<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns="http://specifications.silverchair.com/xsd/1/22/SCJATS-journalpublishing.xsd" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://specifications.silverchair.com/xsd/1/22/SCJATS-journalpublishing.xsd 1/22/SCJATS-journalpublishing.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ptep</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2050-3911</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ptep/ptaa052</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ptaa052</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:1712.09974</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-toc-heading">
<subject>Papers</subject>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-toc-heading">
<subject>Theoretical Particle Physics</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-taxonomy-collection">
<subject>PTEP/B12</subject>
<subject>PTEP/B16</subject>
<subject>PTEP/B31</subject>
<subject>PTEP/B35</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone fermions and bosons for non-relativistic superconformal symmetry: Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices in a trap</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Fujimori</surname> <given-names>Toshiaki</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>Muneto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="ptaa052-cor1"/>
<email xlink:type="simple">nitta@phys-h.keio.ac.jp</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>Keisuke</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF1"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="AFF1"><institution>Department of Physics, and Research and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University</institution>, Hiyoshi 4-1-1, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="ptaa052-cor1">E-mail: <email>nitta@phys-h.keio.ac.jp</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="cover">
<month>05</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<day>01</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2020-05-13">
<day>13</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2020</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<elocation-id>053B01</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>06</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>22</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Physical Society of Japan.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<license license-type="cc-by" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
<license-p>Funded by SCOAP<sup>3</sup></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="ptaa052.pdf"/>
<abstract abstract-type="abstract">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>We discuss a supersymmetric extension of a non-relativistic Chern&#x2013;Simons matter theory, known as the supersymmetric Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model, in a harmonic trap. We show that the non-relativistic version of the superconformal symmetry, called the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry, is not spoiled by an external field including the harmonic potential. It survives as a modified symmetry whose generators have explicit time dependences determined by the strength of the trap, the rotation velocity of the system, and the fermion number chemical potential. We construct 1/3 Bogomol'nyi&#x2013;Prasad&#x2013;Sommerfield (BPS) states of trapped Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices preserving part of the modified superconformal symmetry and discuss fluctuations around static BPS configurations. In addition to the bosonic massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone modes, we find that there exist massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone fermions associated with broken generators of the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry. Furthermore, we find that eigenmodes form supermultiplets of a modified supersymmetry preserved by the static BPS backgrounds. As a consequence of the modified supersymmetry, infinite towers of explicit spectra can be found for eigenmodes corresponding to bosonic and fermionic lowest Landau levels.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="jel">
<kwd>B12</kwd>
<kwd>B16</kwd>
<kwd>B31</kwd>
<kwd>B35</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<page-count count="23"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="SEC1"><title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Non-trivial external background fields are useful tools to study various aspects of field theories. When a generic background field is turned on in a physical system, it may break a symmetry of the system and drastically change the structure of the model. However, it has been shown that if an external field can be viewed as a chemical potential term associated with a conserved charge, a version of the Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone (NG) theorem can still be applied even when a symmetry appears explicitly broken by the external field. The crucial difference from the standard NG theorem is that the corresponding NG mode in this case has a non-vanishing mass precisely determined by the symmetry algebra. Such <italic>massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone bosons</italic> have been discussed in Refs. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>], and the scattering amplitudes of massive NG modes were recently studied in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>].</p>
<p>In Refs. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>], various properties of the massive NG modes associated with the non-relativistic conformal symmetry, called the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>], have been revealed in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation1"><![CDATA[$(2+1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-dimensional non-linear Schr&#x00F6;dinger system in a harmonic trap. One of the most important observations is that the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry survives even in the presence of external background fields including the harmonic potential. More precisely, a modified Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry generated by time-dependent operators remains in such a background. In general, when a symmetry generated by an operator with an explicit time dependence is spontaneously broken, the associated NG modes have a non-vanishing mass determined by the commutation relation between the corresponding broken generator and the Hamiltonian. As in the case of the Lorentz and Galilean symmetry, a time-dependent symmetry can be used to study the dynamical properties of the system. For example, in the non-linear Schr&#x00F6;dinger system in a harmonic trap, time-dependent solutions can be generated from static ones by applying the time-dependent modified Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry.</p>
<p>In this paper we discuss the supersymmetric Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model and study vortices and massive NG modes in a non-trivial background. The Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model is a field-theoretic framework describing anyons in terms of the non-linear Schr&#x00F6;dinger system coupled with a Chern&#x2013;Simons gauge field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. As with the standard non-linear Schr&#x00F6;dinger model, the Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model has a modified (time-dependent) Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry in various backgrounds. Non-topological vortex solutions, called Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], have been discussed in such backgrounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>], and in particular time-dependent solutions were constructed by making use of maps between the models with and without the external fields.</p>
<p>The Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model without a background field has a supersymmetric extension which possesses a non-relativistic superconformal symmetry, called the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. In this paper we show that external background fields corresponding to the harmonic potential, the spatial rotation, and the flavor and fermion number chemical potentials do not spoil the superconformal symmetry as well as the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry. In the presence of such external fields, the whole super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry becomes a time-dependent symmetry of the type which has been discussed in the context of the supersymmetric harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
<p>We also discuss Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices in the non-trivial background fields and construct their 1/3 Bogomol'nyi&#x2013;Prasad&#x2013;Sommerfield (BPS) states, which are invariant under part of the time-dependent supersymmetry. The moduli matrix formalism, which has been used to describe the moduli space of non-Abelian vortices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>], can also be applied to write down a formal solution of the 1/3 BPS equation in this system. For each choice of a holomorphic matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation2"><![CDATA[$H_0(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> we can obtain a BPS configuration of trapped Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices by solving the Gauss law equation. Generic 1/3 BPS solutions turn out to be Q-soliton-like configurations, that is, they are time-dependent stationary configurations stabilized by conserved charges. They are new time-dependent solutions which are different from the known solutions obtained by using the maps between the models with and without the external fields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>].</p>
<p>The BPS solutions become static configurations if <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation3"><![CDATA[$H_0(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> takes one of special forms corresponding to the fixed points of the spatial and flavor rotation. We discuss fluctuations around them and show that bosonic and fermionic eigenmodes form supermultiplets of the unbroken time-dependent supersymmetry. There are two types of supermultiplets: one is a generic supermultiplet composed of a pair of bosonic and fermionic modes; the other is a short supermultiplet consisting only of a bosonic component. In particular, we show that in addition to bosonic massive NG modes associated with spontaneously broken generators of the modified Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry, there exist <italic>massive Goldstinos</italic> corresponding to spontaneously broken modified supercharges. They consistently form supermultiplets, as expected from the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger algebra. In addition to those massive NG modes, we exactly derive eigenvalue spectra of infinite towers of short and long supermultiplets corresponding to the bosonic and fermionic lowest Landau levels, respectively.</p>
<p>The organization of the paper is as follows. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC2">2</xref>, we briefly review the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry in the supersymmetric Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model and show that there exists a modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry even in the presence of generalized chemical potential terms including the harmonic potential. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC3">3</xref>, we discuss 1/3 BPS solutions of trapped non-Abelian Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices which preserve part of the modified superconformal symmetry. By applying the moduli matrix formalism, we write down formal solutions and show that static configurations correspond to fixed points of the rotation and flavor symmetry. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC4">4</xref>, we investigate fluctuations around static BPS backgrounds and elucidate the structure of supermultiplets of eigenmodes, including bosonic and fermionic massive NG modes. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC5">5</xref> is devoted to a summary and discussions. In Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC6">A</xref>, the generalized chemical potential, modified symmetry, and massive NG mode are reviewed, and an example is shown in the free Schr&#x00F6;dinger system in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC7">B</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2"><title>2. Supersymmetric Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model in a harmonic trap</title>
<sec id="SEC2.1"><title>2.1. SUSY Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model and super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry</title>
<p>The supersymmetric (SUSY) Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model consists of a gauge field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation4"><![CDATA[$A_\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and pairs of bosonic matter fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation5"><![CDATA[$\phi_I$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and fermionic matter fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation6"><![CDATA[$\psi_I$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For simplicity, we consider the case of a <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation7"><![CDATA[$U(N)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> gauge field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation8"><![CDATA[$A_\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation9"><![CDATA[$N_{\rm F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matter pairs <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation10"><![CDATA[$(\phi_I, \psi_I)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation11"><![CDATA[$(I=1,\ldots,N_{\rm F})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation12"><![CDATA[$(\mathbf N, \mathbf N_{\rm F})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> representation of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation13"><![CDATA[$U(N)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> gauge group and the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation14"><![CDATA[$SU(N_{\rm F})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> flavor symmetry. It would be straightforward to extend the following discussion to more general settings. By using <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation15"><![CDATA[$N \times N_{\rm F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrix notation for the matter fields,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-1"><label>(2.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation1"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\phi \equiv (\phi_1, \phi_2, \ldots, \phi_{N_{\rm F}}), \quad\quad
\psi \equiv (\psi_1, \psi_2, \ldots, \psi_{N_{\rm F}}),
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
the action of the supersymmetric Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model can be written as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-2"><label>(2.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation2"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
S = \int dt d^2 x \, {\rm Tr}
\Bigg[
\phi^\dagger \hat{\Delta}_0 \phi
+ \frac{1}{m} \psi^\dagger \hat{\Delta}_0 \psi
- \frac{\pi}{km} M^2
- \frac{\pi}{k m^2} \psi^\dagger \, Y \psi
\Bigg]
+ k S_{\rm CS},
\label{eq:JP_action}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the trace is taken over the flavor indices. Just for notational convenience, we have introduced the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation16"><![CDATA[$N_{\rm F} \times N_{\rm F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation17"><![CDATA[$M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation18"><![CDATA[$N \times N$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation19"><![CDATA[$Y$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> defined by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-3"><label>(2.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation3"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
M \equiv \phi^\dagger \phi + \frac{1}{m} \psi^\dagger \psi, \quad\quad
Y \equiv \phi \phi^\dagger - \frac{1}{m} \psi \psi^\dagger + \frac{k}{\pi} i F_{z \bar{z}}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The symbol <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation20"><![CDATA[$\hat{\Delta}_0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the differential operator which gives the standard non-relativistic kinetic term
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-4"><label>(2.4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation4"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{\Delta}_0 \equiv i \mathcal D_t + \frac{1}{m} \left( \mathcal D_z \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} + \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \mathcal D_z \right),
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation21"><![CDATA[$z=x_1+i x_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation22"><![CDATA[$\bar{z} = x_1-i x_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the complex coordinates on the two-dimensional plane. The covariant derivative and the field strength are defined by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation23"><![CDATA[$\mathcal D_\mu \phi \equiv (\partial_\mu + i A_\mu) \phi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation24"><![CDATA[$\mathcal D_\mu \phi^\dagger \equiv \partial_\mu \phi^\dagger - i \phi^\dagger A_\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation25"><![CDATA[$F_{\mu \nu} \equiv - i [\mathcal D_\mu, \mathcal D_\nu]$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, etc.</p>
<p>The parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation26"><![CDATA[$k$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the Chern&#x2013;Simons level and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation27"><![CDATA[$S_{\rm CS}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the Chern&#x2013;Simons term normalized as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-5"><label>(2.5)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation5"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
S_{\rm CS} ~\equiv~ \frac{1}{4\pi} \int {\rm tr} \left[ A \wedge dA + \frac{2i}{3} A \wedge A \wedge A \right].
