<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing-oasis-article1-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PRL</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Physical Review Letters</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Phys. Rev. Lett.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0031-9007</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1079-7114</issn><publisher><publisher-name>American Physical Society</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.231803</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-major"><subject>LETTERS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-minor"><subject>Elementary Particles and Fields</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Extracting the Top-Quark Width from Nonresonant Production</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Herwig</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="n1"><sup>,*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ježo</surname><given-names>Tomáš</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="n2"><sup>,†</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nachman</surname><given-names>Benjamin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="a3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="n3"><sup>,‡</sup></xref></contrib><aff id="a1"><label><sup>1</sup></label>Department of Physics and Astronomy, <institution>University of Pennsylvania</institution>, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA</aff><aff id="a2"><label><sup>2</sup></label>Physics Institute, <institution>Universität Zürich</institution>, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland</aff><aff id="a3"><label><sup>3</sup></label>Physics Division, <institution>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory</institution>, Berkeley, California 94720, USA</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><fn id="n1"><label><sup>*</sup></label><p><email>herwig@sas.upenn.edu</email></p></fn><fn id="n2"><label><sup>†</sup></label><p><email>tomas.jezo@physik.uzh.ch</email></p></fn><fn id="n3"><label><sup>‡</sup></label><p><email>bpnachman@lbl.gov</email></p></fn></author-notes><pub-date iso-8601-date="2019-06-14" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date iso-8601-date="2019-06-14" date-type="pub" publication-format="print"><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>122</volume><issue>23</issue><elocation-id>231803</elocation-id><pub-history><event><date iso-8601-date="2019-03-29" date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date></event></pub-history><permissions><copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder>authors</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p content-type="usage-statement">Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</ext-link> license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP<sup>3</sup>.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>In the context of the standard model of particle physics, the relationship between the top-quark mass and width (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been precisely calculated. However, the uncertainty from current direct measurements of the width is nearly 50%. A new approach for directly measuring the top-quark width using events away from the resonance peak is presented. By using an orthogonal dataset to traditional top-quark width extractions, this new method may enable significant improvements in the experimental sensitivity in a method combination. Recasting a recent ATLAS differential cross section measurement, we find <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.30</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.29</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> expected), providing the most precise direct measurement of the width.</p></abstract><funding-group><award-group award-type="contract"><funding-source country="US"><institution-wrap><institution>U.S. Department of Energy</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open-funder-registry">10.13039/100000015</institution-id></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>DE-AC02-05CH11231</award-id><award-id>DE-SC0007901</award-id></award-group><award-group award-type="contract"><funding-source country="CH"><institution-wrap><institution>Universität Zürich</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open-funder-registry">10.13039/501100006447</institution-id></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>K-72319-02-01</award-id></award-group><award-group award-type="contract"><funding-source country="CH"><institution-wrap><institution>Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open-funder-registry">10.13039/501100001711</institution-id></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>BSCGI0-157722</award-id></award-group></funding-group><counts><page-count count="6"/></counts></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title specific-use="run-in">Introduction.—</title><p>Even though the top quark was discovered over 20 years ago <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c1 c2">[1,2]</xref> and its mass has been measured with a subpercent precision <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c3">[3]</xref>, direct measurements of its width <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have an uncertainty of 50% or worse <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c4 c5 c6">[4–6]</xref>. Indirect measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using single top-quark production are more precise, but also require additional modeling assumptions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c7 c8">[7,8]</xref>. In the context of the standard model (SM), the relationship between the top-quark mass and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is known at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in the strong coupling constant with an uncertainty of a few percent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c9 c10 c11">[9–11]</xref>. Improving the precision of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can therefore provide a stringent test of the SM.</p><p>The current methods for measuring <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> perform template fits to invariant mass spectra that peak near the top-quark mass. Because of their cleaner event signatures, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>lepton</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>jets</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dilepton decays from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> production are used for the fits and the most sensitive observable is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: the invariant mass of a charged lepton and a jet originating from a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> quark (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> jet). While the location of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak is linearly sensitive to the top-quark mass, the measured width around the peak depends sublinearly on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is because the measured width is dominated by the unmeasured neutrino momentum and the fragmentation of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> quark, not by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>We propose a new method for measuring <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that is linearly sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c12">[12]</xref>. The idea is motivated by recent proposals to measure the Higgs boson width from nonresonant production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c17 c18 c19 c20">[17–20]</xref>, which has interesting beyond the standard model (BSM) sensitivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c21 c22 c23 c24 c25 c26 c27 c28">[21–28]</xref> and has lead to measurements by the CMS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c29 c30 c31 c32">[29–32]</xref> and ATLAS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c33">[33]</xref> Collaborations. Similarly, we propose to study the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cross section far from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> resonance peak, using a method that can be linearly sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, this approach may be sensitive to BSM physics that only affects the nonresonant part of the spectrum. Such modifications could be due to interference effects from complex phases or from new decay channels that are kinematically inaccessible at the resonance peak.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title specific-use="run-in">Existing calculations and measurements.—</title><p>Calculations of the top-quark width at next-to-leading order (NLO) in the strong coupling constant were first performed in Refs. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c34 c35 c36">[34–36]</xref>. More recently, the NNLO computation of the total width has been completed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c9 c10 c11">[9–11]</xref>, followed by fully differential calculations of the decay rate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c37 c38">[37,38]</xref>. At leading order (LO), the dependence of the width on the top-quark mass is given by <disp-formula id="d1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>LO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(1)</label></disp-formula>assuming <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and neglecting the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-quark mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c34">[34]</xref>. For a top-quark mass of 172.5 GeV the predicted width is 1.322 GeV, including NNLO QCD, finite <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-quark and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> masses, and NLO electroweak corrections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c37">[37]</xref>.