<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns="http://specifications.silverchair.com/xsd/1/22/SCJATS-journalpublishing.xsd" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://specifications.silverchair.com/xsd/1/22/SCJATS-journalpublishing.xsd 1/22/SCJATS-journalpublishing.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ptep</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2050-3911</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ptep/ptab004</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ptab004</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="arxiv">arXiv:2008.08296</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-toc-heading">
<subject>Papers</subject>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-toc-heading">
<subject>Nuclear Physics</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-taxonomy-collection">
<subject>PTEP/D32</subject>
</subj-group>
<subj-group subj-group-type="category-taxonomy-collection">
<subject>AcademicSubjects/SCI01970</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Electric quadrupole form factors of singly heavy baryons with spin 3/2</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>June-Young</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF1"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF2"/>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="COR1"/>
<email xlink:type="simple">Jun-Young.Kim@ruhr-uni-bochum.de</email></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>Hyun-Chul</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF2"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF3"/>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="COR1"/>
<email xlink:type="simple">Jun-Young.Kim@ruhr-uni-bochum.de</email></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="AFF1">Institut f&#x00FC;r Theoretische Physik II, <institution>Ruhr-Universit&#x00E4;t Bochum</institution>, D-44780 Bochum, Germany</aff>
<aff id="AFF2">Department of Physics, <institution>Inha University</institution>, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea</aff>
<aff id="AFF3">School of Physics, <institution>Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS)</institution>, Seoul 02455, Republic of Korea</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="COR1">E-mail: <email>Jun-Young.Kim@ruhr-uni-bochum.de</email>, <email>hchkim@inha.ac.kr</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="cover" iso-8601-date="2021-02-01"><month>02</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2021-02-11"><day>11</day><month>02</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2021-01-21">
<day>21</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2021</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<elocation-id>023D02</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>24</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Physical Society of Japan.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<license license-type="cc-by" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
<license-p>Funded by SCOAP<sup>3</sup></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="ptab004.pdf"/>
<abstract abstract-type="abstract">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>We study the electromagnetic form factors of the lowest-lying singly heavy baryons in a pion mean-field approach, which is also known as the SU(3) chiral quark-soliton model. In the limit of the heavy-quark mass, the dynamics inside a singly heavy baryon is governed by the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation1"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> valence quarks, while the heavy quark remains as a static one. In this framework, a singly heavy baryon is described by combining the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation2"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> soliton with the singly heavy quark. In the infinitely heavy-quark mass limit, we can compute the electric quadrupole form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2, with the rotational <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation3"><![CDATA[$1/N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and linear corrections of the explicit flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking taken into account. We find that the sea-quark contributions or the Dirac-sea level contributions dominate over the valence-quark contributions in the lower <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation4"><![CDATA[$Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> region. We examined the effects of explicit flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking in detail. The numerical results are also compared with the recent data from the lattice calculation with the unphysical value of the pion mass considered, which was used in the lattice calculation.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="jel">
<kwd>D32</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<page-count count="15"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="SEC1"><title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Conventional lowest-lying singly heavy baryons consist of a heavy quark and two light valence quarks. In the limit of the infinitely heavy-quark mass (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation5"><![CDATA[$m_Q\to \infty$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>), the physics of singly heavy baryons becomes simple: The spin of the heavy quark <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation6"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{J}_Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is conserved in this limit and hence it leads also to the conservation of the spin of the light-quark degrees of freedom, i.e. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation7"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{J}_L=\boldsymbol{J}-\boldsymbol{J}_Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This is known as the heavy-quark spin symmetry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. In the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation8"><![CDATA[$m_Q\to \infty$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> limit, we do not distinguish a charm quark from a bottom quark, which gives up heavy-quark flavor symmetry. On the other hand, chiral symmetry and its spontaneous breakdown still play an important part in describing the singly heavy baryons because of the presence of the light quarks inside a singly heavy baryon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. The singly heavy baryons consisting of two light valence quarks can then be represented in terms of irreducible representations of flavor SU(3) symmetry: <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation9"><![CDATA[$\boldsymbol{3}\otimes \boldsymbol{3}=\bar{\boldsymbol{3}}\oplus \boldsymbol{6}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Thus we have the two representations for the lowest-lying singly heavy baryons, i.e. the baryon antitriplet and sextet. The baryon antitriplet has the total spin <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation10"><![CDATA[$J=1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> that comes from <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation11"><![CDATA[$J_Q=1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation12"><![CDATA[$J_L=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, whereas the baryon sextet can have either <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation13"><![CDATA[$J=1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation14"><![CDATA[$J=3/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation15"><![CDATA[$J_L=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation16"><![CDATA[$J_Q=1/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>In a pion mean-field approach, which is also known as the SU(3) chiral quark-soliton model (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation17"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>QSM), a singly heavy baryon can be viewed as the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation18"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> valence quarks bound by the pion mean fields that are created from the presence of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation19"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> valence quarks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. In fact, this idea is taken from Witten&#x2019;s seminal paper on baryons in the large <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation20"><![CDATA[$N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> limit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. This pion mean-field approach has successfully reproduced the mass spectra of the lowest-lying singly heavy baryons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>] and even explained their nontrivial isospin mass splittings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Interestingly, the corrections from the heavy quark mass are indeed negligible in the description of the isospin mass splittings of the singly heavy baryons, as shown in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], although they provide hyperfine interactions which remove the spin degeneracy of the baryon sextet.</p>
<p>Recently, the electromagnetic (EM) form factors of singly heavy baryons have been studied for the first time within lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. While there are no experimental data on the EM form factors of the singly heavy baryons to date, the results from the lattice calculation provide a clue to the internal structure of singly heavy baryons. Thus, it is also of great importance to investigate the EM form factors of the singly heavy baryons. In Refs. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>], we have studied the electric monopole and magnetic dipole form factors of the singly heavy baryons in detail, based on the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation21"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>QSM. Since we consider the limit of the infinitely heavy-quark mass, there is no physical difference between the heavy baryons with spin 1/2 and those with 3/2 except for the value of the spin. On the other hand, the baryon sextet with spin 3/2 has yet another structure that arises from its higher spin, which is revealed by the electric quadrupole (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation22"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) form factor. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation23"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factor of a baryon exhibits how the baryon is deformed. It is also known that the pion clouds play a significant role in understanding this deformation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. This will also be discussed in the present work. We will also examine the effects of flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking on the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation24"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. The numerical results for <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation25"><![CDATA[$\Omega_c^{*0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> will be compared with that from the lattice calculation.</p>
<p>The present work is organized as follows: In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC2">2</xref>, we briefly recapitulate the general formalism for the electric quadrupole form factors within the framework of the chiral quark-soliton model. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC3">3</xref>, we present the numerical results and discuss them in detail. The final section is devoted to the summary and conclusion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC2"><title>2. Electric quadrupole form factors in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation26"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>QSM</title>
<p>We start with the EM current for a singly heavy baryon, which is defined by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M1"><label>(1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation1"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\label{eq:LHcurrent}
J^\mu (x) = \bar{\psi} (x) \gamma^\mu \hat{\mathcal{Q}} \psi(x) + e_{Q}
\bar{\Psi} \gamma^\mu \Psi,
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation27"><![CDATA[$\psi(x)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> stands for the light-quark field <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation28"><![CDATA[$\psi=(u,d,s)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in SU(3) flavor space and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation29"><![CDATA[$\Psi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the heavy-quark field for the charmed or bottom quark. The charge operator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation30"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is expressed as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M2"><label>(2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation2"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\hat{\mathcal{Q}} =
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac23 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & -\frac13 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & -\frac13
\end{pmatrix}
=\frac12\left(\lambda_3 + \frac1{\sqrt{3}} \lambda_8\right)\!.
