<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns="http://specifications.silverchair.com/xsd/article/1/0/SCJATS-journalpublishing1-0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ptep</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2050-3911</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ptep/pty045</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">pty045</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1711.03242</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-toc-heading">
<subject>Papers</subject>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-toc-heading">
<subject>Theoretical Particle Physics</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-journal-collection">
<subject>PTEP/B10</subject>
<subject>PTEP/B11</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Codimension-2 brane solutions of maximal supergravities in 9, 8, and 7 dimensions</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Imamura</surname><given-names>Yosuke</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="COR1"/>
<email xlink:type="simple">imamura@phys.titech.ac.jp</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>Hirotaka</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="COR2"/>
<email xlink:type="simple">h.kato@th.phys.titech.ac.jp</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF1"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="AFF1"><italic>Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan</italic></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="COR1">E-mail: <email>imamura@phys.titech.ac.jp</email></corresp>
<corresp id="COR2"><email>h.kato@th.phys.titech.ac.jp</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="cover">
<month>05</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<day>01</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2018-05-08">
<day>08</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2018</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<elocation-id>053B01</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>21</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>13</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Physical Society of Japan.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="cc-by" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
<license-p>Funded by SCOAP<sup>3</sup></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="pty045.pdf"/>
<abstract abstract-type="abstract"><title>Abstract</title>
<p>We construct codimension-2 BPS brane solutions in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation1"><![CDATA[$D=9,8,7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> maximal supergravities by solving Killing spinor equations. We assume the Poincar&#x00E9; invariance along the worldvolume and vanishing gauge fields, and determine the metric and the scalar fields. The solution in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation2"><![CDATA[$D=9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is essentially the same as the ten-dimensional one, which is specified by a holomorphic function in the transverse space. For <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation3"><![CDATA[$D=8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the solution is specified by two holomorphic functions, and regarded as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation4"><![CDATA[$T^2\times T^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compactification of F-theory. For <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation5"><![CDATA[$D=7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, we find that the solution can be interpreted as M-theory on Calabi&#x2013;Yau, and under an additional assumption a solution is specified by two holomorphic functions.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="jel">
<kwd>B10</kwd>
<kwd>B11</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<page-count count="16"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="SEC1"><title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>An important feature of codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation6"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> branes is that they can have non-trivial monodromies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. Namely, when we move charged objects around such branes they may get transformed to dual objects. The element of the duality group specifying this duality transformation is called a monodromy associated with the branes. In the context of brane realization of field theories, such monodromy transformations are often interpreted as electric&#x2013;magnetic duality, and in some cases the existence of branes with non-trivial monodromies causes the emergence of particles with mutually non-local charges. This is a common feature of some classes of non-Lagrangian theories such as Argyres&#x2013;Douglas theories [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>] and four-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation7"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> superconformal theories [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].<xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN1"><sup>1</sup></xref> This fact motivates us to investigate codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation8"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> branes.</p>
<p>In the context of string/M-theory a maximal supergravity is obtained by torus compactification of ten- or eleven-dimensional theory. The U-duality group is generated by geometric coordinate changes of the torus and duality transformations. Half BPS branes in eleven or ten dimensions descend to various sorts of codimension-2 branes in lower dimensions by dimensional reduction and duality transformations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>].</p>
<p>F- and M-theories are useful to describe codimension-2 branes. For example, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation9"><![CDATA[$7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-branes in type IIB string theory are described as purely geometric objects in the context of F-theory. We can also realize various branes in lower dimensions by considersing M- and F-theory in different purely geometric backgrounds in which fields other than the metric are vanishing or constant. However, there may be branes that do not have a geometric description in M- or F-theory. Such branes have not been investigated in detail, and their realization and classification may give new insight for strongly coupled field theories. A purpose of this paper is to search for such branes in the case of codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation10"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS branes.</p>
<p>Actually, construction of such branes is quite restricted, as argued in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Some examples given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>] have non-compact dimensions less than four, and it seems difficult to give examples in higher dimensions. We show that this is actually the case for codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation11"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS brane solutions by explicitly solving Killing spinor equations. Namely, BPS solutions of codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation12"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> branes always have geometric realization in M/F-theory for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation13"><![CDATA[$D=9,8,7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>Maximal supergravities in various dimensions have common structure. The scalar manifolds of these theories have the form <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation14"><![CDATA[$G/H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation15"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the classical global symmetry and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation16"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the local symmetry group, which is the maximal compact subgroup of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation17"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1
">Table 1</xref> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation18"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation19"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in dimensions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation20"><![CDATA[$D=10,\ldots,4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. The scalar fields are coordinates of this manifold, and represented as a matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation21"><![CDATA[$L\in G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with left action of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation22"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and right action of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation23"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The U-duality group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation24"><![CDATA[$G_\mathbb{Z}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the integral form of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation25"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For the theories in seven or higher dimensions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation26"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are all <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation27"><![CDATA[$SL$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> type and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation28"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are all <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation29"><![CDATA[$SO$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> type, and they can be dealt with in similar ways. In this paper we investigate these theories; theories in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation30"><![CDATA[$D\leq 6$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are left for future work.</p>
<p><table-wrap id="T1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>The global symmetry group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation31"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the duality group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation32"><![CDATA[$G_{\mathbb{Z}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and the local symmetry group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation33"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in maximal supergravities.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">dim</th>
<th align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation34"><![CDATA[$G$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation35"><![CDATA[$G_\mathbb{Z}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation36"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">10(A)</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation37"><![CDATA[$SO(1,1)/\mathbb{Z}_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation38"><![CDATA[$1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation39"><![CDATA[$1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10(B)</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation40"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation41"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation42"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation43"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times O(1,1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation44"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{Z})\times\mathbb{Z}_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation45"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation46"><![CDATA[$SL(3,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation47"><![CDATA[$SL(3,\mathbb{Z})\times SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation48"><![CDATA[$SO(3)\times SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation49"><![CDATA[$SL(5,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation50"><![CDATA[$SL(5,\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation51"><![CDATA[$SO(5)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation52"><![CDATA[$O(5,5)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation53"><![CDATA[$O(5,5;\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation54"><![CDATA[$SO(5)\times SO(5)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation55"><![CDATA[$E_{6(6)}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation56"><![CDATA[$E_{6(6)}(\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation57"><![CDATA[$USp(8)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation58"><![CDATA[$E_{7(7)}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation59"><![CDATA[$E_{7(7)}(\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation60"><![CDATA[$SU(8)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></p>
<p>A maximal supergravity contains
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; the vielbein <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation61"><![CDATA[$e_M^{\widehat M}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; scalar fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation62"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; gravitino <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation63"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; dilatino <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation64"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,</p></list-item>
</list>
and anti-symmetric tensor fields of different ranks, which are not relevant to our analysis in this paper.</p>
<p>We use the following indices:
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation65"><![CDATA[$M,N,\ldots$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : global coordinates</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation66"><![CDATA[$\widehat M,\widehat N,\ldots$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : local Lorentz</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation67"><![CDATA[$\alpha,\beta,\ldots$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation68"><![CDATA[$SL(m)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> fundamental representation</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>&#x25E6; <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation69"><![CDATA[$i,j,\ldots$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation70"><![CDATA[$H=SO(n)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vector.</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>The scalar fields appear in the action and the supersymmetry transformation laws through one-form fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation71"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation72"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which are defined as the traceless symmetric and anti-symmetric parts of the Maurer&#x2013;Cartan form:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M1-1"><label>(1.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation1"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
P_{ij}=(L^{-1}dL)_{(ij)},\quad
Q_{ij}=(L^{-1}dL)_{[ij]}. 