</p><p>The width of the top quark has been measured at the Tevatron and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) using several approaches. Direct measurements, based on the reconstructed top-quark mass distribution in events with top-quark pairs were made by the CDF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c4">[4]</xref>, ATLAS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c5">[5]</xref>, and CMS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c6">[6]</xref> Collaborations, with Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c5">[5]</xref> obtaining the most precise value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.33</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>stat</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>syst</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using this method. The D0 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c7">[7]</xref> and CMS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c8">[8]</xref> Collaborations have each determined the width indirectly, via a combination of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-channel single-top cross section and measurement of the branching fraction ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">BR</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">BR</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The most precise estimate from Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c8">[8]</xref> finds <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>stat</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>syst</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the restrictive assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title specific-use="run-in">Sensitivity of the ATLAS measurement.—</title><p>Recently, the ATLAS Collaboration reported a differential cross section measurement of events with two charged leptons (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and two <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> jets, in an observable sensitive to both top-quark pair (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) and single top-quark (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c39">[39]</xref>. The measurement probed the interference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by comparing the data with state-of-the-art interference models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c40 c41 c42 c43">[40–43]</xref>. The target observable was the minimax pairing of lepton-jet invariant masses <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <disp-formula id="d2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>min</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>max</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>max</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:malignmark/></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(2)</label></disp-formula>where the labeling of leptons and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-tagged jets is arbitrary. For values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the top-quark pair process at LO enters only through off-shell effects and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contributions become important. In this high-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> region, the NLO calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> including interference effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c44 c45 c46 c47 c48 c49">[44–49]</xref> and parton showering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c43">[43]</xref>, provides an excellent description of the data.</p><p>The advent of such calculations enables these data to constrain other properties of the top quark. Specifically, modifications to the top-quark width impact the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum. The origin of this dependence is twofold.</p><p>First, the cross section of events with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> considerably greater than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> has a contribution from top-quark pair production diagrams, where at least one of the top (anti-)quarks is produced far off shell. The width impacts the size of this contribution directly through the top-quark line shape, which can be described as a Breit-Wigner distribution: <disp-formula id="d3"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(3)</label></disp-formula>Integrating over both top-quark resonances, the fraction of off-shell events is found to be linearly dependent on the width <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c50">[50]</xref>.</p><p>Second, the “tail” cross section is also enhanced by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diagrams containing only one top-(anti-)quark propagator. While this is a smaller overall contribution than that of top-quark pairs, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> boson and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> quark not originating from a top quark often satisfy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, so that a comparatively large fraction of such events have <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For this reason, width variations affect the relative importance of these two classes of diagrams and thus the shape itself of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> observable.</p><p>In Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c39">[39]</xref>, the fractional contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> events to 15 bins of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> was reported, including many measurements with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These data enable an extraction of the top-quark width, assuming that BSM effects modifying the width do not also modify nonresonant production. Despite the measurement not considering a width uncertainty, the unfolded result would only be impacted through migrations in the response matrix, and the effect is thus expected to be negligible. For comparison, the uncertainty due to unfolding with different interference schemes is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo form="prefix">&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> in most bins, despite the predictions leading to raw differences of 50% or more for large values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title specific-use="run-in">Signal models and event selection.—</title><p>The primary calculation used to model the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> signal is the <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c43">[43]</xref> generator implemented in <sc>powheg box res</sc> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c51">[51]</xref>. It includes NLO QCD corrections and matching with the parton shower (PS) based on the <sc>Powheg</sc> method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c52 c53">[52,53]</xref>. The process is described in terms of exact matrix elements for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, dominated by top-pair topologies with leptonic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-boson decays, with massive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> quarks provided by the <sc>OpenLoops</sc> program <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c54">[54]</xref>. The <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 generator combines for the first time consistent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>NLO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>PS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatment of top-quark resonances, including quantum corrections to top-quark propagators and off-shell top-quark decay chains; exact spin correlations at NLO, interference between NLO radiation from top-quark production and decays, full NLO accuracy in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> production and decays; NLO accuracy in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-quark kinematics; access to phase-space regions with unresolved <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> quarks and/or jet vetoes.</p><p>The nominal event sample was obtained using the <monospace>NNPDF30_nlo_as_0118</monospace> parton distribution function (PDF) set and the input top-quark mass value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:mn>172.5</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additional samples were generated with a range of top-quark widths <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>172.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.3328</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c55">[55]</xref> to enable the extraction of the best-fit value from data, with a range of top-quark mass values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mn>171.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>172.