<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">cpc</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Chinese Physics C</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1674-1137</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">cpc_45_6_065105</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1674-1137/abf4f6</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">abf4f6</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-article-type"><subject>Paper</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section"><subject>Particle and nuclear astrophysics and cosmology</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Pair production in Reissner-Nordström-Anti de Sitter black holes <xref ref-type="fn" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_fn1">*</xref>  
					          <fn id="cpc_45_6_065105_fn1"><label>*</label><p>Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11675272), the Ministry of Science and Technology of the R.O.C. under the grant MOST 108-2112-M-008-007, National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1I1A3A01063183)</p></fn> 
				        </article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name><name content-type="non-latin-no-space" name-style="eastern"><surname>张</surname><given-names>俊</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affiliation01">1</xref><email>zhangj626@mail2.sysu.edu.cn</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Yi-Yu</given-names></name><name content-type="non-latin-no-space" name-style="eastern"><surname>林</surname><given-names>乙裕</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affiliation01">1</xref><email>linyy27@mail2.sysu.edu.cn</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Hao-Chun</given-names></name><name content-type="non-latin-no-space" name-style="eastern"><surname>梁</surname><given-names>灏淳</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affiliation01">1</xref><email>lianghch3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chi</surname><given-names>Ke-Jia</given-names></name><name content-type="non-latin-no-space" name-style="eastern"><surname>匙</surname><given-names>可佳</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affiliation01">1</xref><email>chikj@mail2.sysu.edu.cn</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affiliation02">2</xref><email>cmchen@phy.ncu.edu.tw</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Sang Pyo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affiliation03">3</xref><email>sangkim@kunsan.ac.kr</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name><name content-type="non-latin-no-space" name-style="eastern"><surname>孙</surname><given-names>佳睿</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affiliation01">1</xref><email>sunjiarui@sysu.edu.cn</email></contrib><aff id="affiliation01">
               <label>1</label> 
					 School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275
				</aff><aff id="affiliation02">
               <label>2</label> 
					 Department of Physics, and Center for High Energy and High Field Physics (CHiP), National Central University, Chungli 32001
				</aff><aff id="affiliation03">
               <label>3</label> 
					 Department of Physics, Kunsan National University, Kunsan 54150
				</aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>01</day><month>6</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="open-access"><day>11</day><month>5</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><elocation-id content-type="artnum">065105</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>2</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="published-online"><day>11</day><month>5</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="oa-requested"><day>1</day><month>2</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2021Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><license license-type="cc-by" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p> 
						            <graphic content-type="online" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="ccby.gif" xlink:type="simple"/>Content from this work may be used under the terms of the 
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0" xlink:type="simple">Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence</ext-link>. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Article funded by SCOAP<sup>3</sup> and published under licence by Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd
					</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105.pdf" xlink:type="simple"/><abstract><title>Abstract</title><p>We studied the pair production of charged scalar particles of a five-dimensional near extremal Reissner-Nordström-Anti de Sitter (RN-AdS<sub>5</sub>) black hole. The pair production rate and the absorption cross section ratio in full spacetime are obtained and are shown to have a concise relation with their counterparts in the near horizon region. In addition, the holographic descriptions of the pair production, both in the IR CFT in the near horizon region and the UV CFT at the asymptotic spatial boundary of the RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole, are analyzed in the AdS<sub>2</sub>/CFT<sub>1</sub> and AdS<sub>5</sub>/CFT<sub>4</sub> correspondences, respectively. This work gives a complete description of scalar pair production in a near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole.
				</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>black holes</kwd><kwd>pair production</kwd><kwd>AdS/CFT correspondence</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><open-access><p content-type="scoap3">Article funded by SCOAP<sup>3</sup>
               </p></open-access></funding-group><counts><page-count count="13"/></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta xlink:type="simple"><meta-name>arxivppt</meta-name><meta-value>2003.06398</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s01"><label>I.</label><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>The Schwinger pair production of charged particles is an important QED phenomenon that is related to the vacuum instability and persistence in the presence of strong external electromagnetic fields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib1">1</xref>]. Another important spontaneous pair production phenomenon is the Hawking radiation from black holes, which can be viewed as a tunneling process through the black hole horizon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib2">2</xref>]. A charged black hole thus provides a natural lab in which both the Schwinger pair production and the Hawking radiation can occur and mix with each other. Usually the equation of motions (EoMs) of quantum fields in a general black hole background is difficult to solve analytically in full spacetime. However, when the symmetry of the spacetime geometry is enhanced under some conditions, the problem becomes manageable; for this reason, in a series of recent studies, the spontaneous pair production of charged particles has been systematically studied in near extremal charged black holes, including the RN black hole [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib3">3</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib5">5</xref>] and the Kerr-Newman (KN) black hole [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib7">7</xref>], in which the near horizon geometry is enhanced into AdS<sub>2</sub> or warped AdS<sub>3</sub> in the near extremal limit. Owing to the enhanced near horizon symmetry, the explicit forms of the pair production rate and other 2-point correlation functions have been obtained and their holographic descriptions have been found based on the RN/CFT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib8">8</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib13">13</xref>] and KN/CFTs dualities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib14">14</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib16">16</xref>]. In addition to charged black hole backgrounds, pair production has also been investigated in pure AdS or dS spacetime, see, e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib17">17</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib20">20</xref>], whereas in the absence of a gravitational field, the pure Schwinger effect has been efficiently analyzed by using the phase-integral method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib21">21</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib24">24</xref>].
			</p><p>However, previous studies mainly focused on analyzing spontaneous pair production in the near horizon region of black holes in an asymptotically flat spacetime. A charged black hole in AdS spacetime has an additional AdS symmetry at the asymptotical boundary. From the holographic point of view, the CFT description of pair production has been revealed only in the near horizon region in terms of AdS<sub>2</sub>/CFT<sub>1</sub> (or warped AdS<sub>3</sub>/CFT<sub>2</sub>). Although particle pairs produced in the near horizon region of black holes indeed provide important contributions to those in full spacetime, an understanding of the whole picture is still lacking. In the present paper, we extend the study of pair production to a full near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole background, which possesses an AdS<sub>5</sub> geometry at the asymptotic spatial boundary as well as an AdS<sub>2</sub> structure in the near horizon region. It is shown that the radial equation of the charged scalar field propagating in this spacetime can be transformed into a Heun-like differential equation and thus be solved by matching its solutions in the near and far spacetime regions, using the low temperature limit. Consequently, analytical forms of the full solutions for the pair production rate, the absorption cross section ratio, and the retarded Green's functions are obtained, and they are shown to have concise relations with their counterparts calculated in the near horizon region. Based on these concise relations, numerical analysis can easily be performed, and the pair production rate in full spacetime is shown to be smaller than that in the near horizon region, which is consistent with the assumption that pair production mainly comes from the black hole near horizon region.
			</p><p>A near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole is also a very useful background for studying holographic dualities. As the near horizon AdS<sub>2</sub> (or warped AdS<sub>3</sub>) spacetime is dual to a 1D CFT (or chiral CFT<sub>2</sub>), while asymptotical AdS<sub>5</sub> spacetime is dual to another 4D CFT, the former is called IR CFT, while the latter is called UV CFT, and they are connected with each other via the holographic renormalization group (RG) flow along the radial direction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib25">25</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib27">27</xref>]. For example, it has been shown that a near extremal RN-AdS black hole acts as a holographic model in describing typical properties of a (non)Fermi liquid at the quantum critical point [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib28">28</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib31">31</xref>]. It is thus natural and interesting to find holographic descriptions of pair production in an RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole both in the IR CFT<sub>1</sub> in the near horizon region and the UV CFT<sub>4</sub> at the asymptotical AdS<sub>5</sub> boundary. We show that the picture in the IR CFT<sub>1</sub> is very similar to those in the near extremal RN and KN black holes, and that the pair production rate and the absorption cross section ratio calculated from the AdS<sub>2</sub> spacetime can be matched with those from the dual IR CFT. Regarding the UV 4D CFT, a direct comparison of calculations between the bulk and the boundary in terms of the AdS<sub>5</sub>/CFT<sub>4</sub> is not made due to a lack of information on the dual finite temperature CFT<sub>4</sub> side. However, from the bulk gravity side, the condition for pair production in the full near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> spacetime is the violation of the Breitenlohner-Freedman (BF) bound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib33">33</xref>] in AdS<sub>5</sub> spacetime. This, on the dual 4D CFT side, corresponds to a complex conformal weight for the scalar operator dual to the bulk charged scalar field, which indeed indicates instabilities for the scalar operator on the boundary and is consistent with the situation in the IR CFT. Furthermore, we determined an interesting relation between the full pair production rate and the absorption cross section ratio via changing the roles of sources and operators simultaneously both in the IR and the UV CFTs.
			</p><p>The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we provide a brief review of the bulk theory and consider the near horizon geometry of an RN- 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_{d+1} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> black hole and the EoMs of the probe charged scalar field. In Sec. III, spontaneous pair production in the near horizon region of near extremal RN- 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_{d+1} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M2.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> black holes is discussed, and the 2-point functions of the charged scalar field (such as the retarded Green's function), pair production rate, and absorption cross section ratio are calculated. In Sec. IV, the full analytical solution for the radial equation of the charged scalar field in RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black holes is obtained by applying the matching technique. Consequently, the full analytical forms of the pair production rate, absorption cross section ratio, and retarded Green's function are found, and the connections with their counterparts in the near horizon region of the black hole are discussed. Then, in Sec. V, the dual CFTs descriptions of spontaneous pair production are both analyzed in terms of the AdS<sub>2</sub>/CFT<sub>1</sub> correspondence in the IR region and the AdS<sub>5</sub>/CFT<sub>4</sub> correspondence in the UV region, and their connections are also revealed. Finally, the conclusion and physical implications are provided in Sec. VI.