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Under <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation73"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> transformation, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation74"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> transforms homogeneously as the symmetric matrix representation of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation75"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, while <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation76"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> transforms inhomogeneously and plays the role of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation77"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-connection.</p>
<p>To obtain BPS solutions we solve the Killing spinor equations for the gravitino <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation78"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and dilatino <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation79"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In the next section we first look at the ten-dimensional case to explain the basic prescription for solving the Killing spinor equations and then we move on to lower-dimensional cases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2"><title>2. Solving Killing spinor equations</title>
<sec id="SEC2.1"><title>2.1. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation80"><![CDATA[$D=10$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>Let us consider BPS solutions in type IIB supergravity. Such solutions have been well investigated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>] and 7-branes are classified by the Kodaira classification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Various four-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation81"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{N}=2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetric theories are realized on D3-branes probing these solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. A purpose of this subsection is to review how we can obtain BPS solutions in ten dimensions by solving the Killing spinor equations. The derivations in lower dimensions are parallel.</p>
<p>The classical global symmetry of type IIB supergravity is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation82"><![CDATA[$G=SL(2,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the local R-symmetry group is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation83"><![CDATA[$H=SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Namely, the scalar manifold is locally the two-dimensional homogeneous space <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation84"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. When we discuss the global structure, we also need to take account of the duality group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation85"><![CDATA[$G_{\mathbb{Z}}=SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Quantum numbers of scalar and spinor fields in type IIB supergravity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. The gravitino field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation86"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> belongs to the spinor representation of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation87"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Namely, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation88"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has the spacetime vector index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation89"><![CDATA[$M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and an <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation90"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> spinor index which is implicit. The dilatino field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation91"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation92"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vector index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation93"><![CDATA[$i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and an implicit <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation94"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> spinor index. It satisfies the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation95"><![CDATA[$\rho$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-traceless condition
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-1"><label>(2.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation2"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\rho_i\lambda^i=0,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation96"><![CDATA[$\rho_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are Dirac matrices associated with the orthogonal group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation97"><![CDATA[$H=SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. See the appendix for our notation. This condition removes components carrying <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation98"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation99"><![CDATA[$\pm1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation100"><![CDATA[$\lambda^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and the remaining components in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation101"><![CDATA[$\lambda^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> carry <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation102"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation103"><![CDATA[$\pm3/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<p><table-wrap id="T2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Quantum numbers of scalar and spinor fields in type IIB supergravity.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">&#160;</th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation104"><![CDATA[$G=SL(2,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation105"><![CDATA[$H=SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation106"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation107"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation108"><![CDATA[$\pm1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation109"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation110"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation111"><![CDATA[$\pm\frac{1}{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation112"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation113"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation114"><![CDATA[$\pm\frac{3}{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation115"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation116"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation117"><![CDATA[$\pm\frac{1}{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></p>
<p>Due to the existence of the self-dual four-form field it is difficult to write down the full Lagrangian of the type IIB supergravity. However, it is easy to give the Lagrangian of the subsector which is relevant to us. If we assume vanishing anti-symmetric tensor fields, the equations of motion for the remaining fields are obtained from the Lagrangian
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-2"><label>(2.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation3"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
{\cal L}
&=\frac{e}{4}R
+\frac{e}{2}(\psi_M\Gamma^{MNP}D_N\psi_P)
\nonumber\\
&\quad-\frac{e}{4}(P_M{}^{ij})^2
+\frac{e}{2}(\lambda_i\Gamma^ND_N\lambda_i)
+\frac{e}{2}P_M{}^{ij}(\psi_N\Gamma^M\Gamma^N\Gamma_i\lambda_j),
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
up to higher-order fermion terms.</p>
<p>The Killing spinor equations are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-3"><label>(2.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation4"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\psi_M
&=D_M\epsilon,
\\\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-4"><label>(2.4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation5"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\lambda^i
&=P_M^{ij}\Gamma^M\rho_j\epsilon,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation118"><![CDATA[$D_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the covariant derivative defined with the spin connection <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation119"><![CDATA[$\omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation120"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> connection <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation121"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-5"><label>(2.5)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation6"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
D_M\epsilon=
\left(\partial_M+\frac{1}{4}\omega_{M\widehat P\widehat Q}\Gamma^{\widehat P\widehat Q}
+\frac{1}{4}Q_{Mij}\rho^{ij}\right)\epsilon.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We are interested in codimension-2 brane solutions. Let us assume the solution has the eight-dimensional Poincar&#x00E9; invariance along the eight longitudinal directions. We use <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation122"><![CDATA[$x^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation123"><![CDATA[$\mu=0,1,\ldots,7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation124"><![CDATA[$x^m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation125"><![CDATA[$m=8,9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) for longitudinal and transverse coordinates, respectively. We take the ansatz
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-6"><label>(2.6)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation7"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
ds^2=f^2(x^m)\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu
+g^2(x^m)dx^m dx^m 
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
for the metric and
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-7"><label>(2.7)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation8"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L^\alpha{}_i=L^\alpha{}_i(x^m)
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
for the scalar fields. We introduce the local frame so that the vielbein has the diagonal components
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-8"><label>(2.8)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation9"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
e^{\widehat\mu}=f(x^m)\delta^{\widehat\mu}_\mu dx^\mu,\quad
e^{a}=g(x^m)\delta^a_m dx^m.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Because we are interested in the rigid supersymmetry on the branes we assume that the supersymmetry parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation126"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> depends only on the transverse coordinates:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-9"><label>(2.9)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation10"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\epsilon=\epsilon(x^m).
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Because <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation127"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is independent of the longitudinal coordinates <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation128"><![CDATA[$x^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the longitudinal components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation129"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vanish. For the longitudinal components of the Killing spinor equation of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-3">2.3</xref>),
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-10"><label>(2.10)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation11"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\psi_\mu
=D_\mu\epsilon
=\left(\partial_\mu-\frac{1}{2g}(\partial_mf)\Gamma_{m\widehat\mu}\right)\epsilon
=0 ,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
to have non-trivial solutions the function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation130"><![CDATA[$f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be constant, and without loss of generality we can set <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation131"><![CDATA[$f=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The covariant derivative in the transverse components of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-3">2.3</xref>) include the connection of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation132"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the rotation in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation133"><![CDATA[$8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>&#x2013;<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation134"><![CDATA[$9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> plane, and that of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation135"><![CDATA[$H=SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-11"><label>(2.11)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation12"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
D_m\epsilon =
\left(\partial_m+\frac{1}{2}\omega_{m89}\Gamma^{89}
+\frac{1}{2}Q_{m12}\rho^{12}\right)\epsilon=0.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>For the existence of non-vanishing solutions, the action of two connections on some components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation136"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be pure gauge. To study this condition, it is convenient to decompose the parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation137"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> into four parts <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation138"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{s,r}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> according to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation139"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation140"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charges so that
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-12"><label>(2.12)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation13"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\frac{1}{2}\Gamma_{89}\epsilon_{s,r}=is\epsilon_{s,r},\quad
\frac{1}{2}\rho_{12}\epsilon_{s,r}=ir\epsilon_{s,r},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where both the indices <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation141"><![CDATA[$s$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation142"><![CDATA[$r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> take values in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation143"><![CDATA[$\{+\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2}\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We also decompose <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation144"><![CDATA[$\lambda^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the same way into <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation145"><![CDATA[$\lambda^i_{sr}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For distinction we use <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation146"><![CDATA[$s=\{\uparrow,\downarrow\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation147"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation148"><![CDATA[$r=\{+,-\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation149"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We also introduce <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation150"><![CDATA[$i=\{\oplus,\ominus\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the complex basis of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation151"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vectors, which carry <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation152"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation153"><![CDATA[$\pm 1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. See the appendix for details.</p>
<p>Let us require the solution to be half BPS. Without loss of generality we can assume that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation154"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and its Majorana conjugate <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation155"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow -}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> correspond to the unbroken supersymmetries. The other components are set to zero: <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation156"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow+}=\epsilon_{\uparrow-}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Then, the non-vanishing components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation157"><![CDATA[$\delta\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-13"><label>(2.13)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation14"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\lambda^i_{\downarrow-}=P_{z^*}^{i\oplus}\epsilon_{\uparrow +},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and its complex conjugate.</p>