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>173.5</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in order to estimate the uncertainty due to the top-quark mass, and a range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the PDF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.115</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.118</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.121</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>172.5</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to explore the uncertainty due to variation of scale of the shower evolution. The central renormalization and factorization scales are set to the geometric average of transverse masses of the top quark and antitop quark, and the value of hdamp is always set equal to the input value of the top-quark mass. The samples include all possible combinations of different family final state leptons (corresponding to the channel 7 setting). Events also feature additional weights due to standard 7-point scale variation and due to PDF variation. Up to three hardest emissions are kept with the allrad 1 setting, one from the production process and one from each of the top-quark resonances, and matching to <sc>Pythia </sc>8.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c56">[56]</xref> makes use of both the <sc>PowhegHooks</sc> and <sc>PowhegHooksBB</sc>4<sc>L</sc> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c57">[57]</xref> vetoes, and A14 set of tuned parameters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c58">[58]</xref>. In the samples with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.115</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.121</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the <sc>SpaceShower</sc>:<sc>alphaSValue</sc> parameter of shower evolution in <sc>Pythia </sc>8.2 is set correspondingly.</p><p>In addition, a LO calculation of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> process is examined, calculated by <sc>Madgraph</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc> 2.6.4 (<sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c59">[59]</xref> with up to 2 extra jets, matched to a parton shower implemented in <sc>Pythia </sc>8.240. This sample of events was simulated using the <monospace>NNPDF23_nlo_as_0118</monospace> PDF set, the A14 set of tuned parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>172.5</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Alternative samples were produced with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied as described above, as well as with alternative top-quark mass hypotheses <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mn>170</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>175</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">}</mml:mo><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>Event samples are analyzed and compared to data using the selection criteria of Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c39">[39]</xref> as implemented in the Rivet toolkit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c60">[60]</xref>. Briefly, leptons and jets are reconstructed at particle-level with selections based upon the acceptance of the ATLAS detector. Leptons are dressed with nearby photons and are required to have transverse momentum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>28</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and pseudorapidity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mi>η</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.47</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.5) for electrons (muons). Jets are reconstructed with the anti-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm using a radius parameter of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c61 c62 c63">[61–63]</xref> and considered in the analysis only if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mi>η</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>. They are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tagged if a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> hadron with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is found within the jet cone. Events are selected that have two leptons, two <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-tagged jets, with same-flavor lepton events vetoed if the dilepton mass <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or satisfies <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p><p>The <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 simulation produces events with different-flavor leptons and must be corrected to account for same-flavor contributions. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution is obtained by reweighting the generated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> events that satisfy same-flavor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> requirements. Good closure of this technique is found using the LO <sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc> simulation, which includes all leptonic decays of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> boson. Further, the contribution of di-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> events (with fully leptonic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decays) is found to be negligible and is not considered.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title specific-use="run-in">Top-quark width extraction.—</title><p>Using the experimental data of Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c39">[39]</xref> and the signal models described above, the top-quark width is extracted by minimizing the following <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>χ</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> statistic: <disp-formula id="d4"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>χ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(4)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured, normalized, differential cross section indexed by bins of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the corresponding prediction. The covariance matrix <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gives the uncertainty on the unfolded data, including bin-to-bin correlations. The measurements with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>160</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are only weakly sensitive to variations in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and are thus excluded from Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="d4">(4)</xref>.</p><p>For each systematic uncertainty, the differential cross section is computed separately for a set of test widths <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. To interpolate between generated samples, the calculated yields are fit as a function of the top-quark width to obtain a parametrized prediction <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, individually for each bin <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Choosing the functions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be quadratic in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is found to fit the calculated predictions well for each bin of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, given the data and choice of signal model, the statistic may be written explicitly as a function of the width <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>χ</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>χ</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>. By minimizing this function with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the best-fit value of the width may be extracted.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title specific-use="run-in">Uncertainties.—</title><p>Uncertainties stemming from the precision of the experimental measurement, from choices in signal modeling, and from the limited number of generated events are each considered. Pseudoexperiments are used to assess the experimental uncertainty, where pseudodata are drawn from a multivariate Gaussian distribution with mean and covariance matrix given by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each pseudoexperiment a random dataset <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pseudo</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> is drawn from this distribution and a new value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is extracted by minimizing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>χ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">|</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pseudo</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The experimental uncertainty is calculated as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> range of extracted widths from the pseudoexperiment distribution.</p><p>Theoretical uncertainties are assessed on the <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 signal model by generating event samples with alternative input parameters. The nominal simulated sample with alternative weight sets is used to estimate the uncertainty due to the choice of PDF as well as renormalization and factorization scales. The PDF uncertainty is assessed as the standard deviation of widths extracted over the set of 100 eigenvector variations of the <monospace>NNPDF30_nlo_as_0118</monospace> PDF set. The scale uncertainty is the maximum pairwise difference between the widths extracted with the nominal and varied scales.</p><p>For top-quark mass and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, independent samples of events are generated. To minimize the impact of statistical variations across samples and make optimal use of all generated events, the systematic uncertainty dependence is extracted in a fit, writing <disp-formula id="d5"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo indentalign="id" indenttarget="d5a1">=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:malignmark/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(5)</label></disp-formula>Further, the fitted coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are constrained to vary quadratically in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to reduce unphysical, statistical fluctuations. The postfit yields for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations are then used to reweight the nominal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectra for each value of the top-quark width and to extract the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>χ</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-minimizing value for each variation.