			</p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s02"><label>II.</label><title>BULK THEORY</title><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s02-01"><label>A.</label><title>RN- 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_{d+1} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M3.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> black hole
				</title><p>The 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ d+1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M4.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> dimensional Einstein-Maxwell theory has an action (in units of 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ c = \hbar = 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M5.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>) as
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>1</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E1"> <?CDATA $ I = \int {\rm d}^{d+1}x \sqrt{-g} \left[ \frac{1}{16 \pi G_{d+1}} \left( R + \frac{d(d-1)}{L^2} \right) - \frac1{g_{\mathrm s}^2} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} \right], $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where <italic toggle="yes">L</italic> is the curvature radius of the asymptotical 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_{d+1} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M6.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> spacetime, and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ g_{\mathrm s} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M7.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is the dimensionless coupling constant of the 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ U(1) $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M8.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> gauge field. The dynamical equations
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>2</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E2"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] R_{\mu\nu} \!-\! \frac12 g_{\mu\nu} R \!-\! \frac{d(d-1)}{2L^2} g_{\mu\nu} & \!=\! \frac{8 \pi G_{d+1}}{g_{\mathrm s}^2} \left( 4 F_{\mu\lambda} F_{\nu}{}^{\lambda} \!-\! g_{\mu\nu} F_{\alpha\beta} F^{\alpha\beta} \right), \\ \partial_\mu \left( \sqrt{-g} F^{\mu\nu} \right) & = 0, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E2.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>admit the Reissner-Nordström-Anti de Sitter (RN-
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_{d+1} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M9.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>) black brane (or the planar black hole) solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib34">34</xref>]
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>3</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E3"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}s^2 & = \frac{L^2}{r^2 f(r)} {\rm d}r^2 + \frac{r^2}{L^2} \left( -f(r) {\rm d}t^2 + {\rm d}x_i^2 \right), \\ A & = \mu \left( 1 - \dfrac{r_{\mathrm o}^{d-2}}{r^{d-2}} \right) {\rm d}t, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E3.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>with</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>4</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E4"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] f(r) = & 1 - \frac{G_{d+1} L^2 M}{r^d} + \frac{G_{d+1} L^2 Q^2}{r^{2d-2}}, \qquad {} \\ \mu = & \sqrt{\frac{d-1}{2(d-2)}} \frac{g_{\mathrm s} Q}{r_{\mathrm o}^{d-2}},\end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E4.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M10.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is the radius of the outer horizon (
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ f(r_{\mathrm o}) = 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M11.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>), 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \mu $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M12.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is the chemical potential with dimension 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ [\mu] = \mathrm{length}^{-(d-1)/2} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M13.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, <italic toggle="yes">M</italic> is the mass, and <italic toggle="yes">Q</italic> is the charge of the black brane. We may find an explicit expression of 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M14.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> for 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ d = 4 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M15.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> from a solution of the cubic equation, which is complicated, but 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_\mathrm{o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M16.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> has a general expression in the extremal case, i.e., 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_* $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M17.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> in IIB. The condition 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ f(r_{\mathrm o}) = 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M18.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> gives 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ M = \dfrac{r_{\mathrm o}^d}{G_{d+1} L^2} + \dfrac{Q^2}{r_{\mathrm o}^{d-2}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M19.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> (which is the Smarr-like relation related to the first law of thermodynamics of the black brane); temperature <italic toggle="yes">T</italic> and “surface” entropy density <italic toggle="yes">s</italic> of the black brane are, respectively,
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>5</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E5"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] T = & \frac{r_{\mathrm o} \, d}{4\pi L^2} \left( 1 - \frac{d-2}{d} \frac{G_{d+1} L^2 Q^2}{r_{\mathrm o}^{2d-2}} \right), \qquad {\rm{}} \\ s = & \frac{1}{4G_{d+1}} \left( \frac{r_{\mathrm o}}{L} \right)^{d-1}. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E5.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Moreover, the first law of thermodynamics of the dual boundary <italic toggle="yes">d</italic>-dimensional quantum field is
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>6</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E6"> <?CDATA $ \delta \epsilon = T \delta s + \mu \delta\rho_{\mathrm c}, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E6.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where the “surface” energy and charge densities are, respectively,</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>7</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E7"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] & \epsilon = \frac{d - 1}{16 \pi L^{d-1}} M, \qquad {\rm{}} \qquad \\ & \rho_{\mathrm c} = \frac{\sqrt{2(d-1)(d-2)}}{8 \pi g_{\mathrm s} L^{d-1}} Q. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E7.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Then, it is straightforward to check the Euler relation</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>8</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E8"> <?CDATA $ \left( \frac{d}{d-1} \right) \epsilon = \epsilon + p = T s + \mu \rho_{\mathrm c}, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E8.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where the pressure is 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ p = \dfrac{\epsilon}{d-1} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M20.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, which shows that the dual <italic toggle="yes">d</italic>-dimensional quantum field theory on the asymptotic boundary is conformal, as expected.
				</p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s02-02"><label>B.</label><title>Near-horizon near-extremal geometry</title><p>To make the following analysis convenient, let us introduce the length scale 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_*^{2d-2} \equiv \dfrac{d-2}{d} G_{d+1} L^2 Q^2 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M21.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>; then, the temperature can be rewritten as
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>9</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E9"> <?CDATA $ T = \frac{r_{\mathrm o} d}{4\pi L^2} \left( 1 - \frac{r_*^{2d-2}}{r_{\mathrm o}^{2d-2}} \right). $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E9.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Note that 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_* $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M22.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> may be treated as the “effective” radius of the inner black hole horizon though 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ f(r_*) \neq 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M23.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> in general and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_* \lt r_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M24.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>. The extremal condition for a degenerate horizon at 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r_\mathrm{o} = r_* $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M25.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ M = M_0 \equiv \dfrac{2 (d-1)}{d-2} \dfrac{r_*^d}{G_{d+1} L^2} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M26.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>. The near extremal limit of the near horizon is obtained by taking the limit 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \varepsilon \to 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M27.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> of the transformations
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>10</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E10"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] & M - M_0 = \frac{d (d-1) r_*^{d-2}}{G_{d+1} L^2} \varepsilon^2 \rho_\mathrm{o}^2, \\ & r_{\mathrm o} - r_* = \varepsilon \rho_{\mathrm o}, \quad r - r_{\mathrm o} = \varepsilon (\rho - \rho_0), \quad t = \frac{\tau}{\varepsilon}, \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E10.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where in general 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \rho_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M28.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is finite and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \rho \in [\rho_0, \infty) $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M29.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>.
				</p><p>Expanding 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ f(r) $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M30.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> around 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ r = r_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M31.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, we have
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>11</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E11"> <?CDATA $ f(r) \simeq \frac{{d(d - 1)}}{{r_{\rm{o}}^2}}({\rho ^2} - \rho _{\rm{o}}^2){\varepsilon ^2} + O\left( {{\varepsilon ^3}} \right), $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E11.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>the near horizon geometry is given by</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>12</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E12"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}s^2 & = - \frac{\rho^2 - \rho_{\mathrm o}^2}{\ell^2} {\rm d}\tau^2 + \frac{\ell^2 {\rm d}\rho^2}{\rho^2 - \rho_{\mathrm o}^2} + \frac{r_{\mathrm o}^2}{L^2} {\rm d}x_i^2, \\ A & = \frac{(d-2) \mu}{r_{\mathrm o}} (\rho - \rho_{\mathrm o}) {\rm d}\tau, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E12.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \ell^2 \equiv \dfrac{L^2}{d (d - 1)} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M32.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is defined as the square of the curvature radius of the effective AdS<sub>2</sub> geometry. The limit 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \rho_{\mathrm o} \to 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M33.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> yields the extremal limit.
				</p><p>The solution in Eq. (12) can also be written in the Poincaré coordinates in terms of 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \xi = \ell^2/\rho $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M34.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, (
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ |\xi| \leqslant \xi_{\mathrm o} = $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M35.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>
					          <inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \ell^2/\rho_\mathrm{o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M35-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>),
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>13</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E13"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}s^2 & = \frac{\ell^2}{\xi^2} \left( - \left( 1 - \frac{\xi^2}{\xi_{\mathrm o}^2} \right) {\rm d}\tau^2 + \frac{{\rm d}\xi^2}{1-\dfrac{\xi^2}{\xi_{\mathrm o}^2}} \right) + \frac{r_{\mathrm o}^2}{L^2} {\rm d}x_i^2, \\ A & = \frac{(d-2) \mu \ell^2}{r_{\mathrm o}} \left( \frac{1}{\xi} - \frac{1}{\xi_{\mathrm o}} \right) {\rm d}\tau. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E13.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>The above geometry is a black brane with both local and asymptotical topology 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_2 \times {{R}}^{d-1} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M36.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> (AdS<sub>2</sub> has the 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ SL(2,R)_R $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M37.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> symmetry). The horizons of the new black brane are located at 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \xi = \pm \xi_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M38.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, and its temperature is 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ T_{ {{n}}} = \dfrac{1}{2 \pi \xi_{\mathrm o}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M39.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>. Note that if we adopt the new coordinates 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z \equiv \xi/\xi_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M40.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> with 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ |z| \leqslant 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M41.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \eta = \tau/\xi_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M42.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, the metric becomes
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>14</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E14"> <?CDATA $ {\rm d}s^2 = \frac{\ell^2}{z^2} \left( - (1 - z^2) {\rm d}\eta^2 + \frac{{\rm d}z^2}{1-z^2} \right) + \frac{r_{\mathrm o}^2}{L^2} {\rm d}x_i^2, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E14.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>and the temperature associated with the inverse period of 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \eta $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M43.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is normalized to 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tilde{T}_{ n} = \dfrac{1}{2\pi} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M44.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>.
				</p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s02-03"><label>C.</label><title>Charged scalar field probe</title><p>The action of a bulk probe charged scalar field 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Phi $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M45.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> with mass <italic toggle="yes">m</italic> and charge <italic toggle="yes">q</italic> is
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>15</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E15"> <?CDATA $ S = \int {{{\rm d}^{d + 1}}} x\sqrt { - g} \left( { - \frac{1}{2}{D_\alpha^* }{\Phi ^*}{D^\alpha }\Phi - \frac{1}{2}{m^2}{\Phi ^*}\Phi } \right), $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E15.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ D_{\alpha} \equiv \nabla_{\alpha} - {\rm i} q A_{\alpha} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M46.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> with 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \nabla_\alpha $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M47.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> being the covariant derivative in curved spacetime. The corresponding Klein-Gordon (KG) equation is
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>16</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E16"> <?CDATA $ (\nabla_\alpha - {\rm i} q A_\alpha) (\nabla^\alpha - {\rm i} q A^\alpha) \Phi = m^2 \Phi. $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E16.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Moreover, the radial flux of the probe field is</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>17</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E17"> <?CDATA $ {\cal F} = {\rm i}\sqrt { - g} {g^{rr}}(\Phi D_r^*{\Phi ^*} - {\Phi ^*}{D_r}\Phi ). $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E17.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>In the RN-
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_{d+1} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M48.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> background (3), assuming 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Phi(t, \vec{x}, r) = $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M49.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>
					          <inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi(r) \mathrm{e}^{-{\rm i} \omega t + {\rm i} \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M49-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, the KG Eq. (16) has the radial form
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>18</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E18"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] & \left(\frac{L}{r}\right)^{d-1} \partial_r \left( \frac{r^{d+1}}{L^{d+1}} f(r) \partial_r \right) \phi(r) \\ & + \left(\frac{L^2 (\omega + q A_t)^2}{r^2 f(r)} - m^2 - \frac{L^2}{r^2} \vec{k}^2 \right) \phi(r) = 0. \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E18.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>The solutions to Eq. (18) cannot be directly found in terms of special functions in the full spacetime region. In what follows, we solve it in different regions and match these solutions to obtain the full solution.</p></sec></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s03"><label>III.</label><title>PAIR PRODUCTION IN THE INNER ADS<sub>2</sub>
         </title><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s03-01"><label>A.</label><title>Near-horizon solutions</title><p>Firstly, we analyze the near horizon, near extreme region (13) and solve the KG Eq. (16) by expanding the scalar field as</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>19</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E19"> <?CDATA $ \Phi(\tau, \vec{x}, \xi) = \phi(\xi) \mathrm{e}^{-{\rm i} w \tau + {\rm i} \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}}. $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E19.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Then, the KG equation reduces to <sup>
                  <xref ref-type="fn" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_pn1">①</xref>
               </sup>
            </p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>20</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E20"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] \xi^2 \left( 1 - \frac{\xi^2}{\xi_{\mathrm o}^2} \right) \phi''(\xi) - \frac{2\xi^3}{\xi_{\mathrm o}^2} \phi'(\xi) + \xi^2 \frac{(w + q A_\tau)^2}{1 - \dfrac{\xi^2}{\xi_{\mathrm o}^2}} \phi(\xi) = m_\mathrm{eff}^2 \ell^2 \phi(\xi), \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E20.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where the effective mass square is defined as 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ m_\mathrm{eff}^2 = $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M50.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>
					          <inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ m^2 + \dfrac{L^2 \vec{k}^2}{r_{\mathrm o}^2} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M50-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, or the KG equation can be expressed in the <italic toggle="yes">z</italic> coordinate as
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>21</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E21"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] z^2 (1 - z^2) \phi''(z) - 2 z^3 \phi'(z) & + \frac{z^2}{1 - z^2} \left[ \left( w \xi_{\mathrm o} + q_\mathrm{eff} \ell \frac{1 - z}{z} \right)^2\right. \\ & \left.- m_\mathrm{eff}^2 \ell^2 \frac{1 - z^2}{z^2} \right] \phi(z) = 0, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E21.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where the effective charge of the probe field is 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ q_\mathrm{eff} \equiv $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M51.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>
					          <inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ (d-2) \dfrac{\mu \ell}{r_{\mathrm o}} q $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M51-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>. The singularities of Eq. (21) are located at 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z = 0, z = \pm 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M52.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z = \infty $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M53.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>.