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>By rescaling the gauge field as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation28"><![CDATA[$A_\mu \rightarrow A_\mu/k$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, we can see that in the infinite level limit <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation29"><![CDATA[$k \rightarrow \infty$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, this model reduces to the free theory whose equations of motion are given by the Schr&#x00F6;dinger equation. In addition to the standard Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC7">B</xref> for the details of the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry), the action is invariant under the non-relativistic version of superconformal symmetry, namely the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry. We can show that this system has the same symmetry as the free supersymmetric Schr&#x00F6;dinger system even for finite <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation30"><![CDATA[$k$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="SEC2.1.1"><title>2.1.1. Super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger algebra</title>
<p>The generators of the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. The non-vanishing bosonic part of their commutation relation is given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-6"><label>(2.6)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation6"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
& \displaystyle
[H,B^z]=-iP_{\bar{z}}, \quad
[H,C]=iD, \quad
[P_{\bar{z}},C]=-iB^z, \quad
[P_{\bar{z}}, B^{\bar{z}}]=-2im \mathcal N,
\phantom{\bigg[} & \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-7"><label>(2.7)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation7"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
& \displaystyle
[J,\mathcal O]= - j_{\mathcal O} \mathcal O, \quad
[D,\mathcal O]=-i\Delta_{\mathcal O} \mathcal O, \quad
[\mathcal N_f, \mathcal O] = -q_f^{\mathcal O} \mathcal O,
\phantom{\bigg[} &
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation31"><![CDATA[$B^z = B_1 + i B_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation32"><![CDATA[$B^{\bar{z}} = B_1 - i B_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation33"><![CDATA[$P_z=(P_1-iP_2)/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation34"><![CDATA[$P_{\bar{z}}=(P_1+iP_2)/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The symbol <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation35"><![CDATA[$\mathcal O$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes any eigenoperator of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation36"><![CDATA[$(J,D,\mathcal N_f)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The eigenvalues of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation37"><![CDATA[$(J,D)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>, and the fermion numbers are <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation38"><![CDATA[$q_{\mathcal O} = 1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation39"><![CDATA[$(Q,\,q,\,S)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation40"><![CDATA[$q_{\mathcal O} = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the bosonic operators. The non-vanishing part of the commutation relation containing the fermionic generators is given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-8"><label>(2.8)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation8"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
& \displaystyle
\{ Q, \bar{Q} \} = 2 H, \quad
\{Q,\bar{q} \} = P_z, \quad
\{Q, \bar{S} \} = D + i J - \frac{3}{2} i \mathcal N_f ,
\\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-9"><label>(2.9)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation9"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
& \displaystyle
\{ q, \bar{q} \} = m \mathcal N, \quad
\{q, \bar{S} \} = - B^z, \quad \{S, \bar{S} \} = 2 C,
\\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-10"><label>(2.10)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation10"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
& \displaystyle
[H,S]=i Q, \quad
[C,Q]=-iS, \quad
[P_{\bar{z}}, S]=[B^z,Q]=2i q. \quad
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<fig id="F1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 1.</label><caption><p><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation41"><![CDATA[$(\Delta_{\mathcal O},\, j_{\mathcal O})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of the generators.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" mimetype="image" xlink:href="ptaa052f1.tif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label>
<caption><p>Generators of the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry. The generators above and below the dashed line are bosonic and fermionic operators, respectively.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation42"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation43"><![CDATA[$H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : time translation</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation44"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation45"><![CDATA[$P_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : translation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation46"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation47"><![CDATA[$J$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : rotation</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation48"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation49"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : dilatation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation50"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation51"><![CDATA[$B^i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : Galilean symmetry</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation52"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation53"><![CDATA[$C$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : special Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation54"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation55"><![CDATA[$\mathcal N$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : central charge: phase rotation</td>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation56"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation57"><![CDATA[$\mathcal N_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : fermion number symmetry</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="2"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation58"><![CDATA[$\bullet$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation59"><![CDATA[$Q,~q,~S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : supersymmetry <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation60"><![CDATA[$\phantom{\bigg[}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2.1.2"><title>2.1.2. Bosonic part of super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry</title>
<p>Let <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation61"><![CDATA[$\xi^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> be the non-relativistic version of the conformal Killing vector,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-11"><label>(2.11)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation11"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\xi^t = \varepsilon_H + 2 \varepsilon_D t - \varepsilon_C t^2, \qquad
\xi^z = - 2 (\varepsilon_P + \varepsilon_{\bar{B}} t) +
(\varepsilon_D - \varepsilon_C t + i \varepsilon_J ) z, \qquad
\xi^{\bar{z}} = \overline{\xi^z },\qquad
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation62"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_{\mathcal O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are transformation parameters. Then the bosonic part of the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger transformations takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-12"><label>(2.12)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation12"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
\delta \phi \ &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda + i \alpha \Big] \phi,
& \delta \psi \ &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda + i \alpha + i \varepsilon_f \Big] \psi, \quad\quad
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-13"><label>(2.13)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation13"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
\delta \phi^\dagger &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda - i \alpha \Big] \phi^\dagger,
& \delta \psi^\dagger &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda - i \alpha - i \varepsilon_f \Big] \psi^\dagger, \quad\quad
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-14"><label>(2.14)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation14"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta A_\mu = \xi^\nu F_{\nu \mu},
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the real functions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation63"><![CDATA[$\lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation64"><![CDATA[$\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-15"><label>(2.15)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation15"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\lambda = \varepsilon_D - \varepsilon_C t, \qquad
\alpha = \varepsilon_{\mathcal N}
+ m z \varepsilon_B
+ m \bar{z} \varepsilon_{\bar{B}}
+ \frac{m}{2}|z|^2 \varepsilon_C.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2.1.3"><title>2.1.3. Fermionic part of super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry</title>
<p>To see the invariance of the action under supersymmetry, let us first note that the following transformation does not change the action:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-16"><label>(2.16)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation16"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
\delta \phi \ &= \phantom{-}
\frac{1}{m} \left( m \zeta_q - 2i \zeta_Q \mathcal D_{z} \right) \psi,
& \delta \psi \ &= -
\left( m \bar{\zeta}_q - 2i \bar{\zeta}_Q \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \right) \phi, \quad\quad \label{eq:SUSY1} \phantom{\bigg[}
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-17"><label>(2.17)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation17"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
\delta \phi^\dagger &=
-\frac{1}{m} \left( m \bar{\zeta}_q + 2i \bar{\zeta}_Q \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \right) \psi^\dagger,
& \delta \psi^\dagger &=
-\left( m \zeta_q + 2i \zeta_Q \mathcal D_{z} \right) \phi^\dagger, \quad\quad
\label{eq:SUSY2} \phantom{\bigg[}
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-18"><label>(2.18)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation18"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
\delta A_z &= - \frac{2\pi}{km} \bar{\zeta}_Q \phi \psi^\dagger,
& \delta A_{\bar{z}} &= \frac{2\pi}{km} \zeta_Q \psi \phi^\dagger,\label{eq:SUSY3} \phantom{\bigg[}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-19"><label>(2.19)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation19"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\displaystyle \delta A_t =
\frac{\pi}{km^2} \left( m \zeta_q + 2i \zeta_Q \mathcal D_{z} \right) \psi \, \phi^\dagger + (h.c.),
\label{eq:SUSY4}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation65"><![CDATA[$\zeta_q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation66"><![CDATA[$\zeta_Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are fermionic SUSY transformation parameters corresponding to the supercharges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation67"><![CDATA[$q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation68"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. Actually, there exists one more supersymmetry generated by the supercharge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation69"><![CDATA[$S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> whose transformation law can be obtained from Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-16">2.16</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-19">2.19</xref>) by promoting the transformation parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation70"><![CDATA[$\zeta_q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation71"><![CDATA[$\zeta_Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> into the following functions depending on the coordinates <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation72"><![CDATA[$(t, z, \bar{z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-20"><label>(2.20)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation20"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\zeta_q = \varepsilon_q - \bar{z} \varepsilon_S, \quad\quad
\zeta_Q = \varepsilon_Q + t \varepsilon_S,
\label{eq:original_zeta}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation73"><![CDATA[$(\varepsilon_q,\,\varepsilon_Q,\,\varepsilon_S)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are transformation parameters corresponding to the supercharges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation74"><![CDATA[$(q,Q,S)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-21"><label>(2.21)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation21"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta = \varepsilon_q q + \varepsilon_Q Q + \varepsilon_S S + (h.c.).
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2.2"><title>2.2. Harmonic trap and modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry</title>
<p>Now let us put the SUSY Jackiw&#x2013;Pi system in a harmonic trap. The harmonic potential term can be introduced by adding the Noether charge <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation75"><![CDATA[$C$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (corresponding to the special Schr&#x00F6;dinger transformation) to the Hamiltonian. As shown in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC6">A</xref>, a Hamiltonian with such <italic>generalized</italic> chemical potential terms possesses a <italic>modified</italic> symmetry even though the original symmetry appears explicitly broken. In the present case, the generalized chemical potential terms can be turned on by introducing the following external gauge field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation76"><![CDATA[$A_\mu^{\rm ex}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation77"><![CDATA[$A_\mu \rightarrow A_\mu + A_\mu^{\rm ex}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-22"><label>(2.22)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation22"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
A_\mu^{\rm ex} dx^\mu \, = \, \frac{i}{2} m \tilde{\omega} (\bar{z} dz - z d \bar{z}) + \bigg[ \frac{m}{2} ( \omega^2 - \tilde{\omega}^2 ) |z|^2
- \mu_f \, \hat{\mathcal N}_f - \mu_a \, \hat{\mathcal N}_a \bigg] dt,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation78"><![CDATA[$\hat{\mathcal N}_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the fermion number operator,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-23"><label>(2.23)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation23"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{\mathcal N}_f \, \psi =\psi, \quad\quad
\hat{\mathcal N}_f \, \phi = 0,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation79"><![CDATA[$\hat{\mathcal N}_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation80"><![CDATA[$(a=1,\ldots,N_{\rm F})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the flavor number operators:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-24"><label>(2.24)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation24"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{\mathcal N}_a \, \phi_b = \delta_{ab} \, \phi_b, \quad\quad
\hat{\mathcal N}_a \, \psi_b = \delta_{ab} \, \psi_b.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation81"><![CDATA[$(\omega, \tilde{\omega}, \mu_f , \mu_a)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> correspond to the following <italic>generalized</italic> chemical potentials:
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation82"><![CDATA[$\omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : the strength of the harmonic trap</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation83"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\omega}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : the angular velocity of the rotation</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation84"><![CDATA[$\mu_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : the fermion number chemical potential</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation85"><![CDATA[$\mu_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> : the flavor symmetry chemical potential.</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>In the presence of the external gauge fields, the differential operator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation86"><![CDATA[$\hat{\Delta}_0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the kinetic terms is replaced by the differential operator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation87"><![CDATA[$\hat{\Delta}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> obtained by replacing the covariant derivatives with those with the external field
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-25"><label>(2.25)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation25"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{\Delta} &\equiv& i \tilde{\mathcal D}_t + \frac{1}{m} \left( \tilde{\mathcal D}_z \tilde{\mathcal D}_{\bar{z}} + \tilde{\mathcal D}_{\bar{z}} \tilde{\mathcal D}_z \right) \notag \\
&=& \hat{\Delta}_0 - \tilde{\omega} ( z \mathcal D_z - \bar{z} \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} ) - \frac{m \omega^2}{2}|z|^2 + \mu_f \hat{\mathcal N}_f + \sum_{a=1}^{N_{\rm F}} \mu_a \hat{\mathcal N}_a,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation88"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\mathcal D}_\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the covariant derivative including the external field,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-26"><label>(2.26)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation26"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{\mathcal D}_\mu \phi \equiv (\partial_\mu + i A_\mu + i A_\mu^{\rm ex}) \phi, ~ \mbox{etc.}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Since the differential operator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation89"><![CDATA[$\hat{\Delta}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> does not commute with some generators of the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger transformation, it appears that the part of the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry including the supersymmetry is broken in the Jackiw&#x2013;Pi system in the harmonic trap. Although the original super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger transformation is no longer a symmetry of the action, there exists a modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry even in the presence of the external field. By using the general method explained in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC6">A</xref>, we can find the following modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry (see Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M7-19">B.19</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M7-23">B.23</xref>) in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC7">B</xref> for the explicit forms of the symmetry transformations).</p>
<sec id="SEC2.2.1"><title>2.2.1. Bosonic part of modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry</title>
<p>To write down the bosonic part of the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry it is convenient to introduce <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation90"><![CDATA[$\eta_I(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> defined by the following differential equations:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-27"><label>(2.27)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation27"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i \partial_t (\eta_{\bar{B}} \mp i \omega \eta_P) = (\tilde{\omega} \pm \omega)(\eta_{\bar{B}} \mp i \omega \eta_P), \qquad
i \partial_t ( \eta_C + 2 i \omega \eta_D) =
2 \omega ( \eta_C + 2 i \omega \eta_D),
\label{eq:mod_Sch1}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-28"><label>(2.28)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation28"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\partial_t \eta_J = - \tilde{\omega} \partial_t \eta_H = - 2 \tilde{\omega} \eta_D,
\qquad
\partial_t \eta_{\mathcal N} = \partial_t \eta_{f} = 0.