</p><p>An uncertainty due to the finite number of simulated events is estimated from an ensemble of pseudoexperiments where the predicted yields for all bins of each value of the top-quark width are varied within their uncertainties. A width is obtained for each trial to assess the impact on the final extracted parameter.</p><p>For the <sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc> signal model, an identical set of uncertainties are assessed, employing the same estimation methods, with the following modification: the <monospace>NNPDF23_nlo_as_0119</monospace> PDF set is used as the nominal value for this sample. The top-quark mass uncertainty is assessed using samples with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>170</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, 175 GeV, interpolating to obtain the same 1 GeV variations as used above.</p><p>The nominal <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 prediction is compared to ATLAS data in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">1</xref>. Predictions for alternate values of the top-quark width are also shown, as well as the theoretical uncertainty on the nominal estimate. A summary of the uncertainties on the width extracted using both signal models is presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">I</xref>. Changes to the top-quark width are found to produce larger variations in the relative fraction of events in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> tail for samples generated using <sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc> than <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41. As a result, the impact of uncertainties on the extracted width parameter is generally smaller when using the LO simulation, despite the impact on the normalized differential cross section being similar. This effect leads to a smaller uncertainty due to scale variations, among others, in the LO sample than in the more accurate <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 calculation.</p><fig id="f1"><object-id>1</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.231803.f1</object-id><label>FIG. 1.</label><caption><p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum predicted using <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 is shown for various values of the top-quark width. Data from the unfolded ATLAS measurement are included for comparison. The gray band shows the theoretical uncertainty for the simulated sample corresponding to the predicted SM value of the width.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e231803_1.eps"/></fig><table-wrap id="t1" specific-use="style-1col"><object-id>I</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.231803.t1</object-id><label>TABLE I.</label><caption><p>Uncertainty on the top-quark width extracted for data, with individual contributions shown from experimental, theoretical, and statistical sources.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4"><oasis:colspec align="left" colname="col1" colsep="0" colwidth="19%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col2" colsep="0" colwidth="24%"/><oasis:colspec align="center" colname="col3" colsep="0" colwidth="29%"/><oasis:colspec align="char" char="." colname="col4" colsep="0" colwidth="35%"/><oasis:thead><oasis:row><oasis:entry nameend="col2" namest="col1" valign="top">Uncertainty [GeV]</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_4l</oasis:entry><oasis:entry align="center" valign="bottom"><sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc></oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:thead><oasis:tbody><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry nameend="col2" namest="col1">Experimental</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry morerows="4">Theory</oasis:entry><oasis:entry>PDF</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry>Scale</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry>Combined</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry nameend="col2" namest="col1">Simulation Stats.</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row><oasis:row rowsep="0"><oasis:entry nameend="col2" namest="col1">Total</oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry><oasis:entry><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry></oasis:row></oasis:tbody></oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s7"><title specific-use="run-in">Results.—</title><p>Using the <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 signal description, a top-quark width of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.30</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is extracted (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="goodbreak"/><mml:mn>0.29</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> expected), as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">2</xref>. A width is also extracted using the leading order <sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc> simulation, obtaining <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.22</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.23</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> expected). These measurements are more precise than the previously most precise direct measurement of (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c5">[5]</xref>.</p><fig id="f2"><object-id>2</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.231803.f2</object-id><label>FIG. 2.</label><caption><p>Observed and expected top-quark widths for the <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 and <sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc> signal models.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="e231803_2.eps"/></fig><p>These results can also be interpreted into a limit on the BSM decays of the top-quark through the relation <disp-formula id="d6"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>BSM</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ext</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ext</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><label>(6)</label></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the SM partial width for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ext</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the (one-sided) upper limit on the top-quark width at the 95% confidence level. The limit is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">BR</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>BSM</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>29</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the <sc>b</sc>_<sc>bbar</sc>_41 model (30% expected) and 18% using the <sc>MG</sc>5_<sc>aMC</sc>@<sc>NLO</sc> model (26% expected). Model-specific BSM constraints are also possible for processes which have a significant effect in the off-shell region defined by high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimax</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, a charged Higgs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> produced via its <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> coupling and then decaying via <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> would preferentially enhance this region. However, limits from this measurement are not as strong as direct searches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c64 c65 c66">[64–66]</xref> because of the penalties from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decay to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title specific-use="run-in">Conclusions.—</title><p>In conclusion, we present a novel method to directly measure the top-quark width and have provided a first estimate using the technique based on a recent measurement of top-quark properties by the ATLAS Collaboration. The estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>1.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.31</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained using the <sc>powheg box res</sc> calculation is in good agreement with the standard model prediction of 1.32 GeV and more precise than existing direct measurements. Future measurements with more data and in combination with other extractions will be able to provide robust constraints on the top sector of the SM.</p></sec></body><back><ack><p>We would like to thank Till Eifert, Silvia Ferrario Ravasio, Jay Howarth, Elliot Lipeles, and Stefano Pozzorini for careful reading and suggestions on the manuscript. We would also like to thank Stefan Prestel for a clarifying conversation about the <sc>Pythia</sc> treatment of resonances. B. N. is supported by the DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. C. H. is supported by the DOE under Contract No. DE-SC0007901. The work of T. J. is supported in part by the University of Zürich under the Contract No. K-72319-02-01 and in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Contract No. BSCGI0-157722.