<p>Before proceeding, it would be instructive to check the consistency of the quantum numbers in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-13">2.13</xref>). Let us first consider the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation158"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> quantum numbers. The left-hand side has the lower index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation159"><![CDATA[$\downarrow$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This means the component carries <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation160"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge (spin) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation161"><![CDATA[$-1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. On the right-hand side, the parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation162"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has lower index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation163"><![CDATA[$\uparrow$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> which means <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation164"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> spin <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation165"><![CDATA[$+1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In addition, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation166"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has lower index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation167"><![CDATA[$z^*$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and this component carries <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation168"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> spin <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation169"><![CDATA[$-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Therefore, both left- and right-hand sides carry the same <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation170"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{89}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> spin <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation171"><![CDATA[$-1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The coincidence of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation172"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge can be confirmed in a similar way. The index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation173"><![CDATA[$i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is common for the left- and right-hand sides and thus let us focus on the other indices. On the left-hand side we have the lower <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation174"><![CDATA[$-$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> index and this means it carries <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation175"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation176"><![CDATA[$-1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. On the right-hand side there are the upper <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation177"><![CDATA[$\oplus$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> index on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation178"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the lower <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation179"><![CDATA[$+$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> index on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation180"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which carry <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation181"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation182"><![CDATA[$-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation183"><![CDATA[$+1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. Therefore, the left- and right-hand sides carry the same <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation184"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation185"><![CDATA[$-1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The charge counting we have just explained is quite useful when we extract the condition imposed on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation186"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> from Killing spinor equations associated with dilatino fields in different dimensions.</p>
<p>The vanishing of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-13">2.13</xref>) means
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-14"><label>(2.14)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation15"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
P_{z^*}^{\oplus\oplus}=0.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>(<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation187"><![CDATA[$P_{z^*}^{\ominus\oplus}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is identically zero due to the traceless condition.) We want to solve this with respect to the scalar fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation188"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For this purpose it is convenient to gauge fix the local <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation189"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> symmetry so that the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation190"><![CDATA[$L$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-15"><label>(2.15)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation16"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L=
K(\tau),
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation191"><![CDATA[$K(\tau)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for a complex number <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation192"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the upper half-plane is the following <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation193"><![CDATA[$2\times2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrix:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-16"><label>(2.16)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation17"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
K(\tau)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\tau_2}}
\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \\
\tau_1 & \tau_2
\end{array}\right)\!,\quad
\tau\equiv\tau_1+i\tau_2\in H_+.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Then <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation194"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation195"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> have the components
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-17"><label>(2.17)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation18"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
P^{ij}=\frac{1}{2\tau_2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
-d\tau_2 & d\tau_1 \\
d\tau_1 & d\tau_2
\end{array}\right)\!,\quad
Q^{ij}=\frac{d\tau_1}{2\tau_2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
0 & -1 \\
1 & 0
\end{array}\right)\!.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>In this gauge, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-14">2.14</xref>) gives
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-18"><label>(2.18)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation19"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
P_{z^*}^{\oplus\oplus}=\frac{i}{2\tau_2}\partial_{z^*}\tau=0.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Namely, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation196"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be a holomorphic function of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation197"><![CDATA[$z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>Now let us turn to the equation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation198"><![CDATA[$\delta\psi_m=D_m\epsilon=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The components including the non-vanishing parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation199"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation200"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow -}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-19"><label>(2.19)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation20"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
D_m\epsilon_{\uparrow +}
= \left(\partial_m+\frac{i}{2}(\omega_{m89}+Q_{m12})\right)\epsilon_{\uparrow +}
=0
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and its complex conjugation. For Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-19">2.19</xref>) to have solutions with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation201"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow +}\neq0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the net connection <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation202"><![CDATA[$\omega_{89}+Q_{12}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be pure gauge, and we can take the gauge with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation203"><![CDATA[$\omega_{89}+Q_{12}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The explicit forms of the spin connection and the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation204"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> connection are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-20"><label>(2.20)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation21"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\omega_{89}
=i\frac{\partial g}{g}dz
-i\frac{\overline\partial g}{g}dz^*,\quad
Q_{12}=-\frac{d\tau_1}{2\tau_2}
=-i\frac{\partial\tau_2}{2\tau_2}dz
+i\frac{\overline\partial\tau_2}{2\tau_2}dz^* , 
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where we used holomorphy of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation205"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the last equality. From <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation206"><![CDATA[$\omega_{89}+Q_{12}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> we obtain
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-21"><label>(2.21)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation22"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\frac{dg}{g}=\frac{d\tau_2}{2\tau_2} ,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and this is solved by
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-22"><label>(2.22)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation23"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
g=c\sqrt{\tau_2},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation207"><![CDATA[$c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an arbitrary real positive constant, which can be absorbed by the coordinate change <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation208"><![CDATA[$cx^m\rightarrow x^m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The solution is summarized as follows:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-23"><label>(2.23)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation24"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L^\alpha{}_i
&=K(\tau),\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-24"><label>(2.24)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation25"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
ds^2&=\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+\tau_2dx^m dx^m,\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-25"><label>(2.25)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation26"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\tau(z)&=\tau_1+i\tau_2,\quad
\tau_2>0.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This solution is specified by the single holomorphic function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation209"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The imaginary part of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation210"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be positive, and no globally defined holomorphic function satisfies this condition unless <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation211"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a constant. For a non-trivial solution <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation212"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be given as a multi-valued solution with singularities. These singularities are regarded as branes, and the monodromies associated with the multi-valueness specify the charges of the branes. It is well known that these singularities are classified by the Kodaira classification, and we do not give a detailed explanation of this.</p>
<p>In the following we will construct solutions in lower dimensions, and find that they are also described by holomorphic functions with positive imaginary part. Because the classification of the singularity can be done in a similar way to the ten-dimensional case, and it has been well studied, we only focus on the local structure of solutions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2.2"><title>2.2. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation213"><![CDATA[$D=9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>Let us start the analysis in lower dimensions following the prescription in the last subsection. The scalar and spinor fields in the nine-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation214"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supergravity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>] are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<p><table-wrap id="T3" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p>The quantum numbers of scalar and spinor fields in the nine-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation217"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supergravity.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">&#160;</th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation218"><![CDATA[$SL(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation219"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation220"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation221"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation222"><![CDATA[$\pm1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation223"><![CDATA[$\varphi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation224"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation225"><![CDATA[$0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation226"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation227"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation228"><![CDATA[$\pm\frac{1}{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation229"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation230"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation231"><![CDATA[$\pm\frac{3}{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation232"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation233"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation234"><![CDATA[$\pm\frac{1}{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation235"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation236"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation237"><![CDATA[$\pm\frac{1}{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></p>
<p>The fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation215"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are subject to the gamma-traceless condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation216"><![CDATA[$\rho_i\lambda_i=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The Lagrangian is
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-26"><label>(2.26)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation27"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
{\cal L}
&= -\frac{e}{4}R
- \frac{i}{2}e(\psi_L\Gamma^{LMN}D_M\psi_N)
\nonumber\\
&\quad
+ \frac{e}{4}(P_{M ij})^2
+ \frac{i}{2}e(\lambda_i\Gamma^M D_M\lambda_i)
+ \frac{i}{2}e(\psi_M\rho_i\Gamma^N\Gamma^M\lambda_j)P_{Nij}
\nonumber\\
&\quad
+ \frac{e}{2}(\partial_M\varphi)^2
+ \frac{i}{2}e(\widetilde\lambda\Gamma^M D_M\widetilde\lambda)
+ \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}e(\psi_M\Gamma^N\Gamma^M\widetilde\lambda_j)\partial_N\varphi
+ \cdots ,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the dots represent terms with gauge fields and four-fermion terms, which play no role in the following analysis. The supersymmetry transformation rules for the spinor fields are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-27"><label>(2.27)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation28"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\psi_M &= D_M\epsilon,\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-28"><label>(2.28)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation29"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\lambda_i &= \frac{1}{2}P_{M ij}\Gamma^M\rho_j\epsilon ,\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-29"><label>(2.29)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation30"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\widetilde\lambda &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}D_M\varphi\Gamma^M\epsilon .
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We want to obtain codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation238"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> brane solutions by solving the Killing spinor equations. We use <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation239"><![CDATA[$x^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation240"><![CDATA[$\mu=0,1,\ldots,6$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation241"><![CDATA[$x^m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation242"><![CDATA[$m=7,8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) for longitudinal and transverse coordinates, respectively. We take the ansatz
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-30"><label>(2.30)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation31"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L^\alpha{}_i = L^\alpha{}_i(x^m),\quad
\varphi = \varphi(x^m), \quad
e^{\hat{\mu}} = \delta^{\hat{\mu}}_\mu dx^\mu, \quad
e^a = g(x^m)\delta^a_m dx^m, \quad
\epsilon = \epsilon(x^m) .