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation31"><![CDATA[$e_Q$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the second term in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M1">1</xref>) denotes the charge corresponding to a heavy quark, which has the value <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation32"><![CDATA[$2/3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the charm quark and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation33"><![CDATA[$-1/3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the bottom quark. The matrix element of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation34"><![CDATA[$J^\mu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> between baryons with spin 3/2 can be parametrized in terms of four different real form factors as follows:
<disp-formula id="ptab004M3"><label>(3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation3"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\langle B(p',s) | J^{\mu}(0) | B(p,s) \rangle
&= - \overline{u}^{\alpha}(p',s) \left[ \gamma^{\mu} \left \{
F^{B}_{1}(q^2) \eta_{\alpha \beta} + F^{B}_{3}(q^2) \frac{ q_{\alpha} q_{\beta}
}{4M_{B}^{2}} \right \}\right. \cr
&\hspace{0.4cm} \left. + \; i\frac{\sigma^{\mu \nu} q_{\nu}}{2M_{B}}
\left \{ F^{B}_{2}(q^2) \eta_{\alpha \beta} + F^{B}_{4} (q^2)\frac{q_{\alpha}
q_{\beta}}{4 M_{B}^2} \right \} \right ]{u}^{\beta}(p,s),
\label{eq:MatrixEl1}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation35"><![CDATA[$M_B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the mass of a singly heavy baryon in the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. The metric tensor <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation36"><![CDATA[$\eta_{\alpha\beta}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of Minkowski space is defined as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation37"><![CDATA[$\eta_{\alpha\beta} =\mathrm{diag}(1,\,-1,\,-1,\,-1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation38"><![CDATA[$q_\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> represents the momentum transfer <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation39"><![CDATA[$q_\alpha=p'_\alpha-p_\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and its square is written as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation40"><![CDATA[$q^2=-Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation41"><![CDATA[$Q^2 >0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation42"><![CDATA[$u^\alpha (p,\,s)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the Rarita&#x2013;Schwinger spinor for a singly heavy baryon with spin 3/2, carrying the momentum <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation43"><![CDATA[$p$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and the spin component <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation44"><![CDATA[$s$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> projected along the direction of the momentum. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation45"><![CDATA[$\sigma^{\mu\nu}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> designates the antisymmetric tensor <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation46"><![CDATA[$\sigma^{\mu\nu}=i[\gamma^\mu,\,\gamma^\nu]/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Note that when one takes the limit of the infinitely heavy quark mass (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation47"><![CDATA[$m_Q\to \infty$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>), the heavy-quark current given in the second part of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M1">1</xref>) can be safely neglected for the EM form factors. It gives only a constant contribution to the electric form factors as already shown in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>].</p>
<p>It is more convenient to introduce the Sachs-type form factors or the multipole EM form factors, in particular, when the EM structure of a baryon with spin 3/2 is examined. The electric quadrupole form factor reveals how the shape of a baryon with spin 3/2 is deviated from the rotationally symmetric one. The Sachs-type form factors can be expressed in terms of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation48"><![CDATA[$F_i^B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> given in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M3">3</xref>)
<disp-formula id="ptab004M4"><label>(4)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation4"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
G_{E0}^B (Q^2) &= \left(1+\frac23 \tau\right) \left[F_1^B(Q^2) - \tau
F_2^B(Q^2)\right] -\frac13 \tau(1+\tau) \left[F_3^B(Q^2) - \tau
F_4^B(Q^2)\right]\!,\cr
G_{E{2}}^B (Q^{2}) &= \left[F_{1}(Q^2)-\tau F_{2}(Q^2)\right]- \frac{1}{2} (1+ \tau)
\left[F_{3}(Q^2) - \tau F_{4}(Q^2)\right]\!,\cr
G_{M1}^B(Q^2) &= \left(1+ \frac45 \tau\right) \left[F_1^B(Q^2) +
F_2^B(Q^2)\right] -\frac25 \tau(1+\tau) \left[F_3^B(Q^2) +
F_4^B(Q^2)\right]\!, \cr
G_{M3}^B(Q^2) &= \left[F_1^B(Q^2) + F_2^B(Q^2)\right] - \frac12 (1+\tau)
\left[F_3^B(Q^2) + F_4^B(Q^2)\right]\!,
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation49"><![CDATA[$\tau=Q^2/4M_B^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation50"><![CDATA[$G_{E0}^B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation51"><![CDATA[$G_{M1}^B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> have already been investigated in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>], we will focus on the electric quadrupole form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2, i.e., <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation52"><![CDATA[$G_{E2}^B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, in the present work. At <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation53"><![CDATA[$Q^2=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation54"><![CDATA[$G_{E2}(0)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> yields the electric quadrupole moment
<disp-formula id="ptab004M5"><label>(5)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation5"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\mathcal{Q}_B &= \frac{e}{M_B^2} G_{E2}^B(0) = \frac{e}{M_B^2} \left[e_B
-\frac12 F_3^{B}(0)\right]\!,
\label{eq:q2z}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
which reveals how much the charge distribution of a baryon is deformed from a spherical shape. If <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation55"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> has a negative value (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation56"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_B<0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>), then the baryon takes a cushion shape, whereas if <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation57"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is positive (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation58"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_B>0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>), then it looks like a rugby-ball shape.</p>
<p>We want to mention that the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation59"><![CDATA[$M3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors vanish in the present work. In fact, any chiral solitonic approaches yield the null results of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation60"><![CDATA[$M3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors because of the hedgehog structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. However, the experimental data on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation61"><![CDATA[$M3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is absent to date and its value should be very tiny even if it is measured. In fact, one could compute the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation62"><![CDATA[$M3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors if one takes into account the next-to-next-to-leading order in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation63"><![CDATA[$1/N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> expansion. This means that the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation64"><![CDATA[$M3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors should be strongly suppressed in the large <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation65"><![CDATA[$N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> limit. Thus, we will focus in the present work on the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation66"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2.</p>
<p>The SU(3) <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation67"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>QSM is constructed based on the following low-energy effective partition function in Euclidean space, defined by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M6"><label>(6)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation6"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\label{eq:partftn}
\mathcal{Z}_{\chi\mathrm{QSM}} = \int \mathcal{D}\psi \mathcal{D}
\psi^\dagger \mathcal{D} U \exp\left[-\int d^4 x \psi^\dagger D(U)
\psi\right] = \int \mathcal{D} U \exp (-S_{\mathrm{eff}}),
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation68"><![CDATA[$\psi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation69"><![CDATA[$U$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denote, respectively, the quark and pseudo-Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone boson fields. Having integrated over quark fields, we can express the partition function in terms of the effective chiral action <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation70"><![CDATA[$S_{\mathrm{eff}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which is defined by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M7"><label>(7)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation7"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
S_{\mathrm{eff}}(U) \;=\; -N_{c}\mathrm{Tr}\ln(i\rlap{/}{\partial} + i
MU^{\gamma_{5}} + i \hat{m}),
\label{eq:echl}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation71"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{Tr}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> represents the functional trace running over spacetime and all relevant internal spaces. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation72"><![CDATA[$N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the number of colors. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation73"><![CDATA[$M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is the dynamical quark mass that arises from spontaneous symmetry breaking of chiral symmetry. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation74"><![CDATA[$U^{\gamma_5}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> represents the chiral field that consists of the pseudo-Nambu&#x2013;Goldstone (pNG) fields <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation75"><![CDATA[$\pi^a$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation76"><![CDATA[$a=1,\ldots 8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which is expressed as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M8"><label>(8)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation8"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
U^{\gamma_5} = \exp(i\gamma_5\pi^a \lambda^a) = \frac{1+\gamma_5}{2} U
+ \frac{1-\gamma_5}{2} U^\dagger
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with
<disp-formula id="ptab004M9"><label>(9)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation9"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
U = \exp(i\pi^a \lambda^a).