</p></ack><ref-list><ref id="c1"><label>[1]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>1</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Abe</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CDF Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Observation of Top Quark Production in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Collisions</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <page-range>2626</page-range> (<year>1995</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2626</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c2"><label>[2]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>2</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Abachi</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>D0 Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Observation of the Top Quark</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <page-range>2632</page-range> (<year>1995</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2632</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c3"><label>[3]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="eprint"><object-id>3</object-id><person-group><collab>ATLAS, CDF, CMS, and D0 Collaborations</collab></person-group>, <article-title>First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass</article-title>, <pub-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1403.4427</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c4"><label>[4]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>4</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Aaltonen</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CDF Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Direct Measurement of the Total Decay Width of the Top Quark</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <page-range>202001</page-range> (<year>2013</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.202001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c5"><label>[5]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>5</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Aaboud</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Direct top-quark decay width measurement in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>lepton</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>jets</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> channel at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the ATLAS experiment</article-title>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>78</volume>, <page-range>129</page-range> (<year>2018</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5595-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c6"><label>[6]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="report"><object-id>6</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>CMS Collaboration</collab></person-group>, <article-title>Bounding the top quark width using final states with two charged leptons and two jets at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, Report No. <pub-id pub-id-type="other">CMS-PAS-TOP-16-019</pub-id>, <year>2016</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c7"><label>[7]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>7</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>V. Abazov</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>D0 Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>An Improved determination of the width of the top quark</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>85</volume>, <page-range>091104</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.85.091104</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c8"><label>[8]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>8</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>V. Khachatryan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Measurement of the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in pp collisions at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>736</volume>, <page-range>33</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.076</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c9"><label>[9]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>9</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Czarnecki</string-name> and <string-name>K. Melnikov</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Two-loop qcd corrections to top quark width</article-title>, <source>Nucl. Phys.</source> <volume>B544</volume>, <page-range>520</page-range> (<year>1999</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">NUPBBO</pub-id><issn>0550-3213</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00844-X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c10"><label>[10]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>10</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>K. G. Chetyrkin</string-name>, <string-name>R. Harlander</string-name>, <string-name>T. Seidensticker</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Steinhauser</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Second order qcd corrections to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>60</volume>, <page-range>114015</page-range> (<year>1999</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.60.114015</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c11"><label>[11]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>11</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>I. Blokland</string-name>, <string-name>A. Czarnecki</string-name>, <string-name>M. Ślusarczyk</string-name>, and <string-name>F. Tkachov</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Heavy-to-Light-Quark Decays with Two-Loop Accuracy</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <page-range>062001</page-range> (<year>2004</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.062001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c12"><label>[12]</label><note content-type="endnote"><p>Similar ideas were recently discussed in Refs. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c13 c14 c15">[13–15]</xref>. The key difference with respect to this analysis are that these studies (I) were performed at the parton-level only, (II) do not propose a physical observable for measuring the cross section, and (III) do not extract any results with LHC data (and in the case of Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c13">[13]</xref>, are for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). A related idea using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-jet charge asymmetries in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> collisions was proposed in Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="c16">[16]</xref>. While a promising proposal, this latter study does not yet include reconstruction effects.</p></note></ref><ref id="c13"><label>[13]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>13</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Liebler</string-name>, <string-name>G. Moortgat-Pick</string-name>, and <string-name>A. S. Papanastasiou</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Probing the top-quark width through ratios of resonance contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>03</issue> (<volume>2016</volume>) <page-range>099</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP03(2016)099</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c14"><label>[14]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>14</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Baskakov</string-name>, <string-name>E. Boos</string-name>, and <string-name>L. Dudko</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Model independent top quark width measurement using a combination of resonant and non resonant cross sections</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>98</volume>, <page-range>116011</page-range> (<year>2018</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>2470-0010</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.98.116011</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c15"><label>[15]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="proc"><object-id>15</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Baskakov</string-name>, <string-name>E. Boos</string-name>, and <string-name>L. Dudko</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>On the top-quark width measurement using a combination of resonant and non resonant cross sections</article-title>, Proceedings of the 23th International Workshop on High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory (QFTHEP 2017): Yaroslavl, Russia, EPJ Web Conf. <volume>158</volume>, <page-range>04007</page-range> (<publisher-name>EDP Sciences</publisher-name>, Les Ulis Cedex, <year>2017</year>).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c16"><label>[16]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>16</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>P. P. Giardino</string-name> and <string-name>C. Zhang</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Probing the top-quark width using the charge identification of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> jets</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>96</volume>, <page-range>011901(R)</page-range> (<year>2017</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>2470-0010</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.96.011901</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c17"><label>[17]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>17</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>N. Kauer</string-name> and <string-name>G. Passarino</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Inadequacy of zero-width approximation for a light Higgs boson signal</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>08</issue> (<volume>2012</volume>) <page-range>116</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP08(2012)116</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c18"><label>[18]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>18</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Caola</string-name> and <string-name>K. Melnikov</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Constraining the Higgs boson width with ZZ production at the