\label{eq:mod_Sch2}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>By using these functions, ``the non-relativistic conformal Killing vector <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation91"><![CDATA[$\xi^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the modified Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry'' can be written as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-29"><label>(2.29)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation29"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\xi^t = \eta_H, \quad\quad
\xi^z = - 2 \eta_P + (\eta_D + i \eta_J) z, \quad\quad
\xi^{\bar{z}} = - 2 \eta_{\bar{P}} + (\eta_D - i \eta_J) \bar{z}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Then the bosonic part of the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger transformations takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-30"><label>(2.30)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation30"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
\delta \phi \ &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda + i \alpha \Big] \phi,
& \delta \psi \ &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda + i \alpha + i \eta_f \Big] \psi, \quad\quad
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-31"><label>(2.31)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation31"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
\delta \phi^\dagger &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda - i \alpha \Big] \phi^\dagger,
& \delta \psi^\dagger &= \Big[ \xi^\mu \mathcal D_\mu + \lambda - i \alpha - i \eta_f \Big] \psi^\dagger, \quad\quad
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-32"><label>(2.32)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation32"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta A_\mu = \xi^\nu F_{\nu \mu},
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation92"><![CDATA[$\lambda = \eta_D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and
	
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-33"><label>(2.33)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation33"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\alpha = \eta_{\mathcal N}
+ m (\eta_B - i \tilde{\omega} \eta_{\bar{P}}) z
+ m (\eta_{\bar{B}} + i \tilde{\omega} \eta_P) \bar{z}
+ m \bigg[ \frac{1}{2} \eta_C + \tilde{\omega} \eta_J - \frac{1}{2}(\omega^2-\tilde{\omega}^2) \eta_H \bigg] |z|^2.\qquad
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>These are essentially the same as the modified Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry in the free system (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC7">B</xref> for the explicit forms of the symmetry transformations). By appropriately identifying the integration constants of the differential equations in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-27">2.27</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-28">2.28</xref>) with the transformation parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation93"><![CDATA[$\mathcal \varepsilon_{\mathcal O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, we can confirm that this transformation reduces to the standard Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry when the chemical potential terms are turned off (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation94"><![CDATA[$\omega=\tilde{\omega}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>).</p>
<p>It is worth noting that the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation95"><![CDATA[$SU(N_{\rm F})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> flavor symmetry is also not broken but modified as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-34"><label>(2.34)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation34"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta \phi = i \phi \, \mathfrak{T}(t), \quad\quad
\delta \psi = i \psi \, \mathfrak{T}(t),
\label{eq:mod_flavor}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation96"><![CDATA[$\mathfrak{T}(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes a time-dependent generator of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation97"><![CDATA[$SU(N_{\rm F})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> such that
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-35"><label>(2.35)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation35"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i \partial_t \mathfrak{T}(t) = \big[ \mathcal M, \mathfrak{T}(t) \big], \quad\quad
\mathfrak{T}(0) \in \mathfrak{su}(N_{\rm F}), \quad\quad
\mathcal M \equiv {\rm diag}(\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_{N_{\rm F}}).
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2.2.2"><title>2.2.2. Fermionic part of modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry</title>
<p>The fermionic part of the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger transformation takes the same form as the unmodified one in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-16">2.16</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-19">2.19</xref>) if the covariant derivative is promoted as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation98"><![CDATA[$\mathcal D_\mu \rightarrow \tilde{\mathcal D}_\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation99"><![CDATA[$\zeta_q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation100"><![CDATA[$\zeta_Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are replaced with the functions satisfying the differential equation
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-36"><label>(2.36)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation36"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left(\begin{array}{cc} i \partial_t - \mu_f & i \bar{z} (\tilde{\omega}^2-\omega^2) \\ i \partial_{\bar{z}} & i \partial_t - \mu_f - 2 \tilde{\omega} \end{array} \right) \left(\begin{array}{c} \zeta_q \\ \zeta_Q \end{array} \right) = 0, \quad\quad \partial_z \zeta_Q = \partial_{\bar{z}} \zeta_Q = \partial_z \zeta_q = 0.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The general solution takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-37"><label>(2.37)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation37"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\zeta_q \ = \ e^{- i \mu_f t} \varepsilon_q - e^{- i(\mu_f+2\tilde{\omega})t} \, \bar{z} \, f'(t), \quad\quad
\zeta_Q \ = \ e^{- i(\mu_f + 2\tilde{\omega})t} \, f(t),
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation101"><![CDATA[$f(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M2-38"><label>(2.38)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation38"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
f(t) = \frac{1}{2} \left[ \left( \varepsilon_Q + \frac{i \varepsilon_S}{\omega} \right) e^{i(\tilde{\omega} - \omega)t} + \left( \varepsilon_Q -\frac{i \varepsilon_S}{\omega} \right) e^{i(\tilde{\omega} + \omega)t} \right],
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation102"><![CDATA[$f'(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the time derivative of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation103"><![CDATA[$f(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The integration constants (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation104"><![CDATA[$\varepsilon_q, \varepsilon_Q, \varepsilon_S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>), which can be interpreted as the transformation parameters of the modified symmetry, are chosen so that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation105"><![CDATA[$\zeta_q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation106"><![CDATA[$\zeta_Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> reduce to the original forms in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-20">2.20</xref>) in the limit <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation107"><![CDATA[$\omega, \tilde{\omega}, \mu_f \rightarrow 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>By applying these transformations to the action with the generalized chemical potential terms, we can explicitly check that the action is invariant under these modified symmetries.<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN1">1</xref></sup></p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC3"><title>3. 1/3 BPS equation and Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices</title>
<sec id="SEC3.1"><title>3.1. 1/3 BPS condition</title>
<p>Since the SUSY Jackiw&#x2013;Pi system has the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry even in the harmonic trap, it is possible to consider BPS states of the Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>], which preserve part of the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry. A BPS condition can be obtained by requiring <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation108"><![CDATA[$\delta \psi = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for each choice of the transformation parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation109"><![CDATA[$(\varepsilon_q,\varepsilon_Q,\varepsilon_S)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We can obtain a BPS equation with no explicit time dependence by setting
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-1"><label>(3.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation39"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\varepsilon_q = 0, \quad\quad
\varepsilon_S = - i \omega \epsilon_Q.
\label{eq:parameter_choice}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>By using the differential operators <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation110"><![CDATA[$\nabla_z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation111"><![CDATA[$\nabla_{\bar{z}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> defined by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-2"><label>(3.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation40"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\nabla_z \equiv \mathcal D_z - \frac{1}{2} m \omega \bar{z}, \quad\quad
\nabla_{\bar{z}} \equiv \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} + \frac{1}{2} m \omega z
\label{eq:nabla_z}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
we can write the BPS equation corresponding to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-1">3.1</xref>) as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-3"><label>(3.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation41"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\nabla_{\bar{z}} \, \phi = 0.
\label{eq:BPS}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Any solution of this BPS solution satisfies the full set of equations of motion if the following first-order differential equations are also satisfied:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-4"><label>(3.4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation42"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i F_{z \bar{z}} + \frac{\pi}{k} \phi \phi^\dagger = 0,
\quad\quad
\nabla_t \, \phi = 0,
\label{eq:Gauss_t}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where we have defined
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-5"><label>(3.5)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation43"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\nabla_t \ \equiv \ \mathcal D_t + \frac{\pi i}{k m} \phi \phi^\dagger
+ i (\omega-\tilde{\omega}) (z \mathcal D_z - \bar{z} \mathcal D_{\bar{z}}) + i \sum_{a=1}^{N_{\rm F}} (\omega - \mu_a) \hat{\mathcal N}_a.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>In the following, we consider field configurations satisfying the set of equations in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-3">3.3</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-4">3.4</xref>) with asymptotic behaviors<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN2">2</xref></sup>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-6"><label>(3.6)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation44"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\phi \rightarrow 0 , \quad\quad
F_{\mu \nu} \rightarrow 0.
\label{eq:b.c.}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC3.2"><title>3.2. General BPS solution</title>
<p>To write down the general solution of Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-3">3.3</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-4">3.4</xref>) it is convenient to introduce an arbitrary <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation112"><![CDATA[$N \times N_{\rm F}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> holomorphic matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation113"><![CDATA[$H_0(t, z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, called the moduli matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. By using <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation114"><![CDATA[$H_0(t, z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, we can formally solve Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-3">3.3</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-4">3.4</xref>) as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-7"><label>(3.7)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation45"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\phi \, &=& \,
S^{-1} H_0(t, z) \,
{\rm diag} (e^{i \mu_1 t}, e^{i \mu_2 t}, \ldots, e^{i \mu_{N_{\rm F}}}), \phantom{\bigg(} \label{eq:sol_1} \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-8"><label>(3.8)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation46"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
A_{\bar{z}} &=&
\quad -i S^{-1} \partial_{\bar{z}} S
+ \frac{i}{2} m \omega z ,
\phantom{\bigg(} \label{eq:sol_2} \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-9"><label>(3.9)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation47"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
A_t &=&
\quad - \frac{\pi}{k m} \phi \phi^\dagger
+ i (\omega - \tilde{\omega}) (z A_z - \bar{z} A_{\bar{z}})
- \omega
, \phantom{\bigg(}
\label{eq:sol_3}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation115"><![CDATA[$N \times N$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation116"><![CDATA[$S(t, z, \bar{z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an element of the complexified gauge group <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation117"><![CDATA[$U(N)^\mathbb{C} \cong GL(N,\mathbb{C})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> satisfying
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-10"><label>(3.10)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation48"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\partial_{\bar{z}} ( \partial_z \Omega \Omega^{-1}) ~ = ~
m \omega - \frac{\pi}{k} H_0 H_0^\dagger \Omega^{-1}, \quad\quad
\Omega \equiv S S^\dagger.
\label{eq:master}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This equation ensures that the Gauss law <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation118"><![CDATA[$i F_{z \bar{z}} + \frac{\pi}{k} \phi \phi^\dagger = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is satisfied. The BPS equation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation119"><![CDATA[$\nabla_{\bar{z}} \phi = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which can be rewritten as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-11"><label>(3.11)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation49"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\partial_{\bar{z}} H_0(t,z) = 0,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
is automatically satisfied for an arbitrary choice of the holomorphic matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation120"><![CDATA[$H_0(t,z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The remaining equation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation121"><![CDATA[$\nabla_t \phi = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> determines the time dependence of the solution as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-12"><label>(3.12)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation50"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\Big[ \partial_t + i (\omega-\tilde{\omega}) (z \partial_z - \bar{z} \partial_{\bar{z}}) \Big] S = \Big[ \partial_t + i (\omega-\tilde{\omega}) (z \partial_z - \bar{z} \partial_{\bar{z}}) \Big] H_0 = 0.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>It follows from this equation that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation122"><![CDATA[$S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation123"><![CDATA[$H_0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> have no explicit <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation124"><![CDATA[$t$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> dependence if they are written in terms of the coordinates <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation125"><![CDATA[$z_\ast$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation126"><![CDATA[$\bar{z}_\ast$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> defined as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-13"><label>(3.13)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation51"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
z_\ast \equiv e^{i(\tilde{\omega} - \omega)t} \, z, \quad\quad
\bar{z}_\ast \equiv e^{-i(\tilde{\omega} - \omega)t} \, \bar{z}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This implies that the whole system is rotating in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation127"><![CDATA[$z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-plane with angular velocity <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation128"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\omega} - \omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. By solving Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-10">3.10</xref>) for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation129"><![CDATA[$\Omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, physical quantities such as energy density profiles can be explicitly obtained for an arbitrarily chosen <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation130"><![CDATA[$H_0(z_\ast)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>Note that for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation131"><![CDATA[$N=N_{\rm F}=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-10">3.10</xref>) can be rewritten into the vortex equation classified as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM1"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation52"><![CDATA[$$\begin{alignat}{3}
m\omega &= 0, ~k < 0
&& \mbox{Jackiw-Pi} && \mbox{[14]} \notag \\
m\omega &> 0, ~k < 0
&& \mbox{Ambj{\o}rn-Olesen} \quad\quad && \mbox{[35,36]} \notag \\
m\omega &> 0, ~k > 0
&& \mbox{Taubes} && \mbox{[37]} \notag \\
m\omega &> 0, ~k = \infty \quad\quad
&& \mbox{Bradlow} && \mbox{[38]} \notag \\
m\omega &< 0, ~k < 0
&& \mbox{Popov} && \mbox{[39]} \notag
\end{alignat}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Although Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-10">3.10</xref>) has an identical form to the vortex equation, the boundary conditions are different and consequently the vortices in our setup have some distinctive physical properties.</p>
<p>The stability of the solution is guaranteed by the conserved charges associated with the spatial rotation and the internal phase rotation. We can show that for given values of the Noether charges, the energy of the system is bounded from below as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-14"><label>(3.14)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation53"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
E \ \geq \ (\omega - \tilde{\omega}) J + \sum_{a=1}^{N_{\rm F}} (\omega -\mu_a) \mathcal N_a,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation132"><![CDATA[$J$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation133"><![CDATA[$\mathcal N_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the angular momentum and the flavor symmetry Noether charges,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-15"><label>(3.15)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation54"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
J = \int d^2 x \, \phi_a^\dagger (z \mathcal D_z - \bar{z} \mathcal D_{\bar{z}}) \phi_a,
\qquad
\mathcal N_a = \int d^2 x \, \phi_a^\dagger \phi_a~(\mbox{no sum over a}).