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>We assume isospin symmetry, i.e., <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation77"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{u}}=m_{\mathrm{d}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The average mass of the up and down quarks is defined by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation78"><![CDATA[$\overline{m}=(m_{\mathrm{u}} + m_{\mathrm{d}})/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Then, the matrix of the current quark masses is written as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation79"><![CDATA[$\hat{m} = \mathrm{diag}(\overline{m},\, \overline{m},\, m_{\mathrm{s}}) = \overline{m} +\delta m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation80"><![CDATA[$\delta m$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is written as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M10"><label>(10)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation10"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\delta m \;=\; \frac{-\overline{m} + m_{s}}{3}\boldsymbol{1} +
\frac{\overline{m} - m_{s}}{\sqrt{3}} \lambda^{8} =
m_{1} \boldsymbol{1} + m_{8} \lambda^{8}\,,
\label{eq:deltam}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation81"><![CDATA[$m_1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation82"><![CDATA[$m_8$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denote the singlet and octet components of the current quark masses, defined by <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation83"><![CDATA[$m_1=(-\overline{m} +m_{\mathrm{s}})/3 $]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation84"><![CDATA[$m_8=(\overline{m} -m_{\mathrm{s}})/\sqrt{3}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively. The single-quark Hamiltonian <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation85"><![CDATA[$h(U)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is defined by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M11"><label>(11)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation11"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
h(U) \;=\;
i\gamma_{4}\gamma_{i}\partial_{i}-\gamma_{4}MU^{\gamma_{5}} -
\gamma_{4} \overline{m}\,.
\label{eq:diracham}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Since the pion field has flavor indices, one has to introduce the hedgehog ansatz with which the flavor indices can be coupled to three-dimensional spatial axes. The pion fields are then expressed in terms of a single function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation86"><![CDATA[$P(r)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which is called the profile function, as follows:
<disp-formula id="ptab004M12"><label>(12)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation12"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\pi^a(\boldsymbol{x}) = n^a P(r),
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation87"><![CDATA[$n^a = x^a/r$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Then the SU(2) chiral field is written as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M13"><label>(13)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation13"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
U_{\mathrm{SU(2)}}^{\gamma_5} \;=\; \exp(i\gamma^{5}\hat{\boldsymbol{n}}\cdot
\boldsymbol{\tau} P(r))
\;=\; \frac{1+\gamma^{5}}{2}U_{\mathrm{SU(2)}} +
\frac{1-\gamma^{5}}{2}U_{\mathrm{SU(2)}}^{\dagger},
\label{eq:embed}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation88"><![CDATA[$U_{\mathrm{SU(2)}}=\exp(i\hat{\boldsymbol{n}}\cdot \boldsymbol{\tau} P(r))$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The SU(3) chiral field can be constructed by Witten&#x2019;s trivial embedding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]
<disp-formula id="ptab004M14"><label>(14)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation14"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
U^{\gamma_{5}}(x) \;=\; \left(\begin{array}{lr}
U_{\mathrm{SU(2)}}^{\gamma_{5}}(x) & 0\\
0 & 1
\end{array}\right)\!,
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
which preserves the hedgehog ansatz.</p>
<p>Integration over <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation89"><![CDATA[$U$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M6">6</xref>) quantizes the pNG fields. In the large <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation90"><![CDATA[$N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> limit, the meson mean-field approximation is justified [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Thus, we can carry out the integration over <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation91"><![CDATA[$U$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M6">6</xref>) around the saddle point, where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation92"><![CDATA[$\delta S_{\mathrm{eff}}/\delta P(r) =0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is satisfied. This saddle-point approximation yields the equation of motion that can be solved self-consistently. The solution provides the self-consistent profile function <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation93"><![CDATA[$P_c(r)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of the chiral soliton. A detailed method of the self-consistent procedure can be found in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
<p>While the quantum fluctuations of the self-consistent pion fields can be ignored by the large <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation94"><![CDATA[$N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> argument, the fluctuations along the direction of both the rotational and translational zero modes cannot be ignored, since they are not at all small. Note that rotational and translational zero modes are related to rotational and translational symmetries. Thus, the zero modes can be taken into account by the following rotational and translational transformations:
<disp-formula id="ptab004M15"><label>(15)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation15"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\tilde{U}(\boldsymbol{x}, t) = A(t) U[\boldsymbol{x}- \boldsymbol{Z}(t)] A^\dagger,
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation95"><![CDATA[$A(t)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is an SU(3) unitary matrix. Thus, the functional integral over <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation96"><![CDATA[$U$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be approximated by those over zero modes:
<disp-formula id="ptab004M16"><label>(16)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation16"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\int DU [\cdots] \approx \int DA D\boldsymbol{Z}[\cdots].
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The integration over translational zero modes will naturally give the Fourier transform of the EM densities. We refer to Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] for a detailed description of the zero-mode quantization in the present scheme.</p>
<p>Having carried out the zero-mode quantization, we obtain the collective Hamiltonian as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M17"><label>(17)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation17"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
H_{\mathrm{coll}} = H_{\mathrm{sym}} + H_{\mathrm{sb}},
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where
<disp-formula id="ptab004M18"><label>(18)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation18"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\label{eq:Hamiltonian}
H_{\mathrm{sym}} &= M_{\mathrm{cl}} + \frac1{2I_1} \sum_{i=1}^3
J_i^2 + \frac1{2I_2} \sum_{p=4}^7 J_p^2,\;\;\;
H_{\mathrm{sb}} = \alpha D_{88}^{(8)} + \beta \hat{Y} +
\frac{\gamma}{\sqrt{3}} \sum_{i=1}^3 D_{8i}^{(8)} \hat{J}_i.