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>In fact, the solution is almost the same as that of the type IIB case. Although we have extra fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation243"><![CDATA[$\varphi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation244"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compared to the ten-dimensional case, the condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation245"><![CDATA[$\delta\widetilde\lambda = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> forces <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation246"><![CDATA[$\varphi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> to be constant;
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-31"><label>(2.31)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation32"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\partial_m\varphi\Gamma^m\epsilon
\quad
\rightarrow
\quad
\partial_m\varphi = 0.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Therefore, we can forget about <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation247"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation248"><![CDATA[$\varphi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and the remaining fields give a set of equations identical to the ten-dimensional case. After some gauge choices the general solution is given by
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-32"><label>(2.32)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation33"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\varphi&=\mathrm{const} , \\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-33"><label>(2.33)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation34"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L^\alpha{}_i&=K(\tau),\quad
\tau=\tau_1 + i\tau_2 : \mbox{holomorphic function} , \\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-34"><label>(2.34)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation35"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
ds^2&=\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+\tau_2dx^m dx^m.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>A solution is specified by a single holomorphic function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation249"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and a constant vacuum expectation value of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation250"><![CDATA[$\varphi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Codimenison-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation251"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> brane solutions appear as singularities of the function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation252"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2.3"><title>2.3. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation253"><![CDATA[$D=8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>The scalar and fermion fields in eight-dimensional maximal supergravity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>] are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>. Classical <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation254"><![CDATA[$p$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-brane solutions with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation255"><![CDATA[$p=0,1,3,4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. Half BPS solutions of ten-dimensional supergravity given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] can be regarded as codimension-2 branes in eight-dimensional supergravity. In the following we construct general 5-brane solutions without assuming a ten-dimensional supergravity description.</p>
<p><table-wrap id="T4" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 4.</label><caption><p>Quantum numbers of scalar and spinor fields in eight-dimensional maximal supergravity. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation256"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge of each component of a spinor is proportional to the chirality.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">&#160;</th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation257"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation258"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation259"><![CDATA[$\widetilde L^{\widetilde\alpha}{}_{\widetilde i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation260"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{3}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation261"><![CDATA[$0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation262"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation263"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation264"><![CDATA[$\pm 1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation265"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation266"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation267"><![CDATA[$\frac{1}{2}\Gamma_9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation268"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation269"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation270"><![CDATA[$\frac{3}{2}\Gamma_9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation271"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda_{\widetilde i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation272"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{4}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation273"><![CDATA[$-\frac{1}{2}\Gamma_9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></p>
<p>The scalar manifold of the eight-dimensional maximal supergravity is the direct product of two homogeneous spaces: <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation274"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{Z})/SO(2)_R\times SL(3,\mathbb{Z})/SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Each factor can be interpreted geometrically in an appropriate duality frame. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation275"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{Z})/SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> becomes manifest when we regard the theory as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation276"><![CDATA[$T^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compactification of type IIB theory, while <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation277"><![CDATA[$SL(3,\mathbb{Z})/SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be regarded as the moduli space associated with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation278"><![CDATA[$T^3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compactification of M-theory. The S-duality group in the type IIB picture is a subgroup of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation279"><![CDATA[$SL(3,\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>For each factor of the R-symmetry group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation280"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R\times SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> there is an associated dilatino field. We denote fields associated with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation281"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation283"><![CDATA[$\lambda^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation284"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. All fermion fields have implicit spinor indices for all <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation285"><![CDATA[$SO(1,7)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation286"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation287"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In addition, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation288"><![CDATA[$\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation289"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> have <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation290"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation291"><![CDATA[$SO(3)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vector indices, respectively, and they satisfy the traceless conditions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation292"><![CDATA[$\rho_i\lambda^i=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation293"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\rho_{\widetilde i}\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Namely, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation294"><![CDATA[$\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation295"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> belong to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation296"><![CDATA[$2_{\pm\frac{3}{2}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation297"><![CDATA[$4_{\pm\frac{1}{2}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively, of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation298"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R\times SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The Lagrangian is
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-35"><label>(2.35)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation36"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
{\cal L}
&=\frac{e}{4}R
+\frac{e}{2}(\psi_M\Gamma^{MNP}D_N\psi_P)
\nonumber\\
&\quad
-\frac{e}{4}(P_M{}^{ij})^2
+\frac{e}{2}(\lambda_i\Gamma^ND_N\lambda_i)
+\frac{e}{2}P_M{}^{ij}(\psi_N\Gamma^M\Gamma^N\rho_i\lambda_j)
\nonumber\\
&\quad
-\frac{e}{4}(\widetilde P_M{}^{\widetilde i\widetilde j})^2
-\frac{e}{2}(\widetilde\lambda_{\widetilde i}\Gamma^ND_N\widetilde\lambda_{\widetilde i})
+i\frac{e}{2}\widetilde P_M{}^{\widetilde i\widetilde j}(\psi_N\Gamma^M\Gamma^N\Gamma_{\widetilde i}\widetilde\lambda_{\widetilde j})
+ \cdots
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the dots represent four-fermion terms and terms with gauge fields. The supersymmetry transformation laws of fermions are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-36"><label>(2.36)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation37"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\psi_M&=D_M\epsilon,\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-37"><label>(2.37)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation38"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\lambda^i&=\frac{1}{2}P_M{}^{ij}\Gamma^M\rho_j\epsilon,\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-38"><label>(2.38)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation39"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}&=\frac{i}{2}\widetilde P_M{}^{\widetilde i\widetilde j}\Gamma^M\widetilde\rho_{\widetilde j}\epsilon.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We are interested in codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation299"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> brane solutions and we use <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation300"><![CDATA[$x^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation301"><![CDATA[$\mu=0,1,\ldots,5$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation302"><![CDATA[$x^m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation303"><![CDATA[$m=6,7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) for longitudinal and transverse coordinates, respectively. We take the following ansatz:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-39"><label>(2.39)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation40"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L^\alpha{}_i=L^\alpha{}_i(x^m),\quad
\widetilde L^{\widetilde\alpha}{}_{\widetilde i}=\widetilde L^{\widetilde\alpha}{}_{\widetilde i}(x^m),\quad
e^{\hat{\mu}}=\delta^{\hat{\mu}}_\mu dx^\mu,\quad
e^a=g(x^m)\delta^a_mdx^m,\quad
\epsilon=\epsilon(x^m) .
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The covariant derivative <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation304"><![CDATA[$D_M\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> contains three connections, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation305"><![CDATA[$\omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation306"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation307"><![CDATA[$\widetilde Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, corresponding to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation308"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{67}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation309"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation310"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. For the existence of non-trivial solution to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation311"><![CDATA[$\delta\psi_m=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the actions of the three connections to some components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation312"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be pure gauge. For this to be the case, non-vanishing components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation313"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> connection <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation314"><![CDATA[$\widetilde Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> should be in a certain <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation315"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> subgroup of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation316"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We can take the gauge such that it is rotation of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation317"><![CDATA[$\widetilde 1 \widetilde 2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> plane and
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-40"><label>(2.40)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation41"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\widetilde Q^{\widetilde i\widetilde3}=0.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>After taking this gauge, we have three <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation318"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> connections, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation319"><![CDATA[$\omega_{67}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation320"><![CDATA[$Q_{12}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation321"><![CDATA[$\widetilde Q_{\widetilde 1\widetilde 2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. As in the ten-dimensional case it is convenient to divide the parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation322"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> into components <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation323"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> so that
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-41"><label>(2.41)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation42"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\frac{1}{2}\Gamma_{67}\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r}=is\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r},\quad
\frac{1}{2}\rho_{12}\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r}=ir\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r},\quad
\frac{1}{2}\widetilde\rho_{12}\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r}=i\widetilde r\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where all of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation324"><![CDATA[$s$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation325"><![CDATA[$r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation326"><![CDATA[$\widetilde r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> take values in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation327"><![CDATA[$\{+\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2}\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For distinction we introduce the notation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation328"><![CDATA[$s\in\{\uparrow,\downarrow\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation329"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{67}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation330"><![CDATA[$r\in\{+,-\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation331"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation332"><![CDATA[$\widetilde r\in\{\widetilde +,\widetilde -\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation333"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We also introduce <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation334"><![CDATA[$\{\oplus,\ominus\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the complex basis of an <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation335"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vector and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation336"><![CDATA[$\{\widetilde\oplus,\widetilde\ominus,\widetilde 3\}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the basis of an <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation337"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vector that diagonalizes <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation338"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{\widetilde 1\widetilde 2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The six-dimensional chirality of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation339"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation340"><![CDATA[$s$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation341"><![CDATA[$\widetilde r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-42"><label>(2.42)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation43"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\gamma_7\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r} = \mathrm{sign}(s\widetilde r)\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We want to consider a solution in which some of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation342"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{sr\widetilde r}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are preserved. Without loss of generality, we can suppose that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation343"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and its complex conjugate <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation344"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow-\widetilde-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are non-vanishing. Both of them have positive six-dimensional chirality Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-42">2.42</xref>), and they generate six-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation345"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(1,0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetry.</p>
<p>Let us consider the condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation346"><![CDATA[$\delta\lambda=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> first. The component of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation347"><![CDATA[$\delta\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> depending on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation348"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-43"><label>(2.43)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation44"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\lambda^\oplus_{\downarrow-\widetilde +}