LHC</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>88</volume>, <page-range>054024</page-range> (<year>2013</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.88.054024</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c19"><label>[19]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>19</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. M. Campbell</string-name>, <string-name>R. K. Ellis</string-name>, and <string-name>C. Williams</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC using full analytic results for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>04</issue> (<volume>2014</volume>) <page-range>060</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP04(2014)060</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c20"><label>[20]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>20</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. M. Campbell</string-name>, <string-name>R. K. Ellis</string-name>, and <string-name>C. Williams</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC: Complementary results from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>89</volume>, <page-range>053011</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.89.053011</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c21"><label>[21]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>21</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>C. Englert</string-name> and <string-name>M. Spannowsky</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Limitations and opportunities of off-shell coupling measurements</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>90</volume>, <page-range>053003</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.90.053003</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c22"><label>[22]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>22</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>G. Cacciapaglia</string-name>, <string-name>A. Deandrea</string-name>, <string-name>G. D. LaRochelle</string-name>, and <string-name>J. B. Flament</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Higgs Couplings: Disentangling New Physics with Off-Shell Measurements</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <page-range>201802</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.201802</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c23"><label>[23]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>23</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Azatov</string-name>, <string-name>C. Grojean</string-name>, <string-name>A. Paul</string-name>, and <string-name>E. Salvioni</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Taming the off-shell Higgs boson</article-title>, <source>J. Exp. Theor. Phys.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <page-range>354</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JTPHES</pub-id><issn>1063-7761</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1134/S1063776115030140</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c24"><label>[24]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="proc"><object-id>24</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Ghezzi</string-name>, <string-name>G. Passarino</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Uccirati</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Bounding the Higgs width using effective field theory, Proceedings of the 12th DESY Workshop on Elementary Particle Physics: Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory (LL2014): Weimar, Germany, 2014</article-title>, <source>Proc. Sci.</source>, <issue>LL2014</issue> (<volume>2014</volume>) <page-range>072</page-range>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c25"><label>[25]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>25</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Buschmann</string-name>, <string-name>D. Goncalves</string-name>, <string-name>S. Kuttimalai</string-name>, <string-name>M. Schonherr</string-name>, <string-name>F. Krauss</string-name>, and <string-name>T. Plehn</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Mass effects in the Higgs-Gluon coupling: Boosted vs off-shell production</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>02</issue> (<volume>2015</volume>) <page-range>038</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP02(2015)038</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c26"><label>[26]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>26</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. S. Gainer</string-name>, <string-name>J. Lykken</string-name>, <string-name>K. T. Matchev</string-name>, <string-name>S. Mrenna</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Park</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Beyond Geolocating: Constraining higher dimensional operators in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> with off-shell production and more</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>91</volume>, <page-range>035011</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.91.035011</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c27"><label>[27]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>27</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>C. Englert</string-name>, <string-name>Y. Soreq</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Spannowsky</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Off-shell Higgs coupling measurements in BSM scenarios</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>05</issue> (<volume>2015</volume>) <page-range>145</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP05(2015)145</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c28"><label>[28]</label><mixed-citation id="c28a" publication-type="journal"><object-id>28a</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>D. Goncalves</string-name>, <string-name>T. Han</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Mukhopadhyay</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Off-Shell Higgs Probe of Naturalness</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <page-range>111801</page-range> (<year>2018</year>); <pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.111801</pub-id></mixed-citation><mixed-citation id="c28b" publication-type="journal" specific-use="author"><object-id>28b</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>D. Goncalves</string-name>, <string-name>T. Han</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Mukhopadhyay</string-name></person-group><article-title>Erratum</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <page-range>079902(E)</page-range> (<year>2018</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.079902</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c29"><label>[29]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>29</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>V. Khachatryan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Constraints on the Higgs boson width from off-shell production and decay to Z-boson pairs</article-title>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>736</volume>, <page-range>64</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.077</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c30"><label>[30]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>30</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>V. Khachatryan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Search for Higgs boson off-shell production in proton-proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV and derivation of constraints on its total decay width</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>09</issue> (<volume>2016</volume>) <page-range>051</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP09(2016)051</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c31"><label>[31]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>31</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>V. Khachatryan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Limits on the Higgs boson lifetime and width from its decay to four charged leptons</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>92</volume>, <page-range>072010</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>1550-7998</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.92.072010</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c32"><label>[32]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>32</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. M. Sirunyan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>11</issue> (<volume>2017</volume>) <page-range>047</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP11(2017)047</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c33"><label>[33]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>33</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Aaboud</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Constraints on off-shell Higgs boson production and the Higgs boson total width in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>ℓ</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> final states with the ATLAS detector</article-title>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>786</volume>, <page-range>223</page-range> (<year>2018</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2018.09.048</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c34"><label>[34]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>34</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Jeżabek</string-name> and <string-name>J. H. Kühn</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>QCD corrections to semileptonic decays of heavy quarks</article-title>, <source>Nucl. Phys.