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The BPS solution saturates this lower bound for the energy. This is an example of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation134"><![CDATA[$Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> solitons, that is, solitons which are stabilized by Noether charges.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that we can obtain more general solutions of the equations of motion (breathing solutions, etc.) by applying the modified Schr&#x00F6;dinger transformation to the BPS configurations discussed in this section. Such solutions preserve different combination of the supercharges and satisfy a certain time-dependent BPS equations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC3.3"><title>3.3. Static BPS solution</title>
<p>Although a generic BPS configuration is a stationary solution which depends on time <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation135"><![CDATA[$t$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the solution in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-7">3.7</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-9">3.9</xref>) becomes static if <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation136"><![CDATA[$H_0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is chosen so that the resulting scalar field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation137"><![CDATA[$\phi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is invariant under the rotation and the flavor transformations, that is,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-16"><label>(3.16)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation55"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{J} \, \phi \ = \ \hat{\mathcal N}_a \, \phi \ = \
0 + \{ \mbox{infinitesimal gauge transformation} \}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>By appropriately fixing the gauge, the static solution with, e.g., <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation138"><![CDATA[$\mu_a \, \hat{\mathcal N}_a \, \phi = \boldsymbol \mu \phi \equiv {\rm diag}(\mu_1,\ldots, \mu_N) \phi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, can be written as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-17"><label>(3.17)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation56"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\phi \ &=&
\big( e^{-\frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol \sigma} z^{\boldsymbol L} \, \big| \, \mathbf 0_{N \times (N_{\rm F}-N)} \big), \phantom{\bigg(} \label{eq:static_sol_1} \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-18"><label>(3.18)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation57"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
A_{\bar{z}} &=&
\quad - \frac{i}{2} \partial_{\bar{z}} \,
\left( \boldsymbol \sigma - m \omega |z|^2 \right),
\phantom{\bigg(} \label{eq:static_sol_2} \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-19"><label>(3.19)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation58"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
A_t &=&
\quad - \frac{\pi}{k m} \phi \phi^\dagger
+ i (\omega - \tilde{\omega})
(z A_z - \bar{z} A_{\bar{z}} + i \boldsymbol L)
- (\omega - \boldsymbol \mu),
\phantom{\bigg(}
\label{eq:static_sol_3}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation139"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol L = {\rm diag} (l_1, l_2,\ldots, l_N)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation140"><![CDATA[$N \times N$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> diagonal matrix with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation141"><![CDATA[$l_i \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation142"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol \sigma = {\rm diag}(\sigma_1, \sigma_2, \ldots, \sigma_N)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes a set of real profile functions satisfying
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-20"><label>(3.20)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation59"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\partial_z \partial_{\bar{z}} \sigma_i = m \omega - \frac{\pi}{k} |z|^{2l_i} e^{-\sigma_i},
\quad\quad
(z \partial_z - \bar{z} \partial_{\bar{z}}) \sigma_i = 0,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with asymptotic behavior <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation143"><![CDATA[$\sigma_i \rightarrow m \omega |z|^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. We can show that the subleading part of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation144"><![CDATA[$\sigma_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-21"><label>(3.21)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation60"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\sigma_i \rightarrow m \omega |z|^2 - \rho_i \log |z|^2 .
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>From this asymptotic behavior, it follows that the real parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation145"><![CDATA[$\rho_i$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> correspond to the magnetic fluxes and the flavor charges
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M3-22"><label>(3.22)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation61"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{1}{2\pi} \int d^2 x \, i F_{z \bar{z}} =
- \frac{1}{2} {\rm diag} ( \rho_1, \ldots, \rho_N ), \quad\quad
\mathcal N_a = \frac{k}{2\pi} \rho_a.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>See Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref> for the profiles of the charge density.</p>
<fig id="F2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 2.</label><caption><p>Profiles of particle number density <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation146"><![CDATA[$|\phi|^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation147"><![CDATA[$k=\pi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation148"><![CDATA[$N=N_{\rm F}=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation149"><![CDATA[$m\omega=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" mimetype="image" xlink:href="ptaa052f2.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="F3" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 3.</label><caption><p>Profiles of particle number density <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation150"><![CDATA[$|\phi|^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation151"><![CDATA[$k=-\pi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation152"><![CDATA[$N=N_{\rm F}=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation153"><![CDATA[$m\omega=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" mimetype="image" xlink:href="ptaa052f3.tif"/></fig>
<p>As in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>], time-dependent solutions can be obtained from these static solutions by applying the modified Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry. Although such solutions do not satisfy the BPS equation in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-3">3.3</xref>), they preserve a certain time-dependent linear combination of the supercharges.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC4"><title>4. Spectrum of fluctuation modes in BPS background</title>
<p>In this section we consider fluctuations of the fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation154"><![CDATA[$(\delta A_\mu, \delta \phi, \delta \psi)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> around a BPS background <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation155"><![CDATA[$(A_\mu, \phi)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and show that, in addition to the so-called massive NG modes in the bosonic fluctuations, there exist fermionic massive NG modes associated with the broken supercharges of the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry.</p>
<sec id="SEC4.1"><title>4.1. Linearized equations for fluctuations</title>
<p>When we discuss fluctuations of the bosonic fields, it is convenient to remove the gauge zero modes by imposing the gauge-fixing condition on the fluctuations as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-1"><label>(4.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation62"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta A_t = - \frac{\pi}{k m} (\delta \phi \phi^\dagger + \phi \delta \phi^\dagger) - i (\omega-\tilde{\omega})(z \delta A_z - \bar{z} \delta A_{\bar{z}}).
\label{eq:linear_gauge}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This gauge-fixing condition does not completely remove unphysical gauge zero modes since there remain gauge degrees of freedom generated by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation156"><![CDATA[$\Lambda \in \mathfrak u(N)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> such that
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-2"><label>(4.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation63"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal D_t \Lambda + i (\omega-\tilde{\omega}) (z \mathcal D_z \Lambda - \bar{z} \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \Lambda) + \frac{\pi i}{km} [\phi \phi^\dagger, \Lambda] = 0.
\label{eq:residual}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This residual gauge degrees of freedom can be fixed by imposing the additional gauge-fixing condition as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-3"><label>(4.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation64"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i ( \mathcal D_z \delta A_{\bar{z}} + \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \delta A_z ) + \frac{\pi}{k} (\delta \phi \phi^\dagger - \phi \delta \phi^\dagger) = 0.
\label{eq:additional_cond}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The Gauss law equation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation157"><![CDATA[$i F_{z \bar{z}} + \frac{\pi}{k} \phi \phi^\dagger = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> reduces to the linearized Gauss law for the fluctuation fields:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-4"><label>(4.4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation65"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i ( \mathcal D_z \delta A_{\bar{z}} - \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \delta A_z ) + \frac{\pi}{k} (\delta \phi \phi^\dagger + \phi \delta \phi^\dagger) = 0.
\label{eq:linear_gauss}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>If the gauge-fixing condition in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-1">4.1</xref>) and the linearized Gauss law in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-4">4.4</xref>) are satisfied, the linearized equations for the fluctuation fields can be written as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-5"><label>(4.5)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation66"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left( i \nabla_t+ \frac{2}{m} \boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \right)
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta A_{\bar{z}} \\
\delta \phi
\end{array} \right)
=0 ,
\quad\quad
\left( i \nabla_t +\frac{2}{m} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \boldsymbol{\nabla} \right) \delta \psi = 0,
\label{eq:linearaized_eq}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the differential operators are given by<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN3">3</xref></sup>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-6"><label>(4.6)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation67"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\nabla_t \ \equiv \ \mathcal D_t + \frac{\pi i}{k m} \phi \phi^\dagger
+ i (\omega-\tilde{\omega}) \left( \hat{J} - \frac{3}{2} \hat{\mathcal N}_f \right) + i \sum_{a=1}^{N_{\rm F}} (\omega - \mu_a) \hat{\mathcal N}_a - i (\mu_f+\omega+\tilde{\omega}) \hat{\mathcal N}_f
\label{eq:nabla_t}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-7"><label>(4.7)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation68"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\boldsymbol{\nabla} =
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\frac{\pi i}{k} \hat{\phi}^\dagger \\
\nabla_z
\end{array} \right),
\quad\quad
\tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} =
\left(\begin{array}{cc}
i \hat{\phi} & \nabla_{\bar{z}}
\end{array} \right).
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The operators <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation158"><![CDATA[$\hat{\phi}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation159"><![CDATA[$\hat{\phi}^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denote the right multiplications of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation160"><![CDATA[$\phi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation161"><![CDATA[$\phi^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, e.g. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation162"><![CDATA[$\hat{\phi} \cdot \delta A_{\bar{z}} = \delta A_{\bar{z}} \phi_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and the differential operators <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation163"><![CDATA[$\nabla_z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation164"><![CDATA[$\nabla_{\bar{z}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are defined by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-8"><label>(4.8)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation69"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\nabla_z \equiv \mathcal D_z - \frac{1}{2} m \omega \bar{z}, \quad\quad
\nabla_{\bar{z}} \equiv \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} + \frac{1}{2} m \omega z.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC4.2"><title>4.2. Eigenmode expansion and supermultiplets</title>
<p>Here we consider fluctuations around the static BPS background in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-17">3.17</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-19">3.19</xref>). Let us consider the eigenmode expansion of the fluctuations
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-9"><label>(4.9)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation70"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta A_{\bar{z}} \\
\delta \phi
\end{array} \right)
=
\sum_n
\varphi_n(t)
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_{g,\,n} \\
u_{s,\,n}
\end{array} \right),
\quad\quad
\delta \psi = \sum_n \chi_n(t) \, u_{f,\,n},
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation165"><![CDATA[$(u_{g,\,n}, u_{s,\,n})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation166"><![CDATA[$u_{f,\,n}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are bosonic and fermionic mode functions satisfying the eigenmode equations
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-10"><label>(4.10)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation71"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left( i \nabla(\epsilon_{b,\,n}) + \frac{2}{m} \boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \right)
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_{g,\,n} \\
u_{s,\,n}
\end{array} \right)
=0 ,
\quad\quad
\left( i \nabla(\epsilon_{f,\,n}) +\frac{2}{m} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \boldsymbol{\nabla} \right) u_{f,\,n} = 0,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation167"><![CDATA[$\nabla(\epsilon)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the operator which can be obtained from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation168"><![CDATA[$\nabla_t$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-6">4.6</xref>) by replacing the time derivative <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation169"><![CDATA[$i \partial_t$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with an eigenvalue <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation170"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Then the linearized equations reduce to the following equations for the bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation171"><![CDATA[$\varphi_n(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation172"><![CDATA[$\chi_n(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-11"><label>(4.11)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation72"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i \partial_t \varphi_n(t) = \epsilon_{b,\,n} \, \varphi_n(t), \quad\quad
i \partial_t \chi_n(t) = \epsilon_{f,\,n} \, \chi_n(t).