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation97"><![CDATA[$I_1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation98"><![CDATA[$I_2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denote the moments of inertia for the soliton, the explicit expressions of which can be found in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC5">A</xref>. The parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation99"><![CDATA[$\alpha$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation100"><![CDATA[$\beta$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation101"><![CDATA[$\gamma$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for heavy baryons arise from the breaking of flavor SU(3) symmetry, which are defined by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M19"><label>(19)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation19"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\alpha=\left (-\frac{\overline{\Sigma}_{\pi N}}{3m_0}+\frac{
K_{2}}{I_{2}}\overline{Y}
\right )m_{\mathrm{s}},
\;\;\; \beta=-\frac{ K_{2}}{I_{2}}m_{\mathrm{s}},
\;\;\; \gamma=2\left ( \frac{K_{1}}{I_{1}}-\frac{K_{2}}{I_{2}}
\right ) m_{\mathrm{s}},
\label{eq:alphaetc}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation102"><![CDATA[$K_{1,\,2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the anomalous moments of inertia, the expressions of which are found in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC5">A</xref>. Note that the number of light valence quarks for a singly heavy baryon is <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation103"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This means that the expression for the valence part of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation104"><![CDATA[$\overline{\Sigma}_{\pi N}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> also contains <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation105"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in place of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation106"><![CDATA[$N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. It can be related to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation107"><![CDATA[$\pi N$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> sigma term as follows: <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation108"><![CDATA[$\overline{\Sigma}_{\pi N} = (N_c-1)N_c^{-1} \Sigma_{\pi N}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The detailed expressions for the moments of inertia and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation109"><![CDATA[$\overline{\Sigma}_{\pi N}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are given in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>].</p>
<p>The presence of the symmetry-breaking part in the collective Hamiltonian, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation110"><![CDATA[$H_{\mathrm{sb}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, causes baryon wavefunctions mixed with those in higher SU(3) representations. In the present case, the collective wavefunctions for the baryon antitriplet (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation111"><![CDATA[$J=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and the sextet (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation112"><![CDATA[$J=1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) are obtained respectively as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]
<disp-formula id="ptab004M20"><label>(20)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation20"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
&|B_{\overline{\boldsymbol3}_{0}}\rangle = |\overline{\boldsymbol3}_{0},B\rangle +
p^{B}_{\overline{15}}|\overline{\boldsymbol{15}}_{0},B\rangle, \;\;\;
|B_{\boldsymbol6_{1}}\rangle = |{\boldsymbol6}_{1},B\rangle +
q^{B}_{\overline{15}}|{\overline{\boldsymbol{15}}}_{1},B
\rangle + q^{B}_{\overline{24}}|{
{\overline{\boldsymbol{24}}}_{1}},B\rangle,\label{eq:mixedWF1}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with the mixing coefficients
<disp-formula id="ptab004M21"><label>(21)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation21"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
p_{\overline{15}}^{B}
\;\;=\;\;
p_{\overline{15}}\left[\begin{array}{c}
-\sqrt{15}/10\\
-3\sqrt{5}/20
\end{array}\right]\!,
&
q_{\overline{15}}^{B}
\;\;=\;\;
q_{\overline{15}}\left[\begin{array}{c}
\sqrt{5}/5\\
\sqrt{30}/20\\
0
\end{array}\right]\!,
&
q_{\overline{24}}^{B}
\;\;=\;\;
q_{\overline{24}}\left[\begin{array}{c}
-\sqrt{10}/10\\
-\sqrt{15}/10\\
-\sqrt{15}/10
\end{array}\right]\!,
\label{eq:pqmix}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
in the basis <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation113"><![CDATA[$\left[\Lambda_{Q},\;\Xi_{Q}\right]$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the antitriplet and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation114"><![CDATA[$\left[\Sigma_{Q},\; \Xi_{Q}^{\prime},\;\Omega_{Q}\right]$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> for the sextets with both spin 1/2 and 3/2. The parameters <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation115"><![CDATA[$p_{\overline{15}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation116"><![CDATA[$q_{\overline{15}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation117"><![CDATA[$q_{\overline{24}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are explicitly written as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M22"><label>(22)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation22"><![CDATA[$$\begin{eqnarray}
p_{\overline{15}}
\;\;=\;\;
\frac{3}{4\sqrt{3}}\alpha {I}_{2},
&
q_{\overline{15}}
\;\;=\;\;
{\displaystyle -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}}
\left(\alpha+\frac{2}{3}\gamma\right)
{I}_{2},
&
q_{\overline{24}}\;\;=\;\;
\frac{4}{5\sqrt{10}}
\left(\alpha-\frac{1}{3}\gamma\right) I_{2}.
\label{eq:pqmix2}
\end{eqnarray}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The collective wavefunction for the soliton with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation118"><![CDATA[$(N_c-1)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> valence quarks is then obtained in terms of the SU(3) Wigner <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation119"><![CDATA[$D$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> functions
<disp-formula id="ptab004M23"><label>(23)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation23"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\label{eq:SolitonWF1}
\psi_{(\nu;\, F),(\overline{\nu};\,\overline{S})}(R) =
\sqrt{\mathrm{dim}(\nu)} (-1)^{Q_S} [D_{F\,S}^{(\nu)}(R)]^*,
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation120"><![CDATA[$\mathrm{dim}(\nu)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> represents the dimension of the representation <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation121"><![CDATA[$\nu$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation122"><![CDATA[$Q_S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is a charge corresponding to the soliton state <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation123"><![CDATA[$S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation124"><![CDATA[$Q_S=J_3+Y'/2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation125"><![CDATA[$F$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation126"><![CDATA[$S$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> stand for the flavor and spin quantum numbers corresponding to the soliton for the singly heavy baryon. Finally, the complete wavefunction for a singly heavy baryon can be derived by coupling the soliton wavefunction to the heavy quark spinor
<disp-formula id="ptab004M24"><label>(24)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation24"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\Psi_{B_{Q}}^{(\mathcal{R})}(R)
= \sum_{J_3,\,J_{Q3}}
C_{\,J,J_3\, J_{Q}\,J_{Q3}}^{J'\,J_{3}'}
\;\mathbf{\chi}_{J_{Q3}}
\;\psi_{(\nu;\,Y,\,T,\,T_{3})(\overline{\nu};\,Y^{\prime},\,J,\,J_3)}(R),
\label{eq:HeavyWF}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation127"><![CDATA[$\chi_{J_{Q3}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denote the Pauli spinors for the heavy quark and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation128"><![CDATA[$C_{\,J,J_3\, J_{Q}\,J_{Q3}}^{J'\,J_{3}'}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are the Clebsch&#x2013;Gordan coefficients.</p>
<p>The matrix elements of the EM current (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M3">3</xref>) can be computed within the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation129"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>QSM by representing them in terms of the functional integral in Euclidean space,
<disp-formula id="ptab004M25"><label>(25)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation25"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\langle B,\,p'| J_\mu(0) |B,\,p\rangle &= \frac1{\mathcal{Z}}
\lim_{T\to\infty} \exp\left(i p_4\frac{T}{2} - i p_4'
\frac{T}{2}\right) \int d^3x d^3y \exp(-i \boldsymbol{p}'\cdot \boldsymbol{y} + i
\boldsymbol{p}\cdot \boldsymbol{x}) \cr
& \quad{} \times \int \mathcal{D}U\int \mathcal{D} \psi \int
\mathcal{D} \psi^\dagger J_{B}(\boldsymbol{y},\,T/2) \psi^\dagger(0)
\gamma_4\gamma_\mu \hat{Q} \psi(0) J_B^\dagger (\boldsymbol{x},\,-T/2)\nonumber\\
& \qquad{} \exp\left[-\int d^4 z \psi^\dagger iD(U) \psi\right]\!,
\label{eq:correlftn}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the baryon states <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation130"><![CDATA[$|B,\,p\rangle$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation131"><![CDATA[$\langle B,\,p'|$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are, respectively, defined by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M26"><label>(26)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation26"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
|B,\,p\rangle &= \lim_{x_4\to-\infty} \exp(i p_4 x_4)
\frac1{\sqrt{\mathcal{Z}}} \int d^3 x
\exp(i\boldsymbol{p}\cdot \boldsymbol{x}) J_B^\dagger
(\boldsymbol{x},\,x_4)|0\rangle,\cr
\langle B,\,p'| &= \lim_{y_4\to\infty} \exp(-i p_4' y_4)
\frac1{\sqrt{\mathcal{Z}}} \int d^3 y
\exp(-i\boldsymbol{p}'\cdot \boldsymbol{y}) \langle 0| J_B^\dagger
(\boldsymbol{y},\,y_4).