				</p><p>To find the solutions, we determine the indices at each singular point. For 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z \to 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M54.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, setting 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi(z) \sim z^{\bar{\alpha}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M55.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, the leading terms in Eq. (21) are
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>22</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E22"> <?CDATA $ z^2 \phi''(z) + (q_\mathrm{eff}^2 - m_\mathrm{eff}^2) \ell^2 \phi(z) = 0, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E22.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>which gives</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>23</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E23"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \bar{\alpha} = & \frac12 \pm \frac12 \sqrt{1 + 4 ( m_\mathrm{eff}^2 - q_\mathrm{eff}^2 ) \ell^2} \\\equiv & \frac12 \pm \frac12 \sqrt{1 + 4 \tilde{m}_\mathrm{eff}^2 \ell^2} \equiv \frac12 \pm \nu. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E23.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>For 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z \to -1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M56.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, setting 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi(z) \sim (1 + z)^{\bar{\beta}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M57.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, Eq. (21) reduces to
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>24</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E24"> <?CDATA $ 2 (1 + z) \phi''(z) + 2 \phi'(z) + \frac{(w \xi_{\mathrm o} - 2 q_\mathrm{eff} \ell)^2}{2 (1 + z)} \phi(z) = 0, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E24.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>and the index is</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>25</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E25"> <?CDATA $ \bar{\beta} = \pm {\rm i} \left( \frac{w \xi_{\mathrm o}}{2} - q_\mathrm{eff} \ell \right) = \pm {\rm i} \left( \frac{w}{4 \pi T_{\mathrm n}} - q_\mathrm{eff} \ell \right). $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E25.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Finally, for 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z \to 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M58.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, setting 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi(z) \sim (1 - z)^{\bar{\gamma}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M59.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, Eq. (21) reduces to
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>26</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E26"> <?CDATA $ 2 (1 - z) \phi''(z) - 2 \phi'(z) + \frac{(w \xi_{\mathrm o})^2}{2 (1 - z)} \phi(z) = 0, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E26.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>from which</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>27</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E27"> <?CDATA $ \bar{\gamma} = \pm {\rm i} \frac{w \xi_{\mathrm o}}{2} = \pm {\rm i} \frac{w}{4 \pi T_{\mathrm n}} = \pm {\rm i}\frac{\omega/\varepsilon}{4\pi /(2\pi \xi_{\mathrm o})} = \pm {\rm i}\frac{\omega}{2\varepsilon\rho_{\mathrm o}/\ell^2} = \pm {\rm i}\frac{\omega}{4\pi T} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E27.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>is obtained. Further, imposing the ingoing boundary condition at the black brane horizon 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z = 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M60.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> requires 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\gamma} = $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M61.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>
					          <inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ -{\rm i} \dfrac{w \xi_{\mathrm o}}{2} = -{\rm i} \dfrac{w}{4\pi T_{\mathrm n}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M61-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>.
				</p><p>Also, note that Eq. (21) can be rewritten in a more explicit form as</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>28</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E28"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \phi''(z) + \left( \frac{1}{z+1} + \frac{1}{z-1} \right) \phi'(z) + \left( \frac{\tilde{m}_\mathrm{eff}^2 \ell^2}{z} + \frac{\dfrac{1}{2} (w \xi_{\mathrm o} - 2 q_\mathrm{eff} \ell)^2}{z+1} + \frac{\dfrac12 w^2 \xi_{\mathrm o}^2}{z-1} \right) \frac{\phi(z)}{z (z+1) (z-1)} = 0, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E28.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>which becomes the Fuchs equation with three canonical singularities 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ a_1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M62.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ a_2 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M63.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ a_3 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M64.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, as follows:
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>29</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E29"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \phi''(z) & + \left( \frac{1-\bar{\alpha}_1-\bar{\alpha}_2}{z-a_1} + \frac{1-\bar{\beta}_1-\bar{\beta}_2}{z-a_2} + \frac{1-\bar{\gamma}_1-\bar{\gamma}_2}{z-a_3} \right) \phi'(z) + \left( \frac{\bar{\alpha}_1 \bar{\alpha}_2 (a_1-a_2) (a_1-a_3)}{z-a_1} + \frac{\bar{\beta}_1 \bar{\beta}_2 (a_2-a_3) (a_2-a_1)}{z-a_2}\right. \\ & \left.+ \frac{\bar{\gamma}_1 \bar{\gamma}_2 (a_3-a_1) (a_3-a_2)}{z-a_3} \right) \frac{\phi(z)}{(z-a_1)(z-a_2)(z-a_3)} = 0, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E29.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ a_1 = 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M65.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ a_2 = -1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M66.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ a_3 = 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M67.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> and
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>30</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E30"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] & \bar{\alpha}_1 = \frac12 \pm \nu, \quad \bar{\alpha}_2 = \frac12 \mp \nu, \quad \bar{\beta}_1 = - \bar{\beta}_2 = \pm {\rm i} \frac{w \xi_{\mathrm o} - 2 q_\mathrm{eff} \ell}2, \\ & \bar{\gamma}_1 = - \bar{\gamma}_2 = \pm {\rm i} \frac{w \xi_{\mathrm o}}2, \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E30.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\alpha}_1 + \bar{\alpha}_2 + \bar{\beta}_1 + \bar{\beta}_2 + \bar{\gamma}_1 + \bar{\gamma}_2 = 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M68.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is satisfied. The Fuchs Eq. (29) can be transformed into the standard hypergeometric function
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>31</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E31"> <?CDATA $ \zeta (1 - \zeta) \psi''(\zeta) + \left[ \tilde{\gamma} - (1 + \tilde{\alpha} + \tilde{\beta}) \zeta \right] \psi'(\zeta) - \tilde{\alpha} \tilde{\beta} \psi(\zeta) = 0, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E31.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>via the conformal coordinate transformation</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>32</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E32"> <?CDATA $ \zeta = \frac{(a_2-a_3)(z-a_1)}{(a_2-a_1)(z-a_3)}, \quad {\rm{}} \;\; \phi(z) = \left(\frac{z-a_1}{z-a_3}\right)^{\bar{\alpha}_1} \left(\frac{z-a_2}{z-a_3}\right)^{\bar{\beta}_1} \psi(\zeta), $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E32.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tilde{\alpha} = \bar{\alpha}_1 + \bar{\beta}_1 + \bar{\gamma}_1, \tilde{\beta} = \bar{\alpha}_1 + \bar{\beta}_1 + \bar{\gamma}_2 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M69.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tilde{\gamma} = 1 + \bar{\alpha}_1 - \bar{\alpha}_2 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M70.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>. (Note that one can freely choose the indices 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ i = 1,\; 2 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M71.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> for 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\alpha}_i $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M72.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\beta}_i $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M73.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\gamma}_i $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M74.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>.)