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Note that since <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation173"><![CDATA[$\nabla(\epsilon)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> commutes with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation174"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation175"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-12"><label>(4.12)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation73"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left[ \nabla(\epsilon_{b,\,n}) ,\boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \right]
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_{g,\,n} \\
u_{s,\,n}
\end{array} \right)
= 0, \quad\quad
\Big[ \nabla(\epsilon_{f,\,n}) , \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \boldsymbol{\nabla} \Big] u_{f,\,n} = 0,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
the solution to the bosonic (fermionic) linearized equation can be decomposed into simultaneous eigenmodes of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation176"><![CDATA[$\nabla(\epsilon)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation177"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation178"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \boldsymbol{\nabla}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>).</p>
<p>Since the BPS background configuration preserves a linear combination of three complex supercharges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation179"><![CDATA[$(q, Q, S)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, eigenmodes of the bosonic and fermionic fluctuations are paired so that they form supermultiplets of the unbroken supersymmetry. Let <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation180"><![CDATA[$(u_g, u_s)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> be a bosonic eigenmode with eigenvalue <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation181"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_b$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The partner fermionic eigenmode <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation182"><![CDATA[$u_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be obtained as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-13"><label>(4.13)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation74"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
u_f = \tilde{\boldsymbol \nabla}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right) , \quad\quad
\epsilon_f = \epsilon_b - \mu_f - \omega - \tilde{\omega}.
\label{eq:b_to_f}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>On the other hand, any fermionic eigenmode <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation183"><![CDATA[$u_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with eigenvalue <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation184"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be mapped to its partner bosonic eigenmode as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-14"><label>(4.14)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation75"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
=
\boldsymbol{\nabla} u_f,
\quad\quad
\epsilon_b = \epsilon_f + \mu_f + \omega + \tilde{\omega}.
\label{eq:f_to_b}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Since <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation185"><![CDATA[$(u_g, u_s)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation186"><![CDATA[$u_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are eigenmodes of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation187"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation188"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \boldsymbol{\nabla}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> respectively, the sequential mappings (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation189"><![CDATA[$boson \rightarrow fermion \rightarrow boson$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation190"><![CDATA[$fermion \rightarrow boson \rightarrow fermion$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) do not give new eigenmodes,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-15"><label>(4.15)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation76"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
~\rightarrow~
\boldsymbol{\nabla} \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
~\propto~
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right),
\quad\quad
u_f ~\rightarrow~ \tilde{\boldsymbol{\nabla}} \boldsymbol{\nabla}
u_f ~\propto~ u_f.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Therefore, a generic supermultiplet consists of a pair of bosonic and fermionic eigenmodes.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that, unlike the case of ordinary supersymmetry, bosonic and fermionic eigenmodes in a supermultiplet have different eigenfrequencies, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation191"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_b - \epsilon_f = \mu_f + \omega + \tilde{\omega}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This is due to the unbroken supersymmetry being part of the modified supersymmetry which explicitly depends on the time <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation192"><![CDATA[$t$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. One can check that the unbroken supersymmetry becomes independent of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation193"><![CDATA[$t$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation194"><![CDATA[$\epsilon_b - \epsilon_f = \mu_f + \omega + \tilde{\omega} = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="SEC4.2.1"><title>4.2.1. Short supermultiplets</title>
<p>Although a generic supermultiplet is made up of a pair of bosonic and fermionic eigenmodes, there also exist short supermultiplets, each of which consists of only a single bosonic eigenmode. Such a short multiplet can be found by solving the linearized BPS equation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation195"><![CDATA[$\nabla_{\bar{z}} \delta \phi + i \delta A_{\bar{z}} \phi = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, i.e.
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-16"><label>(4.16)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation77"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{\boldsymbol \nabla}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
= 0.
\label{eq:linear_BPS}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>For a bosonic eigenmode satisfying this equation, the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation196"><![CDATA[$boson \rightarrow fermion$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> mapping in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-13">4.13</xref>) vanishes. Furthermore, there is no fermionic eigenmode such that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation197"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol \nabla u_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a solution of the linearized BPS equation since the operator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation198"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\boldsymbol \nabla} \boldsymbol \nabla = \nabla_z \nabla_{\bar{z}} - m \omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has no zero mode.<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN4">4</xref></sup> Therefore, this type of short multiplet consists of only a single bosonic mode.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC4.2.2"><title>4.2.2. Linearized Gauss law and gauge-fixing condition</title>
<p>Since the bosonic component of a long supermultiplet is an element of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation199"><![CDATA[${\rm im} \nabla$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the linearized Gauss law in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-4">4.4</xref>) and the gauge-fixing condition in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-3">4.3</xref>) are automatically satisfied:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-17"><label>(4.17)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation78"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i \mathcal D_z u_g + \frac{\pi}{k} u_s \phi^\dagger \ = \
i \mathcal D_z \left( \frac{\pi i}{k} u_f \phi^\dagger \right) + \frac{\pi}{k} \nabla_z u_f \phi^\dagger
\ = \ 0.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>On the other hand, for any solution of the linearized BPS equation in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-16">4.16</xref>) (element of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation200"><![CDATA[${\rm Ker} \, \tilde{\nabla}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>), we can always find a short multiplet satisfying the constraints in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-4">4.4</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-3">4.3</xref>) by using the symmetry of the eigenmode equation,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-18"><label>(4.18)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation79"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
\rightarrow
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g - \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \Lambda \\
u_s + i \Lambda \phi
\end{array} \right),
\label{eq:sym_short}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation201"><![CDATA[$\Lambda \in \mathfrak{gl} (N)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation202"><![CDATA[$N \times N$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrix satisfying <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation203"><![CDATA[$\nabla(\epsilon_b) \, \Lambda = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-19"><label>(4.19)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation80"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i \left[ \mathcal D_z \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \Lambda - \frac{\pi}{k} \Lambda \phi \phi^\dagger \right] \ = \ i \mathcal D_z u_g + \frac{\pi}{k} u_s \phi^\dagger.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>In this way, we can find physical short multiplets satisfying the linearized Gauss law equation and the gauge-fixing condition.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC4.3"><title>4.3. Bosonic and fermionic massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone modes</title>
<p>Since the static BPS configuration in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-17">3.17</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-19">3.19</xref>) breaks part of the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry, there exist NG modes in the fluctuations of the fields.</p>
<sec id="SEC4.3.1"><title>4.3.1. Bosonic massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone modes</title>
<p>In the presence of the external fields, the super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry is modified in such a way that the generators explicitly depend on the time <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation204"><![CDATA[$t$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Consequently, the corresponding NG modes become massive. The bosonic NG modes satisfying the constraints of Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-4">4.4</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-3">4.3</xref>) take the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-20"><label>(4.20)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation81"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
P_z - i \omega B^{\bar{z}}
& ~\rightarrow~
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
=
\left(\begin{array}{c}
-i F_{z \bar{z}} - m \omega \\
- i \nabla_z \phi
\end{array} \right),
&\epsilon_b&= \tilde{\omega} - \omega, \quad\quad
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-21"><label>(4.21)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation82"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
P_z + i \omega B^{\bar{z}}
&~\rightarrow~
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
=
\left(\begin{array}{c}
-i F_{z \bar{z}} \\
- i \nabla_z \phi
\end{array} \right),
&\epsilon_b& = \tilde{\omega} + \omega. \quad\quad
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-22"><label>(4.22)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation83"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
D + 2 i \omega C
&~\rightarrow ~
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
=
\left(\begin{array}{c}
z F_{z \bar{z}} \\
\left( z \mathcal D_z + \bar{z} \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} + 1 \right) \phi
\end{array} \right),
&\epsilon_b&= 2\omega, \quad\quad
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the first NG mode generated by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation205"><![CDATA[$P_z - i \omega B^{\bar{z}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is in a short multiplet and we have used the symmetry in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-18">4.18</xref>) so that it satisfies the constraints in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-4">4.4</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-3">4.3</xref>). These three complex modes (and their complex conjugate) correspond to the broken modified symmetry generated by six real operators (translation, Galilean, dilatation, and special conformal symmetry). There also exist massive NG modes corresponding to the broken modified flavor symmetry in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-34">2.34</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC4.3.2"><title>4.3.2. Fermionic massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone modes</title>
<p>Since the BPS configuration breaks part of the supersymmetry, there also exist fermionic NG modes. As in the bosonic case, the modified supersymmetry transformations explicitly depend on time and hence the corresponding fermionic NG modes are massive. There are two such fermionic massive NG modes corresponding to the broken fermionic generators <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation206"><![CDATA[$q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation207"><![CDATA[$Q + i \omega S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-23"><label>(4.23)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation84"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\quad\quad
q ~~~~
&~\rightarrow~~
u_f = \phi,
&\epsilon_f& = - \mu_f,
\label{eq:massive_q} \\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-24"><label>(4.24)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation85"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
Q + i \omega S
&~\rightarrow~~
u_f = z \phi,
&\epsilon_f& = - \mu_f - \tilde{\omega} + \omega.
\label{eq:massive_QS}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We can check that the NG modes generated by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation208"><![CDATA[$( P_z + i \omega B^{\bar{z}} , q )$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation209"><![CDATA[$( D + 2 i \omega C , Q + i \omega S )$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the pairs of supermultiplets related by the boson&#x2013;fermion mapping discussed above.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC4.4"><title>4.4. Infinite towers of eigenmodes in static BPS background</title>
<p>As we have seen in the previous section, the bosonic and fermionic massive NG modes have eigenfrequencies given by the chemical potentials with the integer coefficients determined by the charges of the corresponding generators. Here we show that there are infinite towers of eigenmodes with such eigenvalues.</p>
<p>Let us first consider the case of short multiplets. Since the BPS equation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation210"><![CDATA[$\nabla_{\bar{z}} \phi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is satisfied by Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-7">3.7</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-9">3.9</xref>) for an arbitrary matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation211"><![CDATA[$H_0(t,z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the linearized BPS equation can be solved by using the linearized version of Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-7">3.7</xref>)&#x2013;(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-9">3.9</xref>), which takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-25"><label>(4.25)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation86"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
u_g \\
u_s
\end{array} \right)
=
\left(\begin{array}{c}
0 \\
e^{-\frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol \sigma} \delta H_0(z)
\end{array} \right)
+
\left(\begin{array}{c}
- \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \Lambda \\
i \Lambda \phi
\end{array} \right),
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation212"><![CDATA[$\Lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation213"><![CDATA[$N \times N$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> matrix determined by the constraint<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN5">5</xref></sup>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-26"><label>(4.26)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation87"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
i \left[ \mathcal D_z \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} \Lambda - \frac{\pi}{k} \Lambda \phi \phi^\dagger \right] = \frac{\pi}{k} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol \sigma} \delta H_0(z) \phi^\dagger.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This solution of the linearized BPS equation satisfies the eigenmode equation with eigenvalue <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation214"><![CDATA[$\epsilon$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> if the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation215"><![CDATA[$\delta H_0(z)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is chosen so that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation216"><![CDATA[$\Lambda(\epsilon) \, \delta H_0 = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This condition is satisfied when <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation217"><![CDATA[$\delta H_0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has one non-zero component given by a monomial of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation218"><![CDATA[$z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For example, if <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation219"><![CDATA[$\delta H_0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation220"><![CDATA[$z^l$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation221"><![CDATA[$(l \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in its <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation222"><![CDATA[$(j,J)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-component,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-27"><label>(4.27)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation88"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
(\delta H_0)_{iI} = z^l \delta_{ij} \delta_{IJ},
\label{eq:LLL_b}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
the eigenfrequency of the corresponding short multiplet is given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-28"><label>(4.28)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation89"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\epsilon_b
= ( l - l_j ) (\omega-\tilde{\omega}) - \mu_J + \mu_j.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The NG mode generated by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation223"><![CDATA[$P_z - i \omega B^{\bar{z}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> corresponds to a linear combination of the modes with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation224"><![CDATA[$(l,J) = (l_j - 1, j)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The NG modes corresponding to the broken (modified) flavor symmetry are also contained in these towers of eigenmodes.</p>
<p>In addition to the short multiplets, we can also find exact spectra of a class of ordinary long supermultiplets. Such supermultiplets can be obtained from the fermionic eigenmode corresponding to the lowest Landau level. For example, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation225"><![CDATA[$u_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an eigenmode with frequency
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-29"><label>(4.29)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation90"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\epsilon_f = ( l - l_j )(\omega - \tilde{\omega}) - \mu_J + \mu_j - \mu_f
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
if <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation226"><![CDATA[$u_f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has a non-zero monomial in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation227"><![CDATA[$(j,J)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-component
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-30"><label>(4.30)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation91"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
(u_f)_{iI} = e^{-\frac{1}{2} \sigma_j} z^l \delta_{ij} \delta_{IJ}.