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The heavy baryon current <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation132"><![CDATA[$J_B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be constructed from the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation133"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> valence quarks
<disp-formula id="ptab004M27"><label>(27)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation27"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
J_B(x) = \frac1{(N_c-1)!} \epsilon_{i_1\cdots i_{N_c-1}} \Gamma_{JJ_3
TT_3 Y}^{\alpha_1\cdots \alpha_{N_c-1}} \psi_{\alpha_1 i_1} (x)
\cdots \psi_{\alpha_{N_c-1} i_{N_c-1}}(x),
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation134"><![CDATA[$\alpha_1\cdots \alpha_{N_c-1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> represent spin-flavor indices and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation135"><![CDATA[$i_1\cdots i_{N_c-1}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> color indices. The matrices <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation136"><![CDATA[$\Gamma_{JJ_3 TT_3 Y}^{\alpha_1\cdots \alpha_{N_c-1}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are taken to consider the quantum numbers <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation137"><![CDATA[$JJ_3TT_3Y$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation138"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> soliton. The creation operator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation139"><![CDATA[$J_B^\dagger$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be constructed in a similar way. The calculation of the baryonic correlation function given in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M25">25</xref>) is a tedious one, so we will present here only the final expressions for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation140"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factor. As for the detailed formalism, we refer to Refs. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
<p>The final expressions for the electric quadrupole form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2 can be written as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M28"><label>(28)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation28"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
G^{B_6}_{E{2}}(Q^{2}) &= 6 \sqrt{{5} } \frac{M^{2}_{B}}{|\boldsymbol{q}|^{2}}
\int d^{3} z \, j_{2}(|\boldsymbol{q}||\boldsymbol{z}|)
{\mathcal{G}}^{B}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z}),
\label{eq:magfinal}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation141"><![CDATA[$j_2(|\boldsymbol{q}||\boldsymbol{z}|)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> stands for the spherical Bessel function with order 2 and the corresponding density of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation142"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors is given as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M29"><label>(29)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation29"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
{\mathcal{G}}^{B}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z}) =& -2 \left( \frac{3}{I_{1}} \langle
D^{(8)}_{Q3} J_{3} \rangle_{B} - \frac{1}{I_{1}} \langle
D^{(8)}_{Q i} J_{i} \rangle_{B} \right)
{\cal {I}}_{1E2} (\boldsymbol{z}) \cr
& + 4 m_{8}\left( \frac{K_{1}}{I_{1}} \mathcal{I}_{1E2}(\boldsymbol{z}) -
\mathcal{K}_{1E2}(\boldsymbol{z})\right) \left( 3\langle D^{(8)}_{8 3}
D^{(8)}_{Q 3}\rangle_{B} -\langle D^{(8)}_{8 i} D^{(8)}_{Q i}
\rangle_{B} \right)\!.
\label{eq:magden}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The densities of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation143"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation144"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{I}_{1E2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation145"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{K}_{1E2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can be found in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC5">A</xref>. In the limit of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation146"><![CDATA[$m_Q\to \infty$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the charge distribution of the heavy quark becomes a point-like static charge given as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation147"><![CDATA[$\rho_Q(\boldsymbol{r})=e_Q \delta^{(3)}(\boldsymbol{r})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This leads to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation148"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_{ij} = \int d^{3} r \rho_Q(\boldsymbol{r})( 3 r_{i}r_{j} - r^{2}\delta_{ij})=0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. This implies that the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation149"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the singly heavy baryons are solely governed by the light quarks in the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation150"><![CDATA[$m_Q\to \infty$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> limit.</p>
<p>Having calculated the matrix elements of the collective operators in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M29">29</xref>), we arrive at the final expressions for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation151"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2:
<disp-formula id="ptab004M30"><label>(30)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation30"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\mathcal{G}^{B}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z}) &= \mathcal{G}^{B(0)}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z})
+ \mathcal{G}^{B(\text{op})}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z})
+ \mathcal{G}^{B(\text{wf})}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z}),
\label{eq:E2final}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation152"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{G}_{E2}^{B(0)}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation153"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{G}_{E2}^{B(\mathrm{op})}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation154"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{G}_{E2}^{B(\mathrm{wf})}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denote, respectively, the symmetric terms, the flavor SU(3) symmetry-breaking terms from the effective chiral action, and those from the mixed collective wavefunctions, expressed explicitly as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M31"><label>(31)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation31"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
{\cal{G}}^{B_{6}(0)}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z})& = \frac{3}{10}\frac{1}{I_{1}}
Q_{B} \mathcal {I}_{1E2} (\boldsymbol{z}),
\label{eq:leading_order}
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptab004M32"><label>(32)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation32"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
{\cal{G}}^{B_{6}(\text{op})}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z}) &= -\frac{1}{405} m_{s}
\left(\frac{K_1}{I_{1}}\mathcal{I}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z})
-\mathcal{K}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z})\right)
\left(\begin{array}{c c c} 6Q_{\Sigma_{c}^{*}}+1 \\
-24Q_{\Xi_{c}^{*}}-13 \\ 9 \end{array} \right)\!,
\label{eq:ms_op}
\\
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="ptab004M33"><label>(33)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation33"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
{\cal{G}}^{B_{6}(\text{wf})}_{E2}(\boldsymbol{z}) & = -\frac{2}{I_{1}} \left[
q_{\overline{15}} \left( \begin{array}{c c c}
{-\frac{2}{9\sqrt{5}}}(3Q_{\Sigma^{*}_{c}}-4) \\
{-\frac{1}{18\sqrt{5}}}(15Q_{\Xi^{*}_{c}}-2)\\
0 \end{array} \right)+
q_{\overline{24}}\left( \begin{array}{c c c}
{-\frac{1}{180}}(3Q_{\Sigma^{*}_{c}}+5) \\
{-\frac{1}{90}}(3Q_{\Xi^{*}_{c}}+5) \\
{\frac{3}{40}}Q_{\Omega^{*}_{c}}
\end{array}
\right) \right] \mathcal{I}_{1E2} (\boldsymbol{z}),
\label{eq:ms_wf}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation155"><![CDATA[$Q_{B}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> stands for the charge of the light-quark components of the corresponding baryons. We can derive similar sum rules for the electric quadrupole moments of singly heavy baryons with spin 3/2 as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]
<disp-formula id="ptab004M34"><label>(34)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation34"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
&\sum_{B\in\mathrm{sextet}} \mathcal{Q}_{B} = 0, \cr
&\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*0}_{c}}= \mathcal{Q}_{\Xi^{*0}_{c}} =
\mathcal{Q}_{\Omega^{*0}_{c}} = -2
\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*+}_{c}}=-2 \mathcal{Q}_{\Xi^{*+}_{c}}=-\frac{1}{2}
\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*++}_{c}}.
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Even though the flavor SU(3) symmetry is broken, we still can find the following sum rules
<disp-formula id="ptab004M35"><label>(35)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation35"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*++}_{c}}-\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*+}_{c}} &=
\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*+}_{c}} - \mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*0}_{c}}, \cr
\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*0}_{c}}-\mathcal{Q}_{\Xi^{*0}_{c}} &=
\mathcal{Q}_{\Xi^{*0}_{c}} - \mathcal{Q}_{\Omega^{*0}_{c}}, \cr
2(\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*+}_{c}}-\mathcal{Q}_{\Xi^{*0}_{c}}) &=
\mathcal{Q}_{\Sigma^{*++}_{c}} - \mathcal{Q}_{\Omega^{*0}_{c}}.