&= P^{\oplus\oplus}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde +}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>For this to hold for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation349"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde +}\neq0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation350"><![CDATA[$P^{\oplus\oplus}_{z^*}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must vanish. This is the same as Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-14">2.14</xref>) in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC2.1">Sect. 2.1</xref>, and the solution is given by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation351"><![CDATA[$L=K(\tau)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation352"><![CDATA[$K(\tau)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-16">2.16</xref>) with a holomorphic function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation353"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>We can also obtain a similar condition for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation354"><![CDATA[$\widetilde L$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation355"><![CDATA[$\delta\widetilde\lambda=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation356"><![CDATA[$\delta\widetilde\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> depending on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation357"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation358"><![CDATA[$\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\downarrow +\widetilde\pm}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and we obtain the following Killing spinor equations:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-44"><label>(2.44)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation45"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\downarrow+\widetilde +}
&= \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde 3}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde +},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-45"><label>(2.45)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation46"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\downarrow+\widetilde -}
&= i\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde\oplus}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde +}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-44">2.44</xref>) requires <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation359"><![CDATA[$\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde3}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and combining this with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-40">2.40</xref>) we conclude that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation360"><![CDATA[$L$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is essentially an <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation361"><![CDATA[$SL(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> element. Namely, in an appropriate choice of gauge it is given by
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-46"><label>(2.46)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation47"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\widetilde L^{\widetilde\alpha}{}_{\widetilde i} = \widetilde L_0
\begin{pmatrix}
K(\widetilde\tau) & 0\\
0 & 1
\end{pmatrix} \quad
(\widetilde\tau\equiv\widetilde\tau_1+i\widetilde\tau_2\in H_+) ,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation362"><![CDATA[$\widetilde L_0\in SL(3,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a constant matrix. The condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation363"><![CDATA[$\widetilde P^{i\widetilde\oplus}_{z^*}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> obtained from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-45">2.45</xref>) requires the function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation364"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> to be a holomorphic function of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation365"><![CDATA[$z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>Finally, we can determine the function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation366"><![CDATA[$g$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> by using <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation367"><![CDATA[$\delta\psi_m=D_m\epsilon=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For this equation to hold for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation368"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow +\widetilde+}\neq0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the sum of three connections <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation369"><![CDATA[$\omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation370"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation371"><![CDATA[$\widetilde Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be pure gauge, and we can take the gauge in which
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-47"><label>(2.47)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation48"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\omega_{m67} + Q_{m12} + \widetilde Q_{m\widetilde 1\widetilde 2} =0.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This gives the differential equation
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-48"><label>(2.48)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation49"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\frac{i}{g}\partial_z g
&= \frac{i}{2\tau_2}\partial_z\tau_2 + \frac{i}{2\widetilde\tau_2}\partial_z\widetilde\tau_2,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
which is solved by
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-49"><label>(2.49)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation50"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
g = c\sqrt{\tau_2\widetilde\tau_2},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation372"><![CDATA[$c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a positive real constant, which can be absorbed by the coordinate change <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation373"><![CDATA[$cx^m\rightarrow x^m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The solution is summarized as follows:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-50"><label>(2.50)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation51"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L^\alpha{}_i &=K(\tau),\quad\tau=\tau_1+i\tau_2,\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-51"><label>(2.51)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation52"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\widetilde L^{\widetilde\alpha}{}_{\widetilde i} &= \widetilde L_0
\begin{pmatrix}
K(\widetilde\tau) & 0\\
0 & 1
\end{pmatrix}\!,
\quad
\widetilde L_0\in SL(3,\mathbb{R}),\quad
\widetilde\tau =\widetilde\tau_1+i\widetilde\tau_2 , \\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-52"><label>(2.52)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation53"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
ds^2 & =\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+\tau_2\widetilde\tau_2dx^m dx^m.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This is the general form of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation374"><![CDATA[$1/4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions. A solution is specified by two holomorphic functions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation375"><![CDATA[$\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation376"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\tau(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and constant <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation377"><![CDATA[$\widetilde L_0\in SL(3,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation378"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions are realized as special cases of this solution. Let us consider the case in which the supersymmetries associated with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation379"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow-\widetilde +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and its conjugate <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation380"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow+\widetilde -}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are also preserved in addition to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation381"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and its conjugate <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation382"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow-\widetilde -}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-42">2.42</xref>) shows that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation383"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow-\widetilde +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation384"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow+\widetilde -}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> have negative six-dimensional chirality and we have <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation385"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(1,1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetry in this case. The Killing spinor equations including <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation386"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow-\widetilde +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-53"><label>(2.53)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation54"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\lambda^\ominus_{\downarrow+\widetilde +}
&= P^{\ominus\ominus}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow-\widetilde +},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-54"><label>(2.54)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation55"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\downarrow-\widetilde +}
&=\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde 3}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow-\widetilde +},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-55"><label>(2.55)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation56"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\downarrow-\widetilde -}
&=i\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde\oplus}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow-\widetilde +},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-56"><label>(2.56)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation57"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\psi_{m,\uparrow-\widetilde +}
&=D_m\epsilon_{\uparrow-\widetilde +}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We have the additional condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation387"><![CDATA[$P^{\boldsymbol{--}}_{z^*}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-53">2.53</xref>), and this requires <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation388"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> to be anti-holomorphic. This means <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation389"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be a constant. Then the other equations hold.</p>
<p>There is another type of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation390"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solution with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation391"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde -},\epsilon_{\downarrow-\widetilde +}\neq0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-42">2.42</xref>) shows that these components have positive six-dimensional chirality, and we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation392"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{N}=(2,0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetry in six dimensions. The Killing spinor equations including <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation393"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde -}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-57"><label>(2.57)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation58"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\lambda^\oplus_{\downarrow-\widetilde -}
&= P^{\oplus\oplus}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde -}, \\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-58"><label>(2.58)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation59"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\downarrow+\widetilde -}
&= \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde 3}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde -},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-59"><label>(2.59)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation60"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\downarrow+\widetilde +}
&=\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde\ominus}_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde -},
\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-60"><label>(2.60)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation61"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\psi_{m,\uparrow+\widetilde -}
&=D_m\epsilon_{\uparrow+\widetilde -}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-59">2.59</xref>) gives the new condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation394"><![CDATA[$\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde\ominus}_{z^*}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and this means <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation395"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a constant. Then the other conditions are satisfied.</p>
<p>Finally, let us consider the case with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation396"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow +\widetilde+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation397"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow -\widetilde-}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> non-vanishing. The Killing spinor equations including <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation398"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow+\widetilde +}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-61"><label>(2.61)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation62"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\lambda^\oplus_{\uparrow-\widetilde +}
&= P^{\oplus\oplus}_{z}\epsilon_{\downarrow+\widetilde +},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-62"><label>(2.62)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation63"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\uparrow+\widetilde +}
&= \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde 3}_{z}\epsilon_{\downarrow+\widetilde +}, \\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-63"><label>(2.63)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation64"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\widetilde\lambda^{\widetilde i}_{\uparrow+\widetilde -}
&= i\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde\oplus}_{z}\epsilon_{\downarrow+\widetilde +},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-64"><label>(2.64)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation65"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\psi_m
&=D_m\epsilon_{\downarrow+\widetilde +}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The first gives the additional condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation399"><![CDATA[$P^{\oplus\oplus}_{z}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which requires <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation400"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> to be a constant, and the third gives <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation401"><![CDATA[$\widetilde P^{\widetilde i\widetilde\oplus}_{z}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and this means constant <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation402"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Then, the solution becomes the trivial flat solution, and all supersymmetries are preserved.</p>
<p>We summarize the non-trivial BPS solutions in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>. As shown there, two holomorphic functions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation403"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation404"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> correspond to two types of branes. Namely, singularities of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation405"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation406"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> give <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation407"><![CDATA[$5$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-branes with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation408"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(2,0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation409"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(1,1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetry, respectively. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation410"><![CDATA[$1/4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation411"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(1,0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetry are regarded as simple superposition of two types of branes.</p>
<p><table-wrap id="T5" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 5.</label><caption><p>The non-trivial 5-brane solutions in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation412"><![CDATA[$D=8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supergravity and worldvolume supersymmetries.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">&#160;</th>
<th align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation413"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(1,0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation414"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(1,1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation415"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(2,0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation416"><![CDATA[$\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left">holomorphic</td>
<td align="left">constant</td>
<td align="left">holomorphic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation417"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\tau$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left">holomorphic</td>
<td align="left">holomorphic</td>
<td align="left">constant</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></p>