\label{eq:LLL_f}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The fermionic massive NG modes in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-23">4.23</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-24">4.24</xref>) correspond to the linear combinations of the eigenmodes with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation228"><![CDATA[$(l,J)=(l_j,j)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation229"><![CDATA[$(l,J) = (l_j+1,j)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. The corresponding bosonic mode can be obtained by applying the map in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-14">4.14</xref>),
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-31"><label>(4.31)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation92"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
(u_g)_{iI} = \frac{\pi i}{k} e^{-\frac{1}{2}(\sigma_j + \sigma_J)}
z^l \bar{z}^{l_J} \delta_{ij} \delta_{IJ}, \quad\quad
(u_s)_{iI} =
e^{-\frac{1}{2} \sigma_j} z^{l-1} \left( l - \frac{1}{2} r \partial_r \sigma_j \right) \delta_{ij} \delta_{IJ},
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation230"><![CDATA[$r=|z|$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. As we have seen above, this bosonic mode has eigenfrequency related to that of the fermionic mode as in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-13">4.13</xref>),
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M4-32"><label>(4.32)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation93"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\epsilon_b =
( l - l_j )(\omega - \tilde{\omega}) - \mu_J + \mu_j - \omega - \tilde{\omega}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The towers of the eigenmodes in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-27">4.27</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M4-30">4.30</xref>) can be interpreted as the lowest Landau levels in the bosonic and fermionic sectors, respectively. As was done in the non-linear Schr&#x00F6;dinger system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>], it would be interesting to discuss the low-energy dynamics of such degrees of freedom with physically distinctive properties.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC5"><title>5. Summary and discussion</title>
<p>In this paper we have discussed the supersymmetric Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model in the harmonic trap. The super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry of the original SUSY Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model is modified in the presence of the external background fields which correspond to the generalized chemical potential terms including the harmonic potential. We have seen that the 1/3 BPS states of Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices, which preserve part of the modified supersymmetry, are stationary configurations rotating around the origin. They become static when the moduli matrix is at the fixed points of the spatial rotation and the flavor symmetry. We have investigated fluctuations around the static BPS backgrounds and revealed the structure of supermultiplets of eigenmodes. In addition to the bosonic massive NG modes, we identified the fermionic massive NG modes associated with the broken modified superconformal symmetry. We have also found the eigenmode spectra of the infinite towers of supermultiplets corresponding to the bosonic and fermionic lowest Landau levels.</p>
<p>While we have discussed one of the simplest examples of (modified) non-relativistic supersymmetry in the Jackiw&#x2013;Pi model, it is known that there exist Chern&#x2013;Simons matter systems with extended non-relativistic supersymmetries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]. It would be interesting to investigate bosonic and fermionic massive NG modes in the extended models such as the non-relativistic Aharony&#x2013;Bergman&#x2013;Jafferis&#x2013;Maldacena model. Another direction to be explored is to clarify the relation between the quantum states of the Jackiw&#x2013;Pi vortices in the harmonic potential and the spectrum of the chiral primary operators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>] from the viewpoint of the non-relativistic version of the state&#x2013;operator mapping [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>]. If we set <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation231"><![CDATA[$\mu_f + \omega + \tilde{\omega} = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in our model, the explicit time dependence of the supersymmetry preserved by the 1/3 BPS states disappears and hence we can compactify the time direction without breaking the supersymmetry. Such a situation is quite similar to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation232"><![CDATA[$\Omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>-background [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>], and it would be possible to compute certain types of superconformal indices by using the supersymmetric localization method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>]. As in the case of the vortex partition functions in two-dimensional <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation233"><![CDATA[$\mathcal N=(2,2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> theories [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>], the moduli matrix method, which was used to describe the BPS vortex solution, would play a crucial role in the localization computation and hence it is an important future work to investigate the structure of the space of the BPS solutions from the viewpoint of the moduli matrix formalism and its relation to the Atiyah&#x2013;Drinfield&#x2013;Hitchin&#x2013;Manin-like construction discussed in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>].</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack id="ack1">
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>This work is supported by the the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science (MEXT)-supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities ``Topological Science'' (Grant No. S1511006). The work of M. N. is also supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ``Topological Materials Science'' (KAKENHI Grant No. 15H05855) from the MEXT of Japan, and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI Grant No. 16H03984). We would like to thank Yunguo Jiang and Sven Bjarke Gudnason for helpful discussions at an early stage of this work.</p>
</ack>
<sec><title>Funding</title>
<p>Open Access funding: SCOAP<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation234"><![CDATA[$^3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<app-group>
<app><title/>
<sec id="SEC6"><title>Appendix A. Generalized chemical potential and massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone mode</title>
<p>In this section we summarize the basic properties of the generalized chemical potential, modified symmetry, and the massive NG mode.</p>
<p>Consider a system with a symmetry generated by conserved charges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation235"><![CDATA[$Q^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> obeying the commutation relation
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-1"><label>(A.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation94"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
[Q^a, Q^b] = i f^{ab}{}_c Q^c.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>If some of these generators have explicit time dependence, they do not commute with the Hamiltonian. It follows from the Noether theorem and the Heisenberg equations of motion
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-2"><label>(A.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation95"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{d Q^a}{dt} = i [H, Q^a] + \frac{\partial Q^a}{\partial t} = 0
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
that the explicit time dependence of the conserved charges can be written as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-3"><label>(A.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation96"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
Q^a = (e^{\mathcal H t})^a{}_b \, \underline{Q^b},
\label{eq:Q_underlined}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation236"><![CDATA[$\mathcal H^a{}_b$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the matrix defined by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-4"><label>(A.4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation97"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
[H, Q^a] = i \mathcal H^a{}_b Q^b
\label{eq:calH}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation237"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^a}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are operators which do not have explicit time dependence and satisfy the same commutation relation as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation238"><![CDATA[$Q^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-5"><label>(A.5)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation98"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \underline{Q^b} = 0, \quad\quad
[\underline{Q^a}, \underline{Q^b}] = i f^{ab}{}_c \underline{Q^c}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Note that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation239"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^a}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are identical to the symmetry generators <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation240"><![CDATA[$Q^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> if the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation241"><![CDATA[$Q^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> do not have explicit time dependence. Using <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation242"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^a}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, we can add ``chemical-potential-like terms'' to the Hamiltonian without introducing explicit time dependence,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-6"><label>(A.6)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation99"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{H} = H - \mu_a \underline{Q^a},
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation243"><![CDATA[$\mu_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are parameters corresponding to the chemical potentials. In the presence of these terms, which we call generalized chemical potential terms, the original symmetry of the system is explicitly broken. Nevertheless, we can find the same number of conserved charges as follows. Consider a linear combination of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation244"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^a}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with time-dependent coefficients
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-7"><label>(A.7)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation100"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{Q}^a = \mathcal G^a{}_b(t) \underline{Q^b}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The Heisenberg equation of motion implies
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-8"><label>(A.8)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation101"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{d \tilde{Q}^a}{dt} \ = \ i [\tilde{H}, \tilde{Q}^a] + \frac{\partial \tilde{Q}^a}{\partial t} \ = \ \left[ - \mathcal G^a{}_b \left( \mathcal H^b{}_c - \mu_d f^{db}{}_c \right) + \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \mathcal G^a{}_b \right] \underline{Q^c}.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This equation implies that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation245"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are conserved charges if the coefficients <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation246"><![CDATA[$\mathcal G^a{}_b(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are chosen so that they satisfy
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-9"><label>(A.9)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation102"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \mathcal G^a{}_b = \mathcal G^a{}_c \left( \mathcal H^c{}_b - \mu_d f^{dc}{}_b \right).
\label{eq:eq_G}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>For constant chemical potentials <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation247"><![CDATA[$\mu_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the conserved charges <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation248"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-10"><label>(A.10)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation103"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{Q}^a = \mathcal G^a{}_b(t) \underline{Q^b} = (e^{\tilde{\mathcal H} t})^a{}_b \underline{Q^b}, \quad\quad
\tilde{\mathcal H}^a{}_b \equiv \mathcal H^a{}_b - \mu_c f^{ca}{}_b.
\label{eq:modified_Q}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We call the symmetry generated by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation249"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> ``modified symmetry.'' It is worth noting that even for time-dependent <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation250"><![CDATA[$\mu_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, we can construct <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation251"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> by using the solution of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M6-9">A.9</xref>).</p>
<sec id="SEC6.1"><title>Appendix A.1. Massive Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone mode</title>
<p>Here we briefly review the massive NG mode, which appears when a symmetry with explicit time dependence is spontaneously broken.</p>
<p>Let us assume that the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation252"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\mathcal H}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is diagonalizable. Then, corresponding to the eigenvector of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation253"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\mathcal H}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, there exists a linear combination of the modified conserved charge in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M6-10">A.10</xref>) such that
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-11"><label>(A.11)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation104"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{Q}^\alpha = e^{- i \alpha t} \underline{Q^\alpha},
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation254"><![CDATA[$\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an eigenvalue of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation255"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\mathcal H}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation256"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^\alpha}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a certain linear combination of the operators <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation257"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^a}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The Heisenberg equation for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation258"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}^\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> implies that
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-12"><label>(A.12)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation105"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{Q}^\alpha(t) = e^{-i \alpha t} \, e^{i \tilde{H} t} \underline{Q^b}(0) e^{- i \tilde{H} t},
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation259"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^b}(0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the operator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation260"><![CDATA[$\underline{Q^b}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation261"><![CDATA[$t=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> (Schr&#x00F6;dinger picture). Consider a matrix element <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation262"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}^\alpha(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> between two energy eigenstates <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation263"><![CDATA[$|E_1 \rangle$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation264"><![CDATA[$|E_2 \rangle$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-13"><label>(A.13)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation106"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\langle E_2 | \tilde{Q}^\alpha(t) | E_1 \rangle = e^{i (E_2 - E_1 - \alpha) t} \langle E_2 | \underline{Q^b}(0) | E_1 \rangle.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Since the matrix element of the conserved charge is independent of time, the right-hand side cannot have time dependence. Therefore, if a matrix element of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation265"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}^\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is nonzero,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-14"><label>(A.14)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation107"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\langle E_2 | \tilde{Q}^\alpha | E_1 \rangle \not = 0,
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
then there exists a gap between the two energy eigenstates,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M6-15"><label>(A.15)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation108"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\Delta E = E_2 - E_1 = \alpha.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The massive mode corresponding to this gap is the massive NG mode, whose mass is exactly given by an eigenvalue of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation266"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\mathcal H}^a{}_b = \mathcal H^a{}_b - \mu_c f^{ca}{}_b$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. See Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>] for a more precise argument for the massive NG theorem.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC7"><title>Appendix B. Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry in free Schr&#x00F6;dinger system</title>
<p>In this section we briefly review the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry, the generalized chemical potential, and the modified symmetry in the free Schr&#x00F6;dinger system as an example. The action of the free Schr&#x00F6;dinger system in (2+1) dimensions takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-1"><label>(B.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation109"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
S = \int dt d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ i \partial_t + \frac{1}{2m} \partial_i^2 \right] \phi.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This is a non-relativistic system, in which the canonical commutation relation is given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-2"><label>(B.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation110"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
[\phi(x), \bar{\phi} (x')] = \delta^2(x-x').