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC3"><title>3. Results and discussion</title>
<p>In the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation156"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>QSM, there are several parameters to fix. Since the sea-quark or Dirac-sea contributions contain divergent integrals, one has to introduce a regularization to tame the divergences. In the present work, we introduce the proper-time regularizations with the cutoff mass. This can be fixed by using the pion decay constant <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation157"><![CDATA[$f_\pi=93$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV. The average mass of the up and down current quarks <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation158"><![CDATA[$\overline{m}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is determined by the physical pion mass <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation159"><![CDATA[$m_\pi=140$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="SEC6">B</xref> for details). While the mass of the strange current quark <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation160"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> can also be fixed by reproducing the kaon mass, which gives <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation161"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}=150$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV, we prefer to use <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation162"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}=180$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV, since this value of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation163"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> yields the best results for the hyperon mass splittings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. The remaining parameter is the dynamical quark mass <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation164"><![CDATA[$M$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which is the only free parameter of the model. However, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation165"><![CDATA[$M=420$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV is known to be the best value in reproducing various observables in the light baryon sector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. Thus, we will also use this value in the present calculation.</p>
<p>It was shown that in the calculation of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation166"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the baryon decuplet the sea-quark contributions turn out to be rather important; we will first examine the valence- and sea-quark contributions separately. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>, we draw the numerical results for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation167"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. As expected, the general behaviors of the valence- and sea-quark contributions to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation168"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the heavy singly baryons are rather similar to those of the baryon decuplet. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>, the valence-quark contributions decrease mildly as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation169"><![CDATA[$Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> increases, whereas the sea-quark or Dirac-sea contributions fall off drastically in the smaller <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation170"><![CDATA[$Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> region, so that they govern the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation171"><![CDATA[$Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> dependence of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation172"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors. In particular, the magnitudes of the sea-quark contributions are considerably larger than in the region of smaller <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation173"><![CDATA[$Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Thus, they provide the main contributions to the electric quadrupole moments of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. Considering the fact that the electric quadrupole moment shows how the corresponding baryon is deformed, the present results provide certain physical implications. Recent investigations into the gravitational form factors of baryons within the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation174"><![CDATA[$\chi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>QSM indicate that the valence quarks are mainly located in the inner part of a baryon, while the sea quarks lie in its outer part [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. Thus, the sea-quark contributions, which can also be interpreted as pion clouds, mainly describe how a singly heavy baryon with spin 3/2 is deformed. The present results are in line with what was discussed in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>], where the significance of the pion clouds in the electric quadrupole moment of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation175"><![CDATA[$\Delta$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> isobar was studied.</p>
<fig id="F1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 1.</label><caption><p>Valence- and sea-quark contributions to the electric quadrupole form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. The long-dashed curves draw the valence-quark contributions to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation176"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors, whereas the short-dashed ones depict the sea-quark contributions. The solid ones represent the total results for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation177"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" mimetype="image" xlink:href="ptab004f1.tif"/></fig>
<p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>, we show how much the effects of flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking contribute to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation178"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. As expressed in Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M32">32</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M33">33</xref>), there are two different <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation179"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> corrections to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation180"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors. The first one, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation181"><![CDATA[${\cal{G}}^{B_{6}(\text{op})}_{E2}(Q^2)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, arises from the current-quark mass term in the effective chiral action given in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M7">7</xref>), whereas the second one comes from the wavefunction corrections (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M20">20</xref>). Each correction affects <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation182"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors in a different way, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Fig. 3</xref>. The wavefunction corrections to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation183"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factor of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation184"><![CDATA[$\Sigma_{c}^{*++}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are negligibly tiny and the corrections from the current-quark mass term are also small. As a result, the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation185"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> corrections turn out to be negligible, as shown in the upper left-hand panel of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>. On the other hand, the wavefunction corrections contribute noticeably to the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation186"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation187"><![CDATA[$\Sigma_c^{*+}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, while those from the current-quark mass term are of the same order as in the case of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation188"><![CDATA[$\Sigma_{c}^{*++}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. In the case of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation189"><![CDATA[$\Sigma_c^{*0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation190"><![CDATA[$\Xi_c^{*0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, the wavefunction corrections to <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation191"><![CDATA[$G_{E2}^{\Sigma_c^{*0},\Xi_c^{*0}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> are even larger than those from the mass term. This can be understood by examining Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M32">32</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M33">33</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 2.</label><caption><p>The effects of flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking on the electric quadrupole form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. The dashed curves draw the results for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation192"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors without the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation193"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> corrections, whereas the solid curves depict the results with the effects of flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking taken into account.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" mimetype="image" xlink:href="ptab004f2.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="F3" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 3.</label><caption><p>Linear <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation194"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> corrections from the current-quark mass term in the effective chiral action <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation195"><![CDATA[$G_{E2}^{B_c^*(\mathrm{op})}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and from the collective wavefunctions <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation196"><![CDATA[$G_{E2}^{B_c^*(\mathrm{wf})}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which are drawn using short-dashed and long-dashed curves, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" mimetype="image" xlink:href="ptab004f3.tif"/></fig>
<p>In the left-hand panel of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Fig. 4</xref>, we compare the results for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation197"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factors of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation198"><![CDATA[$\Omega_c^{*0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> baryon with that from the lattice calculation. We employ for this comparison the unphysical pion mass <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation199"><![CDATA[$m_\pi=156$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV that is used in the lattice calculation. Note that there is only one lattice data with large uncertainty.</p>
<fig id="F4" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 4.</label><caption><p>Electric quadrupole form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2 in comparison with the data from the lattice QCD. The data of the lattice QCD is taken from Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>].</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" orientation="portrait" position="float" mimetype="image" xlink:href="ptab004f4.tif"/></fig>
<p>We anticipate more accurate lattice data in the near future, so that one can draw a clear conclusion. In the right-hand panel of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Fig. 4</xref>, we depict the results of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation200"><![CDATA[$G_{E2}^{\Omega_c^{*0}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> as a function of the pion mass <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation201"><![CDATA[$m_\pi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation202"><![CDATA[$Q^2=0.183\ \mathrm{GeV}^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> fixed. As expected, the present results fall off slowly as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation203"><![CDATA[$m_\pi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> increases.</p>
<p>For completeness, we present the results for the electric quadrupole moments of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> lists those of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation204"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> in the second and third rows, which correspond to the SU(3) symmetric and breaking cases, respectively. As already shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>, those of the charged baryon sextet have negative values of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation205"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_{B}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, which indicates that the positively charged singly heavy baryons with spin 3/2 take oblate shapes. On the other hand, those of the neutral ones get positive values, so they are distorted in prolate forms. It is interesting to see that the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation206"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_B$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of the doubly positive-charged <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation207"><![CDATA[$\Sigma_c^*$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is approximately 8 times larger than that of the singly positive-charged one. This can be understood by examining Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M30">30</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label>