				</p><p>For Eq. (28), we have 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \zeta = 2z/(z-1) $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M75.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>,
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $\tilde{\alpha} = \dfrac12 \pm \nu + $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M76.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>
					          <inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm i} w \xi_{\mathrm o} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell, \;\;\;\;\tilde{\beta} = \dfrac12 \pm \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{\rm eff} \ell, \;\;\;\; \tilde{\gamma} = 1 \pm 2\nu$?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M76-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>. Therefore, the explicit solutions in the near horizon near extreme region are
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>33</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E33"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \phi(z) = & c_1 \left(\frac{z}{z-1}\right)^{\frac12 + \nu} \left(\frac{z+1}{z-1}\right)^{{\rm i} \frac{w \xi_{\mathrm o}}{2} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} {_2F_1}\left(\frac12 + \nu + {\rm i} w \xi_{\mathrm o} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell, \frac12 + \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell; 1 + 2 \nu; \frac{2z}{z-1} \right) \\ & + c_2 \left(\frac{z}{z-1}\right)^{\frac12 - \nu} \left(\frac{z+1}{z-1}\right)^{{\rm i} \frac{w \xi_{\mathrm o}}{2} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} {_2F_1}\left(\frac12 - \nu + {\rm i} w \xi_{\mathrm o} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell, \frac12 - \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell; 1 - 2 \nu; \frac{2z}{z-1} \right).\\ \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E33.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s03-02"><label>B.</label><title>2-point correlators from AdS<sub>2</sub>
            </title><p>At the horizon of the AdS<sub>2</sub> black brane, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z = 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M77.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, Eq. (33) is expanded as follows:
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>34</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E34"> <?CDATA $ \phi(z) = c_H^{(\mathrm {in})}(1-z)^{-{\rm i} \frac{w}{4\pi T_{ n}}} + c_H^{(\mathrm {out})} (1-z)^{{\rm i} \frac{w}{4\pi T_{n}}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E34.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E35-1"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] c_H^{(\mathrm {in})} = c_1 (-)^{-\frac12 - \nu - {\rm i} \frac{w}{2 \pi T_{ n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} \, 2^{-\frac12 - \nu + {\rm i} \frac{w}{4\pi T_{ n}}} \frac{\Gamma\left(1 + 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left({\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu + {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}\end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E35-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>35</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E35"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b]+ c_2 (-)^{-\frac12 + \nu - {\rm i} \frac{w}{2 \pi T_{ n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} \, 2^{-\frac12 + \nu + {\rm i} \frac{w}{4\pi T_{ n}}} \frac{\Gamma\left(1 - 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left({\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu + {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E35.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>and</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>36</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E36"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] c_H^{(\mathrm {out})} = & c_1 (-)^{-\frac12 - \nu - {\rm i} \frac{w}{2 \pi T_{ n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} \, 2^{-\frac12 - \nu - {\rm i} \frac{w}{4 \pi T_{ n}}} \frac{\Gamma\left(1 + 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left(-{\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu - {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)} \\ & + c_2 (-)^{-\frac12 + \nu - {\rm i} \frac{w}{2 \pi T_{ n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} \, 2^{-\frac12 + \nu - {\rm i} \frac{w}{4\pi T_{ n}}} \frac{\Gamma\left(1 - 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left(-{\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu - {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E36.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>In contrast, at the AdS<sub>2</sub> boundary, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ z \rightarrow 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M78.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, the asymptotic expansion of Eq. (33) is
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>37</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E37"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \phi(z) = & c_2 (-)^{\frac12 - \nu + {\rm i} \frac{w}{4\pi T_{ n}} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} z^{\frac{1}{2}- \nu} + c_1 (-)^{\frac12 + \nu + i \frac{w}{4\pi T_{\mathrm n}} - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell} z^{\frac{1}{2}+ \nu} \\= & {\cal A}(w, \vec{k})z^{\frac{1}{2}- \nu}+{\cal B}(w, \vec{k})z^{\frac{1}{2}+ \nu},\end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E37.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal A} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M79.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is the source of the charged scalar field in the bulk AdS<sub>2</sub>, while 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal B} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M80.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is the response or the operator 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal \hat{O}}(w,\vec{k}) $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M81.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> (in the momentum space) of the boundary CFT<sub>1</sub> (i.e., the IR CFT) dual to the charged scalar field in the bulk AdS<sub>2</sub> background. Note that in order to obtain the propagating modes, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \nu $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M82.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> should be purely imaginary, which can be set as 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \nu \equiv {\rm i} |\nu| $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M83.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, i.e., 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi(z) = c_B^{(\mathrm {out})} z^{\frac{1}{2} - {\rm i}|\nu|} + c_B^{(\mathrm {in})} z^{\frac{1}{2} + {\rm i}|\nu|} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M84.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>. It was shown in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib3">3</xref>] that the condition of an imaginary 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \nu $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M85.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is equivalent to the violation of the BF bound in AdS<sub>2</sub> spacetime, namely
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>38</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E38"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned} \tilde{m}_\mathrm{eff}^2 \lt -\frac{1}{4\ell^2}, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E38.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>which corresponds to a complex conformal weight of the scalar operator in the dual IR CFT.</p><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s03-02-01"><label>1.</label><title>Pair production rate and absorption cross section ratio</title><p>The Schwinger pair production rate 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ |\mathfrak{b}|^2 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M86.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and the absorption cross section ratio 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ \sigma_{\mathrm{abs}} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M87.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> can be calculated from the radial flux by imposing different boundary conditions
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>39</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E39"> <?CDATA $ \begin{align} {\cal F} = {\rm i} \left(\frac{r_{\mathrm o}}{L}\right)^{d-1} (1-z^2) (\Phi \partial_z \Phi^* - \Phi^* \partial_z \Phi), \end{align} $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E39.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>which gives</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>40</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E40"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {in})} = & 2 |\nu| \left(\frac{r_{\mathrm o}}{L}\right)^{d-1} |c_B^{(\mathrm {in})}|^2,\\ {\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {out})} = & -2 |\nu| \left(\frac{r_{\mathrm o}}{L}\right)^{d-1} |c_B^{(\mathrm {out})}|^2, \\ {\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {in})} = & \frac{w}{2\pi T_{\mathrm n}} \left(\frac{r_{\mathrm o}}{L}\right)^{d-1} |c_H^{(\mathrm {in})}|^2, \\ {\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {out})} = & -\frac{w}{2\pi T_{\mathrm n}} \left(\frac{r_{\mathrm o}}{L}\right)^{d-1} |c_H^{(\mathrm {out})}|^2, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E40.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>where 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {in})} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M88.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {out})} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M89.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> are the ingoing and outgoing fluxes at the AdS<sub>2</sub> boundary, while 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {in})} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M90.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {out})} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M91.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> are the ingoing and outgoing fluxes at the AdS<sub>2</sub> black brane horizon, respectively.
					</p><p>The Schwinger pair production rate 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {{{\left| {{\mathfrak{b}^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{2}}}}}} \right|}^{\text{2}}}} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M92.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> can be computed either by choosing the inner boundary condition or the outer boundary condition, which gives the same result [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib3">3</xref>], e.g., by adopting the outer boundary condition, i.e., 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {in})} = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M93.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>, (
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ c_B^{(\mathrm {in})} = 0 \Rightarrow c_1 = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M94.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>),
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>41</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E41"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {{{\left| {{\mathfrak{b}^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{2}}}}}} \right|}^{\text{2}}}} & = \frac{{\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {out})}}{{\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {in})}} = \frac{4 \pi T_{ n} |\nu|}{w} \left|\frac{c_B^{(\mathrm {out})}}{c_H^{(\mathrm {in})}}\right|^2 = \frac{ 8 \pi T_{ n} |\nu|}{w} \left| \frac{\Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - {\rm i}|\nu| + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - {\rm i}|\nu| + {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}} -{\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}{\Gamma\left(1 - 2{\rm i}|\nu|\right) \Gamma\left({\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}\right)}\right|^2\\ & = \frac{2\sinh\left(2\pi|\nu| \right)\sinh\left(\dfrac{w}{2T_{ n}}\right)}{\cosh\pi\left(|\nu|-q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)\cosh\pi\left(|\nu|-\dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}+q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E41.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>Similarly, by adopting the outer boundary condition, the absorption cross section ratio is computed as</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>42</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E42"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \sigma _{{\text{abs}}}^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{2}}}} & = \frac{{\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {out})}}{{\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {out})}} = \frac{4 \pi T_{ n} |\nu|}{w} \left|\frac{c_B^{(\mathrm {out})}}{c_H^{(\mathrm {out})}}\right|^2 = \frac{ 8 \pi T_{ n} |\nu|}{w} \left| \frac{\Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - {\rm i}|\nu| - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - {\rm i}|\nu| - {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}} +{\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}{\Gamma\left(1 - 2{\rm i}|\nu|\right) \Gamma\left(-{\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}\right)}\right|^2\\ & = \frac{2\sinh\left(2\pi|\nu| \right)\sinh\left(\dfrac{w}{2T_{ n}}\right)}{\cosh\pi\left(|\nu|+q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)\cosh\pi\left(|\nu|+\dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}}-q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E42.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>The pair production rate and the absorption cross section ratio are connected by the simple relation</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>43</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E43"> <?CDATA $ {{{\left| {{\mathfrak{b}^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{2}}}}}} \right|}^{\text{2}}}} =-\sigma_{\mathrm{abs}}(|\nu|\rightarrow -|\nu|). $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E43.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>It was shown that the abovementioned relation also holds for a charged scalar field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib11">11</xref>] and for a charged spinor field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib4">4</xref>], both in a four-dimensional near extremal RN black hole.
					</p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s03-02-02"><label>2.</label><title>Retarded Green's function</title><p>The two-point retarded Green's function of the boundary operator dual to the bulk charged scalar field is computed through</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>44</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E44"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] G_R^{\mathrm {AdS_2}}(w, \vec{k}) \equiv & \langle {\cal \hat{O}} {\cal \hat{O}} \rangle_R\\ = & -2 {\cal F}|_{z\rightarrow 0} \sim \frac{{\cal B}(w, \vec{k})}{{\cal A}(w, \vec{k})} \\ & + \rm{contact\; terms} \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E44.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>by taking the inner boundary condition, i.e., 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {out})} = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M95.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>, which gives
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>45</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E45"> <?CDATA $ \frac{c_2}{c_1} = (-)^{1 - 2\nu} \, 2^{-2\nu} \frac{\Gamma\left(1 + 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu - {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{\mathrm n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}{\Gamma\left(1 - 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu - {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{\mathrm n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}. $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E45.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>Thus, the two-point retarded Green's function is</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>46</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E46"> <?CDATA $ G_R^{\mathrm {AdS_2}}(w, \vec{k}) \sim \frac{{\cal B}(\omega, \vec{k})}{{\cal A}(\omega, \vec{k})} = (-)^{2\nu} \frac{c_1}{c_2} = (-)^{4\nu-1} \, 2^{2\nu} \frac{\Gamma\left(1 - 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 + \nu - {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{\mathrm n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}{\Gamma\left(1 + 2\nu\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu - {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right) \Gamma\left(\dfrac12 - \nu - {\rm i} \dfrac{w}{2\pi T_{\mathrm n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell\right)}. $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E46.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>In addition, the corresponding boundary condition (
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_B^{(\mathrm {in})} = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M96.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal F}_H^{(\mathrm {out})} = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M97.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>) is used to obtain the quasinormal modes of the charged scalar field in AdS<sub>2</sub> spacetime, which correspond to the poles of the retarded Green's function of dual operators (with complex conformal weight 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ h_R = \dfrac12+\nu $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M98.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>) in the IR CFT, namely
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>47</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E47"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] & \frac12 +\nu - {\rm i} \frac{w}{2\pi T_{ n}} + {\rm i} q_\mathrm{eff} \ell = -N \Rightarrow w\\ = & 2\pi T_{ n}\left(q_\mathrm{eff} \ell-{\rm i}N-{\rm i}h_R\right),\quad N = 0,1,\cdots. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E47.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>Eq. (47) gives the quasinormal modes of the charged scalar field perturbation.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s04"><label>IV.</label><title>PAIR PRODUCTION IN THE ASYMPTOTICAL 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm{AdS}}_{5} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M99.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>
			      </title><p>In this section, we describe our study of the pair production for the whole spacetime of RN-AdS<sub>5</sub>. Like before, we need to solve the corresponding radial Klein equation for the scalar field.