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>This system is invariant under the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM2"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation111"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
&\mbox{time translation} &\delta_H \phi &= \partial_t \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{dilatation} &\delta_D \phi &= ( 2 t \partial_t + x^i \partial_i + 1 ) \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{rotation} &\delta_J \phi &= (x_1 \partial_2 - x_2 \partial_1) \phi,\notag \\
&\mbox{special Schr{\"o}dinger symmetry} &\delta_C \phi &= \left[ t^2 \partial_t + t \left( x_i \partial_i + 1 \right) - i \frac{m}{2} x_i^2 \right] \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{Galilean boost} &\delta_{B_i} \phi &= ( t \partial_i - i m x_i ) \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{translation} &\delta_{P_i} \phi &= - \partial_i \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{phase rotation} &\delta_{\mathcal N} \phi &= - i \phi. \notag
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The corresponding conserved charges are given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM3"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation112"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
&\mbox{Hamiltonian} &H &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ - \frac{1}{2m} \partial_i^2 \right] \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{dilatation charge} &D &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ - \frac{t}{m} \partial_i^2 + i (x_i \partial_i + 1) \right] \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{angular momentum} &J &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \Big[ \, i (x_1 \partial_2 - x_2 \partial_1) \Big] \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{special Schr{\"o}dinger charge} &C &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ - \frac{t^2}{2m} \partial_i^2 + i t \left(x_i \partial_i + 1 \right) + \frac{m}{2} x_i^2\right] \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{Galilean boost charge} & B_i &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \Big[ \, i t \partial_i + m x_i \Big] \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{momentum} & P_i &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \Big[ -i \partial_i \Big] \phi, \notag \\
&\mbox{particle number} & \mathcal N &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \phi. \notag
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>These charges satisfy the Schr&#x00F6;dinger algebra, whose non-trivial part takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-3"><label>(B.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation113"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
[H,B_i]=-iP_i,~~[C,P_i]=iB_i,~~[B_i,P_j]=i m \delta_{ij} \mathcal N,~~[H,C]=iD, \\ {}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-4"><label>(B.4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation114"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
[J, \mathcal O] = - j_{\mathcal O} \mathcal O,~~
[D, \mathcal O] = - i \Delta_{\mathcal O} \mathcal O, \quad
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation267"><![CDATA[$\mathcal O$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes an arbitrary eigenoperator of the Cartan part <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation268"><![CDATA[$(J,D,\mathcal N)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with eigenvalues <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation269"><![CDATA[$(j_{\mathcal O},\Delta_{\mathcal O})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The spins <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation270"><![CDATA[$j_{\mathcal O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and conformal weights <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation271"><![CDATA[$\Delta_{\mathcal O}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of the generators are given by <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table B1</xref>, where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation272"><![CDATA[$P_z = (P_1-i P_2)/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation273"><![CDATA[$B_z=B_1+iB_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The conserved charges given above can be written as linear combinations of the time-independent operators defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M6-3">A.3</xref>):
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM4"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation115"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
H &= \underline H & \underline H &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ - \frac{1}{2m} \partial_i^2 \right] \phi, \notag \\
D& = \underline D + 2 t \underline H & \underline D &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ i (x_i \partial_i + 1) \right] \phi, \notag \\
J &= \underline J & \underline J &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \Big[ - i (x_1 \partial_2 - x_2 \partial_1) \Big] \phi, \notag \\
C &= \underline C + t \underline D + t^2 \underline H & \underline C &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ \frac{m}{2} x_i^2 \right] \phi, \notag \\
B_i &= \underline B_i - t \underline P_i & \underline B_i &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \Big[ m x_i \Big] \phi, \notag \\
P_i &= \underline P_i & \underline P_i &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \Big[ -i \partial_i \Big] \phi, \notag \\
\mathcal N &= \underline{\mathcal N} & \underline{\mathcal N} &= \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \phi. \notag
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Note that the time dependence is at most quadratic since the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation274"><![CDATA[$\mathcal H$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> defined in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M6-4">A.4</xref>) satisfies <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation275"><![CDATA[$\mathcal H^3 = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and hence <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation276"><![CDATA[$e^{\mathcal H t} = 1 + \mathcal H t + (\mathcal H t)^2/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the case of the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table B1.</label>
<caption><p>Generator spins and conformal weights.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left"></th>
<th align="center">H</th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation277"><![CDATA[$P_z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation278"><![CDATA[$P_{\bar{z}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center">D</th>
<th align="center">J</th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation279"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{N}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation280"><![CDATA[$B_z$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation281"><![CDATA[$B_{\bar{z}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center">C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation282"><![CDATA[$\Delta_{\mathcal{O}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation283"><![CDATA[$-$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>1</td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation284"><![CDATA[$-$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>1</td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation285"><![CDATA[$-$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation286"><![CDATA[$j_{\mathcal{O}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation287"><![CDATA[$-$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>1</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation288"><![CDATA[$-$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Now let us deform the Hamiltonian by introducing the generalized chemical potential terms,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-5"><label>(B.5)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation116"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{H} = H - \mu_a \underline{Q}^a.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>For the most generic chemical potential, the deformed Hamiltonian terms takes the form
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-6"><label>(B.6)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation117"><![CDATA[$$\begin{multline}
\tilde{H} = \!\! \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \bigg[ \! - \frac{1}{2m} \partial_i^2 - i \Big( \mu_D x_i + \mu_J \epsilon_{ij} x_j - \mu_{P_i} \Big)\partial_i \\
- \Big( i \mu_D + \frac{m}{2} \mu_C x_i^2 + m \mu_{B_i} x_i + \mu \Big) \bigg] \phi.
\end{multline}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>These chemical potential terms can also be written as an external gauge field as
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-7"><label>(B.7)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation118"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{H} = \int d^2 x \, \bar{\phi} \left[ - \frac{1}{2m} \tilde{\mathcal D}_i^2 + A_t^{\rm ex} \right] \phi,
\label{eq:H_deformed}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation289"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\mathcal D}_\mu \equiv \partial_\mu + i A_\mu^{\rm ex}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-8"><label>(B.8)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation119"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
A_\mu^{\rm ex} dx^\mu \, = \, \frac{i}{2} m \tilde{\omega} \bigg[ (\overline{z-z_0}) dz - (z-z_0) d \bar{z} \bigg] + \bigg[ \frac{m}{2} ( \omega^2 - \tilde{\omega}^2 ) |z-z_0|^2 \bigg] dt + d \alpha.
\label{eq:ex_gauge}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Here, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation290"><![CDATA[$z= x_1 + i x_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the complex coordinate and the function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation291"><![CDATA[$\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-9"><label>(B.9)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation120"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\alpha = \frac{m \mu_D}{2} |z-z'|^2 - \mu t.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The chemical potentials <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation292"><![CDATA[$\mu_a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation293"><![CDATA[$(\omega, \tilde{\omega}, \mu, z_0, z')$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are related by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-10"><label>(B.10)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation121"><![CDATA[$$\begin{gather}
\mu_J = - \tilde{\omega}, \quad
\mu_C = - |\omega + i \mu_D|^2, \quad
\mu_{\mathcal N} = \mu - \frac{m}{2} \Big[ (\omega^2-\tilde{\omega}^2)|z'|^2 + |\tilde{\omega} z_0 + i \mu_D z'|^2 \Big], \\
\end{gather}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-11"><label>(B.11)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation122"><![CDATA[$$\begin{gather}
\mu_{B_1}+i\mu_{B_2} = (\omega^2-\tilde{\omega}^2) z' + (\tilde{\omega} - i \mu_D) (\tilde{\omega} z_0 + i \mu_D z'), \quad
\mu_{P_1}+i\mu_{P_2} = - i(\tilde{\omega} z' + i \mu_D z').
\end{gather}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M7-7">B.7</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M7-8">B.8</xref>) show that the generalized chemical potential terms for the Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry can be essentially regarded as the harmonic potential and constant magnetic field characterized by the frequencies <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation294"><![CDATA[$\omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation295"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\omega}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
<p>For simplicity, let us focus on the case with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation296"><![CDATA[$\mu_D=\mu_{B_i}=\mu_{P_i}=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation297"><![CDATA[$(z_0=z'=0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In the presence of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation298"><![CDATA[$\mu_C = - \omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation299"><![CDATA[$\mu_J = - \tilde{\omega}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation300"><![CDATA[$\mu_{\mathcal N} = \mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the modified conserved charges in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M6-10">A.10</xref>) are given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-12"><label>(B.12)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation123"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{H} &=& \underline{H} + \omega^2 \underline{C} + \tilde{\omega} \underline{J} - \mu \underline{\mathcal N}, \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-13"><label>(B.13)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation124"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{\mathcal N} &=& \underline{\mathcal N}, \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-14"><label>(B.14)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation125"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{J} \ &=& \underline{J}, \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-15"><label>(B.15)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation126"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{Q}_\pm &=& e^{i (\omega \pm \tilde{\omega}) t} \Big[ \omega (\underline{B}_1 \pm i \underline{B}_2) + i ( \underline{P}_1 \pm i \underline{P}_2) \Big], \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-16"><label>(B.16)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation127"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{Q}_{0} &=& e^{2 i \omega t} \Big[ \omega^2 \,\underline{C} - i \omega \, \underline{D} - \underline{H} \Big].
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>These conserved charges are chosen so that the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation301"><![CDATA[$\tilde{H}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> takes the diagonal form, that is,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-17"><label>(B.17)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation128"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
[\tilde{H}, \tilde{J}] = 0, \quad\quad
[\tilde{H}, \tilde{\mathcal N}] = 0, \quad\quad
[\tilde{H}, \tilde{Q}_{\pm} ] = - \omega_\pm \tilde{Q}_{\pm}, \quad\quad
[\tilde{H}, \tilde{Q}_0 ] = - 2 \omega \tilde{Q}_0,
\label{eq:com_H}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation302"><![CDATA[$\omega_{\pm} = \omega \pm \tilde{\omega}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. These equations implies that they satisfy the conservation law
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-18"><label>(B.18)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation129"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{d \tilde{Q}^a}{dt} = i [ H, \tilde{Q}^a] + \frac{\partial \tilde{Q}^a}{\partial t} = 0.
\label{eq:conservation}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Note that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation303"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_{\pm}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation304"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are complex quantities and hence <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation305"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_{\pm}^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation306"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_0^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are also conserved.</p>
<p>The explicit forms of the transformations corresponding to the modified conserved charges are given by
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-19"><label>(B.19)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation130"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta_{\tilde{H}} \phi &=& \partial_t \phi, \label{eq:modified_H} \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-20"><label>(B.20)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation131"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta_{\tilde{\mathcal N}} \phi &=& i \phi, \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-21"><label>(B.21)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation132"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta_{\tilde{J}} \phi &=& i \big[ z \partial_z - \bar{z} \partial_{\bar{z}} \big] \phi, \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-22"><label>(B.22)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation133"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta_{\pm} \phi &=& e^{i \omega_\pm t} \big[ \partial_1 \pm i \partial_2 + m \omega (x_1 \pm i x_2) \big] \phi, \\
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-23"><label>(B.23)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation134"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\delta_0 \phi &=& e^{2i \omega t} \big[ \partial_t + i ( m \omega^2 |z|^2 - \mu ) + i \omega ( z \partial_z + \bar{z} \partial_{\bar{z}} + 1) - i \tilde{\omega} (z \partial_z - \bar{z} \partial_{\bar{z}}) \big] \phi. \label{eq:modified_0}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We can show that the deformed system, which is described by the action
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-24"><label>(B.24)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation135"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
S = \int dt \, d^2 x \, \left[ i \bar{\phi} \tilde{\mathcal D}_t \phi + \frac{1}{2m} \bar{\phi} \tilde{\mathcal D}_i^2 \phi \right],
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
is invariant under the modified transformations given above. The last two equations in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M7-17">B.17</xref>) imply that <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation307"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_\pm^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation308"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_-^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are essentially the creation operators of massive quanta,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052M7-25"><label>(B.25)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation136"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
[\tilde{H}, \tilde{Q}_\pm^\dagger] = \omega_\pm \tilde{Q}_\pm^\dagger, \quad\quad
[\tilde{H}, \tilde{Q}_0^\dagger] = 2 \omega \tilde{Q}_0^\dagger.