<caption><p>Electric quadrupole moments of the baryon sextet.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation208"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{Q}_{B}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation209"><![CDATA[$e\cdot$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> fm<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation210"><![CDATA[$^{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>]</th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation211"><![CDATA[$\Sigma^{*++}_{c}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation212"><![CDATA[$\Sigma^{*+}_{c}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation213"><![CDATA[$\Sigma^{*0}_{c}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center">
<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation214"><![CDATA[$\Xi^{*+}_{c}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation215"><![CDATA[$\Xi^{*0}_{c}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation216"><![CDATA[$\Omega^{*0}_{c}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation217"><![CDATA[$m_{s} = 180$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV</td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation218"><![CDATA[$-0.0490 $]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation219"><![CDATA[$-0.0058$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation220"><![CDATA[$0.0373$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation221"><![CDATA[$-0.0234$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation222"><![CDATA[$0.0330$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation223"><![CDATA[$0.0286$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation224"><![CDATA[$m_{s} = 0$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV</td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation225"><![CDATA[$-0.0518$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation226"><![CDATA[$-0.0129$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation227"><![CDATA[$0.0259$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation228"><![CDATA[$-0.0129$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation229"><![CDATA[$0.0259$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center"><inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation230"><![CDATA[$0.0259$]]></tex-math></inline-formula></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC4"><title>4. Summary and conclusion</title>
<p>In the present work, we have investigated the electric quadrupole form factors of the lowest-lying singly heavy baryons with spin 3/2 in a pion mean-field approach, also known as the SU(3) chiral quark-soliton model. In the limit of an infinitely heavy quark, a heavy quark inside a singly heavy baryon can be regarded as a mere static one. This means that the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation231"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> light valence quarks govern the quark dynamics inside a heavy baryon. The presence of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation232"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> light valence quarks make the vacuum polarized, which produces the pion mean fields. The <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation233"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> valence quarks are bound by the attraction provided by the pion mean fields self-consistently, from which a soliton consisting of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation234"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> valence quarks arises. We call this soliton an <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation235"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> soliton. The singly heavy baryon can then be constructed by coupling the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation236"><![CDATA[$N_c-1$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> soliton with a heavy quark. This is called the pion mean-field approach for the singly heavy baryons. Based on this pion mean-field approach, we computed the electric qudrupole form factors of the baryon sextet with spin 3/2, taking into account the rotational <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation237"><![CDATA[$1/N_c$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and linear <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation238"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> corrections.</p>
<p>We first examined the valence- and sea-quark contributions separately. As in the case of the baryon decuplet, the contributions from the sea quarks or the Dirac-sea level quarks govern the electric quadrupole form factors, in particular, in the smaller <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation239"><![CDATA[$Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> region. Considering the fact that the electric quadrupole moment of a baryon provides information on how the baryon is deformed, we can draw the following physical implications: the deformation of a singly heavy baryon is also mainly governed by the sea-quark contributions or the pion cloud effects. We found a similar feature in the case of the baryon decuplet. The effects of the explicit flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking are also sizable except for the case of the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation240"><![CDATA[$\Sigma_c^{*++}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation241"><![CDATA[$\Omega_c^{*0}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. Since there are two different linear <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation242"><![CDATA[$m_{\mathrm{s}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> corrections, we have scrutinized each effect in detail. To compare the present results with those from the lattice calculation, we have computed the electric quadrupole form factor with the adopted unphysical value <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation243"><![CDATA[$m_\pi=156$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV, which was used by the lattice work. We also showed how the value of the form factor at a fixed <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation244"><![CDATA[$Q^2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is changed as the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation245"><![CDATA[$m_\pi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> increases. As expected from previous works, the value of the form factor falls off as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation246"><![CDATA[$m_\pi$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> increases. We also presented the results for the electric quadrupole moment. The charged singly-heavy baryons have consistently negative values of electric quadrupole moments. This indicates that the charged baryons take oblate shapes. On the other hand, the neutral baryons take prolate shapes, having positive values of electric quadrupole moments.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack id="ack1">
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The authors are grateful to Gh.-S. Yang for valuable discussions. They want to express the gratitude to M. Oka and K. U. Can for providing us with the lattice data. The present work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2018R1A2B2001752 and 2018R1A5A1025563). J.-Y. Kim acknowledges partial support by the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) doctoral scholarship.</p>
</ack>
<sec>
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Open Access funding: SCOAP<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation247"><![CDATA[$^3$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<app-group>
<app><title>&#x02002;</title>
<sec id="SEC5"><title>Appendix A. Densities for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation248"><![CDATA[$E2$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> form factor and moments of inertia</title>
<p>In this Appendix, we provide the explicit expressions for the <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation249"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{I}_{1E2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation250"><![CDATA[$\mathcal{K}_{1E2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> densities of the electric quadrupole form factors in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M29">29</xref>):
<disp-formula id="ptab004M36"><label>(A.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation36"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\mathcal{I}_{1E2}(\boldsymbol{z})&= -\frac{(N_c-1)}{2\sqrt{10}} \sum_{n \ne
\mathrm{val} }\frac{1}{E_{n}-E_{\mathrm{val}}}{\langle\mathrm{val}
| \boldsymbol{\tau} | n\rangle} \cdot{\langle n |\boldsymbol{z} \rangle
\{ \sqrt{4\pi}Y_{2} \otimes\tau_{1} \}_{1}\langle \boldsymbol{z} |
\mathrm{val}\rangle} \cr
& + \frac{N_c}{4\sqrt{10}} \sum_{n,m} {\cal{R}}_{3}(E_n,E_m)
{\langle n | \boldsymbol{\tau} | m \rangle} \cdot{\langle m | \boldsymbol{z}
\rangle \{ \sqrt{4\pi} Y_{2} \otimes \tau_{1} \}_{1} \langle
\boldsymbol{z} | n \rangle},\cr
\mathcal{K}_{1E2}(\boldsymbol{z})&=
-\frac{(N_c-1)}{2\sqrt{10}}\sum_{n \ne
\mathrm{val} } \frac{1}{E_{n}-E_{\mathrm{val}}} {\langle\mathrm{val}
| \gamma^{0} \boldsymbol{\tau} | n \rangle} \cdot {\langle n | \boldsymbol{z} \rangle
\{ \sqrt{4\pi} Y_{2} \otimes \tau_{1} \}_{1} \langle \boldsymbol{z} |
\mathrm{val} \rangle} \cr
& - \frac{N_c}{4\sqrt{10}}\sum_{n,m} {\cal{R}}_{5}(E_n,E_m) {\langle
n | \gamma^{0} \boldsymbol{\tau} | m \rangle} \cdot {\langle m | \boldsymbol{z}
\rangle \{ \sqrt{4\pi} Y_{2} \otimes \tau_{1} \}_{1} \langle
\boldsymbol{z} | n \rangle},
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
where the regularization functions are defined by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M37"><label>(A.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation37"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
&{\cal{R}}_{3}(E_{n},E_{m}) = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{\pi}} \int^{\infty}_{0}
\phi(u) \frac{du}{\sqrt{u}} \left[ \frac{ e^{-u E_{m}^{2}}- e^{-u
E_{n}^{2}}}{u(E^{2}_{n} - E^{2}_{m})} -\frac{E_{m} e^{-u
E_{m}^{2}}+E_{n} e^{-u E_{n}^{2}}}{E_{n} + E_{m}} \right ], \cr
&{\cal{R}}_{5}(E_{n},E_{m}) =
\frac{\mathrm{sign}(E_{n})-\mathrm{sign}(E_{m})}{2(E_{n}-E_{m})},
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with the proper-time regulator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation251"><![CDATA[$\phi(u)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. Here, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation252"><![CDATA[$|\mathrm{val}\rangle$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation253"><![CDATA[$|n\rangle$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> denotes the state of the valence and sea quarks with the corresponding eigenenergies <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation254"><![CDATA[$E_{\mathrm{val}}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation255"><![CDATA[$E_n$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> of the single-quark Hamiltonian <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation256"><![CDATA[$h(U_c)$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
<p>The moments of inertia (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation257"><![CDATA[$I_{1}, I_{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) and anomalous moments of inertia (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation258"><![CDATA[$K_{1}, K_{2}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>) are expressed respectively as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M38"><label>(A.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation38"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
I_{1} &= \frac{(N_{c}-1)}{6} \sum_{n\neq\mathrm{val}}
\frac{1}{E_{n}-E_{\mathrm{val}}}\langle \mathrm{val} |
\boldsymbol{\tau} | n \rangle \cdot \langle n | \boldsymbol{\tau} |
\mathrm{val} \rangle + \frac{N_{c}}{12}\sum_{n,m\neq n}\langle
m | \boldsymbol{\tau} | n \rangle \cdot \langle n | \boldsymbol{\tau} | m
\rangle \mathcal{R}_{3}(E_n,E_m), \cr
I_{2} &= \frac{(N_{c}-1)}{4} \sum_{n^{0}}
\frac{1}{E_{n^{0}}-E_{\mathrm{val}}}\langle \mathrm{val} |
n^{0} \rangle \langle n^{0} | \mathrm{val} \rangle
+\frac{N_{c}}{4} \sum_{n^{0},m}\langle m | \boldsymbol{\tau} | n^{0}
\rangle \langle n^{0} | m \rangle
\mathcal{R}_{3}(E_{n^{0}},E_m), \cr
K_{1} &= \frac{(N_{c}-1)}{6} \sum_{n\neq\mathrm{val}}
\frac{1}{E_{n}-E_{\mathrm{val}}}\langle \mathrm{val} |
\boldsymbol{\tau} | n \rangle \cdot \langle n | \gamma^{0} \boldsymbol{\tau} |
\mathrm{val} \rangle + \frac{N_{c}}{12}\sum_{n,m\neq n}\langle
m | \boldsymbol{\tau} | n \rangle \cdot \langle n | \gamma^{0}
\boldsymbol{\tau} | m \rangle \mathcal{R}_{5}(E_n,E_m), \cr
K_{2} &= \frac{(N_{c}-1)}{4} \sum_{n^{0}}
\frac{1}{E_{n^{0}}-E_{\mathrm{val}}}\langle \mathrm{val} |
n^{0} \rangle \langle n^{0} |\gamma^{0} | \mathrm{val}
\rangle +\frac{N_{c}}{4}\sum_{n^{0},m}\langle m | \boldsymbol{\tau} |
n^{0} \rangle \langle n^{0} |\gamma^{0} | m \rangle
\mathcal{R}_{5}(E_{n^{0}},E_m).