			</p><p>To find the solution in the full region, we focus on 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ d = 4 $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M100.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> and the near extremal cases. By introducing the coordinate transformation 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \varrho = \dfrac{{{r^2}}}{{M'}} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M101.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> (and denoting 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ M'{\text{ = }} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M102.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>
				        <inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {{\text{G}}_{d + 1}}{L^2}M $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M102-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \varrho_{\mathrm o} = \dfrac{r_{\mathrm o}^2}{M'} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M103.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \varrho _* = \dfrac{r_*^2}{M'} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M104.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>), the radial Eq. (18) can be expressed as
			</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>48</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E48"> <?CDATA $ \phi ''(\varrho ) + \left( {\frac{1}{{\varrho - {\varrho _1}}} + \frac{1}{{\varrho - {\varrho _2}}} + \frac{1}{{\varrho - {\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}}} \right)\phi '\left( \varrho \right) + \left( {\frac{{\varrho {{\left( {\tilde \omega \varrho - \tilde q\mu {\varrho_{\mathrm o} }} \right)}^2}}}{{{{\left( {\varrho - {\varrho _1}} \right)}^2}{{\left( {\varrho - {\varrho _2}} \right)}^2}{{\left( {\varrho - {\varrho_{\mathrm o} }} \right)}^2}}} - \frac{{{{\tilde m}^{\rm{2}}}\varrho + {{\tilde k}^2}}}{{\left( {\varrho - {\varrho _1}} \right)\left( {\varrho - {\varrho _2}} \right)\left( {\varrho - {\varrho_{\mathrm o} }} \right)}}} \right)\phi \left( \varrho \right) = 0, $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E48.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>where the parameters are 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tilde \omega = \dfrac{{{L^2}(\omega + q\mu )}}{{2\sqrt {M'} }} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M105.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tilde q = \dfrac{{{L^2}q}}{{2\sqrt {M'} }} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M106.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tilde m = \dfrac{Lm}{2} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M107.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tilde k = \dfrac{{{L^2}\left| {\vec k} \right|}}{{2\sqrt {M'} }} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M108.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> and
			</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>49</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E49"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \varrho _1 & = - \frac{1}{2}{\varrho_{\mathrm o} } - \frac{1}{2}\sqrt {{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }^{\text{2}} + 8\frac{{{\varrho _*}^{\text{3}}}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}}}, \\ \varrho _2 & = - \frac{1}{2}{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }{\text{ + }}\frac{1}{2}\sqrt {{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }^{\text{2}} + 8\frac{{{\varrho _*}^{\text{3}}}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}}}. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E49.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>Further, defining another coordinate</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>50</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E50"> <?CDATA $ y\equiv \frac{{\varrho - {\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}},\quad a\equiv \frac{\varrho _2-\varrho _{\mathrm{o}}}{\varrho _{\mathrm{o}}},\quad {} b\equiv \frac{\varrho _1-\varrho _{\mathrm{ o }}}{\varrho _{\mathrm{ o }}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E50.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>the metric of the RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole becomes
			</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>51</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E51"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {\rm d}s^2 & = \frac{L^2 {\rm d}y^2}{4(1+y)^2 f(y)}+\frac{r_{\mathrm{o}}^2}{L^2}(1+y)\left(-f(y){\rm d}t^2+{\rm d}x_i^2 \right),\\ A & = \frac{\mu y}{1+y}{\rm d}t, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E51.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>where</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>52</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E52"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] f(y) = & 1-\frac{M'}{r_{\mathrm{o}}^4}(1+y)^{-2}+\frac{Q'^2}{r_{\mathrm{o}}^6}(1+y)^{-3}, \\ {{Q'}^2} = & {{\text{G}}_{d + 1}}{L^2}{Q^2}. \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E52.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>Moreover, Eq. (48) transforms into</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>53</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E53"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] \phi ''(y) & + \left( {\frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{{y - a}} + \frac{1}{{y - b}}} \right)\phi '\left( y \right) \\ & + \left( \frac{{{{\left( {\tilde \omega (y + 1) - \tilde q\mu } \right)}^2}(y + 1)}}{{{y^2}{{\left( {y - a} \right)}^2}{{\left( {y - b} \right)}^2}}}\right.\\ & \left. - \frac{{{{\tilde m}^2}(y + 1){\varrho_{\mathrm o} } + {{\tilde k}^2}}}{{y\left( {y - a} \right)\left( {y - b} \right)}} \right)\frac{{\phi \left( y \right)}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}} = 0.\end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E53.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>To solve 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi(y) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M109.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, first, we determine its exponents at the corresponding singularities 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ 0 $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M110.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, <italic toggle="yes">a</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">b</italic>,<italic toggle="yes"/>and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \infty $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M111.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, which are 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \alpha _{1,2} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M112.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \beta _{1,2} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M113.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \gamma _{1,2} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M114.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \delta _{1,2} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M115.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, respectively,
			</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>54</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E54"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] & \alpha _{1,2} = \pm {\rm i}\frac{(\tilde \omega - \tilde q\mu) }{ab\sqrt {\varrho_{\mathrm o}}} = \pm\frac{{\rm i}\omega}{4\pi T},\\ & \beta _{1,2} = \pm {\rm i}\frac{{(\tilde \omega (1 + b) - \tilde q\mu )\sqrt {1 + b} }}{{(a - b)b\sqrt {{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }} }},\\ & \gamma _{1,2} = \pm {\rm i}\frac{{(\tilde \omega (1 + a) - \tilde q\mu )\sqrt {1 + a} }}{{(b - a)a\sqrt {{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }} }}, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E54.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>where the index “1” corresponds to the “
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ + $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M116.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>” sign, and the index “2” corresponds to the “
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ - $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M117.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>” sign. Then, decomposing 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi \left( y \right) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M118.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> as
			</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>55</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E55"> <?CDATA $ \phi \left( y \right) = {\left( {\frac{y}{{y - b}}} \right)^{{\alpha _1}}}{\left( {\frac{{y - a}}{{y - b}}} \right)^{{\gamma _1}}}R(y), $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E55.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>we obtain</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>56</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E56"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] R''(y) & + \left( {\frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{{y - a}} + \frac{1}{{y - b}} - \frac{{2b{\alpha _1}}}{{y(y - b)}} + \frac{{2(a - b){\gamma _1}}}{{(y - a)(y - b)}}} \right)R'\left( y \right) \\ & + {V_2}R(y) = 0, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E56.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>where</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>57</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E57"> <?CDATA $ {V_2} \equiv - \frac{{(2 + 3a - {a^2}y){{\tilde \omega }^{\rm{2}}} - {\rm{4}}\left( {a + 1} \right)\tilde \omega \tilde q\mu {\rm{ + }}\left( {a + {\rm{2}}} \right){{\tilde q}^{\rm{2}}}{\mu ^{\rm{2}}}}}{{{\varrho _{\rm{o}}}{a^2}y\left( {y - a} \right){{\left( {y - b} \right)}^2}}} - {M_1}, $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E57.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>and</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>58</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E58"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] M_1 = & \frac{{\left( {b - a} \right){\gamma _1}}}{{y\left( {y - a} \right)(y - b)}} + \frac{{2b\left( {a - b} \right){\alpha _1}{\gamma _1}}}{{y\left( {y - a} \right){{(y - b)}^2}}} + \frac{{{{\tilde m}^2}(y + 1){\varrho_{\mathrm o} } + {{\tilde k}^2}}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }y\left( {y - a} \right)\left( {y - b} \right)}}\\ & + \frac{{b{\alpha _1}}}{{y\left( {y - a} \right)(y - b)}}. \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E58.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s04-01"><label>A.</label><title>Solutions in the near and far regions</title><p>We divide the regions into a near region</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>59</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E59"> <?CDATA $ y = \frac{{\varrho - {\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}} \ll 1, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E59.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>and a far region</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>60</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E60"> <?CDATA $ y = \frac{{\varrho - {\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }}}\gg -a, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E60.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>and an overlapping region, in which</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>61</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E61"> <?CDATA $ -a \ll 1. $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E61.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>The physical reasoning of 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ -a \ll 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M119.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> relies on the observation that the temperature of a black hole is
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>62</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E62"> <?CDATA $ T = \frac{{{r_{\mathrm o} }}}{{\pi {L^2}}}\left( {1 - \frac{{{\varrho _*}^3}}{{{\varrho_{\mathrm o} }^3}}} \right), $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E62.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>which gives 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ -a \to 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M120.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> for 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ T \to 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M121.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, as
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>63</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E63"> <?CDATA $ - a = \frac{3}{2} - \frac{1}{2}\sqrt {9 - \frac{8\pi L^2 T}{r_{\mathrm o} }}. $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E63.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>We want to point out that the matching condition in Eq. (61) indicates that the near extremal condition is essential for matching the solutions in the near and far regions. It is not necessary for the frequency to be infinitely small; however, the frequency should definitely not be very large compared with the temperature <italic toggle="yes">T</italic>; otherwise, the backreaction to the background geometry cannot be ignored.
				</p><p>Now we find the approximate solutions in different regions. First, by using the near region condition (
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ y \ll 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M122.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>), Eq. (53) reduces to
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>64</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E64"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] \phi ''(y) & + \left( {\frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{{y - a}}} \right)\phi '\left( y \right) \\ & + \left( { - \frac{{{{(a{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell y)}^2}}}{{{y^{\rm{2}}}{{\left( {y - a} \right)}^{\rm{2}}}}} + \frac{{{{\tilde m}^2}{\varrho _{\rm{o}}} + {{\tilde k}^2}}}{{{\varrho _{\rm{o}}}by(y - a)}}} \right)\phi (y) = 0. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E64.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Obviously Eq. (64) can be solved by the hypergeometric function as</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>65</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E65"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] \phi \left( y \right) = & {\left( {y - a} \right)^{{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell}}\bigg( {{c_3}{y^{{\alpha _1}}}_2{F_1}\left( {\alpha ,\beta ;\gamma ;\frac{y}{a}} \right)} \\ & + {c_4}{y^ - }^{{\alpha _1}}{}_2{F_1}\left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha ,1 - \gamma + \beta ;2 - \gamma ;\frac{y}{a}} \right) \bigg), \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E65.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $\alpha = \dfrac{1}{2} + \nu + 2{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell$?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M123.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $\beta = \dfrac{1}{2} - \nu + 2{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell$?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M124.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \gamma = 1 + 2{\alpha _1} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M125.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \ell = L/\sqrt{12} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M126.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is the radius of the effective AdS<sub>2</sub> geometry in the near horizon region of the RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole. Second, in the far region, by using the condition (
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ y \gg -a $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M127.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>), Eq. (56) can turn into
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>66</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E66"> <?CDATA $ R''(y) + \left( {\frac{2}{y} + \frac{1}{{y - b}} - \frac{{4b{\alpha _1}}}{{y(y - b)}}{\rm{ + }}\frac{{2{\rm i}b{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell }}{{y(y - b)}}} \right)R'\left( y \right) + {V_3}R(y) = 0, $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E66.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>where</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>67</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E67"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {V_3} \equiv & \frac{{{{\tilde \omega }^2}}}{{{\varrho _{\rm{o}}}y{{(y - b)}^2}}} + \frac{{4{b^2}{\alpha _1}\left( {{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell } \right)}}{{{y^2}{{(y - b)}^2}}} \\ & - \frac{{b\left( {2{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell } \right)}}{{{y^2}(y - b)}} - \frac{{{{\tilde m}^2}(y + 1){\varrho _{\rm{o}}} + {{\tilde k}^2}}}{{{\varrho _{\rm{o}}}{y^2}(y - b)}},\end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E67.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>(where the relation 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\gamma _1} \approx {\alpha _1} + \dfrac{{{\rm i}\tilde q\mu }}{{b\sqrt {{\varrho _{\rm{o}}}} }} = {\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M128.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> when 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \left| a \right| \ll 1 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M129.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> is used). Similarly, Eq. (66) has a solution in terms of the hypergeometric function as
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>68</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E68"> <?CDATA $\begin{aligned}[b] \phi \left( y \right) = & {\left( {\frac{y}{b} - 1} \right)^\lambda}\bigg( {{c_5}{y^{\nu - \frac{1}{2}}}_2{F_1}\left( {\alpha ',\beta ';\gamma ';\frac{y}{b}} \right)} \\ & + {c_6}{y^{ - \nu - \frac{1}{2}}}_2{F_1}\left( {1 - \gamma ' + \alpha ',1 - \gamma ' + \beta ';2 - \gamma ';\frac{y}{b}} \right) \bigg) \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E68.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>in which 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \alpha ' = \dfrac{1}{2} + \nu + \Delta + \lambda $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M130.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \beta ' = \dfrac{1}{2} + \nu - \Delta + \lambda $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M131.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \gamma ' = 1 + 2\nu $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M132.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Delta = \sqrt {1 + {{\tilde m}^2}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M133.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $\lambda = \sqrt {{{\left( {{\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell } \right)}^2} - \dfrac{{{{\tilde \omega }^2}}}{{{\varrho _{\rm{o}}}b}}}$?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M134.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>.