<p>The most general <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation418"><![CDATA[$1/4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions are embedded in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation419"><![CDATA[$SL(2)\times SL(2)\subset SL(2)\times SL(3)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. These two <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation420"><![CDATA[$SL(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> factors are manifest in the type IIB frame. Namely, the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation421"><![CDATA[$SL(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> factor that is a subgroup of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation422"><![CDATA[$SL(3)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be associated with the axio-dilaton field in type IIB theory, and the other <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation423"><![CDATA[$SL(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is associated with the internal space <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation424"><![CDATA[$T^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. From the viewpoint of F-theory the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation425"><![CDATA[$1/4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solution can be regarded as a compactification of the F-theory in a Calabi&#x2013;Yau realized as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation426"><![CDATA[$T^4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> fibration over <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation427"><![CDATA[$\mathbb{C}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2.4"><title>2.4. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation428"><![CDATA[$D=7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>The seven-dimensional maximal supergravity has the field contents in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. The scalar manifold of seven-dimensional maximal supergravity is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation429"><![CDATA[$SL(5)/SO(5)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. There is no duality frame which manifests the whole of the duality group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation430"><![CDATA[$SL(5,\mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the R-symmetry group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation431"><![CDATA[$SO(5)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. When we regard the system as the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation432"><![CDATA[$T^4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compactification of M-theory <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation433"><![CDATA[$SL(4)/SO(4)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> becomes manifest, while <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation434"><![CDATA[$T^3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compactification of type IIB theory manifests <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation435"><![CDATA[$SL(3)/SO(3)\times SL(2)/SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Combining these we obtain the full symmetry.</p>
<p><table-wrap id="T6" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 6.</label><caption><p>The field contents of seven-dimensional maximal supergravity. Anti-symmetric tensor fields are omitted.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">&#160;</th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation436"><![CDATA[$SO(5)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="left">&#160;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation437"><![CDATA[$e_M^{\widehat M}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation438"><![CDATA[$1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left">vielbein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation439"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation440"><![CDATA[$5$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left">scalars</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation441"><![CDATA[$\psi_M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation442"><![CDATA[$4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left">gravitino</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation443"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation444"><![CDATA[$16$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="left">dilatino, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation445"><![CDATA[$\rho_i\lambda_i=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap></p>
<p>The relevant part of the Lagrangian is
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-65"><label>(2.65)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation66"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
{\cal L}
&=\frac{e}{2}R
-\frac{e}{2}(\overline\psi_M\Gamma^{MNP}D_N\psi_P)
\nonumber\\
&\quad
-\frac{e}{2}P_{Mij}P^{Mij}
-\frac{e}{2}(\overline\lambda^i\Gamma^M D_M\lambda_i)
+\frac{e}{2}(\overline\psi_M\Gamma^N\Gamma^M\rho^i\lambda^j)P_{Nij},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and the supersymmetry transformation rules for fermions are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-66"><label>(2.66)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation67"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\psi_M
&=D_M\epsilon,\nonumber\\
\delta\lambda_i
&=\frac{1}{2}P_{Mij}\Gamma^M\rho^j\epsilon.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The transformation parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation446"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> belongs to the spinor representation of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation447"><![CDATA[$H=SO(5)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and the covariant derivative <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation448"><![CDATA[$D_M\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> includes the connection <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation449"><![CDATA[$Q_{Mij}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>We are interested in codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation450"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> brane solutions and we use <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation451"><![CDATA[$x^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation452"><![CDATA[$\mu=0,1,\ldots,4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation453"><![CDATA[$x^m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation454"><![CDATA[$m=5,6$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) for longitudinal and transverse coordinates, respectively. By assuming the Poincar&#x00E9; invariance in the five dimensions parallel to the brane, we take the following ansatz:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-67"><label>(2.67)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation68"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L=L(x^m),\quad
e^{\widehat\mu}=\delta^{\widehat\mu}_\mu dx^\mu,\quad
e^a=g(x^m)\delta^a_mdx^m,\quad
\epsilon=\epsilon(x^m).
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Let us first consider the case with the minimum number of unbroken supersymmetries. The supersymmetry parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation455"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> belongs to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation456"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{4}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation457"><![CDATA[$SO(5)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> symmetry, and in the minimum case we have only one non-vanishing component. Then the R-symmetry is broken to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation458"><![CDATA[$SU(2)\times U(1)\subset SO(5)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>It is convenient to consider the intermediate subgroup <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation459"><![CDATA[$SU(2)_l\times SU(2)_r\sim SO(4)\subset SO(5)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation460"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is decomposed into four irreducible representations <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation461"><![CDATA[$(2,1)_{\pm\frac{1}{2}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation462"><![CDATA[$(1,2)_{\pm\frac{1}{2}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation463"><![CDATA[$SU(2)_l\times SU(2)_r\times SO(2)_{56}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation464"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{56}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the local Lorentz symmetry in the transverse space.) We denote them as
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-68"><label>(2.68)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation69"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\epsilon\rightarrow\{\epsilon_{s,a},\epsilon_{s,\dot a}\},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation465"><![CDATA[$s=\uparrow,\downarrow$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> represent the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation466"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_{56}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charges and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation467"><![CDATA[$a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation468"><![CDATA[$\dot a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are indices for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation469"><![CDATA[$SU(2)_l$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation470"><![CDATA[$SU(2)_r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. The fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation471"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation472"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are decomposed as
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-69"><label>(2.69)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation70"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
Q_{ij}\rightarrow\{Q_{a\dot a},Q_{(ab)},Q_{(\dot a\dot b)}\},\quad
P_{ij}\rightarrow
\{P,P_{a\dot b},P_{(ab)(\dot a\dot b)}\},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and the dilatino <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation473"><![CDATA[$\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-70"><label>(2.70)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation71"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\lambda\rightarrow
\{\lambda_{s a},
\lambda_{s\dot a},
\lambda_{s(ab)\dot a},
\lambda_{sa(\dot a\dot b)}\},
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where a pair of indices in parenthesis are symmetric. If we choose <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation474"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\dot1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as the component for the unbroken supersymmetry, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation475"><![CDATA[$SU(2)_r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is broken to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation476"><![CDATA[$U(1)_r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The connection <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation477"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> should take its value in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation478"><![CDATA[$SU(2)_l\times U(1)_r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Namely, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation479"><![CDATA[$Q_{a\dot a}=Q_{\dot1\dot1}=Q_{\dot2\dot2}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the only non-vanishing components are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-71"><label>(2.71)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation72"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
Q_{(ab)},\quad
Q_{\dot1\dot2}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation480"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow\dot a}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> appear in the supersymmetry transformation as
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-72"><label>(2.72)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation73"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\lambda_{\downarrow a}&=P_{z^*a\dot b}\epsilon_{\uparrow}^{\dot b},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-73"><label>(2.73)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation74"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\lambda_{\downarrow\dot a}&=P_{z^*}\epsilon_{\uparrow\dot a},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-74"><label>(2.74)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation75"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\lambda_{\downarrow(ab)\dot a}&=P_{z^*(ab)(\dot a\dot b)}\epsilon_{\uparrow}^{\dot b},\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-75"><label>(2.75)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation76"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\delta\lambda_{\downarrow a(\dot a\dot b)}&=P_{z^*a(\dot a}\epsilon_{\uparrow\dot b)}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>(We omitted the numerical coefficients that are not important here.) If we require <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation481"><![CDATA[$\delta\lambda=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation482"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\uparrow\dot1}\neq 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation483"><![CDATA[$P_{z^*}=P_{z^*a\dot a}=P_{z^*(ab)(\dot a\dot2)}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the only non-vanishing components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation484"><![CDATA[$P_{z^*}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-76"><label>(2.76)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation77"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
P_{z^*(ab)(\dot1\dot1)}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>(We also have similar conditions for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation485"><![CDATA[$P_z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> from the equations containing <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation486"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\downarrow\dot 2}\sim(\epsilon_{\uparrow\dot 1})^*$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.) Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-71">2.71</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-76">2.76</xref>) show that non-vanishing components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation487"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation488"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are associated with a subgroup <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation489"><![CDATA[$SO(4)\subset SO(5)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. As we mentioned above, the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation490"><![CDATA[$SO(4)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> subgroup of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation491"><![CDATA[$SO(5)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be realized geometrically if we regard the theory as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation492"><![CDATA[$T^4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compactification of M-theory.</p>
<p>We want to give the scalar fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation493"><![CDATA[$L$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation494"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation495"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> have only the non-vanishing components of Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-76">2.76</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-71">2.71</xref>). Unfortunately, we have not obtained the answer. To simplify the problem, let us consider a restricted case with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation496"><![CDATA[$P_{(12)}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Then <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation497"><![CDATA[$F^{(Q)}=P\wedge P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> takes value in the Cartan part of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation498"><![CDATA[$SU(2)\times U(1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and we can take the gauge such that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation499"><![CDATA[$Q_{(11)}=Q_{(22)}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>; then the non-vanishing components are
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-77"><label>(2.77)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation78"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
Q_{(12)},\quad
Q_{(\dot 1\dot 2)},\quad
P_{(11)(\dot1\dot1)},\quad
P_{(22)(\dot1\dot1)}.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>In this case, with an appropriate real basis, the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation500"><![CDATA[$5\times5$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrices <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation501"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation502"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are block diagonal matrices in the following form:
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-78"><label>(2.78)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation79"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
Q=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
Q' & & \\
& Q'' & \\
&& 0
\end{array}\right)\!,\quad
P=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
P' & & \\
& P'' & \\
&& 0
\end{array}\right)\!.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Therefore, the solution reduces to the superposition of two copies of solutions for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation503"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> scalar manifold. In the same way as in higher dimensions, each <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation504"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> part can be expressed in terms of a holomorphic function. Let the two holomorphic functions be <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation505"><![CDATA[$\tau'$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation506"><![CDATA[$\tau''$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The solution is given by
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-79"><label>(2.79)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation80"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
L^\alpha{}_i&=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
K(\tau') \\
& K(\tau'') \\
&&0
\end{array}\right)\!,\\
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-80"><label>(2.80)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation81"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
