><issn>1742-6588</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1742-6596/375/1/042003</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c59"><label>[59]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="report"><object-id>59</object-id>CERN Technical Report No. <pub-id pub-id-type="other">ATLAS-CONF-2016-089</pub-id>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2016-089/">https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2016-089/</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c60"><label>[60]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="proc"><object-id>60</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. McCarn</string-name> (<collab>ATLAS CMS Collaborations</collab>)</person-group>, in <source>Proceedings, 51st Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories: La Thuile, Italy, 2016</source>, pp. <page-range>307–316</page-range>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://inspirehep.net/record/1591250/files/1589812_307-316.pdf">http://inspirehep.net/record/1591250/files/1589812_307-316.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c61"><label>[61]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="proc"><object-id>61</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>H. Ohman</string-name> (<collab>ATLAS CMS Collaborations</collab>)</person-group>, in <source>Fourth Annual Large Hadron Collider Physics, Lund, Sweden, 2016</source>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://cds.cern.ch/record/2214130/files/ATL-PHYS-PROC-2016-137.pdf?subformat=pdfa">http://cds.cern.ch/record/2214130/files/ATL-PHYS-PROC-2016-137.pdf?subformat=pdfa</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c62"><label>[62]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>62</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. G. Akeroyd</string-name> <etal/></person-group>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>77</volume>, <page-range>276</page-range> (<year>2017</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4829-2</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c63"><label>[63]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>63</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>G. Aad</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>05</issue> (<volume>2014</volume>) <page-range>071</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP05(2014)071</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c64"><label>[64]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="misc"><object-id>64</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>CMS Collaboration</collab></person-group> (<year>2017</year>), <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cds.cern.ch/record/2297116?ln=en">https://cds.cern.ch/record/2297116?ln=en</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c65"><label>[65]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>65</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Adam</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>MEG Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <page-range>201801</page-range> (<year>2013</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.201801</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c66"><label>[66]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="eprint"><object-id>66</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. M. Baldini</string-name> <etal/></person-group>, <pub-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1301.7225</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c67"><label>[67]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>67</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>B. Aubert</string-name> <etal/> (<collab><italic>BABAR</italic> Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <page-range>021802</page-range> (<year>2010</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.021802</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c68"><label>[68]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="eprint"><object-id>68</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Aushev</string-name> <etal/></person-group>, <pub-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1002.5012</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c69"><label>[69]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>69</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>K. Hayasaka</string-name> <etal/></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>687</volume>, <page-range>139</page-range> (<year>2010</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.037</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c70"><label>[70]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>70</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W. H. Bertl</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>SINDRUM II Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>47</volume>, <page-range>337</page-range> (<year>2006</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s2006-02582-x</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c71"><label>[71]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="eprint"><object-id>71</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>L. Bartoszek</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>Mu2e Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <pub-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1501.05241</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c72"><label>[72]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="eprint"><object-id>72</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Staub</string-name></person-group>, <pub-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:0806.0538</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c73"><label>[73]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>73</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Staub</string-name></person-group>, <source>Comput. Phys. Commun.</source> <volume>181</volume>, <page-range>1077</page-range> (<year>2010</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">CPHCBZ</pub-id><issn>0010-4655</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.cpc.2010.01.011</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c74"><label>[74]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>74</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Staub</string-name></person-group>, <source>Comput. Phys. Commun.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <page-range>808</page-range> (<year>2011</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">CPHCBZ</pub-id><issn>0010-4655</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.cpc.2010.11.030</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c75"><label>[75]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>75</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Staub</string-name></person-group>, <source>Comput. Phys. Commun.</source> <volume>185</volume>, <page-range>1773</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">CPHCBZ</pub-id><issn>0010-4655</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.018</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c76"><label>[76]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>76</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Staub</string-name></person-group>, <source>Adv. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>2015</volume>, <page-range>840780</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<issn>1687-7357</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1155/2015/840780</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c77"><label>[77]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>77</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W. Porod</string-name></person-group>, <source>Comput. Phys. Commun.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <page-range>275</page-range> (<year>2003</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">CPHCBZ</pub-id><issn>0010-4655</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00222-4</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c78"><label>[78]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>78</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W. Porod</string-name> and <string-name>F. Staub</string-name></person-group>, <source>Comput. Phys. Commun.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <page-range>2458</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">CPHCBZ</pub-id><issn>0010-4655</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.021</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c79"><label>[79]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>79</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>H.-J. He</string-name>, <string-name>N. Polonsky</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Su</string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>64</volume>, <page-range>053004</page-range> (<year>2001</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.64.053004</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c80"><label>[80]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>80</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Alwall</string-name>, <string-name>M. Herquet</string-name>, <string-name>F. Maltoni</string-name>, <string-name>O. Mattelaer</string-name>, and <string-name>T. Stelzer</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>06</issue> (<volume>2011</volume>) <page-range>128</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP06(2011)128</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c81"><label>[81]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>81</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Alwall</string-name>, <string-name>R. Frederix</string-name>, <string-name>S. Frixione</string-name>, <string-name>V. Hirschi</string-name>, <string-name>F. Maltoni</string-name>, <string-name>O. Mattelaer</string-name>, <string-name>H. S. Shao</string-name>, <string-name>T. Stelzer</string-name>, <string-name>P. Torrielli</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Zaro</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>07</issue> (<volume>2014</volume>) <page-range>079</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c82"><label>[82]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>82</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>R. D. Ball</string-name> <etal/></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys.</source> <volume>B867</volume>, <page-range>244</page-range> (<year>2013</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">NUPBBO</pub-id><issn>0550-3213</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c83"><label>[83]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>83</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>R. D. Ball</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>NNPDF Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>04</issue> (<volume>2015</volume>) <page-range>040</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c84"><label>[84]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="misc"><object-id>84</object-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-13">https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-13</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c85"><label>[85]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>85</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Sjostrand</string-name>, <string-name>S. Mrenna</string-name>, and <string-name>P. Z. Skands</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>05</issue> (<volume>2006</volume>) <page-range>026</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c86"><label>[86]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>86</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. de Favereau</string-name>, <string-name>C. Delaere</string-name>, <string-name>P. Demin</string-name>, <string-name>A. Giammanco</string-name>, <string-name>V. LemaÃőtre</string-name>, <string-name>A. Mertens</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Selvaggi</string-name> (<collab>DELPHES 3 Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>02</issue> (<volume>2014</volume>) <page-range>057</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP02(2014)057</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c87"><label>[87]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>87</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Selvaggi</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. Conf. Ser.</source> <volume>523</volume>, <page-range>012033</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JPCSDZ</pub-id><issn>1742-6588</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1742-6596/523/1/012033</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c88"><label>[88]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>88</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Mertens</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. Conf. Ser.</source> <volume>608</volume>, <page-range>012045</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JPCSDZ</pub-id><issn>1742-6588</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1742-6596/608/1/012045</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c89"><label>[89]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>89</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Cacciari</string-name>, <string-name>G. P. Salam</string-name>, and <string-name>G. Soyez</string-name></person-group>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>72</volume>, <page-range>1896</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c90"><label>[90]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>90</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Cacciari</string-name>, <string-name>G. P. Salam</string-name>, and <string-name>G. Soyez</string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>04</issue> (<volume>2008</volume>) <page-range>063</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c91"><label>[91]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="report"><object-id>91</object-id>CERN Technical Report No. <pub-id pub-id-type="other">ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-022</pub-id>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PUBNOTES/ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-022/">https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PUBNOTES/ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-022/</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