				</p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s04-02"><label>B.</label><title>Near-far matching</title><p>In the overlapping region, one has the inequalities</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>69</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E69"> <?CDATA $- a \ll y \ll 1 \lt , -b$?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E69.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>(
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ 1 \lt - b $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M135.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> since 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ - b = \dfrac{3}{2}{\text{ + }}\dfrac{1}{2}\sqrt {9 - \dfrac{{8\pi {L^2}T}}{{{r_{\mathrm o} }}}} \to {\text{3}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M136.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, as 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ T \to {\text{0}} $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M137.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>), which means 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \left| {\dfrac{a}{y}} \right| \to 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M138.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> and 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \left| {\dfrac{y}{b}} \right| \to 0 $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M139.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, which transforms Eqs. (65) and (68) into the following forms: the near regionsolution
				</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>70</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E70"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \phi (y) = & \left( {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - \alpha }}{c_3}\frac{{\Gamma \left( \gamma \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( \beta \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma - \alpha } \right)}}\right.\\ & \left. + {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - 1 + \gamma - \alpha }}{c_4}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \beta } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}} \right){y^{ - \frac{1}{2} - \nu }} \\ & + \left( {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - \beta }}{c_3}\frac{{\Gamma \left( \gamma \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma - \beta } \right)}} \right.\\ & +\left. {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - 1 + \gamma - \beta }}{c_4}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta } \right)}} \right){y^{ - \frac{1}{2} + \nu }} \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E70.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>and the far region solution</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>71</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E71"> <?CDATA $ \phi (y) \to {\left( { - 1} \right)^\lambda}{c_5}{y^{ - \frac{1}{2} + \nu }} + {\left( { - 1} \right)^\lambda}{c_6}{y^{ - \frac{1}{2} - \nu }}. $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E71.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>Comparing these two identities, one finds the connection relations</p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>72</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E72"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {c_5} = & {( - 1)^{ - \lambda}}\left( {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - \beta }}{c_3}\frac{{\Gamma \left( \gamma \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma - \beta } \right)}}\right.\\ & \left. + {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - 1 + \gamma - \beta }}{c_4}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta } \right)}} \right), \end{aligned}$?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E72.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p><p>
					          <disp-formula> 
						            <label>73</label>  
						            <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E73"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b]{c_6} = & {( - 1)^{ - \lambda}}\left( {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - \alpha }}{c_3}\frac{{\Gamma \left( \gamma \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( \beta \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma - \alpha } \right)}}\right.\\ & \left. + {{\left( { - 1} \right)}^{ - 1 + \gamma - \alpha }}{c_4}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \beta } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}} \right).\end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
						            <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E73.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </disp-formula>
				        </p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s04-03"><label>B.</label><title>2-point correlators from AdS<sub>5</sub>
            </title><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s04-03-01"><label>1.</label><title>Pair production and absorption cross section</title><p>Now we denote the radial flux of the charged scalar field in metric (51) as 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal D} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M140.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>:
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>74</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E74"> <?CDATA $ {\cal D} = \frac{2{\rm i}r_{\mathrm{o}}^4(1+y)^3 f(y)}{L^5}\bigg(\phi(y)\partial_y \phi^*(y)- \phi^*(y)\partial_y \phi(y) \bigg). $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E74.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>In the near horizon limit, i.e.,
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ y \to 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M141.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>, Eq. (65) reduces to
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>75</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E75"> <?CDATA $ \phi (y) = {c_3}{y^{{\alpha _1}}}{\left( {y - a} \right)^{{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell }} + {c_4}{y^{ - {\alpha _1}}}{\left( {y - a} \right)^{{\alpha _1} - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell }}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E75.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>where the first part is the outgoing mode, and the second part is the ingoing mode. Further, the asymptotic form of 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi(y) $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M142.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> at the boundary (
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ y\to \infty $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M143.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>) of the AdS<sub>5</sub> spacetime results in the form
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>76</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E76"> <?CDATA $ \phi(y) = A(\tilde{\omega}, \tilde{k})y^{- 1 + \Delta}+B(\tilde{\omega}, \tilde{k})y^{- 1 - \Delta}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E76.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>where 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ A(\tilde{\omega}, \tilde{k}) $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M144.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> is the source of the charged scalar field in the bulk RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole, while 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ B(\tilde{\omega}, \tilde{k}) $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M145.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> is the response (the operator) of the boundary CFT<sub>4</sub> (i.e., the UV CFT) dual to the charged scalar field in the bulk. As in the case of the AdS<sub>2</sub> spacetime, the condition for the propagating modes requires an imaginary 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Delta $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M146.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>, i.e., 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Delta = {\rm i}\left| \Delta \right| $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M147.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>, which means
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>77</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E77"> <?CDATA $ m^2\leqslant -\frac{4}{L^2}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E77.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>namely, the violation of the BF bound in AdS<sub>5</sub> spacetime.
					</p><p>Therefore, the corresponding outgoing and ingoing fluxes at the horizon and the boundary of the near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black brane are
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>78</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E78"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] {\cal D}_H^{(\mathrm{out})} & = \frac{{4\pi \omega T{r_{\mathrm{o}}}^2}}{{abL}}|{c_3}{|^2} = \frac{2r_{\mathrm{o}}^3\omega}{L^3}|c_3|^2 ,\\{\kern 1pt} {\cal D}_H^{(\mathrm{in})} & = - \frac{{4\pi \omega T{r_{\rm{o}}}^2}}{{abL}}|{c_4}{|^2} = -\frac{2r_{\mathrm{o}}^3\omega}{L^3}|c_4|^2, \\ {\cal D}_B^{({\mathrm{out}})} & = \frac{{4|\Delta |{r_{\rm{o}}}^4}}{{{L^5}}}\left| A( {\tilde \omega ,\tilde k})\right|^2,\\ {\cal D}_B^{({\mathrm{in}})} & = - \frac{{4|\Delta |{r_{\rm{o}}}^4}}{{{L^5}}}\left|B( {\tilde \omega ,\tilde k})\right|^2. \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E78.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>The absorption cross section ratio 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ \sigma _{\mathrm{abs}}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M148.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and the Schwinger pair production rate 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ \left|\mathfrak{b}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}}\right|^2 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M149.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> can be calculated by choosing the inner boundary condition 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal D}_H^{(\mathrm{out})} = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M150.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and (
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ c_3 = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M151.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>) and are given by
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>79</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E79"> <?CDATA $ \sigma _{{\rm{abs}}}^{{\rm{Ad}}{{\rm{S}}_{\rm{5}}}} = \left| {\frac{{{\cal D}_H^{({\rm{in}})}}}{{{\cal D}_B^{({\rm{in}})}}}} \right| = \frac{{{\rm{2}}T{L^{\rm{2}}}\left| \nu \right|\sinh \left( {2\pi \left| \Delta \right|} \right)}}{{{r_{\rm{o}}}{{\left| {H\left( {\nu ;\Delta ;\lambda } \right){{\left( {G_R^{{\rm{Ad}}{{\rm{S}}_{\rm{2}}}}} \right)}^{ - 1}} + H\left( { - \nu ;\Delta ;\lambda } \right)} \right|}^2}}}{\sigma _{{\rm{abs}}}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E79.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>and</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>80</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E80"> <?CDATA $ {\left| {{\mathfrak{b}^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{5}}}}}} \right|^2} \!\!=\!\! \left| {\frac{{{\cal D}_H^{({\text{in}})}}}{{{\cal D}_B^{({\text{out}})}}}} \right| \!\!=\!\! \frac{{{\text{2}}T{L^{\text{2}}}\left| \nu \right|\sinh \left( {2\pi \left| \Delta \right|} \right)}}{{{r_{\rm{o}}}{{\left| {H\left( {\! -\! \nu ; \!-\! \Delta ;\lambda } \right)G_R^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{2}}}} \!+\! H\left( {\nu ;\! -\! \Delta ;\lambda } \right)} \right|}^2}}}{\left| {{\mathfrak{b}^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{2}}}}}} \right|^2}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E80.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>where 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ H\left( {x;y;z} \right) $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M152.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> denotes a function
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>81</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E81"> <?CDATA $ H\left( {x;y;z} \right) \equiv {\left( { - 1} \right)^{2x}}{2^x}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {1 + {\rm{2}}x} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {\dfrac{1}{2} + x - y + z} \right)\Gamma \left( {\dfrac{1}{2} + x - y - z} \right)}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E81.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>and</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>82</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E82"> <?CDATA $ G_R^{\rm{AdS_2}} = {\left( { - 1} \right)^{4\nu - 1}}{2^{2\nu }}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {1 - 2\nu } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 + 2\nu } \right)}}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {\dfrac{1}{2} + \nu - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {\dfrac{1}{2} - \nu - {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell } \right)}}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {\dfrac{1}{2} + \nu - {\rm i}\dfrac{\omega }{{2\pi T}} + {\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {\dfrac{1}{2} - \nu - {\rm i}\dfrac{\omega }{{2\pi T}}{\rm{ + }}{\rm i}{q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell } \right)}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E82.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>which is exactly the retarded Green's function in Eq. (46) of the IR CFT in the near horizon, near extremal region. Furthermore, 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\sigma _{\mathrm{abs}}} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M153.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\left| {{\mathfrak{b}^{{\text{Ad}}{{\text{S}}_{\text{2}}}}}} \right|^2} $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M154.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> are exactly the absorption cross section ratio and the mean number of produced pairs of the corresponding IR CFT obtained from Eqs. (42) and (41). We find a relationship
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>83</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E83"> <?CDATA $\left|\mathfrak{b}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}}\right|^2 = -\sigma _{\mathrm{abs}}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}}\left(\left| \nu \right| \to - \left| \nu \right|, \left| \Delta \right| \to - \left| \Delta \right|\right), $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E83.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>which is similar to Eq. (43) except for a combined change in signs in both 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ |\nu| $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M155.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula> and 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ |\Delta| $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M156.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>.