ds^2&=\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu+\tau'_2\tau''_2dx^m dx^m.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>As a special case of this <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation507"><![CDATA[$1/4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solution we can realize the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation508"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solution. Let us consider the cases where there is another Killing spinor in addition to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation509"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\dot1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. There are two cases.</p>
<p>First, let us consider the case that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation510"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is also a Killing spinor. In this case, from
<disp-formula id="pty045-M2-81"><label>(2.81)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation82"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
0=\delta\lambda_{\downarrow(\dot a\dot b)a}=P_{z^*(ab)(\dot a\dot b)}\epsilon_{\uparrow}^b
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation511"><![CDATA[$P_{z^*(a2)(\dot a\dot b)}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Then the only non-vanishing component of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation512"><![CDATA[$P_{z^*}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation513"><![CDATA[$P_{z^*(11)(\dot1\dot1)}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In this case, just like the case of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation514"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solution in eight dimensions, we can show that one of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation515"><![CDATA[$\tau'$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation516"><![CDATA[$\tau''$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be a <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation517"><![CDATA[$z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-independent constant.</p>
<p>If two Killing spinors have the same <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation518"><![CDATA[$SO(4)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> chirality, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-74">2.74</xref>) requires <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation519"><![CDATA[$P_{z^*(ab)(\dot a\dot b)}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Namely, all components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation520"><![CDATA[$P$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> vanish. Because <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation521"><![CDATA[$F^{(Q)}=P\wedge P=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> we can choose a gauge with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation522"><![CDATA[$Q=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the solution is trivial.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC3"><title>3. Conclusions</title>
<p>In this paper we investigated codimension-2 BPS solutions in maximal supergravities in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation523"><![CDATA[$9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation524"><![CDATA[$8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation525"><![CDATA[$7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> dimensions. We assumed the Poincar&#x00E9; invariance along branes and vanishing of various gauge fields.</p>
<p>The scalar manifold of nine-dimensional maximal supergravity is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation526"><![CDATA[$(SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2))\times\mathbb{R}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In a BPS solution the scalar field associated with the factor <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation527"><![CDATA[$\mathbb{R}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> must be constant and play no role. Therefore, the solutions are essentially the same as those of type IIB supergravity in ten dimensions, and simply interpreted as the double dimensional reduction of type IIB <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation528"><![CDATA[$7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-branes.</p>
<p>In eight dimensions, the scalar manifold consists of the two factors <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation529"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation530"><![CDATA[$SL(3,\mathbb{R})/SO(3)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The Killing spinor equations associated with these factors decouple, and we can solve them one by one. From the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation531"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> part we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation532"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS branes on which six-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation533"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(2,0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetry is realized, while from the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation534"><![CDATA[$SL(3,\mathbb{R})/SO(3)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> part we obtain <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation535"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions on which six-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation536"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=(1,1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> supersymmetry is realized. The latter is always embedded in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation537"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)\subset SL(3,\mathbb{R})/SO(3)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. These two types of solutions have essentially the same structure as the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation538"><![CDATA[$7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-brane solution in ten dimensions. Namely, each type of classical solution is specified by a holomorphic function and singularities of the function give branes. We also found <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation539"><![CDATA[$1/4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions, which are specified by two holomorphic functions and are regarded as simple superposition of two types of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation540"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions. If we regard the eight-dimensional supergravity as the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation541"><![CDATA[$T^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> compactification of type IIB theory, the two copies of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation542"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are associated with the complex moduli of the torus and the axio-dilaton field in type IIB theory, and both are geometrically realized in F-theory.</p>
<p>In seven dimensions, a generic BPS solution is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation543"><![CDATA[$1/4$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS. We showed that such solution can be embedded in <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation544"><![CDATA[$SL(4,\mathbb{R})/SO(4)\subset SL(5,\mathbb{R})/SO(5)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This means the solution can be realized as a geometric compactification of M-theory. We could not solve the Killing spinor solutions in the general situation. We introduced one additional restriction to simplify the problem, and then the solution is factorized into two copies of solutions associated with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation545"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Again, similarly to the eight-dimensional case, the solution can be regarded as a simple superposition of two <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation546"><![CDATA[$1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> BPS solutions.</p>
<p>Although our original motivation for this work was to find essentially new BPS branes, all the solutions we found have simple geometric realization in M- or F-theory.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We would like to thank Tetsuji Kimura for valuable discussions. The work of Y.I. was partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 15K05044), Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.</p>
</ack>
<sec><title>Funding</title>
<p>Open Access funding: SCOAP<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation547"><![CDATA[$^3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SECA"><title>Appendix. Notes on our notation</title>
<p>We denote the Dirac matrices for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation548"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> group by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation549"><![CDATA[$\rho_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation550"><![CDATA[$i=1,2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>). We use the representation
<disp-formula id="pty045-MA1"><label>(A1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation83"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\rho_1=\sigma_x,\quad
\rho_2=\sigma_y,
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation551"><![CDATA[$\sigma_{x,y,z}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the Pauli matrices. We use lower indices <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation552"><![CDATA[$a,b,\ldots$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for two-component spinors, and thus the matrices acting on them have lower and upper indices like <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation553"><![CDATA[$(\rho_i)_a{}^b$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For components of spinors we define the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation554"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge as eigenvalues of the generator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation555"><![CDATA[$(-i/2)\rho_{12}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This means the upper and the lower components of spinors carry the charges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation556"><![CDATA[$+1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation557"><![CDATA[$-1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. To specify these components of a spinor <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation558"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> we use the notation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation559"><![CDATA[$\chi_+$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation560"><![CDATA[$\chi_-$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
<p>For the analysis of the Killing spinor equations it is convenient to use a complex basis for vectors. For example, for a vector <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation561"><![CDATA[$v^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation562"><![CDATA[$i=1,2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) we define <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation563"><![CDATA[$v^\oplus=v_\ominus=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(v^1+iv^2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation564"><![CDATA[$v^\ominus=v_\oplus=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(v^1-iv^2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation565"><![CDATA[$\rho^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> we have
<disp-formula id="pty045-MA2"><label>(A2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation84"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\rho^\oplus=\rho_\ominus=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
0 & \sqrt2 \\
0 & 0
\end{array}\right)\!,\quad
\rho^\ominus=\rho_\oplus=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
0 & 0 \\
\sqrt2 & 0\
\end{array}\right)\!.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>With this representation the lower index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation566"><![CDATA[$\oplus$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and upper index <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation567"><![CDATA[$\ominus$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> carry <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation568"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation569"><![CDATA[$+1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, while the lower <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation570"><![CDATA[$\ominus$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and upper <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation571"><![CDATA[$\oplus$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> carry <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation572"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation573"><![CDATA[$-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This is checked by looking at the non-vanishing components of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation574"><![CDATA[$\rho^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For example, the non-vanishing component of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation575"><![CDATA[$\rho_\oplus$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation576"><![CDATA[$(\rho_\oplus)_-{}^+$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and the total charge of this component must be zero. The statement above about <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation577"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge is consistent with this.</p>
<p>For the local rotation symmetry in the transverse space to branes we use up and down for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation578"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge (spin) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation579"><![CDATA[$\pm1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. With the choice of the Dirac matrices, the lower indices <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation580"><![CDATA[$z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation581"><![CDATA[$z^*$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> carry spin <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation582"><![CDATA[$+1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation583"><![CDATA[$-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
<p>In eight dimensions we also deal with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation584"><![CDATA[$SO(3)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> symmetry. The notation is basically the same as the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation585"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> case except that we put tildes on variables and indices to distinguish them from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation586"><![CDATA[$SO(2)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> objects. We specify components of spinors by eigenvalues of the Cartan generator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation587"><![CDATA[$(-i/2)\widetilde\rho_{\widetilde 1\widetilde 2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation588"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\chi_{\widetilde\pm}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> carry the charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation589"><![CDATA[$\pm1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and a vector <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation590"><![CDATA[$\widetilde v$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has three components, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation591"><![CDATA[$\widetilde v^{\widetilde\ominus}=\widetilde v_{\widetilde\oplus}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation592"><![CDATA[$\widetilde v^{\widetilde\oplus}=\widetilde v_{\widetilde\ominus}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation593"><![CDATA[$\widetilde v^3=\widetilde v_3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, that carry the Cartan charges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation594"><![CDATA[$+1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation595"><![CDATA[$-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation596"><![CDATA[$0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
<p>In the following we give relations of the fields in this paper and those in the references. We will not give detailed explanations for normalization of fields, spinor conventions, etc., because they are not important in our analysis of the Killing spinor equations. We focus on giving a rough correspondence between the fields used in this paper and those in the references.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SECA1"><title><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation597"><![CDATA[$D=10$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>Ten-dimensional supergravity is given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] . The global symmetry <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation598"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is isomorphic to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation599"><![CDATA[$SU(1,1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] the scalar fields are expressed as the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation600"><![CDATA[$V_\pm^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which is defined with a complex basis natural for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation601"><![CDATA[$SU(1,1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The real matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation602"><![CDATA[$L^\alpha{}_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> used in this paper is related to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation603"><![CDATA[$V$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> by
<disp-formula id="pty045-MA3"><label>(A3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation85"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\left(\begin{array}{cc}
V^1{}_- & V^1{}_+ \\
V^2{}_- & V^2{}_+
\end{array}\right)
=
U\left(\begin{array}{cc}
L^1{}_1 & L^1{}_2 \\
L^2{}_1 & L^2{}_2
\end{array}\right)U^\dagger,\quad
U=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1 & -i \\
1 & i
\end{array}\right)\!.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The dilatino field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation604"><![CDATA[$\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] is defined as the field with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation605"><![CDATA[$U(1)_R$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation606"><![CDATA[$\pm3/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, while we denote this as a field with vector and spinor indices. They are related by
<disp-formula id="pty045-MA4"><label>(A4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation86"><![CDATA[
\begin{align}
\lambda\sim \lambda_+^\ominus,\quad
\overline\lambda\sim \lambda_-^\oplus.