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Therefore, if a state is not invariant under the modified symmetry generated by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation309"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_\pm^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation310"><![CDATA[$\tilde{Q}_0^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, there exist massive NG modes with masses <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation311"><![CDATA[$\omega_\pm$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation312"><![CDATA[$2\omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</app>
</app-group>
<fn-group>
<title>Footnotes</title>
<fn id="FN1"><p><sup>1</sup> Although it is possible to directly show the invariance of the action by using the explicit form of the transformation, we can bypass the complicated computation by performing the coordinate transformation
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM5"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation137"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
x^\mu = (t,z,\bar{z}) \rightarrow X^M=(T,Z,\bar{Z}) ~\text{with}~
T = \frac{1}{\omega} \tan \omega (t-t_0), \
Z = \sqrt{T'(t)} \, e^{i \tilde{\omega} t} z, \
\bar{Z} = \sqrt{T'(t)} \, e^{-i \tilde{\omega} t} \bar{z}
\notag
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and the field redefinition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation313"><![CDATA[$(A_\mu, \phi,\psi) \rightarrow (A_M, \Phi, \Psi)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> given by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation314"><![CDATA[$A_\mu d x^\mu = A_M dX^M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM6"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation138"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\phi(t,z,\bar{z}) = \sqrt{T'(t)} \, e^{i \hat{\alpha}} \Phi(T,Z,\bar{Z}), \quad
\psi(t,z,\bar{z}) = \sqrt{T'(t)} \, e^{i \hat{\alpha}} \Psi(T,Z,\bar{Z}), \notag
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation315"><![CDATA[$\hat{\alpha} = (\mu_f \hat{\mathcal N}_f + \mu_a \hat{\mathcal N}_a) t - \frac{m \omega^2}{2} |z|^2 T$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. For an arbitrary value of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation316"><![CDATA[$t_0 \in \mathbb{R}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the action expressed in terms of the fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation317"><![CDATA[$(A_M,\Phi,\Psi)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the coordinates <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation318"><![CDATA[$(T,Z,\bar{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> takes the original form in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M2-2">2.2</xref>), and the modified super-Schr&#x00F6;dinger symmetry reduces to the original one. Then we can check the invariance of the Lagrangian (up to total derivative) in each coordinate patch by choosing the parameter <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation319"><![CDATA[$t_0 \in \mathbb{R}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in such a way that the singularities of the coordinate transformation at <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation320"><![CDATA[$t = t_0 + \frac{\pi}{\omega } (n+1/2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation321"><![CDATA[$(n \in \mathbb{Z})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are not contained in the patch. Note that the super-Sch&#x00F6;dinger symmetry itself is non-singular everywhere.</p></fn>
<fn id="FN2"><p><sup>2</sup> Since the generalized chemical potential terms introduced to deform the action can be regarded as the external gauge field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation322"><![CDATA[$A_\mu \rightarrow A_\mu + A_\mu^{\rm ex}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the solution of the deformed equation of motion <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation323"><![CDATA[$A_\mu^{\rm sol}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be mapped to a solution of the original equation of motion <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation324"><![CDATA[$A_{\mu}^{\rm o} = A_{\mu}^{\rm sol} + A_\mu^{\rm ex}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Neverthless, the original system with boundary condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation325"><![CDATA[$A_{\mu}^{\rm o} \rightarrow 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the deformed system with the boundary condition in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-6">3.6</xref>) are inequivalent since Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-6">3.6</xref>) corresponds to the boundary condition <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation326"><![CDATA[$A_{\mu}^{\rm o}\rightarrow A_{\mu}^{\rm ex}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p></fn>
<fn id="FN3"><p><sup>3</sup> The generator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation327"><![CDATA[$\hat{J}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the angular momentum operator including the spin part:
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM7"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation139"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{J} \equiv z \mathcal D_z - \bar{z} \mathcal D_{\bar{z}} + \hat{S}. \notag
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p></fn>
<fn id="FN4"><p><sup>4</sup> <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation328"><![CDATA[$\tilde{\boldsymbol \nabla} \boldsymbol \nabla = \nabla_z \nabla_{\bar{z}} - m \omega$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> s a negative definite operator, since for any function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation329"><![CDATA[$f$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>,
<disp-formula id="ptaa052UM8"><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation140"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
\int d^2 x \, \bar{f} \left( \nabla_z \nabla_{\bar{z}} - m \omega \right) f
\ = \ - \int d^2 x \, \left[ \ \left| \left( \partial_{\bar{z}} + \frac{m \omega}{2} z \right) f \right|^2 + m \omega |f|^2 \, \right]
\ < \ 0. \notag
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p></fn>
<fn id="FN5"><p><sup>5</sup> The matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation330"><![CDATA[$\Lambda$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can also be written as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation331"><![CDATA[$\Lambda = i e^{-\frac{1}{2} \boldsymbol \sigma} \delta S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> by using the solution <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation332"><![CDATA[$\delta S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of the linearized version of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptaa052M3-10">3.10</xref>) which determines the matrix <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation333"><![CDATA[$S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list id="ref1">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>[1]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Piazza</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>011602</fpage> (<year>2013</year>); <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>039901</fpage> (<year>2013</year>) [addendum]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.011602">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.011602</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.039901">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.039901</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>[2]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Penco</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Piazza</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>1311</volume>, <fpage>055</fpage> (<year>2013</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2013)055">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2013)055</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>[3]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Brauner</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Murayama</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>021601</fpage> (<year>2013</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.021601">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.021601</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>[4]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Ann. Phys.</source> <volume>354</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage> (<year>2015</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.12.009">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.12.009</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>[5]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Brauner</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Jakobsen</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>025021</fpage> (<year>2018</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.01251">arXiv:1709.01251</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1709.01251">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.025021">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.025021</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>[6]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pitaevskii</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>A. Rosch, Phys. Rev. A.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>R853(R)</fpage> (<year>1997</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.R853">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.R853</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>[7]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. A</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>012103</fpage> (<year>2001</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012103">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012103</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>[8]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-Ripoll</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Garc&#x00ED;a</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Vekslerchik</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. E</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>056602</fpage> (<year>2001</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.056602">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.056602</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>[9]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Fujimori</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. A</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>051601(R)</fpage> (<year>2017</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.09118">arXiv:1705.09118</ext-link> [cond-mat.quant-gas]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1705.09118">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.051601">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.051601</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>[10]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Fujimori</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. A</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>023626</fpage> (<year>2017</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.023626">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.023626</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>[11]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hagen</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>377</fpage> (<year>1972</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.5.377">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.5.377</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>[12]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Niederer</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Helv. Phys. Acta</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>802</fpage> (<year>1972</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-114417">https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-114417</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>[13]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Jackiw</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pi</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>3500</fpage> (<year>1990</year>); <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>3929</fpage> (<year>1993</year>) [erratum]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3500">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3500</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3929">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3929</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>[14]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Jackiw</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pi</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>2969</fpage> (<year>1990</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2969">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2969</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>[15]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Dunne</surname> <given-names>G. V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Jackiw</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pi</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Trugenberger</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1332</fpage> (<year>1991</year>); [erratum]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.1332">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.1332</ext-link></comment>) <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>3012</fpage> (<year>1992</year>) (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3012">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3012</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>[16]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ezawa</surname> <given-names>Z. F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hotta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Iwazaki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>452</fpage> (<year>1991</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.452">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.452</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>[17]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ezawa</surname> <given-names>Z. F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hotta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Iwazaki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>411</fpage> (<year>1991</year>); <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1475</fpage> (<year>1991</year>) [erratum]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.411">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.411</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1475.2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1475.2</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>[18]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Jackiw</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pi</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>415</fpage> (<year>1991</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.415">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.415</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>[19]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Jackiw</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pi</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>2524</fpage> (<year>1991</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2524">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2524</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>[20]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ezawa</surname> <given-names>Z. F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hotta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Iwazaki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>3906</fpage> (<year>1991</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3906">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3906</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><label>[21]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Duval</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Horv&#x00E1;thy</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Palla</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>6658</fpage> (<year>1994</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9404047">arXiv:hep-th/9404047</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9404047">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6658">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6658</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><label>[22]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Doroud</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>1601</volume>, <fpage>138</fpage> (<year>2016</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.01491">arXiv:1511.01491</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1511.01491">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2016)138">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2016)138</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><label>[23]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Gauntlett</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Gomis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Townsend</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>248</volume>, <fpage>288</fpage> (<year>1990</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)90294-G">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)90294-G</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><label>[24]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Leblanc</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lozano</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Min</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Ann. Phys.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>328</fpage> (<year>1992</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206039">arXiv:hep-th/9206039</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/9206039">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(92)90350-U">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(92)90350-U</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><label>[25]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Duval</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Horvathy</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Math. Phys.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>2516</fpage> (<year>1994</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0508079">arXiv:hep-th/0508079</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0508079">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.530521">http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.530521</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><label>[26]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Beckers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hussin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. A</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>319</fpage> (<year>1986</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90316-6">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90316-6</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><label>[27]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Beckers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Dehin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hussin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>1137</fpage> (<year>1987</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/20/5/024">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/20/5/024</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><label>[28]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Eto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Isozumi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sakai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>161601</fpage> (<year>2006</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0511088">arXiv:hep-th/0511088</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0511088">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.161601">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.161601</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><label>[29]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Eto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Isozumi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sakai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>R315</fpage> (<year>2006</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0602170">arXiv:hep-th/0602170</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0602170">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/26/R01">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/26/R01</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><label>[30]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Isozumi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sakai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>065018</fpage> (<year>2005</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405129">arXiv:hep-th/0405129</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0405129">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.065018">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.065018</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><label>[31]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Eto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Isozumi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sakai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>025011</fpage> (<year>2005</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0412048">arXiv:hep-th/0412048</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0412048">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.025011">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.025011</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><label>[32]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Eto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Konishi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Marmorini</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Vinci</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yokoi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>065021</fpage> (<year>2006</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0607070">arXiv:hep-th/0607070</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0607070">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.065021">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.065021</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><label>[33]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Eto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Hashimoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Marmorini</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Vinci</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>091602</fpage> (<year>2007</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0609214">arXiv:hep-th/0609214</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0609214">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091602">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091602</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><label>[34]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Manton</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>125403</fpage> (<year>2017</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.06710">arXiv:1612.06710</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1612.06710">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa5f19">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa5f19</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><label>[35]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ambj&#x00F8;rn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Olesen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>214</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage> (<year>1988</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90120-7">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90120-7</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><label>[36]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ambj&#x00F8;rn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Olesen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>315</volume>, <fpage>606</fpage> (<year>1989</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(89)90004-7">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(89)90004-7</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><label>[37]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Taubes</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Commun. Math. Phys.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>277</fpage> (<year>1980</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01197552">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01197552</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><label>[38]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Bradlow</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Commun. Math. Phys.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage> (<year>1990</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02097654">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02097654</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><label>[39]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Popov</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>105044</fpage> (<year>2012</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3578">arXiv:1208.3578</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1208.3578">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.105044">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.105044</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><label>[40]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Biasi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Bizo&#x0144;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Craps</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Evnin</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. A</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>053615</fpage> (<year>2017</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00867">arXiv:1705.00867</ext-link> [cond-mat.quant-gas]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1705.00867">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053615">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053615</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><label>[41]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nakayama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sakaguchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>0901</volume>, <fpage>006</fpage> (<year>2009</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2461">arXiv:0811.2461</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+0811.2461">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/01/006">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/01/006</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><label>[42]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nakayama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sakaguchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>195402</fpage> (<year>2009</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1564">arXiv:0812.1564</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+0812.1564">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/19/195402">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/19/195402</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><label>[43]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nakayama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Sakaguchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>0904</volume>, <fpage>096</fpage> (<year>2009</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.2204">arXiv:0902.2204</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+0902.2204">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/096">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/096</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><label>[44]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nakayama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>0810</volume>, <fpage>083</fpage> (<year>2008</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3344">arXiv:0807.3344</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+0807.3344">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/083">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/083</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><label>[45]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K.-M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>0909</volume>, <fpage>030</fpage> (<year>2009</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3857">arXiv:0902.3857</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+0902.3857">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/030">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/030</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><label>[46]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nishida</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Son</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>086004</fpage> (<year>2007</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3746">arXiv:0706.3746</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+0706.3746">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.086004">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.086004</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><label>[47]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nekrasov</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>831</fpage> (<year>2003</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0206161">arXiv:hep-th/0206161</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0206161">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4">https://dx.doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><label>[48]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nekrasov</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Okounkov</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Prog. Math.</source> <volume>244</volume>, <fpage>525</fpage> (<year>2006</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0306238">arXiv:hep-th/0306238</ext-link>] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+hep-th/0306238">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4467-9_15">https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4467-9_15</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><label>[49]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pestun</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <etal>et al</etal>, <source>J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>440301</fpage> (<year>2017</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.02952">arXiv:1608.02952</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1608.02952">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa63c1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa63c1</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><label>[50]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Fujimori</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kimura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>1206</volume>, <fpage>028</fpage> (<year>2012</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1968">arXiv:1204.1968</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1204.1968">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2012)028">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2012)028</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><label>[51]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Fujimori</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kimura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Nitta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energy Phys.</source> <volume>1512</volume>, <fpage>110</fpage> (<year>2015</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.08630">arXiv:1509.08630</ext-link> [hep-th]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1509.08630">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2015)110">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2015)110</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>