					</p><p>With Eq. (80) at hand we can easily investigate the relationship between the pair production rate in the near horizon and that for the whole spacetime of RN-AdS<sub>5</sub>. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_f1">Fig. 1</xref>, we can see that the mean number of produced pairs for the whole spacetime is less than that from near horizon region. Moreover, with increasing charge of the scalar field, the corresponding ratio becomes smaller, which is consistent with previous assumptions stating that the Schwinger effect mainly occurs in the near horizon region.
					</p><fig id="cpc_45_6_065105_f1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 1</label><caption id="cpc_45_6_065105_fc1"><p>(color online) Ratio of mean number of produced pairs for the whole spacetime to that in the near horizon region as a function of 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ \omega {L^2}/{r_{\rm{o}}} $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M157.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula> for different values of 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ {q_{{\rm{eff}}}}\ell $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M158.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula> with 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ T{L^{\text{2}}}/{{r_{\text{o}}}} = 0.001 $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M159.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>, 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ \nu = 0.1{\rm i} $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M160.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>, and 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Delta = 0.1{\rm i} $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M161.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>(left); 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ T{L^{\text{2}}}/{{r_{\text{o}}}} = 0.001 $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M162.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>, 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ \nu = 0.01{\rm i} $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M163.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>, and 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Delta = 0.01{\rm i} $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M164.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>(middle); 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ T{L^{\text{2}}}/{{r_{\text{o}}}} = 0.01 $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M165.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>, 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ \nu = 0.1{\rm i} $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M166.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>, and 
								<inline-formula>
									                  <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Delta = 0.1i $?></tex-math>
									                  <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M167.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
								                </inline-formula>(right).
							</p></caption><graphic content-type="print" id="cpc_45_6_065105_f1_eps" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_f1.eps" xlink:type="simple"/><graphic content-type="online" id="cpc_45_6_065105_f1_online" orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_f1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/></fig></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s04-03-02"><label>2.</label><title>Retarded Green's function</title><p>To calculate the retarded Green's function, an ingoing boundary condition is required, namely 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ c_3 = 0 $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M168.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>. Then, from Eqs. (72) and (73), the connection relations are
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>84</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E84"> <?CDATA $ {c_5} = {\left( { - 1} \right)^{ - 1 + \gamma - \beta - \lambda}}{c_4}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta } \right)}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E84.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>85</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E85"> <?CDATA $ {c_6} = {\left( { - 1} \right)^{ - 1 + \gamma - \alpha - \lambda}}{c_4}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \beta } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}}. $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E85.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>Substituting Eqs. (84) and (85) into Eq. (68) and taking 
						<inline-formula>
							              <tex-math><?CDATA $ y \to \infty $?></tex-math>
							              <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M169.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </inline-formula>, namely the boundary of the AdS<sub>5</sub> spacetime, one obtains
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>86</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E86"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] A(\tilde \omega ,\tilde k) = & \left( - 1 \right)^{{\rm i} q_{\rm{eff}}\ell - 2\lambda - 1 + \Delta }c_4\bigg( \frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta } \right)}}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {\gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha ' - \beta '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {\alpha '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma ' - \beta '} \right)}}+ \frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \beta } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha ' - \beta '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma ' + \alpha '} \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta '} \right)}} \bigg),\\ \\ B(\tilde{\omega}, \tilde{k}) = & \left( - 1 \right)^{{\rm i} q_{\rm{eff}}\ell - 2\lambda - 1 - \Delta }c_4\bigg( \frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta } \right)}}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {\gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta ' - \alpha '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {\beta '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma ' - \alpha '} \right)}}+ \frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma } \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \beta } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}}\frac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta ' - \alpha '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma ' + \beta '} \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha '} \right)}} \bigg). \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E86.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>Therefore, the retarded Green's function of the boundary CFT<sub>4</sub> is given by
					</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>87</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E87"> <?CDATA $ G_R^{\mathrm{AdS_5}}\sim\frac{B(\tilde{\omega}, \tilde{k})}{A(\tilde{\omega}, \tilde{k})} = {\left( { - 1} \right)^{ - 2\Delta }}\frac{{\dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta } \right)}}\dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {\gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta ' - \alpha '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {\beta '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma ' - \alpha '} \right)}} + \dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \beta } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}}\dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\beta ' - \alpha '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma ' + \beta '} \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha '} \right)}}}}{{\dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {\alpha - \beta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \alpha } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta } \right)}}\dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {\gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha ' - \beta '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {\alpha '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\gamma ' - \beta '} \right)}} + \dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {\beta - \alpha } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma + \beta } \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}}\dfrac{{\Gamma \left( {2 - \gamma '} \right)\Gamma \left( {\alpha ' - \beta '} \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \gamma ' + \alpha '} \right)\Gamma \left( {1 - \beta '} \right)}}}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E87.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p><p>which is further simplified into</p><p>
						            <disp-formula> 
							              <label>88</label>  
							              <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E88"> <?CDATA $ G_R^{\rm{AdS_5}} \sim {\left( { - 1} \right)^{ - 2\Delta }}\frac{{\Gamma \left( { - 2\Delta } \right)}}{{\Gamma \left( {2\Delta } \right)}}\frac{{H\left( {\nu ;\Delta ;\lambda} \right) + H\left( { - \nu ;\Delta ;\lambda} \right)G_R^{\rm{AdS_2}}}}{{H\left( {\nu ; - \Delta ;\lambda} \right) + H\left( { - \nu ; - \Delta ;\lambda} \right)G_R^{\rm{AdS_2}}}}. $?>
 </tex-math>
							              <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E88.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
						            </disp-formula>
					          </p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s05"><label>V.</label><title>CFTS DESCRIPTIONS IN IR AND UV REGIONS</title><p>From the AdS/CFT correspondence, the IR CFT<sub>1</sub> in the near horizon, near extremal limit and the UV CFT<sub>4</sub> at the asymptotic boundary of the RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole can be connected by the holographic RG flow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib26">26</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib27">27</xref>]. The CFT description of the Schwinger pair production in the IR region of charged black holes has been systematically studied in a series of previous works [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib7">7</xref>]. Herein, we address the dual CFTs descriptions in the UV region and compare them with those in the IR region.
			</p><p>The IR CFT<sub>1</sub> of the RN-AdS black hole is very similar to that of the RN black hole in an asymptotically flat spacetime, as CFT<sub>1</sub> can be viewed as a chiral part of CFT<sub>2</sub>, which has the universal structures in its correlation functions. For instance, the absorption cross section of a scalar operator 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal O} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M170.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> in 2D CFT has the universal form
			</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>89</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E89"> <?CDATA $ \begin{aligned}[b] \sigma \sim & \frac{(2 \pi T_{\rm L})^{2h_{\rm L}-1}}{\Gamma(2 h_{\rm L})} \frac{(2 \pi T_{\rm R})^{2 h_{\rm R}-1}}{\Gamma(2 h_{\rm R})} \sinh\left( \frac{\omega_{\rm L} - q_{\rm L} \Omega_{\rm L}}{2 T_{\rm L}} + \frac{\omega_{\rm R} - q_{\rm R} \Omega_{\rm R}}{2 T_{\rm R}} \right) \\ & \times \left| \Gamma\left( h_{\rm L} + {\rm i} \frac{\omega_{\rm L} - q_{\rm L} \Omega_{\rm L}}{2 \pi T_{\rm L}} \right) \right|^2 \left| \Gamma\left( h_{\rm R} + {\rm i} \frac{\omega_{\rm R} - q_{\rm R} \Omega_{\rm R}}{2 \pi T_{\rm R}} \right) \right|^2, \end{aligned} $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E89.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>where 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ (h_{\rm L}, h_{\rm R}) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M171.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ (\omega_{\rm L}, \omega_{\rm R}) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M172.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ (q_{\rm L}, q_{\rm R}) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M173.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> are the left- and right-hand conformal weights, excited energies, charges associated with operator 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal O} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M174.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, respectively, while 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ (T_{\rm L}, T_{\rm R}) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M175.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ (\Omega_{\rm L}, \Omega_{\rm R}) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M176.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> are the temperatures and chemical potentials of the corresponding left- and right-hand sectors of the 2D CFT. Further identifying the variations in the black hole area entropy with those of the CFT microscopic entropy, namely 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \delta S_{\rm BH} = \delta S_{\rm CFT} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M177.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, one derives
			</p><p>
				        <disp-formula> 
					          <label>90</label>  
					          <tex-math id="cpc_45_6_065105_E90"> <?CDATA $ \frac{\delta M}{T_H} - \frac{\Omega_H \delta Q}{T_H} = \frac{\omega_{\rm L} - q_{\rm L} \Omega_{\rm L}}{T_{\rm L}} + \frac{\omega_{\rm R} - q_{\rm R} \Omega_{\rm R}}{T_{\rm R}}, $?>
 </tex-math>
					          <graphic orientation="portrait" position="float" xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_E90.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </disp-formula>
			      </p><p>where the left hand side of Eq. (90) is calculated with coordinate (14), for which 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \delta M = \xi_{\mathrm o}w $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M178.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \delta Q = q $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M179.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ T_H = \tilde{T}_{ n} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M180.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \Omega_H = 2\mu\ell^2/r_{\mathrm o} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M181.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, and thus, it is equal to 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ w/T_{ n}-2\pi q_{\mathrm{eff}}\ell $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M182.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>. Moreover, the violation of the BF bound in AdS<sub>2</sub> makes the conformal weights of the scalar operator 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\cal O} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M183.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> dual to 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \phi $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M184.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> a complex, which can be chosen as 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ h_{\rm L} = h_{\rm R} = \dfrac 1 2+{\rm i}|\nu| $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M185.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, even without further knowledge about the central charge and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ (T_{\rm L}, T_{\rm R}) $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M186.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> of the IR CFT dual to the near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole. One can also see that the absorption cross section ratio (42) in the AdS<sub>2</sub> spacetime has the form of Eq. (89) up to some coefficients, depending on the mass and charge of the scalar field.