\end{align}]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Due to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation607"><![CDATA[$\rho$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-traceless condition, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation608"><![CDATA[$\lambda^\oplus_+=\lambda^\ominus_-=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SECA2"><title><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation609"><![CDATA[$D=9$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>The nine-dimensional maximal supergravity is given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. Two dilatino fields in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>] are renamed as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation610"><![CDATA[$\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation611"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> to match the fields in the other dimensions. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation612"><![CDATA[$SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> Dirac matrices are denoted by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation613"><![CDATA[$\tau_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>] while we use <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation614"><![CDATA[$\rho_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for them.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SECA3"><title><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation615"><![CDATA[$D=8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>The eight-dimensional maximal supergravity is given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. The dilatino field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation616"><![CDATA[$\chi_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>] does not satisfy the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation617"><![CDATA[$\rho$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-traceless condition, and we decompose it into the traceless part <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation618"><![CDATA[$\widetilde\lambda_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the trace part <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation619"><![CDATA[$\lambda_I$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. To make the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation620"><![CDATA[$SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> structure manifest we combine the scalar fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation621"><![CDATA[$\phi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation622"><![CDATA[$B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>] into the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation623"><![CDATA[$L^A{}_I$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. With a gauge choice like Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="pty045-M2-15">2.15</xref>) these are related by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation624"><![CDATA[$L=K(\tau)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation625"><![CDATA[$\tau=-2B+ie^{2\phi}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SECA4"><title><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation626"><![CDATA[$D=7$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></title>
<p>The seven-dimensional maximal supergravity is given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. In the reference the scalar matrix is denoted by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation627"><![CDATA[$\Pi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> instead of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation628"><![CDATA[$L$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The notation for other fields is similar to ours.</p>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Footnotes</title>
<fn id="FN1"><p><sup>1</sup> Non-trivial monodromies arise not only in systems of codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation629"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> branes but also in more general backgrounds with non-trivial fundamental groups. Indeed, the first example of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation630"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> theory in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>] is realized by using an orbifold <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation631"><![CDATA[$\mathbb{C}^3/\mathbb{Z}_k$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which has the fundamental group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation632"><![CDATA[$\mathbb{Z}_k$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Another example of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation633"><![CDATA[${\cal N}=3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> theories, in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], can be regarded as a realization with codimension-<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation634"><![CDATA[$2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> branes.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>[1]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Greene</surname><given-names>B. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Shapere</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Vafa</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yau</surname><given-names>S.-T.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>337</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage> (<year>1990</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(90)90248-C">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(90)90248-C</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>[2]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Argyres</surname><given-names>P. C.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Douglas</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>448</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage> (<year>1995</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9505062">arXiv:hep-th/9505062</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9505062">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00281-V">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00281-V</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>[3]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Argyres</surname><given-names>P. C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Plesser</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Seiberg</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Witten</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>461</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage> (<year>1996</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9511154">arXiv:hep-th/9511154</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9511154">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00671-0">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00671-0</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>[4]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Aharony</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Evtikhiev</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>04</volume>, <fpage>040</fpage> (<year>2016</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03524">arXiv:1512.03524</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1512.03524">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. . (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2016)040">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2016)040</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>[5]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-Etxebarria</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Regalado</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>03</volume>, <fpage>083</fpage> (<year>2016</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06434">arXiv:1512.06434</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1512.06434">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. . (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2016)083">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2016)083</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>[6]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-Etxebarria</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Regalado</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></string-name> <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>042</fpage> (<year>2017</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05769">arXiv:1611.05769</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1611.05769">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. . (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2017)042">https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2017)042</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>[7]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Elitzur</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Giveon</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kutasov</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Rabinovici</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>509</volume>, <fpage>122</fpage> (<year>1998</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9707217">arXiv:hep-th/9707217</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9707217">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00622-6">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00622-6</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>[8]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Obers</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pioline</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Phys. Rept.</source> <volume>318</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage> (<year>1999</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9809039">arXiv:hep-th/9809039</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9809039">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00004-6">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00004-6</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>[9]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>de Boer</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Shigemori</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>251603</fpage> (<year>2010</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2521">arXiv:1004.2521</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1004.2521">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.251603">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.251603</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>[10]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Vafa</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>396</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage> (<year>1997</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9611007">arXiv:hep-th/9611007</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9611007">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00108-1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00108-1</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>[11]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hull</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Townsend</surname><given-names>P. K.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>438</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage> (<year>1995</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9410167">arXiv:hep-th/9410167</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9410167">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)00559-W">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(94)00559-W</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>[12]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kodaira</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Ann. Math.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>563</fpage> (<year>1963</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/1970131">http://www.jstor.org/stable/1970131</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>[13]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sen</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>475</volume>, <fpage>562</fpage> (<year>1996</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9605150">arXiv:hep-th/9605150</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9605150">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00347-1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00347-1</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>[14]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Dasgupta</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Mukhi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>385</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage> (<year>1996</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9606044">arXiv:hep-th/9606044</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9606044">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00875-1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00875-1</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>[15]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Gaberdiel</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Zwiebach</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>518</volume>, <fpage>151</fpage> (<year>1998</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9709013">arXiv:hep-th/9709013</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9709013">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00841-9">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00841-9</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>[16]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Schwarz</surname><given-names>J. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>226</volume>, <fpage>269</fpage> (<year>1983</year>). . (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(83)90192-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(83)90192-X</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>[17]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nishino</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Rajpoot</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>546</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage> (<year>2002</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207246">arXiv:hep-th/0207246</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0207246">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02704-1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02704-1</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>[18]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Salam</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sezgin</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>258</volume>, <fpage>284</fpage> (<year>1985</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90613-3">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90613-3</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>[19]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>J. X.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>538</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage> (<year>1999</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9805180">arXiv:hep-th/9805180</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9805180">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00674-9">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00674-9</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>[20]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kimura</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>893</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage> (<year>2015</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8403">arXiv:1410.8403</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1410.8403">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.01.023">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.01.023</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><label>[21]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sezgin</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Salam</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>359</fpage> (<year>1982</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90204-0">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90204-0</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><label>[22]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pernici</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pilch</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>van Nieuwenhuizen</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage> (<year>1984</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)90813-X">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)90813-X</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