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="SEC6"><title>Appendix B. Fixing the model parameters</title>
<p>The chiral condensate and the pion decay constant can be derived from the effective chiral action given in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M7">7</xref>). The chiral condensates are written as
<disp-formula id="ptab004M39"><label>(B.1)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation39"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
\langle \overline{\psi}\psi \rangle = - \int
\frac{d^{4}p_{E}}{(2\pi)^{4}}
\frac{8N_{c}M}{p^{2}_{E}+M^{2}}\bigg{|}_{\mathrm{reg}} = M
\frac{N_{c}}{2\pi^{2}} \int^{\infty}_{0}\phi(u)
\frac{du}{u^{2}}e^{-u M^{2}},
\label{eq:1}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
and the pion decay constants are given by
<disp-formula id="ptab004M40"><label>(B.2)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation40"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
f^{2}_{\pi} = - \int \frac{d^{4}p_{E}}{(2\pi)^{4}}
\frac{4N_{c}M^{2}}{(p^{2}_{E}+M^{2})^{2}}\bigg{|}_{\mathrm{reg}} =
M^{2} \frac{N_{c}}{4\pi^{2}} \int^{\infty}_{0}\phi(u)
\frac{du}{u}e^{-u M^{2}},
\label{eq:2}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula>
with proper-time regulator <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation259"><![CDATA[$\phi= c \theta(u-\Lambda^{-2}_{1})+ (1-c) \theta(u-\Lambda^{-2}_{2})$]]></tex-math></inline-formula>. The pion mass is determined by the pole position of the pion propagator that is obtained by a low-energy effective chiral theory given by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M7">7</xref>):
<disp-formula id="ptab004M41"><label>(B.3)</label><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="Equation41"><![CDATA[$$\begin{align}
m^{2}_{\pi} = \frac{\overline{m} \langle \overline{\psi} \psi
\rangle}{f^{2}_{\pi}} + \mathcal{O}(\overline{m}^{2}).
\label{eq:3}
\end{align}$$]]></tex-math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The above expressions satisfy the Gell-Mann&#x2013;Oakes&#x2013;Renner (GMOR) relation. With Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M39">B.1</xref>), (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M40">B.2</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="ptab004M41">B.3</xref>), one can determine the cut-off mass. The average value of the up and down current quark masses is obtained as <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation260"><![CDATA[$\overline{m}=6.13$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV. The strange current quark mass <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation261"><![CDATA[$m_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is fixed by the hyperon mass splittings, by treating <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation262"><![CDATA[$m_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> perturbatively up to the second-order corrections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. The preferable value of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation263"><![CDATA[$m_{s}$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> is found to be <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX" id="ImEquation264"><![CDATA[$m_{s}=180$]]></tex-math></inline-formula> MeV.</p>
</sec>
</app>
</app-group>
<ref-list id="ref1">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>[1]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Isgur</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Wise</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>232</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage> (<year>1989</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)90566-2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)90566-2</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>[2]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Georgi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>240</volume>, <fpage>447</fpage> (<year>1990</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)91128-X">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)91128-X</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>[3]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>T.-M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H.-Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Cheung</surname> <given-names>C.-Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>G.-L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.-C.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H.-L.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>1148</fpage> (<year>1992</year>); <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>5851</fpage> (<year>1997</year>) [erratum]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.1148">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.1148</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5851">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5851</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>[4]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Diakonov</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2157">arXiv:1003.2157</ext-link> [hep-ph] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1003.2157">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>].</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><label>[5]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.-S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Polyakov</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Prasza&#x0142;owicz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>071502(R)</fpage> (<year>2016</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.071502">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.071502</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>[6]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Witten</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>160</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage> (<year>1979</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(79)90232-3">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(79)90232-3</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>[7]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.-S.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Lett. B</source> <volume>808</volume>, <fpage>135619</fpage> (<year>2020</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135619">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135619</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>[8]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Can</surname> <given-names>K. U.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Erkol</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Isildak</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Oka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>J. High Energ. Phys.</source> <volume>1405</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage> (<year>2014</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2014)125">https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2014)125</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>[9]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Can</surname> <given-names>K. U.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Erkol</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Oka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>114515</fpage> (<year>2015</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.114515">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.114515</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>[10]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>114009</fpage> (<year>2018</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.114009">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.114009</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>[11]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01437">arXiv:1912.01437</ext-link> [hep-ph] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+1912.01437">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>].</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>[12]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pascalutsa</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Vanderhaeghen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rept.</source> <volume>437</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage> (<year>2007</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.006">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.006</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>[13]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names></string-name> and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Eur. Phys. J. C</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>570</fpage> (<year>2019</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7079-7">https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7079-7</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><label>[14]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Witten</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys. B</source> <volume>223</volume>, <fpage>433</fpage> (<year>1983</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(83)90064-0">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(83)90064-0</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><label>[15]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Christov</surname> <given-names>Chr.-V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Blotz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pobylitsa</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Watabe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Meissner</surname> <given-names>Th.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Arriola</surname> <given-names>E. Ruiz</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Goeke</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage> (<year>1996</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6410(96)00057-9">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6410(96)00057-9</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><label>[16]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Blotz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Polyakov</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Goeke</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>4013</fpage> (<year>1996</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.4013">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.4013</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><label>[17]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.-S.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>054004</fpage> (<year>2018</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054004">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054004</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><label>[18]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Blotz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Diakonov</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Goeke</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>N. W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Petrov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Pobylitsa</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Nucl. Phys. A</source> <volume>555</volume>, <fpage>765</fpage> (<year>1993</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90505-R">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90505-R</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><label>[19]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Goeke</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Grabis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Ossmann</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Polyakov</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Schweitzer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Urbano</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>094021</fpage> (<year>2007</year>). (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.094021">http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.094021</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><label>[20]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.-Ch.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Polyakov</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name name-style="western"><surname>Son</surname> <given-names>H.-D.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <source>Phys. Rev. D</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>014015</fpage> (<year>2021</year>) [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06652">arXiv:2008.06652</ext-link> [hep-ph]] [<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.inspirehep.net/search?p=find+EPRINT+2008.06652">Search <sc>in</sc>SPIRE</ext-link>]. (<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014015">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014015</ext-link></comment>)</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>