</source> <volume>B314</volume>, <page-range>1</page-range> (<year>1989</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">NUPBBO</pub-id><issn>0550-3213</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/0550-3213(89)90108-9</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c35"><label>[35]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>35</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Czarnecki</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>QCD corrections to the decay <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in dimensional regularization</article-title>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>252</volume>, <page-range>467</page-range> (<year>1990</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/0370-2693(90)90571-M</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c36"><label>[36]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>36</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>C. S. Li</string-name>, <string-name>R. J. Oakes</string-name>, and <string-name>T. C. Yuan</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Qcd corrections to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>43</volume>, <page-range>3759</page-range> (<year>1991</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3759</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c37"><label>[37]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>37</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Gao</string-name>, <string-name>C. S. Li</string-name>, and <string-name>H. X. Zhu</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Top Quark Decay at Next-to-Next-to Leading Order in QCD</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <page-range>042001</page-range> (<year>2013</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.042001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c38"><label>[38]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>38</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Brucherseifer</string-name>, <string-name>F. Caola</string-name>, and <string-name>K. Melnikov</string-name></person-group>, <article-title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corrections to fully-differential top quark decays</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>04</issue> (<volume>2013</volume>) <page-range>059</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP04(2013)059</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c39"><label>[39]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>39</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Aaboud</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Probing the Quantum Interference Between Singly and Doubly Resonant Top-Quark Production in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Collisions at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the ATLAS Detector</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <page-range>152002</page-range> (<year>2018</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.152002</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c40"><label>[40]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>40</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Frixione</string-name>, <string-name>E. Laenen</string-name>, <string-name>P. Motylinski</string-name>, <string-name>C. D. White</string-name>, and <string-name>B. R. Webber</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Single-top hadroproduction in association with a W boson</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>07</issue> (<volume>2008</volume>) <page-range>029</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/029</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c41"><label>[41]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>41</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>W. Hollik</string-name>, <string-name>J. M. Lindert</string-name>, and <string-name>D. Pagani</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>NLO corrections to squark-squark production and decay at the LHC</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>03</issue> (<volume>2013</volume>) <page-range>139</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP03(2013)139</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c42"><label>[42]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>42</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Demartin</string-name>, <string-name>B. Maier</string-name>, <string-name>F. Maltoni</string-name>, <string-name>K. Mawatari</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Zaro</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>tWH associated production at the LHC</article-title>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>77</volume>, <page-range>34</page-range> (<year>2017</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4601-7</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c43"><label>[43]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>43</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Ježo</string-name>, <string-name>J. M. Lindert</string-name>, <string-name>P. Nason</string-name>, <string-name>C. Oleari</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Pozzorini</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>An <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>NLO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>PS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generator for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> production and decay including non-resonant and interference effects</article-title>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>76</volume>, <page-range>691</page-range> (<year>2016</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4538-2</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c44"><label>[44]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>44</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>G. Bevilacqua</string-name>, <string-name>M. Czakon</string-name>, <string-name>A. van Hameren</string-name>, <string-name>C. G. Papadopoulos</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Worek</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Complete off-shell effects in top quark pair hadroproduction with leptonic decay at next-to-leading order</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>02</issue> (<volume>2011</volume>) <page-range>083</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP02(2011)083</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c45"><label>[45]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>45</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Denner</string-name>, <string-name>S. Dittmaier</string-name>, <string-name>S. Kallweit</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Pozzorini</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>NLO QCD Corrections to WWbb Production at Hadron Colliders</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <page-range>052001</page-range> (<year>2011</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.052001</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c46"><label>[46]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>46</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Denner</string-name>, <string-name>S. Dittmaier</string-name>, <string-name>S. Kallweit</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Pozzorini</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>NLO QCD corrections to off-shell top-antitop production with leptonic decays at hadron colliders</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>10</issue> (<volume>2012</volume>) <page-range>110</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP10(2012)110</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c47"><label>[47]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>47</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>G. Heinrich</string-name>, <string-name>A. Maier</string-name>, <string-name>R. Nisius</string-name>, <string-name>J. Schlenk</string-name>, and <string-name>J. Winter</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>NLO QCD corrections to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> production with leptonic decays in the light of top quark mass and asymmetry measurements</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>06</issue> (<volume>2014</volume>) <page-range>158</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP06(2014)158</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c48"><label>[48]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>48</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>R. Frederix</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Top Quark Induced Backgrounds to Higgs Production in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Decay Channel at Next-to-Leading-Order in QCD</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <page-range>082002</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.082002</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c49"><label>[49]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>49</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Cascioli</string-name>, <string-name>S. Kallweit</string-name>, <string-name>P. Maierhöfer</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Pozzorini</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>A unified NLO description of top-pair and associated Wt production</article-title>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>74</volume>, <page-range>2783</page-range> (<year>2014</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2783-9</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c50"><label>[50]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>50</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>N. Kauer</string-name> and <string-name>D. Zeppenfeld</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Finite width effects in top quark