			</p><p>In contrast, the absorption cross section and retarded Green's functions in a general 4D finite temperature CFT cannot be as easily calculated in momentum space as in the 2D CFT. Thus, it is not straightforward to compare the calculations between the bulk gravity and the boundary CFT sides. Nevertheless, from Eqs. (79) and (80), both the absorption cross section ratio 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \sigma _{\mathrm{abs}}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M187.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> and the Schwinger mean number of produced pairs 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \left|\mathfrak{b}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}}\right|^2 $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M188.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> calculated from the bulk near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole have a simple proportional relation with their counterparts in the near horizon region. Moreover, the violation of the BF bound (77) in AdS<sub>5</sub> spacetime indicates the complex conformal weights 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\Delta} = 2+2{\rm i}|\Delta| $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M189.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> of the scalar operator 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{{\cal O}} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M190.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> in the UV 4D CFT at the asymptotic spatial boundary of the RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole, which also indicates that, to have pair production in the full bulk spacetime, the corresponding operators in the UV CFT should be unstable. Interestingly, Eq. (83) shows that under the interchange between the roles of source and operator both in the IR and UV CFTs at the same time, namely 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ h_{\rm L,R} = \dfrac12+ $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M191.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>
				        <inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ {\rm i}|\nu| \to \dfrac12-{\rm i}|\nu| $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M191-1.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> and 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\Delta} = 2+2{\rm i}|\Delta|\to 2-2{\rm i}|\Delta| $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M192.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula>, the full absorption cross section ratio 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \sigma _{\mathrm{abs}}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M193.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> and the Schwinger pair production rate 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \left|\mathfrak{b}^{\mathrm{AdS_5}}\right|^2 $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M194.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> are interchanged with each other only up to a minus sign. Note that both the charge and the mass of the scalar particle contribute to the conformal weights 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ h_{\rm L,R} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M195.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> of the scalar operator in the dual IR CFT; however, only the mass contributes to the conformal weight 
				<inline-formula>
					          <tex-math><?CDATA $ \bar{\Delta} $?></tex-math>
					          <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M196.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
				        </inline-formula> of the scalar operator in the dual UV CFT. Actually, it can be seen from the expressions of the conformal weights that the non-zero charge and mass for the scalar field are crucial for the violation of the BF bound in the corresponding AdS spacetimes and hence guarantee the existence of the Schwinger pair production. However, when the charge of the particle is zero, there will be no Schwinger effect, except for an exponentially suppressed Hawking radiation in near extremal black holes.
			</p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s06"><label>VI.</label><title>SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION</title><p>In this paper, we describe our study of the spontaneous scalar pair production in a near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole that possesses an AdS<sub>2</sub> structure in the IR region and an AdS<sub>5</sub> geometry in the UV region.
			</p><p>We firstly calculated the mean number of produced pairs (see Eq. (41)) in the near horizon region, which has an AdS<sub>2</sub> structure. The retarded Green's function (see Eq. (46)) has also been obtained for this region. Then, we solved the equation for the whole spacetime of the near extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole by using the matching technique. The matching condition we chose is the low temperature limit, i.e., the near extremal limit of the black hole. Therefore, the greybody factor in Eq. (79) and the mean number of produced pairs in Eq. (80) for the whole spacetime are not merely valid for the low frequency limit, and one can easily apply our calculation to the RN-dS black hole, which was recently described in the low frequency limit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib35">35</xref>]. Moreover, the retarded Green's function for an RN-AdS black hole has been calculated (see Eq. (88)), which again is valid at finite frequency, and its corresponding value has only been investigated in the low frequency limit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cpc_45_6_065105_bib31">31</xref>] before. Interestingly, we found that there exists a very explicit relationship between the mean number of produced pairs (see also Eq. (80)) for the whole spacetime and that in the near horizon region, which enables us to easily compare the pair production rates of these two regions. We showed that, for an near-extremal RN-AdS<sub>5</sub> black hole, the dominant contribution to the pair production rate mainly comes from the near horizon region, as expected.
			</p><p>Moreover, the CFT descriptions of the pair production are investigated both from the AdS<sub>2</sub>/CFT<sub>1</sub> correspondence in the IR and the AdS<sub>5</sub>/CFT<sub>4</sub> duality in the UV regions, and consistent results and new connections between the pair production rate and the absorption cross section ratio are found, although the related information computed from the finite temperature 4D CFT is incomplete. This work has successfully generalized the study of pair production in charged black holes to the full spacetime and provided new insights for a complete understanding of the pair production process in curved spacetime.
			</p></sec><sec id="cpc_45_6_065105_s07"><title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</title><p>
            <italic toggle="yes">We would like to thank Shu Lin, Rong-Xin Miao, and Yuan Sun for useful discussions.</italic>
			      </p></sec></body><back><fn-group><fn id="cpc_45_6_065105_pn1"><p>Note that from Eq. (10), one has 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \omega = \varepsilon w $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M197.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, which may indicate that if one considered the finite frequency probe field in the 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \tau $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M198.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula>, 
					<inline-formula>
						            <tex-math><?CDATA $ \xi $?></tex-math>
						            <inline-graphic xlink:href="cpc_45_6_065105_M199.jpg" xlink:type="simple"/>
					          </inline-formula> coordinates, the probe field in the original <italic toggle="yes">t</italic>, <italic toggle="yes">r</italic> coordinates is automatically driven into the low frequency region.
				</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib1"><label>[1]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Schwinger</surname><given-names>Julian</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review</source><year>1951</year><volume>82</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>664</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRev.82.664</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib2"><label>[2]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>K Parikh</surname><given-names>Maulik</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Wilczek</surname><given-names>Frank</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review Letters</source><year>2000</year><volume>85</volume><issue>24</issue><fpage>5042</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5042</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib3"><label>[3]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>I-Chieh</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2012</year><volume>85</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>124041</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.85.124041</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib4"><label>[4]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Fu-Yi</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Classical and Quantum Gravity</source><year>2015</year><volume>32</volume><issue>19</issue><fpage>195003</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0264-9381/32/19/195003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib5"><label>[5]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2020</year><volume>101</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>085014</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.101.085014</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib6"><label>[6]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2017</year><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>044043</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib7"><label>[7]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Physics Letters B</source><year>2018</year><volume>872</volume><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>138</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib8"><label>[8]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>Shou-Jyun</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2010</year><volume>2010</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>57</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP01(2010)057</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib9"><label>[9]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Ying-Ming</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>Shou-Jyun</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2010</year><volume>2010</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>123</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP03(2010)123</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib10"><label>[10]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2010</year><volume>2010</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>34</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP08(2010)034</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib11"><label>[11]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Ying-Ming</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2010</year><volume>82</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>066003</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.82.066003</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib12"><label>[12]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Jia-ju</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2013</year><volume>2013</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>155</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP01(2013)155</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib13"><label>[13]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Jia-ju</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2013</year><volume>87</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>081505</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.87.081505</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib14"><label>[14]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Chiang-Mei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Ying-Ming</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Jia-Rui</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2010</year><volume>82</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>066004</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.82.066004</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib15"><label>[15]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Hartman</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Murata</surname><given-names>Keiju</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Nishioka</surname><given-names>Tatsuma</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2009</year><volume>2009</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>019</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/019</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib16"><label>[16]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Hartman</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Strominger</surname><given-names>Andrew</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2010</year><volume>2010</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>118</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP03(2010)118</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib17"><label>[17]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Garriga</surname><given-names>Jaume</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>1994</year><volume>49</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>6343</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6343</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib18"><label>[18]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pioline</surname><given-names>Boris</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Troost</surname><given-names>Jan</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2005</year><volume>2005</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>043</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1126-6708/2005/03/043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib19"><label>[19]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>N Page</surname><given-names>Don</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2008</year><volume>78</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>103517</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.78.103517</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib20"><label>[20]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Rong-Gen</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2014</year><volume>2014</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>72</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP09(2014)072</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib21"><label>[21]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>N Page</surname><given-names>Don</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2002</year><volume>65</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>105002</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.65.105002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib22"><label>[22]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Pyo Kim</surname><given-names>Sang</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>N Page</surname><given-names>Don</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2007</year><volume>75</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>045013</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.75.045013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib23"><label>[23]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>K Dumlu</surname><given-names>Cesim</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>V Dunne</surname><given-names>Gerald</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical review letters</source><year>2010</year><volume>104</volume><issue>25</issue><fpage>250402</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.250402</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib24"><label>[24]</label><element-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"><comment>Sang Pyo Kim and Don N Page. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1904.09749, 2019.</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib25"><label>[25]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Balasubramanian</surname><given-names>Vijay</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Kraus</surname><given-names>Per</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review Letters</source><year>1999</year><volume>83</volume><issue>18</issue><fpage>3605</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3605</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib26"><label>[26]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Heemskerk</surname><given-names>Idse</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Polchinski</surname><given-names>Joseph</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2011</year><volume>2011</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>31</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP06(2011)031</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib27"><label>[27]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Faulkner</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Hong</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Rangamani</surname><given-names>Mukund</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Journal of High Energy Physics</source><year>2011</year><volume>2011</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>51</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/JHEP08(2011)051</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib28"><label>[28]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Faulkner</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Hong</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>McGreevy</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2011</year><volume>83</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>125002</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.83.125002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib29"><label>[29]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Iqbal</surname><given-names>Nabil</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Hong</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Fortschritte der Physik</source><year>2009</year><volume>57</volume><issue>5-7</issue><fpage>367</fpage><lpage>384</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/prop.200900057</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib30"><label>[30]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Hong</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>McGreevy</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Vegh</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physical Review D</source><year>2011</year><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>065029</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.83.065029</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib31"><label>[31]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Faulkner</surname><given-names>Tom</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Iqbal</surname><given-names>Nabil</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Hong</given-names></name>
                  <etal>et al</etal>
               </person-group><source>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences</source><year>2011</year><volume>369</volume><issue>1941</issue><fpage>1640</fpage><lpage>1669</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsta.2010.0354</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib32"><label>[32]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Breitenlohner</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Z Freedman</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Annals of Physics</source><year>1982</year><volume>144</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>249</fpage><lpage>281</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib33"><label>[33]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Breitenlohner</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Z Freedman</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Physics Letters B</source><year>1982</year><volume>115</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>201</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0370-2693(82)90643-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib34"><label>[34]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Dianyan</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>Classical and Quantum Gravity</source><year>1988</year><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>871</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0264-9381/5/6/008</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="cpc_45_6_065105_bib35"><label>[35]</label><element-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><person-group person-group-type="author">
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>Jamil</given-names></name>
                  <name name-style="western"><surname>Saifullah</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
               </person-group><source>The European Physical Journal C</source><year>2018</year><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>316</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5800-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>