production at hadron colliders</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>65</volume>, <page-range>014021</page-range> (<year>2001</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRVDAQ</pub-id><issn>0556-2821</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevD.65.014021</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c51"><label>[51]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>51</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Ježo</string-name> and <string-name>P. Nason</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>On the treatment of resonances in next-to-leading order calculations matched to a parton shower</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>12</issue> (<volume>2015</volume>) <page-range>065</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP12(2015)065</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c52"><label>[52]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>52</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>P. Nason</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>11</issue> (<volume>2004</volume>) <page-range>040</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c53"><label>[53]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>53</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Frixione</string-name>, <string-name>P. Nason</string-name>, and <string-name>C. Oleari</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton shower simulations: The POWHEG method</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>11</issue> (<volume>2007</volume>) <page-range>070</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c54"><label>[54]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>54</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>F. Cascioli</string-name>, <string-name>P. Maierhofer</string-name>, and <string-name>S. Pozzorini</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops</article-title>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <page-range>111601</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PRLTAO</pub-id><issn>0031-9007</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.111601</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c55"><label>[55]</label><note content-type="endnote"><p>The value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>SM</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> is the NLO top-quark width calculated by <monospace>b_bbar_4l</monospace> from all the other input values.</p></note></ref><ref id="c56"><label>[56]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>56</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>T. Sjöstrand</string-name>, <string-name>S. Ask</string-name>, <string-name>J. R. Christiansen</string-name>, <string-name>R. Corke</string-name>, <string-name>N. Desai</string-name>, <string-name>P. Ilten</string-name>, <string-name>S. Mrenna</string-name>, <string-name>S. Prestel</string-name>, <string-name>C. O. Rasmussen</string-name>, and <string-name>P. Z. Skands</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2</article-title>, <source>Comput. Phys. Commun.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <page-range>159</page-range> (<year>2015</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">CPHCBZ</pub-id><issn>0010-4655</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c57"><label>[57]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>57</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>S. Ferrario Ravasio</string-name>, <string-name>T. Ježo</string-name>, <string-name>P. Nason</string-name>, and <string-name>C. Oleari</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>A theoretical study of top-mass measurements at the LHC using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>NLO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>PS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generators of increasing accuracy</article-title>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>78</volume>, <page-range>458</page-range> (<year>2018</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5909-7</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c58"><label>[58]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="report"><object-id>58</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab></person-group>, <article-title>ATLAS Run 1 Pythia 8 tunes</article-title>, Report No. <pub-id pub-id-type="other">ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021</pub-id>, <year>2014</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c59"><label>[59]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>59</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>J. Alwall</string-name>, <string-name>R. Frederix</string-name>, <string-name>S. Frixione</string-name>, <string-name>V. Hirschi</string-name>, <string-name>F. Maltoni</string-name>, <string-name>O. Mattelaer</string-name>, <string-name>H. S. Shao</string-name>, <string-name>T. Stelzer</string-name>, <string-name>P. Torrielli</string-name>, and <string-name>M. Zaro</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>07</issue> (<volume>2014</volume>) <page-range>079</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c60"><label>[60]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>60</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>A. Buckley</string-name>, <string-name>J. Butterworth</string-name>, <string-name>L. Lonnblad</string-name>, <string-name>D. Grellscheid</string-name>, <string-name>H. Hoeth</string-name>, <string-name>J. Monk</string-name>, <string-name>H. Schulz</string-name>, and <string-name>F. Siegert</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Rivet user manual</article-title>, <source>Comput. Phys. Commun.</source> <volume>184</volume>, <page-range>2803</page-range> (<year>2013</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">CPHCBZ</pub-id><issn>0010-4655</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.cpc.2013.05.021</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c61"><label>[61]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>61</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Cacciari</string-name>, <string-name>G. P. Salam</string-name>, and <string-name>G. Soyez</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>The anti-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> jet clustering algorithm</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>04</issue> (<volume>2008</volume>) <page-range>063</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c62"><label>[62]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>62</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Cacciari</string-name> and <string-name>G. P. Salam</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>Dispelling the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> myth for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> jet-finder</article-title>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>641</volume>, <page-range>57</page-range> (<year>2006</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">PYLBAJ</pub-id><issn>0370-2693</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.037</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c63"><label>[63]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>63</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Cacciari</string-name>, <string-name>G. P. Salam</string-name>, and <string-name>G. Soyez</string-name></person-group>, <article-title>FastJet User Manual</article-title>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>72</volume>, <page-range>1896</page-range> (<year>2012</year>).<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">EPCFFB</pub-id><issn>1434-6044</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c64"><label>[64]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>64</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Aaboud</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying via <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>jets</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>lepton</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> final states with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>36</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> collision data recorded at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the ATLAS experiment</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>09</issue> (<volume>2018</volume>) <page-range>139</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP09(2018)139</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c65"><label>[65]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>65</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>M. Aaboud</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>ATLAS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Search for charged Higgs bosons decaying into top and bottom quarks at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the ATLAS detector</article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>11</issue> (<volume>2018</volume>) <page-range>085</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP11(2018)085</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="c66"><label>[66]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><object-id>66</object-id><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>V. Khachatryan</string-name> <etal/> (<collab>CMS Collaboration</collab>)</person-group>, <article-title>Search for a charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <issue>11</issue> (<volume>2015</volume>) <page-range>018</page-range>.<pub-id pub-id-type="coden">JHEPFG</pub-id><issn>1029-8479</issn><pub-id pub-id-type="doi" specific-use="suppress-display">10.1007/JHEP11(2015)018</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
